Comments by "115islands Compass" (@115islandscompass6) on "Cyrus Janssen"
channel.
-
6
-
4
-
For America, war has always been a profitable business. The United States has always created sparks here and there for its own interests, and when war flares up, it has made money by supplying large amounts of weapons / sending troops / obtaining rights to resources or land in an occupied country / making others owed debts.
Since 1927, the United States began ordering Chinese warlords to conduct anti-Japanese campaigns in exchange for financial and arms support. The Chinese warlords sabotaged Japanese commercial facilities, looted/raped/massacred ordinary Japanese residents, and attacked/slaughtered Japanese soldiers.
This anti-Japanese terrorism was finally taken over by Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang army, which allied with the CCP, and developed into a conflict with the Japanese army.
So it can be said that the US war business has been going on for almost 100 years.
The Roosevelt administration thought that if it participated in WW2, it would be able to get out of the Great Depression, make more money, and hopefully gain world hegemony with the dollar. But the American people were against the war, so the Roosevelt administration cornered Japan to make it attack them.
Since then, the United States has continued to do the same. The United States has secretly set fires, posed as firefighters to make money, and pretend itself the world's police force.
But they are all fictitious. The United States has continued to inflict the suffering of war on both Americans and ordinary people abroad, simply to make a handful of super-rich even richer.
American people should recognize that people in countries other than the United States have been forced to sacrifice of losing their lives and property for greed of the United States.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kurtwinslow2670
It was the Roosevelt administration that continued to provoke Germany and Japan to join WW2.
In particular, the situation in Ukraine before the outbreak of conflict is very similar to the situation in which the United States used Chinese to persecute and massacre Japanese, including civilians, by providing funds and weapons. And if you look at it from this perspective, you can see that the US has been involved in every war in the same/similar way.
The Soviet Union's territorial expansion into Eastern Europe was a promise Roosevelt and Churchill made to Stalin at the Yalta Conference in exchange for the Soviet Union unilaterally breaking the Neutrality Pact with Japan and invading Japanese territory.
About the Korean War. In January 1950, Mr. Acheson delivered a speech stating that "the United States will resolutely oppose military aggression against Japan, Okinawa, the Philippines, and the Aleutian Islands, even in the Far East."
This was the same as saying that the United States would not intervene in a military invasion of South Korea.
The following year, the Korean War broke out. For this reason, it is said that the fact that the United States did not designate south Korea inside the counterattack line led to the NK invasion.
This is very similar to the behavior of the current US president, who is said to have led to the Ukraine conflict.
Ho Chi Minh's North Vietnam was a socialist force, but it was originally supported by the United States and became one force. Therefore, the power of self-reliance as a Vietnamese people was in the north.
In South Vietnam, France set up a puppet government in an attempt to make Vietnam a colony again, and the United States inherited that state. For this reason, although it was called a democratic force, it was a country that relied on the United States for its economy and was basically a country that was not like the hardworking and proud Vietnamese.
In other words, the movement of North Vietnam to absorb South Vietnam was a natural thing for the Vietnamese.
However, it can be said that the Vietnam War was the result of the United States sticking to the South, saying that it could not expand its socialist power.
Yeah, this is another big US fault. But whether it is a fault or even whether the war is won or lost does not matter to the United States. America's purpose in war is to make war businessmen profitable.
I feel sad and sorry for the victims of 9/11, but most people think that the way the US intervened in Afghanistan and Iraq was selfish.
In particular, the US executed Hussein, even though Anscombe reported that there were no weapons of mass destruction, even though the US subsequently searched all over Iraq and found no weapons of mass destruction.
Americans should take seriously how much this damaged the credibility of the United States.
1
-
@kurtwinslow2670
Smh. You seem to be immersed in a history of globalist biased editing and distortion. So after making some corrections, I'm closing this useless discussion.
Japan did not invade China.
In 1899, the Boxer Rebellion started the anti-foreign movement, foreign countries sent their own armies to China to protect their own residents.
However, after the rebellion was suppressed, those Western armies were withdrawn, and each country entrusted the security of consulates and other facilities to the Japanese army. For this reason, the Japanese army was stationed in China.
