Youtube comments of Ginny Jolly (@ginnyjollykidd).

  1. 1700
  2. 452
  3. 371
  4. 361
  5. 337
  6. 221
  7. 217
  8. 215
  9. 197
  10. 152
  11. 147
  12. 146
  13. 146
  14. 112
  15. 110
  16. 101
  17. 98
  18. 96
  19. 92
  20. 90
  21. 89
  22. 84
  23. 83
  24. 81
  25. 81
  26. 72
  27. 72
  28. 69
  29. 66
  30. Stephan Pendarvis There's more to it than that, but correct in a simple way. And if we spot it in others, that means it is possible in yourself. Not to worry, though. Just take this into private contemplation (like at home) and see what your part in it is. They might say, "You always do this," or "You called me ten times yesterday" when you only called twice. They exaggerate and go to extremes when the situation is not like that at all. They might say "I just lost a big client and it is all your fault." In such a case you can rightly and politely ask, "what did I do and how can I make it better?" If they get flustered and walk away, let it go. It is their problem. If they give you a list, no matter how angrily or violently (except physically), write it down calmly and review it with them. "Okay, I didn't get you that folder that day (because you asked for it at 5:00 p.m. and closed up when I came with it 2 minutes later and you said "leave it on my desk.") And I didn't get your client a coffee yesterday (because the machine was broken down.) And I didn't give you the copy of the budget. (because the Copier Repair man didn't come again when we called twice.) And I didn't arrange for a tour. (okay, yes that was my doing. I should have asked if you wanted to invite him around.) One time I was taken to task by a boss at a grocery who was known to throw his weight around a bit. He accused me, "One of our customers complained you left your cash register when there were people in line." "You're right; I did. The customer needed this item, and I knew where it was. It was quicker for me to get it than to wait to call someone in Stock to come up, find out, go back and get, and return to the front. I did it to serve customers better." He saw the sense in that and dropped it.
    65
  31. 65
  32. 63
  33. 63
  34. 61
  35. 61
  36. 60
  37. 53
  38. 53
  39. 51
  40. 50
  41. 48
  42. 47
  43. 47
  44. 42
  45. 38
  46. 38
  47. 37
  48. 36
  49. 36
  50. 35
  51. 34
  52. 30
  53. 29
  54. 27
  55. 27
  56. 26
  57. 26
  58. 25
  59. 25
  60. 24
  61. 24
  62. 24
  63. 23
  64. 23
  65. 23
  66. 23
  67. 23
  68. 23
  69. 23
  70. 22
  71. 22
  72. 22
  73. 22
  74. 21
  75. 21
  76. 21
  77. 21
  78. 21
  79. 20
  80. 20
  81. 20
  82. 20
  83. 20
  84. 19
  85. 19
  86. 18
  87. 18
  88. 18
  89. 18
  90. 18
  91. 18
  92. 17
  93. 17
  94. 17
  95. 16
  96. 16
  97. 16
  98. 16
  99. 16
  100. 16
  101. 16
  102. 16
  103. 15
  104. 15
  105. 15
  106. 15
  107. 15
  108. 15
  109. 15
  110. 14
  111. 14
  112. 14
  113. 14
  114. 14
  115. 14
  116. 14
  117. 14
  118. 14
  119. 14
  120. 14
  121. 14
  122. 13
  123. 13
  124. 13
  125. 13
  126. 13
  127. 13
  128. 13
  129. 13
  130. 13
  131. 13
  132. 13
  133. MrUltra999 So are you saying a woman can't be trusted with what she can do with her body? "I don't want kids." "Oh it's a phase. You'll meet your Prince Charming." "I'll have a glass of wine. I like a taste now and then." "You'll kill the baby!" 😱 I am going to walk a mile to at least keep in touch with my marathon training. I can't run, but I have to move." "Oh no! You can't exercise! You'll abort the baby!" (walking is a great way for a pregnant woman to exercise.) "I'm feeling sexy tonight!" "Oh no! That will damage the baby!" (seriously, men, do you think your six - inch penis is going to do that much damage in a canal that is at least that long?) "I have so much to do in the office today! So many of my patients have limbs that need special wraps to control it. I need to go in to the PT department today! And my paperwork is piled up to my ears!" "No! You can't work! That's too heavy for you to do! Let the others do it!" (NB: my PT worked all the way up to her birth. Others might not have been qualified to handle her patients' measurements or other needs. She could use others to help lift limbs if necessary, but she also has a table for that. And diagnoses and treatment and requisition authority are hers alone for her patients. She was a professional every step of the way, though when I asked about her pregnancy and baby pictures, she was very sociable. Then we got down to business.) Man touches belly Woman whacks him away with well - placed Jujitsu arm - twist and Tai Chi arm push. "What'd you do that for? I was only making sure your baby was alright." "She's not YOUR baby, mister! You have, in one move, molested two people! Now get out of here!"
