Comments by "dragosstanciu" (@dragosstanciu9866) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. It would have been suicide for Britain to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time after they invaded Poland in September 1939.
    458
  2. Making peace with the nazis was out of the question. That would have left continental Europe at the mercy of the nazis and the communists.
    131
  3.  @punishedgloyperstormtroope8098  Germany had a racial agenda for Europe, thus Germany was a bigger threat.
    100
  4. Romania had no love for the Axis, but the territorial losses in 1940 forced Romania to join the Axis. The Romanians were Anglophiles but also feared the Soviet Union.
    53
  5. Women should never be subjected to such atrocities. It is so gruesome, shameful.
    51
  6. For a dictator everyone is just a tool to be used and then to be discarded.
    41
  7.  @alg7115  Wrong. Germany today has the strongest economy in Europe, thus peace did good to Germany.
    34
  8. Britain was already at war with Germany. Britain would have lost the war if they went to war with the USSR too.
    17
  9.  @AMX8799  Wrong. There was no proxy war in 2014 when Russia invaded Ukraine and stole Crimea and half of Donbas.
    16
  10. Relax, such pictures only strengthen the evidence that women were treated horribly during this war.
    14
  11. Many are neonazis.
    14
  12. It would have been suicide for Britain to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time. Britain would have lost the war.
    13
  13. Because the UK was already at war with Germany. The UK would have lost the war if they went to war with the USSR too.
    13
  14. Why should Poland negotiate when it became clear after March 1939 (German invasion of Czechoslovakia) that Germany could not be trusted?
    12
  15.  @jordantabakov1644  I'm eastern European too (Romanian), my country suffered a lot under communist rule, but that does not change the fact that at least western Europe was liberated, and became stronger than ever which allowed them to win the cold war and it also led to the fall of the USSR and communism in Europe.
    11
  16. Very few (in Europe and America) talk about Japanese atrocities because they don't care, but those atrocities are well known in Asia.
    11
  17.  @oberschIesien  Relax, Soviet atrocities are well known, but this video is about the Wehrmacht. No one is protecting any Soviet war crimes.
    9
  18. There are many neonazis.
    9
  19.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Seriously? Feminism has nothing to do with this video and you know it too.
    9
  20. The brave Turkish soldiers would have fought to the last man to stop the Nazis. Turkey was not good terrain for Blitzkrieg tactics.
    9
  21.  @VegetaWien89  The British Empire was doomed even before WW2 started, nationalist liberation movements began to rise all over the empire. As for Churchill he could do nothing to avoid the fall of the empire. Chamberlain declared war on Germany and Churchill had to continue the fight, he could not just ask for peace with the nazis.
    9
  22. Maybe the US Army would have reached Vienna before the Red Army did. Europe's history and the Cold War would have been different.
    9
  23. 10:57 Bachelors had taxes imposed on them in communist Romania too in 1966. It was called "the celibacy tax".
    9
  24. There was no written rule about field marshals committing suicide.
    8
  25. The EU is peaceful. The EU is not waging any war.
    8
  26. Russia was economically ruined because of the Great War.
    8
  27. What lies?
    8
  28. @Assismus No. Russia recognized Ukraine's independence in 1991and guaranteed its borders (Budapest Memorandum). Russia is not protecting anyone, Russia is invading.
    8
  29. Relax, such pictures only strengthen the evidence that women were treated horribly during this war.
    8
  30. Too many neonazis.
    7
  31.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Biden and the Catholic church have nothing to do with this video about the Wehrmacht.
    7
  32. 6:10 West Taiwan on the map.
    7
  33. There are many neonazis.
    7
  34.  @Mrstrangert392  But I doubt they know about the Nanjing massacre and Unit 731.
    7
  35. Maybe he will do a video on that too, but today it is about the Wehrmacht.
    7
  36. There are many neonazis.
    6
  37.  @aryanprivilege9651  This video is about theWehrmacht, not Kaganovich.
    6
  38. How so? The US became a superpower after the war. So, what did the Americans deserve?
    6
  39. Britain had to stop Germany. Europe under German control was gruesome.
    6
  40.  @atoll2453  It matters for neonazis.
    6
  41. The Poles wanted Ukraine and the Caucasus, they would bite more than they could chew.
    6
  42. But it is still socialism.
    6
  43. @Cosmic Wakes Not quite single-handedly, the Soviets were helped by the constant air bombardment the western Allies did against German factories and refineries, reducing German capability to manufacture new weapons.
    6
  44.  @nikolajwinther5955  Democratic leaders are limited in their power and influence.
    6
  45.  @AMX8799  Standing up? How? By destroying Ukraine?
    6
  46.  @jussim.konttinen4981  This video is not about Paulus, it is about atrocities against women.
    6
  47. @Assismus No. Crimea and Donbas are not Russian oblasts, they are Ukrainian. Russia protected no one.
    6
  48. Nazi Germany was what North Korea is today. The people, the party, the army are all one in North Korea.
    6
  49.  @big.atom37  Ancap means anarcho-capitalism. Maybe he believes you are a Jew.
    5
  50. Seriously? Germany wanted European domination and genocide see Generalplan Ost.
    5
  51.  @Shad0wack  Germany wanted more than an empire, she wanted genocide, see Generalplan Ost.
    5
  52. Neville declared war on Germany, so he did something.
    5
  53. What is the "right" history?
    5
  54. Impossible, Germany and the USSR had no common border, Poland was in the way. Look at a map of Europe in 1939.
    5
  55. It was logical for Antonescu to know before Mussolini. Hitler didn't believe that Italy is needed for Barbarossa. Hitler hoped for a fast victory against the USSR. Romania was much more important, since the Romanian army would participate from the beginning and Italy was stuck in Egypt and needed German help there.
    5
  56. Operation Pike was when Britain and France came so close to war with the USSR too in 1940.
    5
  57. Only those who wanted to remain in the USSR, if there was any.
    5
  58.  @jussim.konttinen4981  What are you talking about?
    5
  59. He is not a communist. What is wrong with you?
    5
  60.  @scottboelke4391  Exactly.
    5
  61.  @kondwanimututa2302  So you're talking about an absolute monarchy. Well then, let's look at Saudi Arabia today, there are a lot of human rights violations happening there, so an absolute monarchy is not better than a democracy.
    5
  62. Finland was not part of the Axis, it was co-belligerent against the USSR.
    5
  63.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  Some 7 to 10 million killed in the Holodomor, some 1,5 million killed in the Gulag.
    5
  64.  @HolyLegion12  A Marxist revolutionary agenda is a threat, but not as big as racial genocide.
    5
  65. No. Ukraine still has allies, it can still stop the Russian criminal invasion.
    5
  66. No, he is not.
    5
  67. What you say makes no sense.
    5
  68.  @yochaiwyss3843  He could not do more. The British people were still reluctant to go to war.
    4
  69. That is no excuse for such behavior. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits such behavior. Look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Geneva_Convention
    4
  70. You already said that. What is wrong with you?
    4
  71. He is not Jewish.
    4
  72. What's the problem?
    4
  73. The western Allies could not trust Hitler. He said after the Munich accord in 1938 that he had no more territorial desires, and yet he occupied entire Czechoslovakia in 1939 and half of Poland.
    4
  74. Seriously? The Jews were less than 1 % of Germany's population in 1933. The Nazis needed a scapegoat for Germany's economic problems.
    4
  75. Not quite, the League itself did not have the will to stop Germany, which made things easier for Germany.
    4
  76. There was nothing Churchill could do for Poland, or eastern Europe.
    4
  77. A monarchy can be a democracy too. Look at Sweden, Denmark, Norway, the UK, Japan.
    4
  78. Not yet, wait until the neonazis appear.
    4
  79. The Soviets could just bypass Warsaw and eliminate the free Poles later in a more subtle, political way.
    4
  80. We must learn from Christ's teachings, not from Marx or Hitler.
    4
  81. Because antisemitism is stronger in eastern Europe.
    4
  82.  @WillyEckaslike  What did you want? For Britain to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time?
    4
  83. Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, Greece. These countries were not a threat to Germany.
    4
  84. If Hitler did not start WW2 then why did Germany invade neutral countries like Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia, Greece, Luxembourg?
    4
  85. Hitler knew about British and French guarantees to Poland, he attacked Poland anyway and the French and British reacted, he started WW2.
    4
  86. Only neonazi comments are deleted.
    4
  87.  @TheImperatorKnight  Exactly.
    4
  88. Antisemitism + ultra-nationalism. You gain hatred.
    3
  89. But was he justified to make genocide and occupy almost entire Europe?
    3
  90. Appeasement for China is going on for almost 50 years, since 1971 when the UN recognized the communists as legal representatives of China.
    3
  91. How do you know he was a British agent. Who told you?
    3
  92. Why not? There are many Holocaust deniers like him, even on this channel's comments.
    3
  93.  @oberschIesien  Seriously? Germany and Israel today have good relationship, there is no hatred. Israel has no problem with whites.
    3
  94. The myth about how the German generals wereright and they would have won the war if only AH would not have interfered.
    3
  95. At 3:22 1,9 million German women, 10 million Soviet women.
    3
  96. No, things would not turn out different, the Allied Powers too would become stronger, they would not wait for Hitler to stockpile weapons.
    3
  97. Although Hungary and Romania hated each other, they joined the Axis because they both hated communism and the USSR.
    3
  98. The Romanians, Hungarians and Slovaks had much worse logistics than the Germans. The Axis as a whole had bad logistics.
    3
  99. Did you listen to what Marshal Timoshenko said at 17:31 ? The fall of Moscow would not have stopped the Soviet war effort.
    3
  100. To appease Nazi Germany, to show that it stands with Nazi Germany.
    3
  101. Why?
    3
  102. YouTube automatically deletes comments that contain certain combination of words, antisemitic or racist comments.
    3
  103. How so?
    3
  104. But why did the USA fight the reds in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan?
    3
  105. Before Tojo there was Konoe, he was prime-minister when Japan invaded China and Japan became a member of the Axis. Tojo and Konoe share responsibility for leading Japan to war.
    3
  106. The Finns were good guys, they were attacked and they tried not to commit war crimes.
    3
  107. Legal or not, those POWs didn't want to return to the vicious communist USSR, they were forced to return to the red dictatorship.
    3
  108. How did it happen? What did you learn?
    3
  109. The Czechs had some strong fortifications on the border and had mountainous terrain to their advantage. However there were also some 3 million Germans living there that would not be friendly to the Czechs, while the Luftwaffe would have aerial superiority and the Wehrmacht would have many more tanks than the Czechs. The war would not be easy for the Czechoslovaks. Hungary too wanted a piece of Czechoslovakia (south Slovakia).
    3
  110. Because the USSR invaded Poland two weeks later (17 September 1939). Britain and France were already at war with Germany (since 3 September 1939). It would have been suicide for Britain and France to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    3
  111. Chamberlain wasn't naive, he was aware that the British people did not want another big war, they weren't ready for another war. Even so, he initiated the rearmament program in the interwar period and declared war on Germany.
    3
  112. Germany was seen as a greater threat to Britain and France thus Britain and France did not want to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time, it would have been suicide.
    3
  113. Losing the empire was inevitable, nationalist movements were increasing in Africa, India, the Middle East even before WW2.
    3
  114. The Japanese army was already fighting in China. An attack on the USSR would have overstretched the Japanese army. The Navy however was very powerful and believed that it can win the war against the US Pacific Fleet.
    3
  115.  @genehornung3295  It would have been a humiliation for Japan to withdraw from China. Japan's national pride would be destroyed . China would claim a huge victory and continue the fight against Japan.
    3
  116. But at least we Europeans know that Ethiopia is located in East Africa.
    3
  117. Are you sure they have been debunked?
    3
  118. Hitler was blinded by hatred and racism, that led to his inevitable fall.
    3
  119. The Allies considered the Ardenes to be impossible terrain for tanks, that's why they didn't believe any reports about any German offensive through that area.
    3
  120. Seriously? How so?
    3
  121. What was BREXIT for?
    3
  122. Who would have invaded Italy? Britain and France did not want to invade Italy, not even after Italy invaded Ethiopia and annexed Albania.
    3
  123. Because they didn't want to end up in a Soviet camp.
    3
  124. And if Mr P does not nuke Britain, what then?
    3
  125. Relax, it is just a metaphor.
    3
  126.  @Rob46373  Britain did not have the power to fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time. Britain would lose the war in such a scenario.
    3
  127. So Hitler was just an innocent peace loving victim?
    3
  128. The USSR invaded Poland two weeks after Germany invaded it, and it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR and to fight against both Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    3
  129. Seriously? The entire world knows about the Slavs, Gypsies, Lgbt people killed in ww2.
    3
  130.  @HolyLegion12  My point is that Britain could not fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time. Also my point is that Germany was the bigger threat and she had to be defeated.
