Comments by "Вячеслав Скопюк" (@user-yj8vj3sq6j) on "Why the Allies considered Bombing the Soviet Union 1940" video.

  1. +Paciat that's complete bullshit, of course
    34
  2. +4 Tonnes of Fury Really? Greece, with direct access to the Mediterranean, don't hold a tactical advantage? And Finland didn't 'join' USSR
    31
  3. +4 Tonnes of Fury really? And why Stalin didn't took Greece, for example? Or Finland?
    18
  4. Strangely, USSR wasn't excluded from the League of Nations for invading Poland
    15
  5. +gdansk87 >Another reason was to support ukraine against the soviet invasion And for that reason Poles captured part of the Western Ukraine and Lithuania? To support Ukraine?
    10
  6. Thing is not about 'kickstarting the economy'. Thing is about raw materials USSR lacked. And yes, Soviet Union would have hold the line, but at much higher cost.
    9
  7. How close you knew Stalin?
    8
  8. It's Europeans who didn't give a shit about saving Europe, in the first place.
    8
  9. +Bernhard Jordan it's hard to imagine, with all that Lebensraum thing
    8
  10. +gdansk87 >but dont't try to make poland look bad, thats not the case Maybe you just will not try to make Poland look good? With all that 'support against soviet invasion' bullshit. > it was russian katharina who stole this land from poland. 'Stole'? As you said, 'It was a time when the borders of europe where newly created'. Or you forgot, when and how Poland asquired this land?
    7
  11. Another maked up bullshit?
    6
  12. +Dr Strangelove Btw, what about former Eastern Prussia ad Danzig?
    5
  13. +Haren94 or maybe, just maybe, you are mindless idiot, who repeat something he read elsewhere without understanding. Like a parrot
    4
  14. +Ilex paraguariensis Poles sided with Ukraine? When? While they occupied Western Ukraine? Of course, lol. >but unfortunately for Ukraine, it got partitioned. yes. Poor poles. They were forced by evil Sovietы to annex some part of Ukraine. Just for the good of the Ukrainians themselves
    4
  15. +Dr Strangelove but... Ukraine was part of Poland. Not so long ago....
    4
  16. +gdansk87 >with it was a time i mean after 1918, dont confuse it with 18th century 18th century wasn't 'a time'? Why? > i dont try to make poland look good Pardon me, but by saying about 'help protecting Ukraine against soviet invasion' you are doing exactly that. > u guys always try to make poland look like the biggest aggressor in history OUR biigest aggressor always was Germany. In various forms. >after centuries of being poland, russia has taken it back, even when it was cultured or sophisticated by poland. that was wrong lol. Maybe you forgot, but Lwow was part of Austro-Hungarian empire. And they dшв culturing and sophisticating of they own. > i would love if Germany got its territory back Including Danzig?
    4
  17. +Fraz so, France didn't surrendered in WW2?
    4
  18. +Fraz as a matter of fact - no. There is no definition of 'partial' or 'complete' surrender. There is so-called unconditional surrender. But Finland surrendered conditionally
    4
  19. +JohQx3 >"Surrender" has the idea of destroying other side's armed forces to a state where it's incapable and unwilling to conduct operations nope >something Red Army never managed to do to Finnish Defence Forces. also, nope
    4
  20. +JohQx3 to be exact - you pull that 'idea of surrender' completely out of your ass
    4
  21. >UK, France, and Japan against Russia? with Japan aiming to include all European colonies to the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere? And why US should stay neautral?
    3
  22. Lol. "Soviet Winter"? Really? There is excellent video on that channel, about what "winter" stopped German advance
    3
  23. +Dr Strangelove but, you didn't ansver. Who owns the former Eastern Prussia?
    3
  24. +gdansk87 >U know that the communists had been almost at the polish border prior the war? yup. That happens, when you are trying to restore 'Rzeczpospolita'. Strangely, after the war 'the communists' also have been at polish border. >so it WAS also a counter-attack against the soviet invasion or maybe it was soviet counterattack against polish invasion? You didn't ansver, though - would you love if Germany got Danzig back?
    3
  25. +JohQx3 of course. And Viipuri was just a present :D
    3
  26. +Fraz so, you add conditions here... Not main part of territory, not puppet state... What else?
    3
  27. +4 Tonnes of Fury nope, after war Greece wasn't part of anything
    3
  28. what "soviet crimes"?
    3
  29. +Lunar Safeguard As you remember? Are you former member of Soviet General staff?
    3
  30. +daniel halachev but the United States was actively seeking a pretext for war with Japan. Despite what their citizens wanted
    2
  31. +Eric Taylor soo, you insist on looking as moron. So be it. >so because some of the Germans died, they didn't make any progress? you should collect yourself. Focus, Eric! Focus! First, you were stating that's winter prevented Germans from achieving they goals. But now, when I pointed out that it's not winter, but fierce resistance of Red Army and Soviet people in general, that stopped Germans, YOU ACCUSING ME THAT I WAS DENYING THAT GERMANS DID ADVANCED INTO USSR TERRITORY. Go home. Eric, get sober, get some sleep. You are drunk as fuck.
    2
  32. +Dr Strangelove what about Western Ukraine?
    2
  33. +Dr Strangelove Exploit and killing? What nations? Maybe, Ukrainians and Belorussians, who raised against their Poland oppressors? Finns, who lived better, than average russian? Georgians, who seeked protection from Ottomans? >The collapse is imminent due to the massive corruption and the drop of demand in oil and gas(main Russian export 70-80%). Lol, son. May I remind you, that in the 90-s average price for a barrel was 18$?
