Comments by "Вячеслав Скопюк" (@user-yj8vj3sq6j) on "The Old Soviet Military Doctrine Is Still Alive! Russian Military Power Demonstration" video.

  1.  @stuartg40  ROFL. That's why US exported bunch of troops and tanks into Afganistan and Iraq. Because they are irrelevant on the modern battlefield :D
    9
  2.  @stuartg40  remind me, please, how old are US main battle tanks
    8
  3. ​ @stuartg40  >and that was 16 years ago. yep. 16 years passed and you still need a boot on the ground. Be that US Marine or Kurdish militiaman >The US wasn't fighting against a country's military in Afghanistan meanwhile, warfare in Afganistan really is a modern warfare. You, on the other hand, continue to thinking in terms of the cold war > To get back to the point: tanks and missile batteries are of little help when you're fending off ICBMs, supersonic stealth aircraft, cyber warfare, UAVs and hypersonic cruise missiles. remind me, please, did ICBMs, stealth supersonic aircrafts, cyber warfare, UAVs and hypersonic cruise missiles achieved anything against ISIS?
    8
  4.  @BrevityBuzz  > you're just commenting on every comment that's a lie, sir >This video is just not how war works anymore sorry to disappoint you, but you don't have a slightest idea about how war works now >all those vehicles are just waiting there for a B-52 or a couple A-10s to demolish them. you didn't read any of my comment, do you? > I can understand that this would simply not cut it you can't. Your understanding of modern warfare comes from news reports
    5
  5.  @stuartg40  >We were talking about countries, not terrorist groups ROFL. ISIS wasn't just a terrorist group. It was a state. And only tanks and infantry were able to destroy it >it's just not AS important as it once was was when? During WWI? Cold War, for example, was a war of tactical nuclear strikes. On the other hand, you can't name any modern conflict, except Serbia 1999, that was decided using only stand-off weapons
    4
  6. some S-400, covered with MiG-31 & Su-30 would make the scene look even better
    3
  7. so, basically, any army?
    3
  8.  @michaeldiebold8847  ROFL
    2
  9. You are too used to fighting goat shepherds who armed only with rusty AK's and IED's
    2
  10. @The Delray Dipshits not impressed
    2
  11. >A-10s would have a field day Sorry, dude, that's not a bunch of goat shepherds with rusty AK's and DShK's. MANPADS operators would have a field day
    2
  12.  @BrevityBuzz  >does your understanding of war come a source like video games then? nope. >That seems to be the case. that seems to be number one bullshit > And also you have no idea what I would know about modern warfare. your level of knowledge, expressed in comments, could be measured quite precise >But it seems like your head is way too far up your ass Did someone offend you? You sound offended.
    2
  13. You are to used to fighting against goat shepherds who armed only with rusty AK's and IED's
    1
  14. yep, modern armies rarely use something developed after 2000s
    1
  15. sorry, dude, but you are too used to fighting against goat shepherds, armed with nothing more than rusty AK's. See, regular armies, they have MANPADS.
    1
  16.  @jmwb4u  B-52 bombers are, like, 50 or more years old
    1
  17.  @jmwb4u  check your facts
    1
  18.  @jmwb4u  i checked mine. USA uses B-52
    1
  19.  @probook  do you realize, that 'stealth' planes aren't invisible in all wavelengths?