    3
  131. Hitler was a threat to Poland, Czechoslovakia, the Balkan countries, Ukraine, the Baltic countries. Thus he had to be stopped.
    3
  132.  @jnucleo  That doesn't make any sense.
    3
  133.  @laresial  Yes, nothing happened, because Germany was seen as the bigger threat for France and Britain, not the USSR. Besides, it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR and fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    3
  134. But the Germans didn't fight against the International Central Bankers. They wanted European domination and had a racial agenda, genocide, that had nothing to do with fighting the International Central Bankers.
    3
  135.  @daniels_0399  Exactly.
    3
  136.  @baceniracun4494  Deindustrialized? How so?
    3
  137.  @jussim.konttinen4981  No, the comments are like that, TIK's channel is nothing like that. Neonazi comments are full of whataboutism, the same goes for neocommunist comments.
    2
  138.  @grandcanyon-pg2px  IJN and IJA had separate nuclear programs that went nowhere, because the IJN and IJA were more busy fighting each other politically, while the US had the Manhattan project that had a positive result in a relatively short time. The Germans were far from obtaining a single nuclear bomb even in 1942 at the height of their conquests.
    2
  139. Even if the Uprising would have been successful, later the Soviet Union would have used political subterfuge and political violence in order to eliminate the free Poles and impose the communist Lublin government, or other puppet government. Poland would have inevitably become communist, even if the Uprising would have been victorious.
    2
  140.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Quebec had nothing to do with the Nazi desire to dominate Europe.
    2
  141. Such imagery and propaganda could be used in Putin's Russia today, it will not be surprising at all.
    2
  142. The USSR already controlled half of continental Europe in 1940. But Nazi Germany was the bigger threat for Britain and had to be eliminated.
    2
  143. Even so, if Spain went to war against Britain the RAF would destroy Spanish cities. Spain was completely unprepared for a modern mechanized war. Spain would be dependent on receiving tanks and planes from Germany.
    2
  144. Is there an unbiased channel on YouTube?
    2
  145. But why did Germany invade Poland, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Yugoslavia, Greece, Luxembourg?
    2
  146. It is not a correct map. It is more like a mix of 1937 Europe and 1945 Europe.
    2
  147. But why did Germany invade neutral countries like Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Yugoslavia, Greece?
    2
  148. The Japanese army was already fighting in China. An attack on the USSR would have overstretched the Japanese army. The Navy however was very powerful and believed that it can win the war against the US Pacific Fleet.
    2
  149.  @Pootycat8359  Hungary was very expansionist. Hungary wanted to recover the territories of Slovakia, Transylvania and Northern Croatia, thus recreating Greater Hungary. Austria no longer had the means to be expansionist, after the destruction of the A-H Empire.
    2
  150. Putin showed his attitude towards war in Chechnya, Georgia and Syria. He has no scruples.
    2
  151. But Germany would not have lost if it had only the USSR as enemy. Germany would conquer eastern Europe and become a superpower. Eastern Europe would become the site of a far greater genocide.
    2
  152. Germany should not have made genocide and should have granted freedom to the people of the USSR who were against Stalin. In this way the USSR would have been defeated. Germany's war goal was to conquer eastern Europe all the way to the Ural Mountains and the Caucasus. Look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ural_Mountains_in_Nazi_planning
    2
  153.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  Exactly.
    2
  154. Not quite, Japan bombed the USA after an oil embargo on Japan started, and that oil embargo came after Japan invaded French Indochina. Thus if Japan did not invade China (1937) and French Indochina (1940) there would be no oil embargo and no bombing of Pearl Harbor later.
    2
  155.  @Noperare  Or perhaps Hitler became overconfident, and underestimated the impact of the US entry into the war.
    2
  156. How so? Stalin and his government would simply move to another city.
    2
  157.  @gerardmonsen1267  Do you have a source for your statement that Germany and the USSR agreed upon September 1 as the start of the invasion?
    2
  158.  @DominikKost  A confederation? That would have been easier said than done. The Ukrainians wanted independence, they fought for it both against the Soviets and the Poles after the first world war. The same goes for the Caucasus peoples, there the urge for independence was even bigger and Poland would have had a terrible time dealing with Chechens, Azeris, Armenians, Russians, Cossacks and so on.
    2
  159. But why did Germany invade neutral Greece, Yugoslavia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg?
    2
  160. Without going to war Germany would not obtain living space in eastern Europe, war was on Hitler's agenda.
    2
  161. The British people too wanted peace in 1938, not just Chamberlain.
    2
  162.  @czechpatriot2230  France alone didn't want to fight Germany in 1938 over Czechoslovakia, the French people too wanted peace.
    2
  163.  @-jammy4123  Marxism-Leninism preaches the idea of class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie.
    2
  164.  @-jammy4123  Eternal struggle or not, this "struggle" shows that both the Nazis and the Communists had toxic ideologies.
    2
  165. The Ford factory in Germany was no longer under American control.
    2
  166. ​ @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  The Ford factory in Germany was under complete German control after 1939. Synthetic oil production was small and expensive, it could not have been a catalyst for war.
    2
  167.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  You keep insisting that the Ford factory in Germany was not under German control after 1939. Why? What is your agenda?
    2
  168.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  I understand.
    2
  169.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  Yes, the Ford factory in Germany was under complete German control after 1939, according to the book you posted in your comment "According to evidence presented to the Committee, Ford-Werke A.G. was technically transformed in the late 1930s into a German company. All vehicles and their parts were produced in Germany, by German workers using German materials under German direction and exported to European and overseas territories of the United States and Great Britain. Any needed foreign raw materials, rubber and nonferrous metals, were obtained through the American Ford Company. American influence had been more or less converted into a supporting position (Hilfsstellung) for the German Ford plants. At the outbreak of the war Ford-Werke placed itself at the disposal of the Wehrmacht for armament production."
    2
  170.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  Yes, the Nazis treated Ford nicely, even so the Germans made sure to take full control of the Ford factory in Germany.
    2
  171. Check out TIK's video "The MAIN Reason Why Germany Lost WW2 - OIL", there he discusses why many of Hitler's generals were wrong and in fact they lost the war.
    2
  172. Maybe he didn't want to end the war until the SS would finish its genocidal program.
    2
  173.  @XRG9805  The British government allowed people from the third word to come to work in the UK. No one forced the government to do it.
    2
  174.  @XRG9805  I'm from Romania. Many Romanians work in the UK legally and some have become British citizens.
    2
  175.  @XRG9805  No one forces the British people to accept immigrants. Some of them want immigration , others don't want it. In any case the British people can decide to stop or continue the current policy about immigration.
    2
  176. Germany had to be stopped, see Generalplan Ost Germany's plan for ethnic cleansing and genocide in Europe.
    2
  177. TIK made a video about the Hossbach Memorandum https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N8nuPdV5Ow&t=1s
    2
  178. If the USSR was the real threat, why did Germany invade neutral Yugoslavia, Greece, entire Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium. These countries were neutral and independent and were no threat to Germany.
    2
  179. Exactly.
    2
  180. Germany was seen as a bigger threat by Britain and France. Also it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR, and fight Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    2
  181. Because Adolf was preparing for war, he needed a bigger and stronger army to deal with Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland and later with the USSR.
    2
  182. North Korean anti-American imagery is the same, even worse.
    2
  183. It wasn't alright, but it was better than what the Nazis planned for eastern Europe, see Generalplan Ost, a nightmare scenario.
    2
  184. Not all Slavs were communists, Slavs are white people. Why so much hate?
    2
  185.  @Nick-os3vz  What are they?
    2
  186.  @Nick-os3vz  But that book obviously is incorrect.
    2
  187. How so?
    2
  188.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Yes, you're right, I forgot about Twitter.
    2
  189. But why did Germany declare war on Poland?
    2
  190.  @nikitakuznetsov8446  They liberated Europe at first, but enslaved eastern Europe to communism after.
    2
  191. And in the end Germany ended up worse than in WW1. Versailles was a joke compared to the Potsdam Agreement.
    2
  192.  @occidentadvocate.9759  Stop lying.
    2
  193. By your logic the Germans too were unreasonable when they invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939. The Czechs did not want to be invaded by the nazis.
    2
  194. TIK made a video about why Hitler had to start the war https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGMjDQ-TJ8
    2
  195.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  That doesn't make any sense. Why would Britain plan to destroy its own empire?
    2
  196. Why are you upset?
    2
  197. If Hitler was a Christian then why did he condone genocide?
    2
  198. Yes but his revolution is racial, not communist.
    2
  199. North Korea today is the closest we get to the total spiritual belief in victory, much like nazi Germany. The same fanaticism.
    2
  200. Watch the video again and maybe you will understand why Britain didn't declare war on the USSR.
    2
  201. Seriously? What about the Mongol invasions, the Japanese civil wars in the 16th century, the Ottoman wars?
    2
  202. Well, at the very least they wanted a new world order.
    2
  203. Too many neonazis.
    2
  204. So, you're done! When are you gonna' bring them to Nuremberg? Do you know where they live?
    2
  205. Yes, but Hitler's Germany wasn't supposed to be just strong, but also to implement a gruesome racial agenda in Europe, thus Germany had to be stopped.
    2
  206. Why didn't Hitler respect the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Yugoslavia, Denmark, Norway since they were neutral and didn't want war?
    2
  207. What do you mean Hitler dropped the central bank? Nazi Germany had a central bank Deutsche Reichsbank.
    2
  208.  @command_unit7792  Yes, nazi collaborators had to be punished, but not those Soviet POWs who simply didn't want to return to the USSR.
    2
  209. So that people do not believe that TIK condones such ideas.
    2
  210. But Chamberlain declared war on Germany, not Churchill. Chamberlain fought Hitler in Norway and in France.
    2
  211. If Italy was not sanctioned and remained a friend of Britain and France, then perhaps a chain of events would start and Germany would make an alliance with the USSR.
    2
  212. So there are still people who believe that it was Churchill who declared war on Germany on September 3rd 1939.
    2
  213. In order to annex the Sudetenland with its 3 million Germans, but actually he wanted to occupy entire Czechoslovakia and obtain a better strategic position in central Europe.
    2
  214. But without WW1there would have been no independence for Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Yugoslavia, Hungary.
    2
  215. LOL Sudeten Germans were in Czechoslovakia, not Poland. And the Sudeten German militias were the ones attacking Czechoslovak police.
    2
  216. Germany's lack of oil made the war against the USSR inevitable. Hitler wanted Germany to become an autarky.
    2
  217. The problem with former socialist/communist countries is that they spent to much money on weapons, and in USSR's case it spent too much on nuclear armament and submarines. That diverted too much money from health and education to defense spending. Thus the problems with healthcare could not be solved.
    2
  218. The Japanese army was already fighting in China. An attack on the USSR would have overstretched the Japanese army. The Navy however was very powerful and believed that it can win the war against the US Pacific Fleet.
    2
  219. The flag of Manchukuo.
    2
  220.  @walt1999walt  The Turks were allied to imperial Germany in WW1. Nazi Germany was a very different animal.
    2
  221.  @ajsimo2677  Yes, Turkey was no longer the empire that dominated the Balkans and the Middle East. Even so, Turkey would have opposed a Nazi invasion by any means necessary.
    2
  222.  @gtownboi3877  Everyone needs to read more.
    2
  223. Many people believe Hitler was a British agent.
    2
  224. Who told Hitler that the Jews are freemasons?
    2
  225. Libyan oil was not discovered yet in those years, Romanian oil was insufficient.
    2
  226. No, no , no, you are wrong, it was impossible for Britain to declare war on the Soviet Union in 1945, Britain was at the end of its war effort, it was in a financial crisis, Britain would have been defeated.
    2
  227.  @unnamed776-m9h  Maybe that group is only in your brain. You are searching for scapegoats, like the nazis did.
    2
  228. Not quite. Biden is helping Ukraine against the Russian invaders.
    2
  229.  @uncleanon6445  Was Germany pleading for peace when it invaded Czechoslovakia, Poland, Norway, Denmark, Greece, Yugoslavia, Belgium, the Netherlands and conquered a big part of the USSR?
    2
  230.  @uncleanon6445  Who beat the shit out of Germany? Did Denmark do it? Or maybe Greece, Belgium,Yugoslavia, the Netherlands? Why did Germany invade them? My friend, your data is distorted.
    2
  231.  @uncleanon6445  The USA didn't just nuke 2 cities, the USA firebombed many cities, killing tens of thousands of civilians. The Reich also bombed civilians in Poland, the Netherlands, France, Yugoslavia, Greece, the Soviet Union. There were no good guys in this war, but some were less bad than others.
    2
  232.  @uncleanon6445  The Reich bombed Warsaw, Belgrade, Rotterdam, London, Leningrad, Odessa, Kiev and many more cities, killing civilians indiscriminately and you call these accidents? Seriously?
