Comments by "Вячеслав Скопюк" (@user-yj8vj3sq6j) on "Russia’s Military Power (2017)" video.

  1. A problem with modern western assesments of Russian Military is the lack of qualified experts on Russia. This leads to a variety of absurd statements in the reports. Such as meanings of word "maskirovka" or using of term "Russian Spetsnaz"
    120
  2. > They have had issues supplying even small forces in close proximity, such as in Ukraine and Georgia Err, what? >Their power projection in Syria isn't very impressive. comparing with who? >Somewhat ironic is the fact that much of the Soviet nuclear arsenal was based in Ukraine when the USSR collapsed. somewhat ironic, that it is a absolute crap
    33
  3. +Conor7734 33 you mixed up Russia and Ukraine.
    32
  4. +Scott Christiansen I think, reports of Defence Intelligence Agency are written not by 'most people'.
    26
  5. +Drunkenstein you orthodox Christian and you hang out with Chechens? Are you their bitch of sort?
    21
  6. +Jaak Sootak artillery
    17
  7. +Some Random Guy I think he is a worm.
    15
  8. +Smart LP problem with word 'maskirovka' described in the comment section of corresponding video by MHV. Problem with term 'Spetsnaz' is that it used by common people to reference all Russian special forces. But i think, such vulgar use of this term is inapropriate for report by US DIA.
    15
  9. +Serdiuk Paul >Spetsnaz is a term that is equal to specops. in Russia, in common use - yes. But that report was not compiled by russians, nor common people. >"Maskirovka" is a Western term for the famous Russian bullshitting skills, Nope. And you obviously didn't watch that video, or other video by MHV about 'maskirovka'
    15
  10. +Blah b ROFLMAO. You are so incredibly stupid, amazing how you know how to write. Do you think that T-72 was built with Thales optics? In 1980-s? "According to Thales engineers", my ass. Man, you are a walking joke
    11
  11. +Claire AwesomeSauce >but not without losing more soldiers and equipment than they inflicted upon the Georgian military. WAT?
    11
  12. +Serdiuk Paul Captain Obvious, is that you? I appreciate your efforts to insert your opinion in every discussion. But let it be more meaningful. Did you see 'SpN' in 'Russian Spetsnaz'?
    10
  13. +swatbot2611 yep.
    10
  14. >the war in Crimea WAT? >the continued war in Donbass lay mostly in vague what does the Russian armed forces have to do with this? > Regarding Syria, Russia prove its inabilities to conduct precise strikes and comprehensive reconnaissance says who? >which counts in hundreds OF COURSE! > and effectivness of US lead coalition what effectivness? Thousands of sorties with no apparent effect? US-trained and equipped elite troops, running back from ISIS fighters? Inability for months to take besieged city with all air and artillery support, provided by coalition?
    9
  15. +Matt Kid >Their are people living as if they where in the 1940s do they had satellite television in 1940s?
    8
  16. +Alexander Romanov the general term for more or less academic source would be 'Russian special forces'. Without all that aura of tabloid press, where term 'Spetsnaz' originated
    8
  17. that wasn't in the DIA report
    7
  18. +HoseTheBeast even highly trained military officers use the term "ass", "shit", "cunt". But i doubt that they use it in their reports
    6
  19. Reality from russians? Or from your insane mind?
    5
  20. +comsubpac >Isn't the Armata program already stopped nope >Technologically its still behind anyway and apparently has a lot of dissadvantages he knows a lot, lol. Not as ukrainian paramilitaries, who destroyed T-14 with well placed RPG-7 shot, but close
    5
  21. Beware. Here are the two great geopolicist, who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground
    4
  22. +Kuro Usagi >I understand that only 25% of Russians know that Russian Servicemen are fighting and dying in the Donbass I understand, that you don't know, that most of the captured Donbass militiaman were citizens of Ukraine??
    4
  23. +Suspect on foot[FIN] tell that to Saudy Aravia military. Maybe it will soothe they wounded pride
    4
  24. +Some Random Guy why shouldn't i? He is funny enough. And i'm very doubtful that he is a Westerner
    4
  25. +Doralingus & Assorted it's nothing bad, if common people use tern 'Spetsnaz'. But, i think that report from DIA - not the right place for such use.
    4
  26. +ScoundrelFilms Ukraine and Belarus - pretty much yes. "Others" - no.
