Comments by "Вячеслав Скопюк" (@user-yj8vj3sq6j) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

  1.  @TheKrzy65siek  >there are plenty of photos, and even movie. nor photos, nor movie depicts soviet and german units moving together. >How you can ask for more? the more is Russian commander who wrote in his report that he could not hold a joint parade
    6
  2. +HoseTheBeast even highly trained military officers use the term "ass", "shit", "cunt". But i doubt that they use it in their reports
    6
  3.  @ФедяКрюков-в6ь  > but at the time of blocking detachment they there entirely separate entities Nope. NKGB and NKVD were united in July 1941 and separated again in 1943 >That's not what is called a 'predecessor' NKGB was formed from GUGB NKVD. It's called 'predecessor' in my book >By late 1941 and onwards NKVD was a police force it was only part of their duties. For example, they also trained saboteurs
    6
  4. >armies of socialist nations seemed to all treat their own soldiers far worse than armies of greedy capitalist nations did yep. Armies of greedy capitalists like Imperial Japan army or Argentinian army in 1982 or Central African Republic army - they treat their soldiers quite good, indeed
    6
  5. +Edward The Butler >So in conclusion, the nazis murdered people after promising it and the communists murdered people who they promised to save. and capitalists didn't promised anything. They just murdered people >why is the last point bullshit? because they weren't the enemy of the "working class". "Enemy of the working class" - it's a hoax, maked up by Bula Comunistu on spot
    6
  6. fern van you are drunk. Go home
    5
  7. +Dr Strangelove Btw, what about former Eastern Prussia ad Danzig?
    5
  8. +Beat The Great lol. Now I see, what they teach kids in the school in USA today. 20 millions. Why not 50 millions? Lenin's purges... triplefacepalm
    5
  9. >And which plane was the best? B-29 with nuclear bomb
    5
  10. > the Germans were losing more men to frostbite than to the enemy during that winter and the snow severely hampered logistics and operational movement LOL. It works for both sides
    5
  11. and you know that from...?
    5
  12. ​ @shanebeckett3557  >1.6 million made in 5 years in 2 years. Did you do your homework? >So yeah pretty rare nope. Especially in the first year of war >that's not where I got the Info genius. really? Looks pretty much like "Enemy at the Gates" to me >They threw thousands of untrained unarmed men into battle little trained - maybe. Unarmed - nope. I repeat - serious researchers struggle to find such cases. >with the not one step back order thousands were shot that's utter bullshit. >Simple they don't have numbers exactly but if they had to form units and forces dedicated to stopping men from retreating kinda proves you wrong. That's just nonsense. What 'units, dedicated to stopping men from retreating' has to do with infantry squad and his rifles?
    5
  13. German naval AA did pretty well later in the war. US Navy AA was virtually impenetrable as of 1943-1944
    5
  14. Yes. Those infamous plans that nobody seen ))
    5
  15. Reality from russians? Or from your insane mind?
    5
  16. half of those 20 millions were civilians
    5
  17.  @NoName-vz4wu  not after. It was parallel process
    5
  18. +comsubpac >Isn't the Armata program already stopped nope >Technologically its still behind anyway and apparently has a lot of dissadvantages he knows a lot, lol. Not as ukrainian paramilitaries, who destroyed T-14 with well placed RPG-7 shot, but close
    5
  19. what a bunch of fairy tales
    5
  20. ​ @uni4rm  don't be stupid. T-34-85 continued to serve after war, same as Sherman. USSR replaced it after war, yes, because USSR had production-ready next generation tanks since 1944. Not the case with the USA
    5
  21. ammo
    5
  22. because there was a war in Europe. And strong opponent had plans to go to war against USSR
    5
  23.  @haansolo7834  >but they could not know that the nazis would defeat france that fast at the end of WWI all fighting countries had quite large armies
    5
  24. MsTiK Finland was pretty mush occupied until 1918. And after - perhaps no one wanted to occupy Finland?
    4
  25. MsTiK >When one has to choose between Germans and Russians, the choice is very easy. You said it. These words fairly accurately characterize your morality.
    4
  26. Teemu >The intel of Soviets trying to take over Helsinki is openly taught in schools and military of Finland. This is not surprising. Until recently, the studies of the Winter War were significantly ideologized.
    4
  27. Dmitri Jikharev man. not again :D
    4
  28. +Haren94 or maybe, just maybe, you are mindless idiot, who repeat something he read elsewhere without understanding. Like a parrot
    4
  29. +Ilex paraguariensis Poles sided with Ukraine? When? While they occupied Western Ukraine? Of course, lol. >but unfortunately for Ukraine, it got partitioned. yes. Poor poles. They were forced by evil Sovietы to annex some part of Ukraine. Just for the good of the Ukrainians themselves
    4
  30. +Dr Strangelove but... Ukraine was part of Poland. Not so long ago....
