General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Вячеслав Скопюк
Forgotten Weapons
comments
Comments by "Вячеслав Скопюк" (@user-yj8vj3sq6j) on "Suomi m/31 - Finland's Excellent Submachine Gun" video.
PPD-40 is a copy of PPD-34/38. And PPD-34/38 is a copy of PPD-34. Should I continue?
3
you can watch Ian's videos on PPD and PPSh for clarification
3
Juho Mäki-Petäjä you are full of ignorance. KP-/31 had little of common with PPD or PPSh. So, about what ''simplification' you are talking about?
3
Actually, except that both are open bolt SMG's, they aren't similar
3
banaana1234 facepalm. How the hell PPSh concept was based on KP-/31, when USSR had indigenous SMG designs, similar to PPSh, since late 20-s?
2
Juho Mäki-Petäjä lol. That's all? Look at blueprints. Find similar elements
2
it's grammar KGB doing
2
he said пАпаша
2
who need that goddamn heavy expensive gun?
2
Zetor-Khan the Generous look at MP-28. Looks similar to PPSh, isn'it?
1
why should they copy KP-/31 to make PPD40, when they had PPD34/38 to copy?
1
you mean - 32 finns faced 4 soviets? At the distance of hundreds of meters ;)
1
Yep, it's fiinnish equivalent to Kijirō Nambu
1
KP/-31 was only an inspiration. Inspiration to create cheap mass-produced SMG, which is completely opposite to KP/-31
1
How pronunciation nazi are called in Finland?
1
it's look really similar to most of the early SMG's
1
Juho Mäki-Petäjä don't make yourself an idiot, please
1
Juho Mäki-Petäjä obviously you making yourself an idiot when claiming that PPD and PPSh are copies of KP/31. Because they are, like, not the copies of KP/31, and any sensible man will see that in the blueprints
1
Juho Mäki-Petäjä facepalm. You, sir, in your ignorance, didn't look at MP-18 as the source for inspiration for PPD? And no, they can't be inspired by KP/31. Because they are, like, different. And you obviously didn't look into blueprints
1
Ian and Karl shoot finnish weapons in Finland.
1
ROFLMAO. And why does PPSh-41 look like KP/-31 only superficially? >This was told in a museum here in Finland. in war museum in Finland was told, that PPSh-41 is a copy of KP/-31?
1
>but it really shows that soviet did copy KP31. as a matter of fact, no. It shows only that 'several blueprints of KP31 went missing, and also a finnish liutenant who was a guard went missing'. On the other hand, when you compare construction of PPSh-41 and KP/-31, you can clearly see, that they have very little in common
1
>but they still probably used the blueprints of KP31 facepalm. Look at PPSh-41. Look at KP/-31. Find similar parts. >Doesn't it feel fishy when a Finnish liutenant went missing with stolen blueprints, two years later soviet introduced PPSH41? nope. Because Finland didn't invent SMG as a weapon. And USSR had PPD-29, PPD-34, PPD-34/38 and PPD-40 before introduction of PPSh-41
1
Kopiovastaava >PPSH is a copy of the PPD Facepalm.
1
Kopiovastaava PPSh isn't a copy of PPD. Cheap, or expensive. Just look at disassembled PPD and disassembled PPSh
1
If you REALLY had seen disassembled PPSh and PPD, which I doubt, you should have noticed, that they have very few similar parts. And their bolts, receivers and return springs are significantly differ.
1
Then you should have noticed, that they have very few similar parts. And their bolts, receivers and return springs are significantly differ. And, therefore, PPSh isn't a ''cheap copy of PPD'. Or you don't seen any of them
1
kill claims, to be correct
1
it wasn't based on m/31
1
Juho Mäki-Petäjä stop writing bullshit. PPD have nothing in common with KP/31 except drum mag
1
nope, you are not only one. And it's not reliable at all, because air compression varies depending on temperature
1
and heavy as sin
1
it's not about lifting. it's about carrying around couple kilos of useless iron instead of ammo, food, etc.
1
nope
1
nope, he didn't
1
More Gun Free Man you had the option of captured soviet guns, who were a couple of kilos lighter
1