Comments by "Oblithian" (@Oblithian) on "A Different Bias" channel.

  1. Well, the president at the very least.
    5
  2. It is moronic to begin with. If you want a non-stagnant population you need to NOT put roadblocks in to having more kids.
    4
  3. Well perhaps nothing yet it is likely an indication of what is to come. Barring any other influences, of which there will inevitably be many.
    3
  4. I am surprised anyone who 'makes a deal' has any expectation for it to be upheld. He violated his own "greatest trade agreement" with Canada, which was just an unproductive and needlessly aggressive rehash of NAFTA. Canada especially should have expected this and diversified is economy since last time, let alone previous issues. Until congress steps up to curtail his power, he is going to keep going back on his word at his convenience. Textbook badfaith actor. Far safer to deal with even the most disreputable countries. Save maybe Russia.
    2
  5. ​ @Noel-ji8nm Yeah the sanctions have been small and incremental they need more substantial intervention.
    2
  6. I don't know why anyone would take Farage as an authority or even credible speaker on anything at this point. But then again I think the same of Trump. Some people would rather just blindly follow.
    2
  7. I bet he claims success using companies that were already moving out of China.
    2
  8. ​ @clownofthetimes6727 There are ways to avoid YT netting a benefit.
    1
  9. There was once, but... could have just been for the camera or The Russian side I suppose...
    1
  10. There may be word about cpt. climbdown.
    1
  11. To be fair many small gifts can add up, or even small gifts can influence an outcome. However, as a broader concept, I agree.
    1
  12. I have always thought the discussion of polling is a waste of time. Most surveys aren't even conducted in a reliable way. Even if they are, what difference does it make, he is still the president. Then there's a question of statistical significance. At what point does a change matter, at what low rating would be be recalled? It would have to be extremely low, and not just on the issues pollsters choose, but ones that matter to Americans. Like the mounting supply issues.
    1
  13. 3rd time if you include the 51st state thing.
    1
  14. Throw spaghetti, bet on something that sticks, shift to another explaination once that spaghetti falls, claim again it was always the plan.
    1
  15. I don't think we can even credit him with being the first king lol.
    1
  16. The US was headed down a dark path and Harris would have likely only made it worse. Trump campaigned on adverting that issue. But because he is who he is he is also destroying the economy. Neither option is good. The failure came from within both parties for allowing both to end up in the race. While the american public did vote... they should hold the parties accountable. Creating a viable third party would likely hurt the most but, recinding all political donations in the short term would be a small rebuke.
    1
  17. It is true the less malicious leaders should do more publicity. But... it also lays more groundwork for concerning abuses. Though, nothing is stopping them anyway.
    1
  18. Hopefully we don't have to wait for all the cold war relics to agevout before we return to peace.
    1
  19. To be fair, I don't trust when people say "it doesn't do X or Y" bad thing because so often it does exactly that. Just look at the US, "Tariffs won't raise prices".
    1
  20. To be fair, they could merely take issue with the country politically. After all, India has gotten closer to Russia and China (despite our efforts to become closer with India). India also, like Russia has decided to attack a neighbouring country. Then there are other socio-political concerns. Granted it's not what they've said or how they have said it. But the anti-agreement arguments I have heard you reference are indeed illogical (I am unsure if there have been others, this is the only coverage I have heard so far).
    1