    12
  134. 12
  135. 12
  136. 12
  137. 12
  138. 12
  139. 12
  140. 12
  141. 12
  142. 12
  143. 12
  144. 12
  145. 12
  146. 12
  147. 12
  148. 12
  149. 12
  150. 12
  151. 12
  152. 12
  153. 11
  154. 11
  155. 11
  156. 11
  157. 11
  158. 11
  159. 11
  160. 11
  161. 11
  162. 11
  163. 11
  164. 11
  165. 11
  166. 11
  167. 11
  168. 10
  169. 10
  170. 10
  171. 10
  172. 10
  173. 10
  174. 10
  175. 10
  176. 10
  177. 10
  178. 10
  179. 10
  180. 10
  181. 10
  182. 10
  183. 10
  184. 10
  185. 10
  186. 10
  187. 10
  188. 10
  189. 10
  190. 10
  191. 10
  192. 10
  193. 10
  194. 10
  195. 10
  196. 10
  197. 9
  198. 9
  199. 9
  200. 9
  201. 9
  202. 9
  203. 9
  204. 9
  205. 9
  206. 9
  207. 9
  208. 9
  209. 9
  210. 9
  211. 9
  212. 9
  213. 9
  214. 9
  215. 9
  216. 9
  217. 9
  218. 9
  219. 9
  220. 9
  221. 9
  222. 9
  223. 8
  224.  @2GoatsInATrenchCoat  Learn how to pin up a pair of pants so they break right over your shoe. It's hard to do by yourself, but it can be done. Cut across both legs of the pants about 2 finger widths below that. With pants inside out, measure one finger width and fold that length down on all sides and iron with steam. Measure the leg one more finger down, fold the folded part down once more, capturing the raw edge of the first fold all the way around, and steam iron again. Find the top of the second fold which will be a finger width higher than the leg bottom. Thread a needle with a foot and a half of thread for sewing. A bit longer if you are double - thread sewing. Knot the bottom of the thread. Now you will blind hem: With pants leg still inside out, catch part of that top of the folded hem with your needle (about ⅛ inch) and pull thread through. Go to the fabric next to the hem, and about the same height, pick up another ⅛ inch from the fabric and pull through. Make this stitch not too far away from the first, about ¼ to less than ½ inch away. Move down the hem about ¼ inch and grab an ⅛ inch from the hem side, then move ¼ inch to the next fabric - side stitch. Keep alternating these stitches all around the leg hem till the knot you made at first. If you left some thread at the beginning knot, you can use that to tie off your hem. If not, then you will have to tie off your thread by passing through the inside of the hem a few times, or a couple of times with a fisherman's knot. A a little fabric glue (like Aleen's) will hold your knot down. Clip any threads to about ¼ inch to finish and apply fabric glue. Voila! One hem done! Now do the other side, making sure they end up the same length. Tip: save the cut fabric for patches for your jeans. I guarantee you will need it.
    8
  225. 8
  226. 8
  227. 8
  228. 8
  229. 8
  230. 8
  231. 8
  232. 8
  233. 8
  234. 8
  235. 8
  236. 8
  237. 8
  238. 8
  239. 8
  240. 8
  241. 8
  242. 8
  243. 8
  244. 8
  245. 8
  246. 8
  247. 8
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. 7
  253. 7
  254. Manual transmission will probably go the way of the starter, the crank, and the throttle. I learned and took my driver's test in an automatic, but I also learned on a manual transmission car. At the time, it was important to know both in case I had to drive one. And in 1985 it was good to know. Also, manual transmissions were cheaper. When my Mom bought me a car and we were quoted the prices, the automatics was several thousands more than manual, so she agreed to get a manual. TL;DR I love the stick! All my cars had sticks. I loved the stick on my first car—a Geo Metro — because it had only 3 tiny little cylinders, and a manual was the only way I could climb hills. My later cars had more power, and my Chrysler Neon had powerful front wheel drive that could get up steep hills in Floyds Knobs just north of Southern Indiana. 60° hills! In ice! Even my friend's Chevy S10 (back wheel drive) couldn't do that! But cars I drove after the last one I owned were automatic. I love to drive, and the rentals were powerful (and I had to learn them), but I really loved the stick. Like one gentleman said, it becomes part of you, an extension of your limbs; an extension of yourself. But it's the power I wanted, and while I loved the stick, I'll have to learn the new cars. I can live with that. And because electric cars are even more powerful—and more efficient — I really will have to learn them, too. Still, one does need to calculate the cost of fuel and propulsion. We know how much gasoline (RFG?) it takes to create how much electricity from hybrids. So how much gasoline translates to voltage? (energy; KWH; Joules) And how much energy per mile does it cost? KWH per dollar? Combustion engine drivers will fall away by attrition, and then only avid car enthusiasts will have them. (There will always be those.) Technology moves ever forward, and people move with it. People like me will die off (I'm 57), and electric cars will become cheaper than combustion engines. That is what will drive the car industry: the money people are willing to pay for them. And that will determine how much the car industry will sell them for.