    2
  233.  @uncleanon6445  Today the Holodomor is known and studied. As for the official narrative of WW2 nothing will change, regular people just don't care anymore.
    2
  234.  @uncleanon6445  The Reich didn't save anyone, the Reich invaded neutral countries that wanted nothing to do with Germany, bombed civilians indiscriminately and did ethnic cleansing. In the end it was the Allies that saved western Europe from a potential Soviet "liberation", but already eastern Europe came under Soviet occupation.
    2
  235. Bringing German speaking nations under a single control is fine, but what about the German invasion on Czechoslovakia in March 1939? The Czechs are not Germans, they did not want to be under German control.
    2
  236. The Soviet-German non-aggression pact included secret protocols about the invasion of Poland, the Baltic States, Finland and Romania, thus it was much more than a non-aggression pact, it was more like an alliance.
    2
  237. Germany had no right to become a Super Power under the Nazi vicious regime. The Nazis had to be stopped, they wanted European domination, not just economic power.
    2
  238. The Soviet attack on the Romanian refineries in 1941 did little damage. The main attacks on the Romanian refineries came in 1943 and 1944 and it was done by the US Air Force, it was these attacks that made the biggest damage.
    2
  239. No, no no, Japan started WW2 by invading China in 1937.
    2
  240.  @Francois15031967  By your logic it was the USSR and Germany that started WW2, because they signed the Soviet-German pact in August 1939 in which they split eastern Europe between them.
    2
  241.  @Francois15031967  Wrong. It was a non-aggression pact that included secret protocols that allowed Germany and the USSR to invade Poland, Finland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania.
    2
  242.  @DODO-vy6sf  And yet the Germans tried, see Operation Sea Lion.
    2
  243. Wars are not started by referendum.
    2
  244.  @benh5366  Yes, it was, Nazi Germany was much worse than the British Empire.
    2
  245. The German economy could have been saved if the Nazis were eliminated from power and the army kept in a tight leash with a drastically reduced budget and size.
    2
  246. Seriously? What about Generalplan Ost?
    2
  247.  @cyberhermit1222  It's not just about racism it is also about Hitler's racist agenda, his plans for other nations.
    2
  248. Because the Norwegian port of Narvik was the closest to the Swedish mines. It was faster and cheaper to use Narvik.
    2
  249. Blind to what?
    2
  250. It all depended on the will of the French and British peoples, they wanted peace in 1935. Thus even if the British and French governments would oppose Mussolini over Ethiopia, those government would still have to win the support of the people.
    2
  251. No. The Allies would not wait for Germany and Japan to attack in 1942. The Allies too would become stronger, the Soviets would mobilize more troops, more tanks, more planes. The US too would be more prepared for dealing with Japan in 1942.
    2
  252.  @garycombs5721  Moscow was a huge city. Taking it would have required months of fighting, street by street. Victory was not guaranteed for the Germans.
    2
  253. No, Britain could not, the Baltic Sea was blocked by the German Navy, it would have been a massacre for the British Navy, a complete disaster. Also Denmark was neutral and would not allow passage to the British Navy.
    2
  254. But the Germans didn't fight against the bankers, they had their plans for Eastern Europe, genocide, European domination, all that had nothing to do with fighting the banks.
    2
  255.  @thomasjamison2050  What the bankers wanted had nothing to do with the genocide the Nazis did in Europe, with Nazi plans for European domination.
    2
  256.  @thomasjamison2050  What parameters of war are you talking about that generated the need for genocide?
    2
  257. Seriously? Did Hitler talk to them?
    2
  258. If England truly wanted Germany to fight the USSR then it made no sense for England to declare war on Germany and get herself involved in the war and later bomb Germany and fight in North Africa and the Atlantic.
    2
  259. Well, Germany today is stronger than ever, so Churchill failed.
    2
  260. Very difficult.The French and British people were opposed to war in 1938, even in 1939. Even so, when the Rheinland was re-militarized the German army was ready to make a fighting retreat if the French mobilized, perhaps the same would have happened when Germany annexed Austria.
    2
  261. Even if the EU would create its own army that army would not be a threat to Britain, it makes no sense to be a threat to Britain.
    2
  262. But life is also about cooperation, love, mercy.
    2
  263. The governments.
    2
  264.  @anderstopansson  No, Germany hated the USA.
    2
  265.  @anderstopansson  Because they had a common enemy, the Axis.
    2
  266.  @anderstopansson  Because the Axis wanted to occupy entire independent countries and establish a new world order.
    2
  267. If Stalingrad was ignored the Soviets could have used Stalingrad as a bridgehead to launch counterattacks.
    2
  268. Why do you insult him? Do you know better than him?
    2
  269.  @HolyLegion12  Stalin went West only after some 30 million Soviet soldiers and civilians were sacrificed in the war. There was a price the USSR payed for going West, the price of victory.
    2
  270.  @HolyLegion12  Germany was the bigger threat because she had a racial agenda for Europe (Generalplan Ost).
    2
  271. No, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klara_Hitler
    2
  272. You doubt that Germany would have attacked France and the UK if it wasn't for their declaration of war, but the French and British leaders at the time could not trust Hitler, thus they could not let the Nazis dominate central and eastern Europe. No one knew how far Hitler's ambitions would go.
    2
  273. No, Russia/the USSR invaded Poland two weeks later. Britain and France were already at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR too, Britain would have lost the war. Also, why did Germany invade neutral countries like Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, Greece?
    2
  274.  @user-qe3qs9bv2r  No, I did not forget Austria. Austria is Germany.
    2
  275.  @kevingates503 No, ordinary Romanians were not, but the Iron Guard was.
    2
  276.  @tophernolastname2378  Japan wasn't forced to align with Germany because of the oil embargo, the embargo came all the way in 1941 after Japan invaded French Indochina. Thus, if Japan did not invade China and French Indochina there would not be an oil embargo. Asians did not want a Japanese Empire to rule them. Japan aligned itself with Germany because they were afraid that Japan would be dominated by the USSR or the USA, Japan wanted a bigger empire.
    2
  277. The USSR invaded Poland two weeks later (17 September) by that time Britain was already at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for Britain to declare war on the USSR too, Britain would have lost the war.
    2
  278. The British Empire's days were numbered even if Britain remained neutral, nationalist movements in Africa and India were growing even before 1939, there was no way for Britain to keep control of its empire.
    2
  279.  @jackalexander8021  My point is that Britain had nothing to gain if Germany became a superpower. Germany would dominate continental Europe (and make some genocides), while Britain would remain with her crumbling empire. There was no way for Britain to keep alive her empire even allied with the nazis.
    2
  280. But Hitler knew that Britain and France have guaranteed to help Poland if it was attacked by Germany.
    2
  281.  @laresial  Oh come on. Seriously? Hitler knew about German and French guarantees to Poland but he invaded anyway, he started WW2.
    2
  282.  @laresial  Yes, he didn't believe them, his big mistake, he invaded, he started WW2.
    2
  283.  @laresial  Until the USA got involved there was no true world war, it was mainly a European war.
    2
  284.  @vladimirpecherskiy1910  Maybe the Soviets would have been more nervous having the US Army in the middle of Europe, at the border with communist Hungary and Yugoslavia (Austria's neighbors). In our timeline Austria was neutral, thus the Soviets felt less threatened.
    2
  285. What about the genocide? What about Lebensraum?
    2
  286. But Chamberlain declared war on Germany, not Churchill, Chamberlain fought Hitler in Norway and France.
    2
  287. Because the Japanese army was stuck in China, only the Navy was free to attack. Also the Soviet Siberian divisions were better equipped than the Japanese Kwantung army. Also there were no oil fields for Japan to use in Siberia yet. Oil fields were discovered in Siberia the 1950s and 1960s.
    2
  288. It would have been suicide for Britain and France to fight against Germany and the USSR at the same time. Germany was seen as the greater threat for Britain and France.
    2
  289. Not quite, Hitler took advantage of the reforms made by Weimar Germany. He did not make any economic miracles. On the contrary, his quest for the expansion of the armed forces and economic autarky lead to an economic crisis that could be alleviated only by starting a war and capturing other countries' resources, otherwise the nazi economy would have collapsed in the 1940s.
    2
  290. How do you know that Hitler died in Spain?
    2
  291. To destroy the Nazis and the Japanese militarists.
    2
  292.  @Mrstrangert392  History enthusiasts is not enough, the general population must know too.
    2
  293.  @gumdeo  Yes. Even so, it was a violation of the personal lives of the citizens, it was an abuse.
    2
  294.  @pierren___  Romanians almost disappeared? When? How?
    2
  295. The British Empire was already beginning to collapse even before WW2, the Indians, Arabs and the Africans started nationalist movements and demanded independence. So Britain did not sacrifice its empire.
    1
  296.  @Geotonrike  Giving up imperialism was inevitable, even without the US demanding it to the UK.
    1
  297. He was getting old and sick by 1939.
    1
  298. Germany continued to do business, despite that boycott which itself wasn't very efficient. That boycott was an answer to the German harsh attitude to the Jewish shops.
    1
  299.  @BleedingSnow  Germany bought oil from Romania, so much for a boycott.
    1
  300.  @BleedingSnow  Germany had an oil crisis because its army was dependent on oil now more than ever, Germany was expanding its army in the 1930s, made many tanks, warplanes, more warships, they all needed a lot of fuel, hence the German oil crisis. Even so, despite of the so called boycott Germany received oil from Romania and from the USSR. The boycott itself was almost useless from the start.
    1
  301.  @BleedingSnow  Then it would have been much wiser for Germany not to expand its army and not become antisemitic, there would have been no oil crisis.
    1
  302.  @BleedingSnow  Look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1933_anti-Nazi_boycott The boycott began only after the Germans became violent against Jews.
    1
  303. Because Franz Halder modified the plans for Barbarossa and made Moscow the first target, not the Caucasus.
    1
  304. Japan could not attack the USSR, the Japanese army was fighting in China, and the Red Army in Siberia had better weapons, especially tanks, thus the Japanese army would stand no chance against the superior Red Army. Also the distances involved and the logistics favored the defenders.
    1
  305.  @howardmctroy3303  The Battles of Khalkhin Gol (1939) showed that the Japanese army is no match for the Red Army. After Barbarossa began the Soviet weapons factories were moved beyond the Ural mountains, and they produced more and more weapons, tanks, planes. There were few Japanese weapons factories in Manchuria, therefore the Siberian Red army would still be armed to fight, while the Japanese army would still depend on weapons received from Japan Even in a two front war the Red Army would win against the inferior Japanese army.
    1
  306.  @grandcanyon-pg2px  The only thing in Imperial Japan that was superior to the Red Army was the Navy. The Japanese army however was inferior to the Red Army. The Soviets had far superior tanks, artillery, trucks, logistics and more troops.
    1
  307.  @grandcanyon-pg2px  The Soviet Union had one of the best aviation institutes in the world TsAGI, it had far superior tank development, and it had the biggest industries in the world. In 1939 the Soviet Union had the biggest air force in the world and the most numerous tanks.
    1
  308.  @grandcanyon-pg2px  You cannot have industrial power without superior minds, the USSR too had many scientists and did much scientific research.
    1
  309.  @grandcanyon-pg2px  Yes, they suffered way more casualties because in 1941-1942 they used wrong tactics. It took them some time to adapt. The Japanese too used wrong tactics against the US and that cost them way more casualties.
    1
  310. What is so hard to understand? The Allies were already at war with Germany when the Soviets invaded Poland (17 September). Germany was seen as the bigger threat that had to be defeated. It would have been suicide for the Allies to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time, the Allies would have lost the war.
    1
  311. Where did you learn that the Germans were banned in Czechoslovakia and that the Czechs stole German properties?
    1
  312.  @kissmyassbest  It was impossible to allow 3 million Germans to remain in Czechoslovakia after 1945. The Czechs would have been in serious trouble if they did that, they needed to have a country just for them, without Germans.
    1
  313. Oh come on! "all of judea declare war on germany" is not a reason for genocide, ethnic cleansing and a gruesome war. The Nazi madness had to be destroyed.
    1
  314.  @rekerboi1125  Even if the western Allies would have reached Warsaw, half of Poland was already under Soviet control, Poland would have been split in two, just like Korea.
    1
  315. Marriage is often the result of love. Why would they be mad at you?
    1
  316. Seriously? What does that have to do with the war against the Axis?
    1
  317. He was a Christian in name only. He condoned genocide and a totalitarian regime.
    1
  318.  @flyboyben8384  They supported him because they truly believed in him. The Pope could have excommunicated him at any time, it would have made no difference, the people would still follow him.
    1
  319. What about the German plans for Eastern Europe? They go far beyond defending Germans in Poland... What about the racial agenda? Clearly he wanted war, he wanted domination of Europe.
