Comments by "MelpeckFAM" (@melissaschreiber7) on "Evidence the Jury Did Not See in MA v Karen Read | Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial" video.

  1. The dog marks on the arm thing drives me insane when anyone that knows how a dog attacks knows that's where it attacks the forearm or the center of the arm or the legs or feet.
    24
  2. Then they got rid of the dog for all we know they killed the dog. If these officers are dead set on avoiding their guilt and they'll kill a dog family dog or not
    17
  3. That's the other thing the dog you can clearly see the dog attacks with both arms and bites in the center there are claw marks long car marks on the further ends which is the dog's nails, puncture marks from the tip of the canine teeth the ones that are marked and dragged down slightly those are where the dog's teeth actually went to press in and tear down on the skin those are teeth marks in the center. And I haven't got the pleasure of being able to actually work forensics but I do have a forensics degree and I've researched and studied all this for over 14 years those are clearly canine bites and call Mark's grab both pause brightness Center that's what's there
    8
  4. The defense is going to have a field day on trial 2 because now they can fill it all the other blanks with what has come forward it's going to be awesome
    5
  5. Oh my freaking God he modified the times that s*** was funny watching Jackson on that one. A modified the time because he needed time to take them pieces off get them back at the scene and get back oh my God these guys they covered this crap up. Why are these other jurors not seeing this
    3