Since 1927, the United States began ordering Chinese warlords to conduct anti-Japanese campaigns in exchange for financial and arms support. The Chinese warlords sabotaged Japanese commercial facilities, looted/raped/massacred ordinary Japanese residents, and attacked/slaughtered Japanese soldiers.
This anti-Japanese terrorism was finally taken over by Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang army, which allied with the CCP, and developed into a conflict with the Japanese army.
Japan advanced to Guam and other Southeast Asian countries on December 8, the same day as the attack on Pearl Harbor, in order to fight against the white imperialist Allies that had occupied and colonized Southeast Asian countries.
When MacArthur once said in the senate speech immediately after his return to the United States, "Japan's war was mostly for security," the American people, who had been completely brainwashed by Roosevelt administration’s propaganda, could not accept that facts he said.
This proved propaganda brainwashing is effective in manipulating American people. So, after WW2, those who have been manipulating the United States behind the scenes have manipulated the public with propaganda through the leftist mass media.
Political corruption often causes problems in communism because there is no separation of powers.
On the other hand, even in countries that choose communism, people may not always be oppressed.
Like all things, even what is generally considered good can go bad if misused.
In fact, although Japan is a democratic country, it is a colony that has been exploited by the United States in various ways, and it is difficult to say that the Japanese have sovereignty.
Below is a quote from someone else's comment in the comment section of another video that I thought was a very straightforward representation of the confusion in Ukraine.
“Ukraine problem was started by US:
2014 regime change, replaced president with anti-Russia president, then started attacking Donbass till today.
2022 US supplies weapons to prolong war against Russia.”
Seeing similarities between the way the United States waged war against Japan through China and the way it waged war against Russia through Ukraine, you should realize that the United States begins to wars not because it has no other option, I think.
1
-
1
-
@andrewnorrie2731
The Japanese Communist Party has never taken power. However, the JCP still conducts anti-Japanese maneuvers, mainly through propaganda, in the background in order to destroy Japan's democracy and weaken Japan.
For example, the Science Council of Japan was recently exposed as a den of Communist/Leftist scholars.
GHQ had reshaped Japan's legal system, education system, social organization structure, beliefs and culture in such a way that Japan must continue to be subordinated to the United States.
At this time, conservatives were wiped out of the main posts in society, and communists and leftists took over.
The Science Council of Japan was created during the Occupation, presumably by the GHQ, to monitor Japanese academic research and quickly crush any research that could be used militarily. In other words, the Science Council of Japan is an anti-Japanese activity group, and the so-called intellectuals who belong to it are also communist/leftist anti-Japanese.
In recent years, a certain university had been researching an epoch-making technology that can be expected to reduce fuel costs by increasing the speed of ships by generating fine bubbles between the ship and the sea surface. However, the Science Council of Japan not only cut off the subsidies, but also threatened the university to stop the research, claiming that the research could be diverted to the military.
In this way, anti-Japanese activities are being carried out in various places by communists and leftists who have inherited posts that are vested interests obtained from GHQ.
1
-
In addition, it is true that the Japanese economy recovered after the Korean War, but it was not because Japan made money from the Korean War.
The United States was trying to make Japan a poor country whose main industry was agriculture, but when the Korean War required the production of consumables, it had no choice to make Japan do this.
At that time, Japan was only allowed to import and export from the United States, and Japanese companies imported raw materials for military supplies, such as tents, from the United States, but they had to pay several times the normal price. Also, the minimum price was required for the product price when the United States purchased it.
Because the Japanese government compensated for the losses of those Japanese companies, seeing Japan as a whole had a deficit in the Korean War.
On the other hand, it is certain that the changes between the United States and Japan triggered by the Korean War led to the recovery of the Japanese economy.
In the United States, there was a 180-degree change in the US' view of communism, and the realization that the US could use Japan as a front line of geopolitical buffer zone against the communist nations.
In Japan, the fact that industrial production became possible under those changes in the United States was a major factor of the recovery.
1
-
Japan is held by B!lls?
After the war, the US "Government Appropriation for Relief in Occupied Areas Fund(Garioa)" and EROA funds that were provided to Japan totaled $1.8 billion.
But the US later(60's) began to call the $1.8 billion, which should have been aid money, debt.
So, Japan repaid $480 million after bilateral negotiations.
