Comments by "Mir Ba" (@mirba6933) on "Huge Rus Missile Strike, Rus Advance Ocheretino, Kupiansk; More Ukr Troops Disobey, Zelensky Attempt" video.

  1. Dima believes everything the Deep state says. And the Ukrainian regime does something like this, they announce that the Russian army has entered a certain area, place, it doesn't matter where. However, this is not true. Why do they do that? Because after some time they would say that they liberated that part of a certain area, when in reality the Ukrainians did not move from that area, that is, Russia never occupied that area. This is one way of manipulation.
    3
  2. A few years after the fire, that forest will be much better. Residues after a fire feed the soil, ash and burnt remains that are digested into part of the soil. Which means that the soil is healthier and more nutritious. However, it will take a few years for it to be fully restored. It is incredible how well the fire affects the resurgence of nature even more strongly. Fire has multiple benefits for forests and agricultural lands. People who start fires on their land where they plant plants are not as crazy as people think. I was fiercely against the fire destroying a beautiful forest. No one even tried to turn it off. I was very angry. Today, when I see how that same forest, or the entire hill, looks like, it is a view that makes a person stop, look and rest his soul, enjoying the view of the beautiful nature.
    2
  3. Russian soldiers had Zelensky in their sights in Kherson city after the Russian withdrawal, they asked what to do. They were told, "let the 💩 go down the drain" let him enjoy it while he can. So, they could have hit him at least 10 times as far as is known. However, that man is not worth getting someone else's hands dirty. He is completely irrelevant, the only thing he knows is how to play a role well.
    2
  4. NATO thinks that if Russia, (in my opinion incredibly restrained and calm in relation to what they are trying to do to them), has crossed many of the red lines given by the West (red lines that Russia has never mentioned), it is a sign of the weakness of the Russian Federation. I think they are incredibly deeply mistaken!
    2
  5. ​ @TeunisMarinus Russia did not threaten anyone with an attack. They just said, if anyone goes to war, they will be a legitimate target. Therefore, I ask you to learn something about international law and the regulations that Russia adheres to in contrast to the criminal West, i.e. our so-called political criminals and war criminals. You'd better study, because you'll get lost in official lies and no one will be able to help.
    2
  6. When there was a war in our country, there was only a forest around the settlement where I live. The attackers threw incendiary bombs on the forest and set it on fire. Of course, the firemen could not and were not allowed to put out the fire. Because of the risk of needless death. The solution to prevent the fire from burning the buildings was that we started the fire at the edges of the forest near the settlement so that the fire would spread further away from the buildings. Otherwise, it was not possible to save the settlement and people's lives. However, the smoke was so thick that people began to suffocate. You couldn't breathe normally anywhere except through your clothes preferably if the clothes were wet.
    1
  7. The best example of the destruction of nature is BP - British Petroleum. Find out why they threw away 10 billion to shift the blame from them to us for plastic products!!? How much money is that today? Hundreds of billions of dollars. It looks like something figuratively said that I caricature it if there are 8 billion of us, of which "one million people are responsible for the destruction of nature, while 7,999,999, 999 billion people have to pay for the damage", but who are we paying for? We pay just such industries in one way or another. All through thieving governments that give billions of our money to private companies, and take more and more from us every time.
    1
  8. ​ @JosephBisio Russia has not drawn any red lines. It is a Western delusional idea. Then they say it was the Russian red line. For example F-16 Russia only said that they will destroy them. However, Joe Biden drew a red line when asked to answer about the F-16 deployment. "No, that will mean WW3." Biden said.
    1
  9. ​​ @haupper Good idea how to fool the west. But I don't really care about that, I am disgusted by the behavior of people who want to send all Ukrainians on their way without return, you know what that means!😢😢 Do you know what they do to people who run away from mobilization? These days, people have found many bodies in the Tisza River😢😱🤬💩
    1
  10. Forests are normally a big part of the solution to the so-called global changes or global warming, from landslides, increasingly strong winds, floods of unprecedented proportions, etc. If there is no forest, there is nothing to hold back strong winds and reduce the speed of wind blows, nothing to lower high temperatures, forest roots keep the earth from sliding, forest plant life it drinks so much water that there are no major floods or even floods at all. People cannot understand how much forests mean to our life and the life of the planet in general. If we don't realize this soon, if we don't start massively restoring destroyed forests, and planting trees wherever possible, this atmosphere and soil of ours are doomed, and thus the entire population of all known and unknown living beings on this poor planet. Our "Masters", i.e. criminal large "private" industries are destroying the planet, then they ask us to pay for their 💩
    1