    4
  27. +sting2death2 you are talking to die-hard russophobe.
    3
  28. +Kuro Usagi > Servicemen, who are fighting and dying in the Donbass o'rly? Thing is, that there was almost NO russian servicemen, active, or on 'vacation', captured during war in Donbass last years. Skip that bullshit about crooked government, you are not Alexey Navalny, and I'm not 14 year old boy
    3
  29. I'm very doubt that any LGBT population was in Chechnya in the first place. Because of, you know, Caucasus conservatives. Georgians are christians, but they not wery fond of LGBT too.
    3
  30. +Fokka >what ground-based ATGM missile except Javelin, has F&F? HJ-12, Spike-SR, MBT LAW. I looked only into man-portable ATGM
    3
  31. +Jo Jo Well, you are worm so it's a safe bet you have no brains
    3
  32. I'm laughing my ass out
    3
  33. +Blah b yes, and some russophobic Dutch knows, what Ukrainians and Tatars feel, better, than said Ukrainians and Tatars. They are so opressed, that absolute majority got Russian citizenship. Moreover, hundreds of thousands Ukrainians from Eastern Ukraine escaped to continental Russia - so great is their love of life under Putin dictatorship
    3
  34. So, you missed all that 'Calibr' and X-101 launches? Not to mention using of 'Ataka' ATGM's
    2
  35. +Александр Пахомов you are waisting air here, Seriously
    2
  36. +Jo Jo why should a truth about internet-connected meat worms hurt anybody?
    2
  37. +Fuzzy Dunlop used 'nomenclature' characterizes credibility of the sources
    2
  38. +Fuzzy Dunlop > leads you to arrogantly cast off otherwise good content how do you detect that said contet is good? You don't have required expertise
    2
  39. +Mikk Nigol >Island hasnt no army, why anyone dont attack them Island are backed by USA. Google 'The Cod Wars'. > We are NATO member because Russia wants fuck us all the time nope. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania are part of NATO, because they were't independent states for hundreds of years. It is the form of their existence, to depend on one of the neighbors - Germany, Poland, Russia. >Soon will be Ukraine too in NATO Lol. You think so? >NATO is ans expandes because Russia behive like fucking moran. nope. NATO is expands because it expands.
    2
  40. Most youtube users with nickname naponroy are shameless liars
    2
  41. +Serdiuk Paul was it better before in Crimea? Besides those things that unknown people arrange with electricity supply? I think not. And no, Putin not robbed refugeees from choise. They could choose to run to Ukraine. And many did so
    2
  42. +Serdiuk Paul >it was better for the common people says who? > If these people truly wished to live in Russia out of their own choice, they could have moved there way before the war. facepalm. Are you implying that they were forcibly moved to Russia, against their own choice?
    2
  43. +Serdiuk Paul >Says statistics. And beach webcams, lol. they says excatly what? >Yes, they were forced to flee by Russian invasion. I should remind you your words. "If these people truly wished to live in Russia out of their own choice, they could have moved there way before the war". Are you implying that they were forcibly moved to Russia, against their own choice?
    2
  44. +Blah b Dear Dutch russphobe. How exactly people from the East Ukraine were forcibly moved to Russia? In hundreds of thousands. >I know you're only here because you work for the Russian government You know, there is one russian saying - "The thief louder than all shout "Hold the thief!". All you do in the comments section is a) write some nonsense about Russia, b) accuse other people of being a paid troll.
    2
  45. +Serdiuk Paul >Beach webcams say that a lot of Crimeans are poor since tourism is on downturn Now beach webcams are able to read the material well-being of the inhabitants of the region? >deaths just skyrocketed because people can't get quality healthcare and medicine there. strangely, you so confidently draw conclusions, while the authors of information about the increased mortality in the Crimea can not confidently name its causes. And you do not think, for example, that the reason is in the banal mistakes of statistics in Ukraine >Again, if it was their free choice, why hadn't they moved to Russia before? so you refuse to say "yes" or "no"? Well, I hope you will find the strength to admit that you were wrong
    2
  46. +Сергей Мельников and you are daughter of officer?
    2
  47. +Serdiuk Paul > Ukrainian troops have zero reason to shell civilians outside of counter-battery fire. Yes, of course. And ukrainian troops have zero reasons to drop bombs and tactical rockets on civilians. But, strangely, they deed so. Repeatedly and provable. > Everything points to Russian over-the-border shelling of Ukrainian troops and the use of mortars out of closed positions to shell the center of Donetsk from the east or north. Of course. Especially videos of ukrainian mortar crews from Peski, firing at Donetsk.