    1
  320. Who told you he died in 1962?
    1
  321. In 1938 Germany was not ready to attack the USSR, also Poland was in the way.
    1
  322. But what would have happened to Poland, Belarus, Ukraine if Germany was allowed to gain living space in eastern Europe?
    1
  323. Only God knows what that means.
    1
  324. Maybe yes, maybe no.
    1
  325. Eisenhower warned about the military industrial complex, not Roosevelt. Roosevelt died before the war ended.
    1
  326. YouTube automatically censors antisemitic, racist comments and comments that contain certain combinations of words.
    1
  327.  @sirtalkalot3211  Watch the video. TIK explains why.
    1
  328.  @Samuel070793  Where do the Jesuits live? Do they have names, an address?
    1
  329. Russian propaganda is about some secret biolabs in Ukraine.
    1
  330. Wrong. Germany today has the strongest economy in Europe and a high standard of living compared to the rest of Europe.
    1
  331. Why should he study it? What is so important?
    1
  332. Yes.
    1
  333. Seriously?
    1
  334. Because people need to believe something.
    1
  335.  @MWcrazyhorse  Britain could not just stand and do nothing while Germany enslaved Europe.
    1
  336.  @MWcrazyhorse  I didn't say communism is freedom, I said that Britain had to stop Germany from enslaving Europe.
    1
  337.  @MWcrazyhorse  That was the Nazi agenda, to enslave. You know it too.
    1
  338.  @MWcrazyhorse  This has nothing to do with MK Ultra. Do you have better sources?
    1
  339.  @MWcrazyhorse  The EU is not the 4th Reich, never will be.
    1
  340.  @MWcrazyhorse  We shall see if you are right...
    1
  341.  @MWcrazyhorse  If Germany tried to save Europe from communism then why did Germany invade Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Greece, Holland, Belgium, Denmark?
    1
  342.  @MWcrazyhorse  Seriously? The Serbs were not communists in 1941, Greece was neutral but was invaded by Italy in 1940 then by Germany, Belgium was neutral in 1940, Holland was also neutral in 1940 but was invaded by Germany. Neither one of these countries wanted war with Germany.
    1
  343. American economy was already recovering albeit slowly after 1935, thus it didn't necessarily need a war to grow. Yes, the war dramatically accelerated the economic growth, but there is no clear evidence to suggest that Roosevelt wanted a war to strengthen US economy.
    1
  344. Technically WW2 started on September 1, the USSR invaded Poland on September 17, two weeks after the war started. But the USSR can be an instigator of war because she and Germany had a secret pact to invade Poland and other countries.
    1
  345.  @fallingfallingfallingfalli500  Yes, it looks like that, but in actuality there was no way for France and Britain to fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time, Britain and France would lose the war. A German-Soviet alliance was too powerful.
    1
  346. A united Europe under a conservative government that encouraged genocide? Why?
    1
  347. Because France and Britain were already at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR too, Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  348.  @stinkypete891  BINGO? No, bullshit.
    1
  349. Where did you learn that Poland wanted a big part of the USSR?
    1
  350. More likely he was leveraging his assets to get the best possible outcome for his regime, not for Germany. In the end Germany lost much more than in 1919, the Potsdam Agreement was much worse than the Treaty of Versailles.
    1
  351.  @rafa1z1  I understand.
    1
  352.  @anonymous-rb2sr  If you don't like this channel, just leave, you don't have to insult TIK, just leave.
    1
  353. Where did you learn that? Give us your sources.
    1
  354. The British Empire's days were numbered even without FDR involving the USA in the war, more and more nations in the empire were demanding independence, freedom, and Britain alone would not be capable of keeping control for a long time.
    1
  355. And? Where are they? Why are they not stopped? What is your point?
    1
  356. They did advance into German territory, few kilometers to the river Rhine, but nothing massive, they didn't have the will to invade en masse and go all the way to Berlin.
    1
  357. Because Germany was seen as a bigger threat for France and Britain. Besides, it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR too and fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    1
  358. How did the the CIA support Pol Pot's revolution? What did the CIA do?
    1
  359. How do you know?
    1
  360.  @jerbaancap5244  I understand. And for those who try to enslave us, Jesus Christ will stop them.
    1
  361. But why did Hitler invade neutral Yugoslavia, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway?
    1
  362. How so?
    1
  363. Ridiculous nonsense that only creates racial hatred.
    1
  364.  Minister of Propaganda  And North Korea.
    1
  365. Propaganda, such as thousands of ethnic Germans being murdered by Poland or Czechoslovakia before 1939.
    1
  366. Because the British and the French didn't want to let the Nazis dominate Europe.
    1
  367. Because until December 7, 1941 the USA was neutral and the people were not interested in getting into another big war.
    1
  368. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9mbSBkubzg
    1
  369. Coward? Why? He introduced rearmament in Britain, he declared war on Germany in 1939, he opposed Hitler in Norway in 1940 even if Britain was defeated there.
    1
  370. There was nothing to negotiate with nazi Germany. The failure of appeasement was a clear signal.
    1
  371. Where did you learn that Poles were killing Germans? Also why did Hitler invade and occupy Czechoslovakia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia,Greece?
    1
  372.  @LordComaLordComa  Where did you learn that Poles were slaughtering Germans around Danzig?
    1
  373.  @Pootycat8359  There was no dispute between Hungary and Poland, the dispute was between Hungary, Slovakia and Romania, which led to the First Vienna Award in 1938 and then to the Second Vienna Award in 1940.
    1
  374.  @sosogo4real  What is Putin winning? A ruined Ukraine? The Russian army is stuck in eastern Ukraine.
    1
  375. 5000? How do you know it was 5000? That number seems fake.
    1
  376.  @kms_scharnhorst  It is still debatable if Halder war right to go for Moscow in 1941.
    1
  377.  @kms_scharnhorst  Not just taking the oil fields, but also bringing the oil to Germany or Romania to be refined, and that would be difficult considering the distances involved and the war.
    1
  378.  @kms_scharnhorst  I agree.
    1
  379. Yes, look here https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2002/exploring-what-behind-rare-phenomenon-jewish-anti-semites
    1
  380. Because France and Britain already declared war on Germany, she was seen as the bigger threat, also it would have been suicide for Britain and France to fight Germany and the USSR at the same time, Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  381.  @jason5065  What is your point? That Germany was good while Britain was bad for not saving Poland?
    1
  382.  @jason5065  Yes, Nazi Germany had to be destroyed, the Nazis were very dangerous. Unfortunately Poland and Eastern Europe could not be saved in the end from Soviet occupation and communism, but at least the Nazis were eliminated.
    1
  383. That is not a valid reason to invade Poland, destroy half the country and kill millions.
    1
  384.  @Made_In_Heavenn  Again, that is not a valid reason to invade and destroy half the country and kill millions.
    1
  385.  @Made_In_Heavenn  Oh come on! Versailles didn't destroy Germany. Germany barely lost 15% of her territory, had to pay reparations and had a much smaller army.
    1
  386. Britain is cooked and Europe remains under the nazi boot for a very long time.
    1
  387. Yes, if Britain and France attacked Germany , occupied Berlin and captured Hitler then the war would have been over very fast.
    1
  388. He wasn't a coward, he understood that the British people didn't want war and Britain was not ready for war, he needed more time for rearmament.
    1
  389.  @evilmurlock  I know that Czechoslovakia was ready for war, the problem is that the British people were not ready nor willing to fight for Czechoslovakia in 1938.
    1
  390.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  It makes no sense for the EU to become a threat to the UK, no matter how long the EU would last.
    1
  391. No, Norwegian oil was undiscovered yet.
    1
  392.  @oghazal  Swedish iron ore was transported to Germany through Norwegian ports, Britain wanted to block those ports, that's why Germany fought for Norway.
    1
  393. Germany took loans from he USA.
    1
  394.  @SmotritelMayaka29  You are right. But they don't care if they look stupid, they are stubborn.
    1
  395. Revisionist? How so?
    1
  396. How do you know?
    1
  397. Because we are sinful. We are guided by lust and greed.
    1
  398.  @user-xd4rs6vr4n  And we are guided by it, we do not separate from it.
    1
  399. But why did Germany invade neutral countries like The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Greece, Yugoslavia?
    1
  400.  @nnass262  So what? These countries were still neutral.
    1
  401.  @nnass262  Yugoslavia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Greece weren't under Allied protection.
    1
  402.  @nnass262  Wrong. Greece, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Yugoslavia were never a threat to Germany.
    1
  403.  @nnass262  Greece was fascist before Italy invaded it. Greece was not a threat to Germany. Belgium was too small to pose any threat to Germany.
    1
  404. No. The Weimar Republic was doing fine until the Great Depression began in 1929. Hitler came to power in 1933, and he benefited from the reforms made during Weimar.
    1
  405. France was in a continuous political crisis in the 1930s and was unwilling to do much to stop Hitler.
    1
  406.  @TheImperatorKnight  Could the prime minister go against the will of the people in 1938 and declare war on Germany? Didn't he need the backing of the Parliament?
    1
  407.  @F22onblockland  I understand what you say, in hindsight you could be right, but the fact remains that we have no way of knowing that the coup would have succeeded. In any case Chamberlain needed the support of the Parliament and the British people to stand against Hitler, and in 1938 they wanted peace by any means.
    1
  408. TIK made a video about why Hitler had to start the war https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGMjDQ-TJ8
    1
  409.  @-jammy4123  Yes, they had a genocidal way of implementing it. But the communists too did the same kind of genocidal struggle in communist China, North Korea, Cambodia, the Holodomor in Ukraine.
    1
  410. Germany was the bigger threat because she had a racial agenda (ethnic cleansing, genocide) for Europe and wanted European domination.
    1
  411. War with the USA was inevitable for Germany, even if he didn't declare war on the USA. The Kriegsmarine was insisting on attacking American ships going to Britain and attacks already occurred, thus casus belli already existed.
    1
  412. The Jews needed a country of their own.
    1
  413. Were the Germans even capable of reaching the Caucasus in 1941? The German supply lines and logistics would be so overstretched that it would be impossible to take the oil fields in one campaign.
    1
  414.  @rajaali1063  Maybe the Germans would have managed to take the oil fields eventually, but then they would have a big problem because they would need to waste precious time transporting the oil all the way to Romania to be refined, or to rebuild the destroyed Soviet refineries in the Caucasus area. Either way, it would take some time until oil production from the Caucasus would benefit the Germans. Meanwhile the Soviets would launch counterattacks in order to retake the oil fields.
    1
  415. Maybe because those socialists were against racist policies enacted by the Nazis.
    1
  416.  @Lennon6412  TIK made a video about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCkyWBPaTC8
    1
  417. But why did Hitler invade neutral countries Yugoslavia, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway?
    1
  418. The UK was already at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for Britain to declare war on the USSR too, Britain would have been defeated. For Britain Germany was the bigger threat that had to be defeated.
    1
  419.  @X50505  Germany posed a threat to freedom and democracy, thus she had to be stopped, defeated. A Nazi dominated Europe was a nightmare.
    1
  420.  @survivalbert7017  Since after Munich 1938 Hitler had no more territorial desires, as he claimed, then why invade Poland? Why destroy Warsaw? Why destroy half the country? Why invade the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939?
    1
  421.  @survivalbert7017  What were the other reasons Hitler invaded Poland and destroyed half the country, not to mention the killing of millions of civilians?
    1
  422. So what? Can they be stopped? Arrested? Put on trial?
    1
  423. The same thing can be said about nazi Germany, the main focus was the German people while the rest of European nations would become slaves or be exterminated.
    1
  424. So Hitler wanted war even without a "Gleiwitz incident". War was on Hitlers agenda from the very beginning of his political life.
    1
  425.  @freckleheckler6311  Hitlerwanted much more than to recover lost German territories. He wanted European domination and had a racial agenda.
    1
  426. Hitler's peace overtures were ignored because Hitler could not be trusted anymore after he invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland and had made a pact with the Soviets (1939 Soviet-German pact), and wanted domination of continental Europe.
    1
  427. Tartarian buildings? What are you talking about?
    1
  428. It was gone because Germany was preparing for war, the "tranny ideology" did not help in the buildup for war.
    1
  429. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGMjDQ-TJ8&t=1s
    1
  430. It's complicated. A peace treaty in western Europe in 1940 would alarm Stalin, perhaps the USSR would attack first before the Germans could move troops on the Soviet border.
    1
  431. The Londoners made a Pakistani the mayor of London in a fair election. What is your point?
    1
  432.  @XRG9805  No one forced the government to give them citizenship. It happened legally.
    1
  433.  @XRG9805  If Romania becomes rich it will inevitably attract people from the Third World to work and live here. If they work legally and are peaceful they can stay, if not then they will have to leave immediately.