This looks like only 1/3.75 paid back, but it is not.
The currency rate these funds were given was
¥15/$ in 1945,
¥50/$ in 1946 and 1947,
¥270/$ in 1948.
It's a bit rough calculation, but the average of the rates is about ¥96/$ during this period. Since the rate at the time of repayment was ¥360/$. So, the actual amount will be the same.
Rather, Japan's puppet politicians may be asking, "Jump? How high?" every time they think the US is about to say, "Jump."
Why does Japan follow the coercion from the United States that completely damages Japan like the Plaza Accord or the Japan-US Semiconductor Agreement?
There are more than 80 US military bases in Japan, about 10% of US bases overseas, which means Japan is still in some sense occupied.
And, if Japan loses the military protection of the United States, it may be invaded immediately, so if the United States threatens to withdraw its troops, Japan will have no choice but to comply with their coercion.
In other words, in order for Japan to escape from such an economic colonial state, it is necessary to establish a national system that allows self-existence and self-defense in the same way as other general nations.
The US ostensibly pretends to support it, but I don't think any US president other than former president DT has truly supported it, and if the US really wants/has should have been forced into Japan long ago. But in reality, the United States does not.
By the way, the rare conservative politicians who sought independence have appeared, but they have been eliminated by scandal, death by sudden and unnatural illness, or assassination.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Shenzhou.
China follows Sun's tactics and invades other countries by "infiltration" rather than warfare with weapons. From the point of view of other countries being invaded, it is a silent war.
It is also aggression to try to invade and settle in the territory of another country with civilians and gradually make it Chinese land little by little.
The Senkaku Islands: Uotsuri Island, Minamikojima Island, and Kitakojima Island have been privately owned by Japanese private sector since ancient times, but since China suddenly began to claim sovereignty since 1970, the Japanese government purchased them in 2012.
The waters around the Senkaku Islands are a rich fishing ground, and until 1969 Japanese fishermen were fishing normally. In addition, maps published in China by 1969 list Japanese island names with as Japanese territory.
But now, every day, the Chinese Coast Guard enters Japanese territorial waters and threatens Japanese fishermen with armed vessels. They are so relentless that they almost collide with each other, and fishing is extremely dangerous, so the Japan Coast Guard has no choice but to constantly monitor them.
This is certainly not a war, but it cannot be called a peaceful act.
Then, do you call the act of firing missiles into Japanese territorial waters “peaceful”?
BTW, we often hear in the news in China that the ground is collapsing, trains are falling from overpasses, flooding is happening here and there, and drought is drying up rivers. The reason why they happen so often is because China's infrastructure is not properly maintained. I think that because China is too vast that it can't properly instruct to develop infrastructure. Despite that, why would China want to expand?
1
-
@Shenzhou.
Huh? Is it taught that "Japan took it in World War II"? smh
The first time the Senkaku Islands appear in Western historical records is in British records around 1845. Britain self-investigated the islands located between the Ming and Ryukyu dynasties. However, no one made any protests during the investigation, as such, it is publicly acknowledged around the world that "no one had claimed ownership of these islands at that time."
About 40 years later, Tatsushiro Koga, a Japanese man, noticed that the Senkaku Islands were uninhabited islands. He asked the Japanese government, "I want to make money by developing the island, so please lend me the island after making it Japanese territory."
The Japanese government took about 10 years to carefully confirm that the Senkaku Islands did not belong to any country's territory, and then made them their own territory. In response to this, Koga and other Japanese developed the Senkaku Islands.
When Japan made the Senkaku Islands a territory and used them by the Koga family, 31 Chinese fishermen were shipwrecked and washed up on one of the Senkaku Islands. When Japan rescued them and sent them back, they received a letter of appreciation from the Republic of China.
In the letter, it is written that fishermen drifted to Wayo Island in the Senkaku Islands, Yaeyama County, Okinawa Prefecture, Empire of Japan(大日本帝国沖縄県八重山郡尖閣列島内和洋島).
From this, we know that the Republic of China recognized the Senkaku Islands as Japanese territory.
The Treaty of San Francisco does not require the return of territories recognized as ancient Japanese territories. The Senkaku Islands were also recognized as Japanese territory, so they were not asked to return them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1