    7
  255. 7
  256. 7
  257. 7
  258. 7
  259. 7
  260. 7
  261. 7
  262. 7
  263. 7
  264. 7
  265. 7
  266. 7
  267. 7
  268. 7
  269. 7
  270. 7
  271. 7
  272. 7
  273. 7
  274. 7
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 6
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. Lord Malloch-Brown, Yes, I understand that the stuffy politics of ambassadorial work must prevail to soften tempers of Ukranian and Russian leaders, but compare the heinous and crude methods of war Putin is waging: like China in the Korean War of the 1950's, he is throwing his people to the meat grinder to the point that Russian conscripted soldiers are braving their troops' mortars to be captured by Ukranians in hopes of better treatment. Ukranians are using the armaments and support they are given to fight a smarter, more efficient war to regain their country which was taken away by Russia. To expect Putin to give up what he has taken in peaceful talks is like expecting Mr. Donald Trump to pay his rightful back taxes and pay to contractors he bilked over the years by just being asked. It won't happen. Conservative reserving of promised help is reneging, and it threatens the plans of a world-recognized sovereign country to regain their rightful country's land. Yes, every regiment at one time or another has had to make executive decisions about changes in logistics. I would rather see these regiments in Ukraine adjust to unavoidable extenuating circumstances rather than dealing with supporting countries that can actually, deliberately make good on promises. We sit in relative comfort in our respective countries (I am American) while Ukranian service people sit in water in trenches and live with shelling as they try to get some rest to continue the fight while the war is in a stalemate. Also as they are taking back territory around Bakhmut, now is a critical time for support. Americans have not seen serious battle in our country since our civil war, and though there has been much more fighting in more parts of Britain, we both still have a peaceful buffer between ourselves and the worst conflicts, battles, and wars in the East. Our borders are secure. Understand that Putin will not stop at the Dniepr River if he ever gets there (he won't): Poland and the Baltic states are next. The point of this battle is not only to resist Russian aggression, but it has been put forward several times that Ukraine stands between Russia and NATO. And this is a big reason to support Ukraine.
    4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 3
  467. 3
  468. 3
  469. 3
  470. 3
  471. 3
  472. 3
  473. 3
  474. 3
  475. 3
  476. 3
  477. 3
  478. 3
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. I personally like his extreme characters. Very little if any YA angst. Science done in an industrial fashion. History of the Medieval Earth times used as a plan and plot to cause the downfall of the Empire and the rise of First Foundation. And the growing paranoia that something other than the progress of Foundation is controlling the destiny of the First Foundation. Ebling Mis, a volatile, thrifty man whose favorite cuss words are "unprintable" and "gal-AX-y." Susan Calvin who hates people and prefers robots. Hari Seldon, whose study of human nature put him in many culture clashes and embarrassing situations that could not help but turn him into a 3-D character (and ultimately the literary version of Asimov himself). R. Daneel Olivaw, the robot who traveled through worlds and lived the ages trying to fulfill not only the Three Laws of Robotics but also the Zeroth law (substitute "humanity" or "humankind" for "a human" in the First Law) which was instilled in him by another, more perceptive robot, R. Giskard. And my favorite, Golan Treviz, who determined which direction human history should continue to preserve its existence and chances to thrive. Oh, and I also like Greg Powell and Michael Donovan. All of these characters have developed depth and fleshing out and growth. Just because they all seem academic and dry doesn't mean they are flat, 2-D characters. Heck! Even a runaway robot enjoyed quoting Gilbert and Sullivan (even as Asimov loved to sing it and even Captain Jean-Luc Picard sang it).