    1
  434. The British Empire's days were numbered even before 1939. But a Nazi German Empire dominating Europe would not be a good thing for anyone (except the Nazis), such an empire would last for a long time after the British Empire would collapse and Europe would be traumatized.
    1
  435.  @bobbest1611  Nationalism was on the rise in the Empire, every nation in Africa, India wanted independence, revolutions were inevitable. That is why the Empire's days were numbered.
    1
  436.  @bobbest1611  The breakup of such a huge empire was inevitable, the British army would not be able to keep control for a long time in the face of increasing nationalist movements. The British were not invincible either in Africa or in India.
    1
  437. An ally, not a vassal. Britain is still independent in its foreign policy.
    1
  438. If the Allies would have bombed only the oil refineries, that would have been enough to cripple the German war machine, without any need to bomb civilian centers. But if the Allies did not bomb civilian centers, the German civilians would not have learned some valuable lessons, that war is horrible and that the Nazi regime must be destroyed.
    1
  439. Why would anyone declare war on you? It makes no sense.
    1
  440. No. NATO expansion is not similar. Also NATO expansion did not happen only under Biden, it happened during Clinton and Bush jr too.
    1
  441. It is about the neonazi unproven idea that Poland was murdering thousands of ethnic Germans before 1939. Thus Germany had to "save" them.
    1
  442. Germany took loans from the USA but Hitler refused to pay them back.
    1
  443.  @cayetanosoler3432  The economy was crashing because Germany was heavily rearming, preparing for war, stockpiling ammunition, expanding the army, recruiting more men, stockpiling raw materials, while no one would give any more loans to Germany. Germany was all in for war while trade with other countries was reduced drastically. Just like North Korea today.
    1
  444.  @cayetanosoler3432  Germany also took loans from the USA, not just from German banks and people.
    1
  445.  @cayetanosoler3432  Yes, Germany was in an economic crisis because she was preparing for war, while reducing trade with other countries. Germany became more and more like North Korea.
    1
  446. Nothing is wrong with a mono-ethnic state. Japan, South and North Korea, Israel, Albania, Slovenia are almost mono-ethnic states. There is problem only when a mono-ethnic state becomes xenophobic, racist.
    1
  447.  @galactichitchhiker_  Afghanistan was under communist occupation from 1978 to 1992.
    1
  448. A broken people? How so? Isn't Germany today the strongest in Europe?
    1
  449. Does the Bible confirm your theory?
    1
  450. A billion.
    1
  451. R stands for rape.
    1
  452. He is not a Jew, he said it in a comment to a previous video.
    1
  453. Sure, horrible consequences, like Western Europe becoming very powerful economically, the USA becoming a superpower, African decolonization and more rights for women. Truly horrible. LOL!!!
    1
  454. The Soviet-German pact of 1939 allowed Hitler to go east, Poland was split between Germany and the USSR and they had a common border.
    1
  455. The Soviet Union invaded Poland two weeks after Germany invaded. Germany was seen as a greater threat to Britain thus Britain did not want to fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time, it would have been suicide.
    1
  456. The answer is no, because the British army was not fully ready for war in 1939.
    1
  457.  @silvesteraben7946  Britain had no logical reasons to ignite a war between Germany and Poland.
    1
  458.  @silvesteraben7946  Churchill did whatever was needed to keep the British Empire alive, even if that meant the destruction of Germany. Churchill made the mistake of believing that the Empire would survive this war unharmed.
    1
  459.  @silvesteraben7946  Churchill didn't want to destroy the empire. Its destruction was the result of the long war. As for Germany's proposals, they could not be trusted due to Hitler's actions after Munich 1938 (the occupation of Czechoslovakia, Memel territory and the Nazi-Soviet pact).
    1
  460.  @silvesteraben7946  It was not just about Munich 1938, Britain lost trust in Hitler after Germany occupied entire Czechoslovakia in March 1939 and made a pact with the USSR in August 1939.
    1
  461. But why did Germany invade neutral Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium?
    1
  462. The depression in the USA ended before ww2, already in 1936 the US economy was going well.
    1
  463. @Elgen Boden Oh, so if France and Britain had empires that meant Germany had the right to conquer and control half of Europe?
    1
  464.  @Nick-os3vz  Where did you learn this?
    1
  465.  @Nick-os3vz  How do you know it is correct?
    1
  466. Yes, it is a dignity revolution, because Yanukovich was Russia's vassal, he had to be removed from power.
    1
  467. Yes, the USSR needed Caucasian oil even if the USA gave oil to the USSR through Lend-Lease.The Red Army had huge mechanized units on the ground and in the air, thus it needed a lot of fuel. US war aid came through the ports of Vladivostok, Arkhangelsk, Murmansk and through Iran.
    1
  468. Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria were not opposed to liberalism, even though they were part of the Axis, they were opposed to communism. Japan and Nazi Germany were opposed to liberalism due to their totalitarian racist governments.
    1
  469.  @occidentadvocate.9759  Yes, communist China and communist North Korea still exist.
    1
  470. There is no evidence that the Munich Conference was a trick. Hitler could not invade the USSR as long as Poland was in the way.
    1
  471. Capitalism
    1
  472. And European domination.
    1
  473. Are you sure?
    1
  474.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Yes, because Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1991. Obviously Jussi .
    1
  475. No, the USSR invaded Poland two weeks later. Britain and France already declared war on Germany, it would have been suicide for them to declare war on the USSR too. Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  476. What are the lies?
    1
  477. Seriously? Let's say that Germany didn't start the war, no invasion, nothing. Are you saying that the USSR would still be capable of conquering entire western Europe?
    1
  478. Because German troops were already inside Poland, German planes were already bombing Polish cities, the German people were ready for war, it was too late to turn back.
    1
  479.  @32523Bwahahaha  A day after was too late, Polish citizens were dying, cities were attacked, there was no way to turn back.
    1
  480.  @32523Bwahahaha  Too late for the Nazis, they wanted war, they pushed for war, the people were ready for war, the army was ready for war they could no longer turn back.
    1
  481. The Soviet Union invaded Poland two weeks later. Already Britain and France were at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for them to declare war against the USSR. Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  482. Because Germany was the bigger threat to Britain, also it would have been suicide for Britain to fight against Germany and the USSR at the same time, Britain would have been defeated.
    1
  483. How so?
    1
  484. Sadly conspiracy theories about Jews will not allow such imagery to disappear.
    1
  485. Who told you that it was not a myth?
    1
  486. Yugoslavia would disagree, ethnic cleansing destroyed it.
    1
  487. But why did Hitler invade neutral Yugoslavia, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway?
    1
  488. Was that important?
    1
  489. What are you talking about? Germany today is the most prosperous country in Europe, the driving force in the EU.
    1
  490. The Ukrainians want to fight, they do not want Russian occupation.
    1
  491. How so? Maybe Hitler didn't make himself clear enough?
    1
  492. That is not a valid reason for genocide and total war.
    1
  493. No, the Nazis hated the USA.
    1
  494. No. Trump is not a racist.
    1
  495. Britain won the freedom of Europe from nazi oppression and genocide.
    1
  496. By 1937 the depression ended, the US economy was slowly growing without the need for a war.
    1
  497. It wasn't just about learning Russian or German, the Nazis had a racial agenda for eastern Europe, a gruesome racial agenda. That made Germany far worse than the USSR.
    1
  498. Conquering the British Isles would have been a very difficult job for Germany. They would have to eliminate the Royal Navy, the RAF, to fight for every town, every village and millions of Germans would die and be wounded in battle. Meanwhile the USSR would not wait, the Red Army would prepare for war.
    1
  499. Obviously the Allies had enough of Hitler's shenanigans and decided to act.
    1
  500. What is your point? That Hitler was a peace loving person that never wanted war? And what about "Judea declaring war on Germany in 1933", that is not an excuse for genocide.
    1
  501.  @artoriapendragon6141  Seriously? America funded the Holodomor? Where did you get that idea? Today the Holodomor is known and studied.
    1
  502. But Ukraine doesn't want to be part of Russia, and Poland doesn't want to be part of Germany.
    1
  503. When?
    1
  504. Look on the bright side, the Nazis were defeated, the genocide in Europe was stopped.
    1
  505. The German government took loans from the USA and from the German people.
    1
  506. Hussein and Gaddafi had to go because they were vicious dictators.
    1
  507. What are you talking about?
    1
  508. Bhutan.
    1
  509. Because if Germany won in Europe then the USA would have been the next target. Hitler hated the USA. Look on the bright side, during and after the war the USA became a military superpower.
    1
  510.  @maxmusterman9262  Why not? There were many jews in America.
    1
  511. A Christian priest on his wedding? Why? He wanted to eradicate Christianity.
    1
  512. Germany invaded independent countries and initiated mass genocide, there is no comparison between what Britain and Germany did. Obviously the Nazis had to be destroyed no matter the cost.
    1
  513.  @msc8090  Yes there were other invasions, but not like the ones the Nazis did with the precise purpose of making ethnic cleansing.
    1
  514.  @msc8090  Germany's best interest was not to start a world war by invading independent countries, or to try to achieve European domination by antagonizing the great powers of the day. Thus what the Nazis did wasn't in Germany's best interest, it was all a nightmarish illusion that was transformed into a horrific reality.
    1
  515.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Millions of Germans died during the war or were deported after the war from Poland, East Prussia, Silesia, Pomerania. That is not irrelevant at all.
    1
  516.  @msc8090  Yes, they started the war to win it and then to make some genocide, see Generalplan Ost.
    1
  517. But what about the Gleiwitz incident?
    1
  518. There was no country named Judea in 1933.
    1
  519.  @TheFissionchips  Obviously the press was exaggerating. Very few Jews outside Germany took a stance against Germany. Besides, this "declaration of war" was an answer to violence against Jews in Germany.
    1
  520. Seriously? Where did you learn this?
    1
  521.  @yourbossisonline7108  Of course.
    1
  522. Where did you learn this?
    1
  523.  @Frag_Monkey_1  Do you know who sunk the Lusitania?
    1
  524. What are you talking about?
    1
  525. Maybe in the 22nd century.
    1
  526. Stalin would not be so reckless to be the first to invade Poland, he would wait for Hitler to make the first move against Poland. If Hitler didn't invade Poland then the Nazis would have to massively decrease the armed forces and resume trade with the rest of the world.
    1
  527.  @dashvinny1  If Hitler would not invade Poland, then perhaps Stalin would not invade Finland.
    1
  528.  @TheImperatorKnight  Is the EU a bad thing for Britain?
    1
  529.  @Bingo_Bango_  I understand. We shall see if Britain will be better now that it is out of the EU.
    1
  530.  @electronworld4996  I understand.
    1
  531. What are the similarities?
    1
  532. Churchill actually did not approve the Munich diktat.
    1
  533. Europe is doing great. Western Europe has strong economies while eastern Europe is rising after decades of communist rule.
    1
  534.  @jeffsmith8197  ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!
    1
  535. Reasons always matter. Besides, there is no proof that Britain used Hitler to test the League, Britain had nothing to gain by doing so. The war itself bankrupted Britain.
    1
  536.  @sockenpuppe1057  Actually Britain lost a lot because of the war, Britain lost many soldiers, civilians and the Empire.
    1
  537.  @sockenpuppe1057  But you also said "still they dint lose a thing ... except money"
    1
  538. Hitler went even further approving the plans for the Ratte, a 1000-ton tank.
    1
  539. Italy alone was incapable of conquering Greece as was seen in 1940-1941 when Italy failed and needed German help. Maybe more colonies in Africa could have appeased Mussolini, but that would have meant less colonies for France or Britain.
    1
  540.  @AntaraReis  But would the Greeks accept to become a part of the Italian sphere of influence?
    1
  541. Britain losing her empire was inevitable, nationalist movements in Africa and India were growing, nations demanded freedom, independence.
    1
  542. In this scenario perhaps the Soviet-German non-aggression pact would continue. The Soviets and Germans would unite in the fight against the British and French Empires, while eastern Europe would be split between German and Soviet spheres of influence.
    1
  543. How do you know all this? Who told you?
    1
  544. The problem of coordinating arms was even bigger in the smaller Axis countries (Romania, Hungary, Slovakia) who's armies were much weaker and totally unprepared for such a big war.
    1
  545. Because Hitler wanted to destroy the Communist USSR before the Soviets themselves would be fully ready for war.
    1
  546.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  A dictator then some genocide, some ethnic cleansing.
    1
  547. @trav v Antisemitic comments are automatically censored.
    1
  548. The EU is not a threat for Russia, the EU doesn't even have an army.
    1
  549.  @command_unit7792  Those Soviet POWs who were not nazi collaborators and simply did not want to return to the USSR should not have been forced to return to the USSR.
