Comments by "Ajemone" (@Ajemone) on "French DNA: What is the Genetic History of France?" video.

@thomaslacornette1282 Sono al 70% Italiano e sono molto più bianco di te e questo vale pure per i miei antenati che erano molto Italiani e avevano molti tratti chiari…
2
@iainmc9859 Remember that the “ROMANS” aka Italics-Indoeuropean with the dominant R1b U-152 (like me) like modern Italy where like the Celtic people descended from the R1b Bell-Beakers people and they where part of the same cultures derived from the Bell-Beakers (like Tumulus and Urnfield) and they even spoke the Italo-Celtic language (or some dialects) that later separated in to Proto-Celtic and Proto-Italic
2
@iainmc9859 ⁠ And remember that the main reason why the Romans K…. your A.. was because they were united, above all they had a state, laws and a nationality etc... I think if the Celts had had something similar to their old Svb-Alpine cousins or simply had adopted long before Caesar's Invasion the same ways as the Romans to become an Empire, I believe that in this alternative version the Celtics would not only have had a presence in Northern Italy (the North was originally Italic R1b U-152 from where I I descend and only in 600 BC did the Celtic-Gauls migrate peacefully, it seems from the historical finds found here in Northern Italy and they also mixed genetically and culturally with the Northern Italics, in short they became Italo-Celtic 2.0 LOL) but also in the rest of Italy would have settled and mixed and would probably have ex…… the Italic-Indo-European culture as was almost about to happen in our reality with the Celtics in the North and a little in the Center, the Etruscans who were only culturally and linguistically Pre-Indo-European and the Greeks-Balkans/Illyrians in the South......
2
@iainmc9859 If you do not unite in the future your languages and cultures will be replaced by the English Germanic one, you do not necessarily have to create an aggressive expansionist nation (not an Empire) but one that allows you to pass on your culture in a modern version like those of the other nations. Your pride and stubbornness (characteristics that you Insular Celts have always had) will lead you to ruin if you do not decide to change for the better with your high conservatism which will be like Rome, they after being attacked by the Gauls united and changed ( period sack of Rome, late Republic ) while the Gauls and the Celtics in general did not unite or change when Rome moved on to attack
2
@iainmc9859 I hope that one day you can regain your independence again and do what you want after
2
@iainmc9859 And remember that the main reason why the Romans kicked your ass was because they were united, above all they had a state, laws and a nationality etc... I think if the Celts had had something similar to their old Sub-Alpine cousins or simply had adopted long before Caesar's Invasion the same ways as the Romans to become an Empire, I believe that in this alternative version the Celtics would not only have had a presence in Northern Italy (the North was originally Italic R1b U-152 from where I I descend and only in 600 BC did the Celtic-Gauls migrate peacefully, it seems from the historical finds found here in Northern Italy and they also mixed genetically and culturally with the Northern Italics, in short they became Italo-Celtic 2.0 LOL) but also in the rest of Italy would have settled and mixed and would probably have extinguished the Italic-Indo-European culture as was almost about to happen in our reality with the Celtics in the North and a little in the Center, the Etruscans who were only culturally and linguistically Pre-Indo-European and the Greeks-Balkans/Illyrians in the South......
1
@iainmc9859 And remember that the main reason why the Romans kicked your ass was because they were united, above all they had a state, laws and a nationality etc... I think if the Celts had had something similar to their old Sub-Alpine cousins or simply had adopted long before Caesar's Invasion the same ways as the Romans to become an Empire, I believe that in this alternative version the Celtics would not only have had a presence in Northern Italy (the North was originally Italic R1b U-152 from where I I descend and only in 600 BC did the Celtic-Gauls migrate peacefully, it seems from the historical finds found here in Northern Italy and they also mixed genetically and culturally with the Northern Italics, in short they became Italo-Celtic 2.0 LOL) but also in the rest of Italy would have settled and mixed and would probably have extinguished the Italic-Indo-European culture as was almost about to happen in our reality with the Celtics in the North and a little in the Center, the Etruscans who were only culturally and linguistically Pre-Indo-European and the Greeks-Balkans/Illyrians in the South......
1
@iainmc9859 ⁠ And remember that the main reason why the Romans kick.. your .$$ was because they were united, above all they had a state, laws and a nationality etc... I think if the Celts had had something similar to their old Sub-Alpine cousins or simply had adopted long before Caesar's Invasion the same ways as the Romans to become an Empire, I believe that in this alternative version the Celtics would not only have had a presence in Northern Italy (the North was originally Italic R1b U-152 from where I I descend and only in 600 BC did the Celtic-Gauls migrate peacefully, it seems from the historical finds found here in Northern Italy and they also mixed genetically and culturally with the Northern Italics
1
@iainmc9859 ⁠ And remember that the main reason why the Romans kick.. your .$$ was because they were united, above all they had a state, laws and a nationality etc... I think if the Celts had had something similar to their old Sub-Alpine cousins or simply had adopted long before Caesar's Invasion the same ways as the Romans to become an Empire, I believe that in this alternative version the Celtics would not only have had a presence in Northern Italy (the North was originally Italic R1b U-152 from where I I descend and only in 600 BC did the Celtic-Gauls migrate peacefully, it seems from the historical finds found here in Northern Italy and they also mixed genetically and culturally with the Northern Italics, in short they became Italo-Celtic 2.0 LOL) but also in the rest of Italy would have settled and mixed and would probably have extinguished the Italic-Indo-European culture as was almost about to happen in our reality with the Celtics in the North and a little in the Center, the Etruscans who were only culturally and linguistically Pre-Indo-European and the Greeks-Balkans/Illyrians in the South......
1
@iainmc9859 But instead it didn't go that way 😆😆😆 dear ancient cousins, because the Italic Romans had 2 options: adapt or be supplanted by other non-Italic Latin peoples as happened in the Middle Ages... but they chose to become the toughest M F ever and go from being invaded/subdued to the invaders and the bully and win
1
@iainmc9859 The state of the Roman Empire no longer exists nowadays like all the other Empires.. but we are descendants of the Italics Romans and still here (the Germanics have never replaced anything and are a minority, same thing for Arabized North Africans in Sicily and Calabria) and we speak a language descended from Vulgar Latin, Classical Latin, Proto Italic and Proto Italo-Celtic and we have maintained the culture of the Romans to this day. I don't know which fascis you are referring to since my relatives and region during WW2 only waved the flag with the star and the symbol of liberation from the Fasc and the Germans
1