    4
  31. +gdansk87 >with it was a time i mean after 1918, dont confuse it with 18th century 18th century wasn't 'a time'? Why? > i dont try to make poland look good Pardon me, but by saying about 'help protecting Ukraine against soviet invasion' you are doing exactly that. > u guys always try to make poland look like the biggest aggressor in history OUR biigest aggressor always was Germany. In various forms. >after centuries of being poland, russia has taken it back, even when it was cultured or sophisticated by poland. that was wrong lol. Maybe you forgot, but Lwow was part of Austro-Hungarian empire. And they dшв culturing and sophisticating of they own. > i would love if Germany got its territory back Including Danzig?
    4
  32. +Fraz so, France didn't surrendered in WW2?
    4
  33. +Fraz as a matter of fact - no. There is no definition of 'partial' or 'complete' surrender. There is so-called unconditional surrender. But Finland surrendered conditionally
    4
  34. +JohQx3 >"Surrender" has the idea of destroying other side's armed forces to a state where it's incapable and unwilling to conduct operations nope >something Red Army never managed to do to Finnish Defence Forces. also, nope
    4
  35. +JohQx3 to be exact - you pull that 'idea of surrender' completely out of your ass
    4
  36. +Recon Pirate in fact - not. He is a stupid creature, who is feed with stories of Stalin's greed and other anti-soviet myths
    4
  37. +Oskari M Yup. Exactly. It's not propaganda because you learned that. How could it be a propaganda? You are Finnish, after all. Who could fed a propaganda to the proud son of Finnish people?
    4
  38. +Tyler Christensen you are talking some major bullshit here. Mentioned ukrainian 44-th Division suffered most heavy losses during Battle of Raate Road. Are you implying that ukrainian soldiers killed themselves out of hate to russians?
    4
  39. >No. But essentially you said that troops of 44th killed themselves(by sitting in motti's) out hate to Russia. >How would you feel if you were forcibly drafted to fight for a country that invaded your own and then raped and murdered the peasant farmers? where did you get that shit from? Ukraine wasn't separate country before 1917. And Ukraine wasn't separate country after 1919 >Btw, do I pronounce your first name "Vacheeslav?" it's more like 'Viacheeslav'
    4
  40. Military History Visualized PPSh-41 has predecessors like PPD-40, PPD-34 and PPD-27 - russian submachineguns by Vasiliy Degtyarev. You can google the pictures and see similarities - drum magazine etc. Mechanically PPsh-41 has little common with KP-31.
    4
  41. + 6668084747 you talking bullshit. Finland was Hitler's ally. So no "unnecessary moves", they wanted the war - they got it
    4
  42. + Cwovictor Unless you are the Mongols.
    4
  43. cause soviets destroyed finnish divisions :D
    4
  44. Military History Visualized check out what happens if a company experiencing explosive growth. The Red Army was experiencing problems with the quality of the middle and lower command staff. >I can only imagine what happens if someone is faced with being killed almost constantly. You (and I) are the product of 60 years of peace, has not grown in the devastated country that survived civil war. It's difficult to understand the feelings of people who lived through this
    4
  45. +Military History Visualized >I think you clearly underestimate how much can be changed in 21 years, when it comes to training, doctrine, etc. I think, all was changed since WWI and Mannerheim service as cavalry commander. Emerged mechanized warfare, small unit tactics and such.
    4
  46.  @harrybuttery2447  >the Soviets had a Railway network backing them up yep, but that railway wasn't reaching frontlines. And they had to rely on vehicles, horses and manpower to deliver stuff railways brought, especially when counteroffensive started >The Germans didn't Germans used soviet railways >The Russians were also well equipped for the winter and fighting from positions protected from the elements, they were not being told to hold open ground and expose themselves to the elements that's not true. At least, partially. I don't know how well-equipped for the winter soviet troops were. I think ,they were equipped better than germans. But ' fighting from positions protected from the elements' - that's a clear bullshit. Often they quite hold open ground > The Russians could afford to play that game, the Germans could not ROFL. Afford to play what game - not having enough supplies and manpower? Why they couldn't allow to play that game later in the war? Say, during the siege of Demyansk pocket?
    4
  47.  @Collectorfirearms  being global power and spreading communism does not require invasion into Germany
    4
  48. Beware. Here are the two great geopolicist, who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground
    4
  49. +Kuro Usagi >I understand that only 25% of Russians know that Russian Servicemen are fighting and dying in the Donbass I understand, that you don't know, that most of the captured Donbass militiaman were citizens of Ukraine??
    4
  50. nope
    4