    1
  550. And how exactly could Britain fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time? Impossible, Britain would have lost the war.
    1
  551.  @history9034  So what? The USSR had the biggest army in the world in 1939, the biggest air force in the world and the biggest industrial base in the world while Germany had the most modern army in the world. Even Britain and her Navy would not stand a chance against a German-Soviet alliance.
    1
  552.  @history9034  The Germans had advanced aircraft too and better trained pilots. The British Navy alone cannot win such a huge war for Britain. A combined German-Soviet force would crush Britain on land and put enormous pressure on her Navy. The British-Polish alliance was more like a bluff in hope of deterring Germany from invading Poland, unfortunately it didn't work mainly because the French and the British were not ready for total war against Germany in 1939.
    1
  553.  @history9034  The British Navy alone cannot win a big war. And the British industrial base was much smaller than the US industrial base, the British could not built many aircraft carriers and other ships as fast as the US did. Eventually the Royal Navy would be forced to fight defensively while the Atlantic would be full of German U-Boats and Soviet destroyers.
    1
  554.  @history9034  The Czechs saw it as a betrayal too, however it was inevitable since in 1938-1939 the French and the British people were unprepared to go to war again, especially for foreign countries like Czechoslovakia and Poland.
    1
  555.  @history9034  That alliance was more like a bluff, to deter Germany from further land grabs, unfortunately it didn't work.
    1
  556.  @genehornung3295  Japan had a huge oil shortage after the US started the oil embargo. Attacking the USSR would be pointless for Japan, since Siberia did not have the oil Japan needed.
    1
  557.  @genehornung3295  There were no oil fields discovered in Siberia in the 1940s. Only later in the 1950s and 1970s such oil fields were discovered.
    1
  558.  @genehornung3295  The US started the oil embargo before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor not after. The embargo started when Japan invaded French Indochina. Japan needed the oil from Indonesia (Dutch East Indies), thus the US Pacific Fleet had to be eliminated first.
    1
  559. How so?
    1
  560. Nazi Germany wanted war. Why did Germany invade neutral independent Denmark, Norway, Greece, Yugoslavia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg?
    1
  561. As Fuhrer he was supposed to know about his country's financial situation. It is not as if someone would keep him in the dark, it was mandatory for him to know.
    1
  562. What truth?
    1
  563. Look at North Korea today. Constant propaganda and brainwashing are very effective.
    1
  564. Since the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem sided with the Nazis maybe there would have been no Jihad. The Axis and the Arab Muslims had a common enemy, the British Empire that controlled Palestine, Iraq and Egypt, thus maybe there would have been a tacit alliance between the Axis and the Arabs.
    1
  565. It was inevitable, the nations of the empire wanted freedom.
    1
  566. The USSR also invaded Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania in 1940.
    1
  567. Yes, it would have been much worse.
    1
  568. But why did Germany invade neutral Yugoslavia, Greece, entire Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium. These countries were neutral and independent and were no threat to Germany.
    1
  569.  @ottoheinrichwehmann2252  Doesn't matter for you, but it did matter for all those new independent countries.
    1
  570. Britain could not do that, in 1941 military analysts were certain that the USSR will be defeated fast, then Britain would be alone against the German juggernaut.
    1
  571.  @flamingoxe5984  At that time, in 1940-1941, no one knew that Germany will not defeat the USSR. We have the power of hindsight, but those living in 1940-1941 did not have this luxury.
    1
  572.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Vietnam is covered by jungle, Ukraine is a huge plain ideal for Blitzkrieg.
    1
  573.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  Exactly.
    1
  574.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  And that is why the Germans used pontoon bridges.
    1
  575.  @thefrenchareharlequins2743  The Germans would be shooting too, they had artillery and aerial superiority in 1941.
    1
  576. Yes, it is criminal tyranny, see Generalplan Ost and you will find out what the Nazis wanted for Europe.
    1
  577.  @canemcave  The Nazis were much worse than the British, they wanted not just European domination but also ethnic cleansing.
    1
  578. A greater Germany meant the end of independent Czechoslovakia and Poland. Don't you know that Nazi Germany occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939?
    1
  579. What about China?
    1
  580. The war started in 2014, not in 2021. The war started when Russia took Crimea.
    1
  581.  @OakInch  Wrong. The war started when Russian "little green men" took Crimea.
    1
  582. Spain was unprepared for a modern mechanized war. Spain would be dependent on getting tanks and planes from Germany. Spanish cities would be destroyed by RAF bombing campaigns. Getting enough oil from the Caucasus would take years for the Germans, the Caucasus oil refineries would have to be rebuilt, then the oil would have to be transported to the front and in Germany on thousands of kilometers of fragile railway under attack by Partisans.
    1
  583. What does Hitler not being a true Christian has to do with what the Pope did in those years?
    1
  584. No, because Sweden had a very weak air force, very few tanks and very few reserves. Thus the Swedish army ,even in coordination with Norway, Finland and Denmark, would have been crushed by Nazi Germany.
    1
  585. If Hitler waited 3 more years that would give the USSR, France and the UK more time to prepare for war. It is not like the rest of the world would stand still in those 3 years while Germany expands its army.
    1
  586. But what about the Madagascar plan?
    1
  587.  @unscenegamers  Yes, but Reggie Buffat claimed that AH started the war toeliminate the Jews. The Madagascar plan was proposed in 1940 long after the war started.
    1
  588. But Chamberlain declared war on Germany, not Churchill.
    1
  589. There is no big threat on the continent, the EU is not a threat to Britain.
    1
  590. Why? It was Chamberlain that declared war on Germany in 1939, not Churchill. Churchill could not make peace since the British people did not want peace with the nazis.
    1
  591.  @davidmccarroll2280  Even with Moseley as prime minister the British people most likely would not agree to an alliance with Germany.
    1
  592. Perhaps Britain and France hoped that by promising help to Poland this will persuade Hitler not to invade. It was something between a bluff and a serious initiative, even though neither Britain nor France were ready for war yet. Perhaps they were trying to buy more time.
    1
  593. Warsaw was not German land. Krakow was not German land.
    1
  594.  @coochykilla  In your brain it was.
    1
  595. Who told you this?
    1
  596. Impossible, the Kriegsmarine had few ships in the Black Sea.
    1
  597. France's attitude was normal, because the vast majority of war and destruction in WW1's western front happened on French territory, thus France wanted to make Germany pay. German territory wasn't affected much by fighting on the western front.
    1
  598. Seriously? What about Generalplan Ost?
    1
  599. Why is it better?
    1
  600. But he wanted more, not just a national revolution, also a racial revolution.
    1
  601. Germany had a big fuel crisis, she could not waste time fighting an attrition war in Czechoslovakia, Germany would need a fast victory otherwise the fuel crisis would get bigger even if Czechoslovakia would have been destroyed.
    1
  602. People rightfully criticize the August 1939 pact because that pact meant the end of independent Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and the annexation of Finnish and Romanian territories. The USSR became an accomplice to the start of WW2.
    1
  603. It would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war against the USSR and fight Nazi Germany and the Red Army at the same time. Besides, at that time 1939-1940 Nazi Germany was seen as the bigger threat for France and the UK.
    1
  604. Seriously? What security risk did the Jews pose to Germany?
    1
  605. Roosevelt himself agreed with the Munich pact of 1938, he said "good man" in a letter to Chamberlain. Clearly the USA was initially a fan of appeasement because she didn't want another massive European war that could get the US involved. If Britain made peace with Hitler in 1940 (highly unlikely considering Hitler's ambitions) then there would have been no air raids on Germany done by the RAF and the Afrika Korps would be used on the Soviet front.
    1
  606. YouTube automatically deletes comments that contain certain combinations of words even if the one who commented did so in good faith, not being a neonazi or communist.
    1
  607. @Elgen Boden Germany was doing business just fine even with that supposed boycott, which wasn't even efficient as a boycott.
    1
  608. How do you know he was homosexual?
    1
  609. Because TIK likes a challenge, TIK does not run from anyone.
    1
  610. Took everything from them? How so?
    1
  611. But why did Hitler invade Yugoslavia, Greece, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway?
    1
  612.  @rafa1z1  Today Germany gets oil from the Middle East, from Russia. But Hitler wanted Germany to be an autarky, without any imports of raw materials and fuel, thus he had to invade.
    1
  613. 21:17 Hitler, not TIK, believed that economics is a zero sum game, and being industrialized decreases food production capabilities.
    1
  614. Russia already had access to the Black Sea through the port of Novorossiysk in the Krasnodar region.
    1
  615.  @bennconner1195  White populations are in decline because they have no incentives to make many children.
    1
  616. Who had been trained at the Tavistock Institute in the UK?
    1
  617. Yes, because Britain would have lost the war if it would have fought against Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    1
  618.  @egonjensen7667  You put too much faith in the atomic bomb, the atomic bomb would not have stopped the Soviets from crushing the US and British armies in Europe.
    1
  619.  @egonjensen7667  The Soviets would not give up until victory is achieved. The atomic bomb would not scare the mighty Red Army.
    1
  620.  @egonjensen7667  The Red Army was much stronger than the Japanese, the Soviets would not be stopped by some atomic bombs, the USA would need many bombs to make a difference and it was very difficult to make many atomic bombs fast. The Red Army would conquer Europe and force the USA to sign an armistice.
    1
  621. Because Nazi Germany was perceived as the greater threat to France and the UK. Besides, it would have been suicide for the UK and France to fight against a Nazi-Soviet alliance.
    1
  622. Это видео о Гитлере.
    1
  623. Do you even know what zionism is?
    1
  624. The British Empire's days were numbered even if Britain became a satellite of Germany. There were more and more nationalist movements inside the empire, African nations and India wanted freedom, independence and Britain alone would not be capable of keeping the empire alive much longer.
    1
  625.  @dIRECTOR259  We don't know if Hitler's offers to Britain were sincere, or if those offers would be respected after Hitler died and someone else became Fuhrer of Germany. In any case, there was no way for Britain, even with German help, to maintain control of so many nations in India, Africa, the Middle East for the next 100 years.
    1
  626.  @dIRECTOR259  I've read your deleted comment. But you must realize that by suppressing the Indian, African and Arab nationalist movements by use of force Britain would commit genocide, crimes against humanity.
    1
  627.  @dIRECTOR259  The nationalist movements in Africa and India started in the 19th century, long before there was any USSR or US support. In any case, why should the British Empire continue to exist? Did Britain deserve to rule over so many nations and deny them freedom?
    1
  628. If Germany fought only the USSR perhaps Germany would have won because it had a better army in 1940-1941, but that would have made Eastern Europe a German land where genocide would happen, see Generalplan Ost, a nightmare scenario.
    1
  629. Because US propaganda is better than Russian propaganda.
    1
  630.  @BRANFED  Well, at least one reason for this invasion is still unproven. We are yet to find those secret US biolabs in Ukraine.
    1
  631. Yes, but the UK and Nazi Germany were already at war.
    1
  632.  @reginaldmcnab3265  Yes, because the British Empire hoped to cripple the Nazi's economy by blocking the transport of Swedish iron ore through Norway to Germany. Unfortunately the British failed.
    1
  633. The Nazis had no honor, they wanted genocide.
    1
  634. Seriously? By your logic Hitler was just an innocent peace loving victim.
    1
  635.  @uncleanon6445  Have a nice day.
    1
  636. But why?
    1
  637. He needed an enemy, an entire people used as scapegoats.
    1
  638. There was no Libyan oil in WW2. Later oil was discovered there.
    1
  639.  @dinubunica  The British army would destroy the Middle East oil refineries and set the oil fields on fire. It would take years for the Germans to receive big quantities of oil from the Middle East. Thus victory was impossible for the Axis.
    1
  640. The pro-Allied coup proved to be a disaster for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, but at least the people later began a famous guerilla war.
    1
  641. But Hitler wanted war, he wanted more land in eastern Europe.
    1
  642. Chamberlain wasn't living in a vacuum, he needed the support of the British people and the Parliament. The British and French people wanted peace in 1938, they didn't want to go to war for Czechoslovakia's sake.
    1
  643.  @joshthomas-moore2656  I am not talking about the British cabinet, I'm talking about the Parliament. Unless Chamberlain would gain support for war from the Parliament and the people, there would be no war in 1938.
    1
  644.  @joshthomas-moore2656  He wasn't trying to get support for war because the people themselves didn't want war in 1938, it would have been political suicide to try to force the people to go to war.
    1
  645.  @joshthomas-moore2656  The British people greeted Chamberlain as a hero after he returned from Munich, the King also treated Chamberlain as a hero, the crowds were on his side demanding peace. Of course not all people wanted peace, some marched to the streets demanding war. The mood changed after March 1939 and more after September 1939, by then the British people knew that Hitler could not be trusted.