    1
  20. definitely, Africa degrades everyone :D
    1
  21. Sorry, dude, that's not a bunch of goat shepherds with rusty AK's and DShK's. Did you hear about MANPADS?
    1
  22.  @michaeldiebold8847  little house keeping? Against infantry armed with MANPADS? Definitely you don't know what it is
    1
  23.  @michaeldiebold8847  in computer games, maybe. In reality - go check out why they ceased to use AC-130 during daytime in Iraq. And Iraqis only had old "Strela-2"
    1
  24.  @michaeldiebold8847  >But night does indeed happen. but since then thermal imagers were adopted >And those tank formations would be smoking wrecks after the first week. ROFL. >Also, there are way more weapons in the arsenal than an a10. that works both ways, dude
    1
  25.  @michaeldiebold8847  >Truth is, most of what was featured in this vid was old in the 80s ROFL. B-52 was old in the 80s. Your beloved A-10 was old since the maiden flight >But the truth is what it is. Yep. Armed Forces of USA use decades old equipment :D
    1
  26. ​ @michaeldiebold8847  >Tge A10 is a robust and very effective weapon system in the right conditions. yep. Right conditions being complete lack of any anti-air defense except techicals > it's not the same b52 now irony is that they are the same planes, youngest being 50 years old. >And the video I'm talking about is about the Russians I was trying to give you a bit of perspective, since you quite ignorant to the fact, that all militaries in the world use decades old equipment > The video was almost exclusively very old tech and very old doctrine 'new doctrine' means killing people using MQ-9? >Do you deny that? I doubt that A10 pilot will get lot of fun dodging AA missiles. Because A10 can't dodge
    1
  27.  @michaeldiebold8847  >I dont need perspective. looks like you do need a perspective >This vid is purely old tech. And thus it's old doctrine. Great. So, fleet of 70-year old B-52s shows us that US uses old doctrines? Surprising >The battle of 73 eastings showed that these old tactics dont work. are you sure that tactics that Iraqis used was old? >The side with air superiority will win. really? Strangely, US, having complete air superiority, couldn't do shit to ISIS :D Or Taliban. >The new Russian Stinger is a decent system but it would be shut down pretty quickly. You know that from your computer gaming experience? Try wargames, they have more realistic gameplay >The ground attack planes and drones would take care of the armor. of course. It's not like there is any AA defense in the world :D >Also, why are you repeating what I say? so that you know what part of your message I answer
    1
  28. say that to ISIS
    1
  29. Современное ПВО раскатает современную авиацию еще быстрее
    1
  30.  @BalticWind  сирийские C-125 и C-200 на современные как-то не очень тянут. Впрочем, и у них на счету как минимум один израильский фраг
    1
  31.  @BalticWind  эхехе. Это не компьютерная игра. На них еще операторов тренируют
    1
  32.  @BalticWind  >Спецназ воюет российский, а прикрывать его посадили необученных сирийцев? Там вообще войска прикрывать не требуется. Авиаудары по ним крайне редки, я всего два случая вспомню навскидку. Российскую авиабазу прикрывает российское ПВО, так ее и не бомьили >Вы считаете наше военное руководство дураками? я считаю, что кое-какие комментаторы не владеют матчастью >Поэтому раскатают, да, с потерями, но раскатают сперва ПВО, потом авиацию, а потом и всю эту чадящую бронетехнику Антон, вы же даже не в курсе, какое именно ПВО у сирийцев работало, но делаете эти глубокомысленные выводы
    1
  33.  @BalticWind  итоги противостояния древних комплексов ПВО с истребителями поколения 4+?
    1
  34. >. If anything that’s why they had trouble in Ossetia what trouble, lol?
    1
  35. диванный воен закукарекал
    1
  36. you don't have any ideas about any military doctrine, modern or old, do you?
    1
  37.  rwsthedemonking  sorry, dude, but you are too used to fighting against goat shepherds, armed with nothing more than rusty AK's. A-10 is a sitting duck for someone armed with MANPADS
    1
  38.  rwsthedemonking  > A-10s and other attack plains will take out SAMs and AAA first and from a much farther distance good luck taking out SAM with ~70 km range "from a much far distance". Or chasing every MANPADS-equipped infantryman >Trust me the U.S. Air force is the best and know what they are doing. they did quite well against ISIS or Taliban :D
    1
  39.  rwsthedemonking  >our missiles can hit at 100 miles away yes. Those tomahawks, launched from A-10 :D >Infantry armed with shoulder fired weapons are just cannon fodder anyway. of course. During Desert Storm USAF ceased to use AC-130 during daytime, though. I wonder why :D
    1
  40.  rwsthedemonking  >AC-130s never stopped flying during the daytime during Desert storm that's a bold lie, sir. Shame on you
    1
  41.  rwsthedemonking  no shame on you. For lying so stupidly. Anyone could check that fact. With ease.
    1
  42.  rwsthedemonking  so, mister liar, your stupid lie didn't quite hold, eh? ;) >but no operations were ever stopped. So, you forget to mention that they didn't flew during daytime anymore? Oh, you
    1
  43.  @sauravrollins6779  he is some chairborne commando. His knowledge comes from casual computer games and short internet articles
    1
  44.  @BrevityBuzz  Eastern Ukraine, 2014-2015. Only artillery, tactical rockets and MLRS as indirect fire systems, and use of aviation was denied for Armed Forces of Ukraine
    1