    2
  48. funny, though
    2
  49. +Rick 1998 ultranationa.. lolwhut? Do you know, what the word "nationalistic" means?
    2
  50. Lol. You really don't get the use of oil, do you? Typical Musk fanboy
    1
  51. +valar Typical Musk fanboy. All words and no sense. "Thorium reactors, bla-bla-bla". Try to read something essential on the matter
    1
  52. >They do not have the capability to fight the NATO forces that the US has belligerently built up  on her borders lolwut?
    1
  53. Russia is pretty much capable to fight NATO forces, "builded up" on her borders. Because there is no particularly large NATO force near Russia border, except Poland
    1
  54. Russia pretty much had capability to crush Georgian forces in 2008, fighting on more or less equal terms. So, here goes your analitics
    1
  55. +Dalton Morgan "according to CNN"
    1
  56. +mwnciboo managed to hit? You look quite sure for a man who 'Didn't see alot of precision guides weapons in Syria'
    1
  57. +Dalton Morgan *yawns* you need to try harder, "Dalton". Take an example from your colleagues in the comments
    1
  58. +mwnciboo would you be so kind and specify, for what exactly Kremlin publicly apologized to Iran? Because, apparently, it's a thing that neither I nor Google know about
    1
  59. +mwnciboo Earth to mwnciboo - would you be so kind and specify, for what exactly Kremlin publicly apologized to Iran?
    1
  60. >5. the bombing in Syria worked so well for Russia because Kadyrovs men have infiltrated ISIS and other groups. Lol. I see, fear of Chechens greatly extended over Earth globe :D
    1
  61. > A continously dropping barrel price is pretty much a news of doom for "Russian Federation" . yet they were much lower in 1998 >AS far as I know everyone in Russia hates draft and they do their utmost to run away from it. it's a very old news
    1
  62. +Christopher Schroeder or it's Netherlands, not the netherlands. Or its Gambia, not the Gambia. Why limit yourself?
    1
  63. +Christopher Schroeder i'd tell you to go by some brains, and stop being a brainless moron, but we all know there is no cranial cavity inside your skull any more
    1
  64. >and have comparable front line aerospace forces and deep reserves of manpower you are drunk. Go home.
    1
  65. Type 01 LMAT, семейство Spike, французская MMP, MACAM-3 у испанцев, индийцы возятся с семейством Nag. Плюс самонаводящиеся воздух-поверхность, которые могут быть разработаны в варианте для наземных платформ.
    1
  66. Spain is about to not have a civil war. I see no likes of Poroshenko in Madrid
    1
  67. Lol. Yes, it's a waste of time and money. AFAIR, even Sweden military officers think so
    1
  68. +Margus-Matis Roo don't be ridiculous. In XXI century there is nothing, in military sense, for what Gotland could be good for and mainland not
    1
  69. yep, sanctions could push Russia towards China. no, China couldn't provide all the hi-tech that Russia needs. At the moment, at least.
    1
  70. Muammar Gaddafi thought in a similar way. We all see how it ended for Libya
    1
  71. +Mikk Nigol you forgot that Guaddafy decided to be good, not to fuck with other countries, upgrade salarys instead military and so on.
    1
  72. +Mikk Nigol yes, you dependent on that criminal. Because, you see, there is no police, there is only criminals. >you are one of the most stupid person i ever argue it is a strong statement for a man who has no idea about the topics that are spoken. Did you googled 'cod wars'?
    1
  73. Look at the Ukraine, for example. Does ukraine economy crumbled, being forced to sustain large force during years?
    1
  74. apply ice
    1
  75. +Robert The Wise you could tell that to Israelis. Or to Swiss. Or Finns. They are don't shy to use conscripts to drive all that fancy multi million dollar weapon systems. But for Latvia it changes nothing, with conscripts or without - the only shield for Baltic states are NATO forces
    1
  76. +Robert The Wise Israeli, Swiss, Finland - looks enough modern to me
    1
  77. +Robert The Wise it's not about national unity. If you want to have relatively large army(to a population size), draft is your choice. Or you will be forced to pay relatively high salary to a large group of mostly young, strong, healthy and relatively intelligent people, who essentially are doing nothing but waisting your money.