    1
  646.  @joshthomas-moore2656  Chamberlain was a politician, not a warmonger. Even if Hitler could not be trusted Chamberlain could not just go to war. As long as the people and the Parliament of Britain didn't want war over Czechoslovakia he could not declare war on Germany.
    1
  647.  @joshthomas-moore2656  If everyone wanted war, why wasn't Chamberlain dismissed and replaced immediately with a more bellicose prime minister? Chamberlain was not irreplaceable. Why did he receive a hero's welcome after Munich 1938?
    1
  648. Seriously? More than 10 million Germans were murdered after the war? Who told you this?
    1
  649. Because Germany was considered the bigger threat for Britain. It would have been suicide for Britain to fight against Germany and the USSR at the same time.
    1
  650.  @gyorgysoros1074  LOL, ROFLMFAO
    1
  651. Yes, but that is no excuse for what the Nazis did after 1938, invading other countries and genocide.
    1
  652. Seriously? You forgot to add reptilian, martian, satanist.
    1
  653. They would have won the war and keep Europe under Nazi terror.
    1
  654.  @old891  That was the result of the Munich Diktat of 1938, there was no non-aggression pact there.
    1
  655. Initially Rommel's mission in North Africa was to prevent the defeat of Italy there. Rommel however went far beyond this mission and tried to defeat the British and to take Egypt, the Germans overestimated their capabilities in North Africa and deployed more and more troops there.
    1
  656. Chamberlain had no choice, Britain was not ready for war, the British people wanted peace in 1938. Chamberlain started rearmament in Britain but he needed more time.
    1
  657.  @ajsimo2677  Yes, if he knew about the Oster Conspiracy perhaps he would have opposed Hitler at Munich. We will never know what would have happened. Maybe Chamberlain wanted his moment of glory, but the fact remains that in 1938 the British people wanted peace.
    1
  658. What we have now is better than what we've had before 1991 when Moscow subjugated Warsaw, Prague, Budapest, Bucharest, Sofia and Berlin. Remember the Warsaw Pact and communist eastern Europe?
    1
  659.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  People are leaving our countries because poverty is bigger in former communist countries and people wanted a better life in western Europe.
    1
  660.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  Yes, they are poorer because the communists remained in power but disguised as capitalists.
    1
  661.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  I am 36 years old. In communist Romania in the 1980's there was food shortage, fuel shortage and no heat in winter in the cities. In all communist countries there was censorship and political police. People were hunted and put in prison if they opposed the communists.
    1
  662.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  No, we are now much better, no censorship, no political police, no cult of personality, more food, new houses, more cars.
    1
  663.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  Things have changed, the young people don't care about Ceausescu.
    1
  664.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  Or maybe young people do not want a return to communism and dictatorship.
    1
  665.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  Not only Romania, also Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia and Finland fought against the USSR.
    1
  666.  @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available  They didn't get off easy, they were occupied (except Finland) and made into communist countries.
    1
  667. Yes, Kim-il Sung and Kim Jong-il in North Korea, Pol Pot in Cambodia.
    1
  668. TIK made a video about Suvorov https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyANHGWbUHA
    1
  669. Yes, he was a Jew.
    1
  670. But if Hitler did not invade the USSR and western Europe remained under Nazi occupation to this day, it would have been horrible for occupied western European nations.
    1
  671. The British Empire was already faced with more and more nationalist movements from the nations of the empire. India, African nations were demanding freedom, independence. Britain alone would have been incapable of keeping control of its empire even if a gentleman's agreement with Germany was achieved.
    1
  672.  @somerandomvertebrate9262  Exactly.
    1
  673. Germany too loans from the USA, but not specifically to build up the military but to pay the war reparations from WW1.
    1
  674. But Chamberlain declared war on Germany, not Churchill, Chamberlain fought Hitler in Norway before Churchill came to power.
    1
  675. TIK made a video about Germany and her oil crisis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVo5I0xNRhg&t=1s
    1
  676. Because Poland was an ally of Britain and an independent sovereign country. Look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Polish_military_alliance
    1
  677. Speaking of propaganda... Were there any secret biolabs found in Ukraine?
    1
  678. Britain and the USSR had a common enemy that had to be destroyed, that is why Britain colluded with the USSR.
    1
  679. Britain had to declare war on Germany after September 1 1939, it became inevitable even if the Soviets would have invaded Poland at the same time. There was no specific Soviet-German military plan in detail about the invasion of Poland. Germany and the USSR only settled on what parts of Poland would go to each other. There was no military coordination between Germany and the USSR about invading Poland. Stalin was careful and waited for Hitler to make the first move, Stalin didn't want to attack at the same time as Germany in order to make sure that he does not enter in conflict with France and the UK.
    1
  680. Afghanistan under Taliban regime helped Bin Laden, Taliban Afghanistan had its share of guilt in what happened at 9/11.
    1
  681.  @voswouter87  Yes, Saudi Arabia too had its share of guilt by helping Bin Laden and Muslim extremists.
    1
  682. Even if they knew, that was not enough, they needed to extract that oil, transport it to Europe and then refine it. And all that would have required a lot of time.
    1
  683. Because school shootings can happen.
    1
  684. A Nazi Europe cannot be allowed to exist.
    1
  685. North Korea is an example of Dialectic Materialism as a religion.
    1
  686. April rains and Soviet mud making the roads impossible to cross would stop the German invasion.
    1
  687. I doubt that the French would have accepted Germany as a province of France.
    1
  688. @ Cyber Hermit Yes, you are right, but that is not a justification for Hitler's racist agenda.
    1
  689.  @antonking9652  Read my comment carefully. I said that the west became stronger than ever and that allowed them to win the cold war. Thus I was talking about the west after 1945, after the nazis were defeated.
    1
  690.  @antonking9652  The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, communism was removed from eastern Europe, thus the west won the cold war.
    1
  691. Because some of Hitler's generals insisted on capturing Moscow instead of the oil fields. Halder even changed the plans for Barbarossa in order to capture Moscow.
    1
  692. Betrayed him? How so?
    1
  693. Because those nazi fans didn't study enough about Germany's economy.
    1
  694. Times change, people change, Germany today is not a threat to Britain and that's why Britain has no interest in a weak Germany.
    1
  695. Churchill and Stalin divided eastern Europe at the Moscow conference in 1944, not at Yalta in 1945.
    1
  696.  @Vonsiatsky  You are wrong Look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Conference_(1944)
    1
  697.  @Vonsiatsky  The percentage agreement was made at Moscow in 1944 between Churchill and Stalin. Read the link I posted.
    1
  698. Did you listen to what Marshal Timoshenko said at 17:31 ? The fall of Moscow would not have stopped the Soviet war effort.
    1
  699. They were not doing nothing during those 9 months, the Germans were moving the bulk of their armies to the French and Belgian borders.
    1
  700. There were no oil fields discovered in Libya in the 1940s. Only later in the 1950s and 1960s oil was discovered in Libya.
    1
  701. And do you have any sources for what you wrote?
    1
  702. Good question. Perhaps Hitler would not have risen to power if Germany kept the Danzig corridor and if Austria was allowed to unite with Germany, or if Hitler would have been admitted to the Fine Arts Academy in Vienna.
    1
  703.  @SmotritelMayaka29  England may not have expected a German invasion of France, but France herself was getting ready for the German invasion, France had plans in case Germany invaded. England herself sent an expeditionary force in France to bolster the defense.
    1
  704. This is only temporary. At the end of time all will worship the same God.
    1
  705. Perhaps. But what does Sudan have to do with this video?
    1
  706. Certainly the war would have been prolonged. Yes, the Axis would have lost eventually, but the carnage would have been much bigger.
    1
  707. It wasn't just about getting rid of communism, it simply was not normal to let Germany conquer and control central and eastern Europe at the expense of many nations. Also Germany had a racial agenda, genocide, reserved for eastern Europe.
    1
  708. No, that would be illogical.
    1
  709. No, Germany had a huge fuel shortage even in 1941, thus winning a three front war would have been very difficult if not impossible.
    1
  710. Chamberlain declared war on Germany. Also Chamberlain initiated the rearming of Britain during the interwar period. Thus he wasn't a nazi sympathizer
    1
  711. But why did Hitler invade neutral Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Greece, Yugoslavia, Denmark, Norway?
    1
  712.  @MichaelJ44  But that was illegal, those were neutral independent countries.
    1
  713. How so?
    1
  714. Do you know better?
    1
  715.  @mvfc7637  Mos of them were Jews, few were Russians.
    1
  716.  @mvfc7637  What does that have to do with Marx?
    1
  717.  @mvfc7637  And yet Marx was also Anti-Semitic, as TIK proves in this video.
    1
  718.  @mvfc7637  And yet in this video TIK proves the opposite of what you say.
    1
  719. What could Britain have done? It was impossible for Britain to fight both Germany and the USSR.
    1
  720.  @yingyang1008  If Britain supported the Nazis against the USSR, then the Nazis would win and become masters of continental Europe, that would have been horrific.
    1
  721.  @yingyang1008  Of course it wasn't ok for Stalin to invade other countries but there was nothing Britain and France could do, they could not fight both Germany and the USSR, it was too much.
    1
  722. Why? The EU is not a threat to the UK.
    1
  723.  @andrew.r.lukasik  We shall see what will happen.
    1
  724. Seriously? The arms race in western Europe was started by Germany herself, in eastern Europe the USSR was the first to rearm massively.
    1
  725. Sending a British military force to Poland would give Hitler another reason to invade, it would have been a massive provocation, Hitler could say that the Allies are encircling Germany.
    1
  726.  @YC88888  Normally a British Army in Poland could have made Hitler think twice about invading, but nothing is certain, perhaps that could have served as another reason to invade.
    1
  727. The USSR invaded Poland two weeks later. Britain and France already declared war on Germany, it would have been suicide for them to declare war on the USSR too. Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  728.  @Retard634  Combining them would be terrible.
    1
  729.  @sanchez231996  Believe whatever you want, my friend.
    1
  730.  @sanchez231996  What is your point? What do you believe in?
    1
  731. Wrong, the USSR annexed eastern Europe after Germany allowed it according to the Nazi-Soviet pact in August 1939.
    1
  732. Seriously? Are you a slave? Do they control you?
    1
  733.  @lexbor3511  So why are you upset? What did the Jews do to you?
    1
  734. No, it was not okay, but there was nothing Britain could do about it.
    1
  735.  @jussim.konttinen4981  Fighting the USSR at a different time was impossible for Britain because after 1945 the USSR became a nuclear power.
    1
  736.  @jussim.konttinen4981  If Britain supported the Axis then the USSR would be defeated and the Axis would become master of continental Europe, a nightmare scenario.
    1
  737.  @jussim.konttinen4981  What are you trying to say? That Britain could defeat the USSR? In 1945 the USSR had the strongest land army in the world.
    1
  738. The German air force and Navy would gain since they bore the brunt of the Battles of England and the Atlantic. The Afrika Korps would be moved to the Eastern Front. But even more important, there would not be a bombing campaign over Germany done by the British air force.
    1
  739.  @lisap.31  Yes, that's exactly what it is.
    1
  740. China doesn't need a war. Trade is more profitable for China, instead of destroying everything in a war.
    1
  741. Well, Stalin wanted Christianity gone, Hitler too wanted Christianity gone. They had a common goal.
    1
  742.  @anderstopansson  Who pulls the strings? The reptilians, Freemasons, Jesuits, martians?
    1
  743. But what source is truly reliable?
    1
  744. Seriously? The world is chaotic? Then why is communist China so powerful? Why are Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the EU so rich?
    1
  745. But why did he invade Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Yugoslavia, Greece, Luxembourg, Czechoslovakia?
    1
  746.  @kentr.1391  Yes, but why did he invade neutral independent countries that wanted nothing to do with Germany?
    1
  747.  @kentr.1391  Well, today Germany is the strongest country in Europe, so the Nazis were wrong.
    1
  748.  Minister of Propaganda  In eastern Europe (Russia, Ukraine, the Balkans) the genocide against Slavs, Gypsies and others is known.
    1
  749.  Minister of Propaganda  I wrote one example. But the entire world has heard about the genocide of ww2.
    1
  750.  @AlejandroRamos-im4to  But why did Germany invade neutral countries Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Yugoslavia, Luxembourg?
    1
  751.  @komradebigchungus7268  Prove it.
    1
  752.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  In communist China, North Korea, communist Cambodia, in the USSR (Holodomor)
    1
  753.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  No, more like 8 to 12 million for the whole USSR, not counting WW2, exact numbers are still disputed.
    1
  754.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  You ask "Where are they"? Maybe the USSR archives have the answer, the NKVD's archives may have the answer if they are available.
    1
  755.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  https://holodomormuseum.org.ua/en/the-history-of-the-holodomor/ The numbers are still in conflict, some say 4 million, others up to 7 million.
