Comments by "Mir Ba" (@mirba6933) on "Senators demand special counsel investigation into Justice Clarence Thomas" video.

  1. No and yes! There should be rules that could make them leave if they go against the rules. +There is a solution for everything, there is no will for anything. I would give them a salary so that they can live however they want, but every mistake, be it intentional or accidental, would be severely punished. Of course, one can and must always be a little flexible. Not all evil is for evil!!!??
    2
  2. Insurrection? Yes, from Nancy Pelosi who didn't want to release the National Guard in time for fake insurgent games in the middle of the capitol!!??? Is that what you mean gentlemen?
    2
  3. Democrats!!? 😮 Again?? Joe Biden? Is, behind this!!? I believe he is.
    1
  4. Be sure to join the group of the world's best liars. We sell you the most professional in the business, kidney balls. Is Rachel okay? Joe didn't hear her right?
    1
  5. Hahahaha "We do not make this request LIGHTLY"? 👹
    1
  6. ​ @dhar-u1v Hahahaha 🙏🕊️🙏🕊️❤️🤣😉
    1
  7. Aha, now I understand why they condemned Donald Trump for a legal loan that he legally paid back and overpaid. So that on the basis of that verdict, they can politically judge anyone who bothers them. "They", they are the politicians and their mainstream media puppets. Like MSNBC for example, "The best possible example of what media should not be is MSNBC.
    1
  8. No one has to report anything to anyone except the institutions you work for. They know everything. You two so-called journalists, can we know how many "gifts" you received, from whom and when, to say exactly what you are saying now?? Otherwise, you journalists, especially the mainstream media, without any evidence, lament and babble in a public place about a man who is not there to defend himself. And when he comes to speak (Mr. Thomas or anyone else), you journalists ask a question, the man starts to answer, if he answers the questions as you like, then let him "drown" in his own words. If he doesn't speak the way you like, then at the same moment you interrupt the answer by interrupting. What do you think, that people who look at people like you are blind with healthy eyes?
    1
  9. Because he is not an investigator.
    1
  10. ​ @Skyenchantment8 The enemies.
    1
  11. Hahahaha "Suspicious SILENCE"? It would be best if every time someone said something about Clarence Thomas or whomever for that matter, he could screamed at the top of his voice. "body snatchers"
    1
  12. Hahahaha. Naive people live free from their mind in their lives.
    1
  13. ​@fredfreddy8684Hunter did.
    1
  14. ​ @oleladywho Never. Asking questions is not WHATABOUTISM. Arrange the priorities, in the order of the words from the beginning.
    1
  15. ​ @imisseveryone2716 or maybe 2008?
    1
  16. If you MSNBC journalists and your bosses are honest, if I am naive and stupid about my comments about you "nobinarians" ie journalists!!? Can we please see who is stupid or who is deluded and brainwashed? We or you??? The way you will prove to the people that you are truly a Democrat is: Invite Mr. Justice Clarence Thomas into your MSNBC studio, then give him literally the same free time to answer as you gave this gentleman, make the length of the show exactly the same in every way. From the total duration to the length or time stamps of asking and answering questions. Is that possible gentlemen!!???
    1
  17. After they investigate Mr. Clarence, can a light investigation be done against the investigator, ie the prosecutor!!? I think that would be very fair, what do you think!!???
    1
  18. This is a lying propaganda against mister Clarence Thomas.
    1