    1
  78. +naponroy shrug, say what you will, I live in city around 200km from Moscov and I do know many persons under the age of 60 who had served in the army. Moreover, many of said persons are graduated. Apparently, there are not many persons at all that you know
    1
  79. why Russai and not China?
    1
  80. Russia lacks resources required to participate in the space race. China is the other way around
    1
  81. +Blah b and what isn't a military occupation we also call a military occupation. That we are - free people
    1
  82. +Serdiuk Paul beach webcams? Says a lot of Crimeans are poor and dying? Ok. >Do you even realize that "forced to make a choice" and "deprived of choice by force" is logically the same thing? Do you realize, that it's not logical at all? And again - are you implying that they were forcibly moved to Russia, against their own choice? Yes or no.
    1
  83. +Serdiuk Paul i think you are talking too much for a man, who can not answer 'yes' or 'no' for a simple question. It's not Hyde park. Apropos - are you implying that refugees from the Eastern Ukraine were forcibly moved to Russia, against their own will? Try not to answer the question with a question
    1
  84. +Serdiuk Paul "They were forced to move to Russia against their own will"? Maybe i am forgetting something, but they could choose to seek refuge in the Ukraine
    1
  85. +Serdiuk Paul >Those displaced to Ukraine were forced to do that by Russia, those displaced to Russia were forced to do that by Russia. really? I was sure that the shelling and bombing of cities is an initiative of the then government of Ukraine > What's the point? there is no point in your 'verbal gymnastics'. People from Europe west to the Ukraine, or from the Americas - they will gladly swallow anything you say. But don't try to say that it was Russia, who launched Scarab's on their own city
    1
  86. +Serdiuk Paul https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUL5GJ-ll04 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8E_%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_2_%D0%B8%D1%8E%D0%BD%D1%8F_2014_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0 https://bmpd.livejournal.com/2238635.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9-8KvtfjZA http://cripo.com.ua/?sect_id=8&aid=209352 enough? >Donetsk is a big city with multiple enemy positions. Yes, firing into big city with multiple enemy positions with such precise weapopn as 1200mm mortar will surely hit someone. And there are not so big cities like Luhansk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g545WaMZ4oA >Firing blindly into it is prohibited and makes no sense for regular troops. Lol. How old are you, 17? Military in the war often do what is prohibited or makes no sense.
    1
  87. +Serdiuk Paul > So a single airstrike I wonder how you moved from the statement that there were no bombings, to the statement "one air strike, nothing special." But what about " does not make sense to the military to attack these targets"? >and the use of Tochka versus some Russian targets red the captions under the photos >is all? that's a good Ukrainian. "Our military don't attack civilians... But it they does - who cares?" >Yes, there were some ammo explosions in Donetsk that were mistaken for Tochka impacts YOU. IGNORED.THE CAPTIONS. UNDER. THE FOROS. YOU. DON"t.KNOW.FUCK. ABOUT. YOUR.OWN.ARMY. >Stanitsa was evacuated before the fighting, there were a LOT of troops holding it then. facepalm. You didn't see the date? You didn't the dead civilians? > Ukraine always announces such attacks in built-up areas. Especially when Su-25 strafed square in the center of Luhansk. You are full of shit. >The military does what they are ordered to do. Yes, i had no doubt that airstrikes on civilians were called by high staff
    1
  88. +Serdiuk Paul >There were no indiscriminate bombings. air attack on the Luhansk and Stanitsa were indiscriminate >An airstrike on the leadership of those puppet republics could lead to shortening of the war. it wasn't airstrike on on leadership. It was airstrike in vicinity of administrative building. Terror strike. >Or do you think that an administrative building occupied by the staff of DPR is a civilian target? sigh. It wasn't military target. Even americans at first didn't target administrative buildings in Serbia. >The fault lies with whomever started the war. No shit. So, atrocities of "Tornado" weren't the fault of it's memebers? At first I thought you were an intelligent person. But you are brainwashed zombie, who, in reality, doesn't care about deaths on both sides. For you, it's nothing but words. Once you said, that this war will build ukrainian nation. But in reality, ukrainian natioun will be divided into those who cares, and the likes of you. Remember my words
    1
  89. +Dmitry Smirnov it was 5 days
    1
  90. Crimea is an one large military base. And Ukrainian authorities were notoriously slack on keeping they military stuff
    1