    1
  756.  @HolyLegion12  I know about the Holodomor in the USSR. We are talking in hindsight, but in 1939-1940 no one knew that the communists would make bigger genocides than the Nazis, in any case the Nazis were no better than the communists.
    1
  757.  @ivokantarski6220  Pax Germanica would mean genocide in eastern Europe, see Generalplan Ost, a nightmare scenario.
    1
  758.  @GAndreC  Yes, the USSR would have been a threat to the Empire, the USSR would invade Afghanistan, then India. The British Empire would cease to exist if Britain declared war on the USSR. Also the Soviets would cooperate with the Germans to defeat Britain and France in Europe.
    1
  759.  @kosta5706  Laughable? It is laughable only in your mind.
    1
  760.  @lucone2937  Yes, the USSR had a communist agenda for Europe, while Germany had a racist agenda for Europe. Both agendas were horrible.
    1
  761.  @bennconner1195  He shouldn't have been allowed to gain power in the first place, no matter his economic and racial theories. The guy was mentally disturbed.
    1
  762. Relax, China has no reason to start a world war.
    1
  763.  @markuhlig8626  No, the British Empire's days were numbered even if Britain would not have declared war on Germany. There were more and more nationalist movements inside the empire, African nations and India wanted freedom, independence and Britain alone would not be capable of keeping the empire alive much longer.
    1
  764.  @markuhlig8626  Wrong, the Indian nationalist movement started way before the Nazis even existed, the same is true for Arab and African nationalist movements.
    1
  765. Why?
    1
  766. The Japanese army was already fighting in China. An attack on the USSR would have overstretched the Japanese army. The Navy however was very powerful and believed that it can win the war against the US Pacific Fleet.
    1
  767. He couldn't keep you out. Chamberlain already declared war on Germany in 1939.
    1
  768.  @dirkbruere  The British people would not approve of Churchill doing nothing. He would be forced to resign in favor of someone who would do something against the nazis.
    1
  769. The British Empire was already on the decline even before the war, its days were numbered, there were independence movements in India and Africa. The 3rd Reich however was a threat to humanity because of its racial agenda.
    1
  770.  @jayhawk9267  Even so, it was not normal to let Germany dominate Europe. Germany had to be stopped by any means possible.
    1
  771.  @jayhawk9267  Yes, the USSR, Japan, Italy and Germany did not accept a British and French dominated world. But that is not a good reason to accept a German dominated Europe and racial cleansing.
    1
  772. No, Hitler started the war. At Munich in 1938 he told Chamberlain that he had no more territorial desires and yet Germany invaded entire Czechoslovakia in March 1939 and invaded Poland in September, thus Germany started the war.
    1
  773. Because the Royal Navy would have blocked any transport of oil to Germany on the Atlantic Ocean.
    1
  774. TIK made a video about why Hitler had to start the war https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGMjDQ-TJ8
    1
  775. Relax, no one will start a civil war, the army will take control.
    1
  776. Seriously? Germany tried to conquer continental Europe and implemented a racial agenda that was unprecedented and horrified the world. Clearly Germany had to be stopped.
    1
  777. Well, surely he wanted a better world.
    1
  778. The USSR invaded Poland two weeks later. Britain and France already declared war on Germany, it would have been suicide for them to declare war on the USSR too. Britain and France would have lost the war.
    1
  779. Because they believed they will win nonetheless, even if Halder went against Hitler's plan. The Red Army appeared to be crumbling in July-October 1941 and the German High Command vastly overestimated the capabilities of the Wehrmacht in the USSR, this situation gave the Germans too much optimism in 1941.
    1
  780. The war would have been prolonged for another 2 or 3 years. Even so, achieving victory would have been difficult for the Axis since it was already fighting on several fronts.
    1
  781.  @johnweerasinghe4139  France and Britain did not declare war on Germany in 1938 (Austria, Czechoslovakia) because the French and British people did not want war, France and Britain were not ready for war. They weren't ready for war in 1939 either, but they had to declare war on Germany in 1939 because Hitler went too far by invading the rump of Czechoslovakia and Poland. What Britain and France did not expect was the signing of the Soviet-German pact in August 1939 which made war easier for the Germans.
    1
  782. But what did the bankers get from injecting money into Germany?
    1
  783. And in all this the Poles, Belorussians and Ukrainians will end up without a country and without freedom.
    1
  784. Germany was the bigger threat for Britain. The USSR invaded Poland two weeks later (17 September) by that time Britain was already at war with Germany, it would have been suicide for Britain to fight both Germany and the USSR at the same time, Britain would have lost the war.
    1
  785. How so?
    1
  786. What did Hitler learn at Tavistock?
    1
  787. But why would anyone even launch such a theory that Hitler was a British agent? It makes no sense.
    1
  788. Well, after what happened in Chechnya, Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan we can say that both the US and Russia are bad.
    1
  789.  @jackalexander8021  If Germany became a superpower she would have control of eastern Europe and a huge genocide would begin there, see Generalplan Ost, a nightmare scenario. How would that benefit Britain? The British empire would crumble anyway, even if Germany became a superpower.
    1
  790.  @jackalexander8021  Britain could not have kept her empire even if Germany won . Even if Britain would have had a colonial deal with Germany, that would not have stopped the disintegration of the British Empire. India, Arab and African nations wanted freedom, nationalist movements were rising, it would have been impossible for Britain to keep control and force all those nations to continue to submit to British rule.
    1
  791.  @jackalexander8021  All the power of the British Empire was in the resources and manpower of India, Africa, the oil of Iraq, without these vassal nations there was no Empire. A federation made of Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand was a pale substitute for an empire.
    1
  792.  @jackalexander8021  So your point is that Britain should have sided with Nazi Germany in order to keep her empire, even if that would have meant for continental Europe to be controlled by the Nazis. That is a very big price European nations would have had to pay just so Britain could keep her empire.
    1
  793.  @jackalexander8021  I understand. Well, as I already stated I believe that even if Britain remained neutral or sided with Nazi Germany and somehow the Nazis won, the Empire would have been lost anyway. The nations of the empire wanted freedom, they had enough of British rule.
    1
  794. @lati long It is not a surprise that some Romanians, Hungarians and Baltics have pro-Nazi views, since their countries suffered a lot under communist regimes brought by the Soviets.
    1
  795. You were wrong.
    1
  796.  @manichaean1888  What are you talking about? Comparing the Third Reich with the EU is idiotic at best.
    1
  797.  @manichaean1888  Yes, you are right.
    1
  798. What are you talking about? Your comment has nothing to do with this video.
    1
  799. Fraudulent translation? Is there a better translation?
    1
  800. No, what you say is illogical. He wanted to eliminate certain peoples, he wanted European domination, he failed, we are not living in his dream of a New World Order.
    1
  801.  @jasonjason6525  Seriously? Where did you learn this?
    1
  802. Actually it was not at the same time, the Soviets invaded Poland two weeks later (17 September) and the Polish government did not want the army to fight the Soviet invaders.
    1
  803. Keep in mind that even if Czechoslovakia went to war in 1938 victory was not guaranteed, in 1938 war would be different that in 1914 especially since the Germans would surely gain aerial supremacy over Czechoslovakia.
    1
  804. No, the EU is not a military threat for the UK.
    1
  805. If the Jews were given a country in Europe, even in former German lands, the hatred towards Jews would not have disappeared in Europe. It became clear that the Jews must return to Palestine.
    1
  806.  @mikebellis5713  Because it would have been suicide for Britain and France to fight against both Germany and the USSR. Britain would have been defeated. Besides, in 1939 Germany was seen as a bigger threat than the USSR for France and the UK.
    1
  807. TIK made a video about why Hitler had to start the war https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGMjDQ-TJ8
    1
  808. Revenge? By genocide and ethnic cleansing? Seriously?
    1
  809.  @chiselcheswick5673  His point is invalid. Crippling economic reparations are not a reason for genocide, ethnic cleansing and total war.
    1
  810. @Bremner's Ghost Even if he knew, there was no way to extract that oil in the 1940s.
    1
  811.  @Saeronor  Yes, but that would postpone the war at least several years and it would be a disaster for Hitler's agenda.
    1
  812.  @Saeronor  Exactly.
    1
  813. The Luftwaffe was overstretched, it had to fight on three fronts (USSR, North Africa and western Europe), it was too much, it has little to do with Goering's ineptitude.
    1
  814. Well, it is not as if Japan and Germany could have conquered and control entire Asia, Europe and Africa, this is not the Man in the High Castle universe, even so Germany and Japan were ideological enemies of the USA and had to be defeated.
    1
  815.  @duerandaggi  Asia is much bigger than China, there was no way for Japan to conquer Asia. As for Africa, only a small part (Ethiopia, Tunisia and Libya) of this continent came under Axis control.
    1
  816.  @duerandaggi  I am not giving you a break. Japan and Germany would not have been capable of controlling entire Asia and Africa, they would have been overwhelmed by resistance everywhere. India would not accept to come under Japanese rule, the same goes for Iran and the Arabs. As for Africa, the Germans would be busy controlling Europe and would be left with far too few troops to control Africa.
    1
  817.  @duerandaggi  Bye bye.
    1
  818. Germany was actually Nazi Germany and a Nazi empire in Europe would have been a nightmare for Europe.That is why such an empire had to be destroyed.
    1
  819.  @shad0w1599  Of course I know, I live in Romania a former communist country. I didn't say that communism wasn't a nightmare for eastern Europe, but that does not change the fact that the Nazis were not better.
    1
  820. Well, the Phoney War was still going on between Germany and France in 1940. The French army had a low morale. Maybe if Hitler did not invade France and the Low Countries a peaceful agreement could have been reached eventually. Maybe.
    1
  821.  @jaakkooksa5374  If that's the case, then Hitler should have settled first the score with the UK, and not attack the USSR until after the war against the UK would have been won. But who knows how the USSR would have reacted? Maybe the Soviets would have attacked Germany.
    1
  822.  @jaakkooksa5374  Well, Germany could have defeated the USSR, but only if Japan would have attacked the USSR, not the USA ,thus keeping the Soviet Siberian armies out of Europe. Fortunately Japan attacked the USA, thus Moscow was saved by the Siberian armies and in the end Nazi Germany lost the war.
    1
  823.  @jaakkooksa5374  I see. However, Nazi Germany had another chance to win in 1942, if the Wehrmacht did not waste time trying to conquer Stalingrad and focused on a defensive posture on the Volga River. Fortunately the Germans wasted time and troops trying to conquer a useless city. It was enough for the Germans if they managed to cut off Soviet oil supplies from the Caucasus, but Hitler insisted on conquering Stalingrad.
    1
  824. How so?
    1
  825.  @russmartin4888  I understand.
    1
  826. Because Britain and France were already at war with Germany when the USSR invaded Poland (two weeks later), it would have been suicide for Britain and France to declare war on the USSR too, Britain would have lost the war.
    1
  827. The Third Reich wasn't protestant, it was nazi, it wasn't a Christian country.
    1
  828. But that would lead to the sacrifice of Poland, the Baltic states, Ukraine, while possibly making Germany the master of continental Europe.
    1
  829. Germany borrowed money from the USA.
    1
  830.  @henriklarssen1331  Relax, eastern Europe is much worse than Germany, here we have corruption and war.
    1
  831. Actually there is some truth . Interwar Poland had big Ukrainian and Belarusian minorities in the south and east. Poland even had a war with Ukraine for the territory known as Galicia after WW1.
    1
  832.  @miracleyang3048  Indeed. Poland became greedy. But that greed was somewhat justified because Poland's neighbors (German empire, Russian empire, Austrian empire) destroyed Poland's independence in the 18th century.
    1
  833.  @miracleyang3048  Exactly. Polish ambitions were big and the victory in the Soviet-Polish war gave the Poles the confidence to demand more land.
    1
  834. Where exactly did you learn that Gnosticism was the first Christianity? In the Bible? Where?
    1
  835. Yes, but war in 1938 would be different than in 1914, even if Czechoslovakia had fortifications the Germans had a more powerful air force, more tanks, they could strike behind Czechoslovak lines, and once they gained air superiority even supremacy they could force a surrender from the Czechoslovaks.
    1
  836. It was not in vain. If the Germans would have gained control of the Caucasus in 1942 the USSR would have lost a major source of oil and its war effort would have been crippled.
    1
  837. The Germans won WW1 in 1916? How so?
    1
  838. If Hitler was a Christian, why did he condone genocide?
    1
  839. Be patient, this video is about the Wehrmacht, maybe TIK will do videos about other atrocities too.
    1
  840. Hitler gave half of Poland to the USSR in the August 1939 pact.
    1
  841.  @mikebellis5713  Because Britain and France were already at war with Germany. It would have been suicide for Britain to be at war with Russia too. Britain would have lost the war.
    1