    2
  34. +Faith Rox 13 DBLE couldn't have do nothing to Russia. Why, you may ask? Because they had no experience of fighting in Arctic. Let me remind you, that Operation Silver Fox couldn't achieve planned goals.
    2
  35. +ari hyvarinen >At this time allies didnt want Finland to make peace with soviet union you hit the spot there
    2
  36. +Fraz no, France just present some territory in an armistice. Don't you remember Vichy government?
    2
  37. there was no 'cooperation' in invasion to Poland
    2
  38. Don't be ridiculous. Britain bombers couldn't hit the wide side of a barn, so to speak
    2
  39. +Lunar Safeguard "bit earlier"? Are you sane?
    2
  40. +AKlover lol. Maybe, if "someone" don't supported corrupted governments of said countries, it would saved a lot more lives?
    2
  41. there were no 'battlefield alliance' against Poland.
    1
  42. +mam162 Poles didn't fight two enemies at once. It was all but over, when USSR invaded Poland. Red Army almost did not meet resistance, The advance of the Red Army was limited mainly by problems in the supply of fuel
    1
  43. USA(the Allies) didn't declare war on Germany ;)
    1
  44. +nicks238 stop spreading bullshit. USSR was in the process of rearming his forces and strengthening the new border with Germany.
    1
  45. +nicks238 >explain why almost entire army of the USSR was at the border with Germany not in defense, but in attack positions. there is simple explanation - that's complete bullshit statement >Why all positions and airfields so close, that they were destroyed in first minutes? that's bullshiit >Why no proper tactical maps of own territory, but plenty of German? it's also bullshit
    1
  46. +Lt. Voss >In terms of their tanks, the steel was of terrible quality, forcing them to use thicker plates to achieve the same relative protection as other nations' could with thinner plates Lol. In the case of earlier M4 armour - just lol >The T-34 used the Christie suspension system, which was cheap and easy to build but terrible for internal space and longetivity (there's a reason no one used it long after it was introduced). you could tell that to Israeli's. Or Brits, with they Comets etc >The Soviets shot themselves in the foot (almost literally) and needed lots of outside help to be brought into the modern world. strangely, USSR build it's own nuclear bomb without 'lots of outside help'
    1
  47. +theordinarytime >please provide me with a single example of a tank fitted with it after 1942 that is not a T 34 or version of it. Merkava is fitted with Cristie suspension ;) I guess, it was built long after 1942. Also - Cromwell, Comet and Charioteer.
    1
  48. +Eric Taylor very little? Man, you are ridiculous. I strongly recommend you to watch video on German losses in the first months of Barbarossa. It's also on MHV. Maybe then you stop looking like a moron.
    1
  49. +Eric Taylor had no trouble? Lol. What a moronic idiot you are.
    1
  50. +Eric Taylor so, you moronic idiot, who don''t know shit, and, especially, that The battle for Stalingrad took place one year after the outbreak of the war. What a brainless freak you are, lol
    1
  51. +Eric Taylor Houston callls Eric. Are you hear me? Eric? Are you there? German invasion into USSR begin in june 1941. The Battle of Stalingrad took place in august 1942. Of course, being brainless idiot who don't knows his ass from hole in the ground, you can call this RAPID. But i can call you a product of Thalidomide. Houston, over and out.
    1
  52. +Eric Taylor Yes, it's considered rapid - moving your army 1800 miles into enemy territory in a year. Considered rapid among likes of you - victims of thalidomide :D
    1
  53. They could have won, but at much, much larger cost. See WWI
    1
  54. >the more manpower the merrier as shown by the soviets. really? And its not Germans who concentrated about 4 mln soldiers on the Soviet-German borders for "Barbarossa"? >German tech was unexpectedly advanced but expensive to make. But this applies to the soviets except it being opposite. that's complete bullshit. German mass-produced tech wasn't expensive to make. For Germans, of course. And Soviet tech wasn't some orkish style "battle-wagons", welded together from pieces of armour
    1
  55. >In 1920, the Soviets also attempted an invasion of war weary Europe. stop spreading bullshit. It wasn't attempt to invasion. It was a conflict over parts of former Russian Empire.
    1
  56. +King Baldwin IV what 'pretext', you clown? Do you familiar with progression of Soviet-Polish war? What "activated cells" are you raving about? All USSR was trying to do in the 20-s - is to secure borders. Even at the cost of giving up some territories, as it was in the case of Finland
    1
  57. +mercenarieboy I also can point out, that those former parts didn't want to be a part of the Poland. But Poles don't give a shit about their thoughts. They wanted to restore 'Rzhech Pospolita'. Soo, what did you say about 'my' logic?
    1
  58. Карл Манов is a bullshit, no discuss
    1
  59. Lol. It was Hitlers excuses for invading USSR. With no evidence at all
    1
  60. +Andrey Stolyarov stop spreading bullshit, I beg you.
    1
  61. But anime - product of American culture. Particularly, Disney films
    1
  62. +Terence Mirley >Stalin murdered 12 million Ukranians and Russians in the late 30's why not 12 billions?
    1
  63. +Nick Toons >they built their own Atom Bomb using our own tech Really? Soviet spies sent centrifuge for uranium separation across the ocean? Or just enriched uranium?
    1