    3
  517. 3
  518. Yes, there's a glycemic index, no it's not on the package. I have used a combination of plate division and carb counting (30g per meal X3 plus 30 g for snacks for females, an extra 25 g/day for males). Also taking my blood sugar, sometimes testing a food before and an hour after to see how my body acts upon it. Glycemic index is only a number used for research comparison. It doesn't really measure a whole lot. I think I get a better idea about any one food if I measure my blood sugar before and after a food. If a food makes my blood sugar stay high at 1 hour afterwords (close to 200, and I've measured some at 200+ a few points), then I know it is a high-glycemic food for me, and I must watch how much I eat of it at a time. Otherwise, I eat fruits and veggies of lower glycemic index like apples, peanut butter, meat-heavy foods, avocados, cucumbers, and other stuff in the produce section. I try to stay away from bread and rice, and if possible I remove rice from any frozen dinner. Since rice is mostly pure carbs, removing even five grams makes a difference, since each gram of carbs contains five calories each, and 25 calories removed makes a difference. Now I know why there is frozen riced cauliflower in the freezer section at the store. I've used it as a filler for stuffed cabbage successfully, and my stuffed bundles make 41g - carb meals. I've also found a small electronic scale useful. Mine cost $15.00,and a number of them cost $20.00 - $30.00. I try to keep to one slice of bread since one slice has 23g carbs. I like light rye, and it has about 3 or more grams less per serving of carbs per slice. Pair rye with sliver-sliced lean beef, Swiss cheese, saurkraut, and Thousand-Island or Russian dressing (Reuben on Rye), and you have an excellent, carb-friendly meal. Things like that. For cakes and cookies from scratch, I'd have to count total carbs and divide the whole thing by servings and determine carbs per serving. Yes it's a pain in the derriere, but it becomes easier as you do it more. Then you can save the info. And there are always carbs posted in the nutrition info on a food package. Another tool I use is Nutritionix.com where you can look up the nutrition info on most foods. It's the most comprehensive database out there. But I've read nutrition information since I was a child of about 8 yo.
    3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556.  Floofy Chicken  Do take courses you like as well as pre - med requirements. They are necessary to your personal and professional flourishing. For me, I took Marching Band. Also, I adored the German classes I took. I was a member of the German Honor Society (and Pre-med Honor Society), and, had I taken one more semester with 2 more German classes, I would have completed A German minor as well. (My German friend assured me, though, that my German was fluent enough to get along once I get to Germany —a bucket list travel item of mine.) But do what's right for you. For me, it was necessary to finish ASAP. Degree in hand. Besides, I was getting spring fever. Had I realized I could take Japanese — only a single credit hour — I might have taken one more semester, gotten that German minor, and taken another language that I wanted to take. I didn't realize Japanese was less complicated than Chinese. But find your passion! And make sure you confer often enough with your department head. They can help you plan your course, focus your direction, and steer you to avenues that can help you on your way. Talk to your professors about your ideas. In fact, interact with your professors often. If you are invited to join an honor society, join. Be wary of sororities. While they give great service, it can possibly eat into your school time. Balance is key. Do go to honor society functions and the meet and greet things. Often there are snacks, and you get to see people like deans, president, and provost. I love to hobnob at these! Much good studying and college - ing to you!
    3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. Alfonso J. Ramos Then we wouldn't have prosthetics, much less beautiful prosthetics. We wouldn't have artificial hearts or heart valve replacements. We wouldn't know about heretofore unknown organs like the recently found interstitium. We wouldn't know how the immune system works or how chemicals inside the body act in their many and varied ways. We wouldn't have oxygen concentrators that are lighter, smaller, and much less dangerous (no frozen parts) to use than liquid oxygen cylinders and the Linde Walker liquid O2 tank. We wouldn't have pacemakers. We wouldn't have MRI, X-Ray, PET, Ultrasound, or other imaging that have revolutionized diagnoses in general. We wouldn't have genetic testing. We wouldn't know how blood types work. We wouldn't know how immunity works or even have vaccines. We would still have endemic smallpox and severe illnesses that prey most often on children and infants (measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, pertussis, and others). We would not have discoveries like fungi that fight bacteria (penicillium mold, e.g.), nor culture media to determine what diseases are causing your symptoms. We would still have broken limbs in plaster casts rather than removable yet equally - effective soft casts. We would still have people having had radiation for cancer who have chronically swollen arms due to lymphedema caused by the radiation. We would have nothing but flats, tennis shoes, and heels instead of the choice of shoes we have today for sports, arch support, walking and standing support, and stylish orthopedic shoes. Even high heels have supported cork heels, padded soles, and several differences over decades. There are 3-D printer plans to build arm prosthetics for children and others. Movie technology has fathered a creation of a prosthetic arm for a child in the shape of the Iron Man arm that Robert Downey Jr. wore in the Marvel movies. That's what experimentation in medicine has given us, and more. And it continues to do so.
    3
  562. 3
  563. Ruben Stanišić Anyone can sound genuine if they believe in their ideas enough. The only things he said that were true were inequality, hierarchy, and self - compare. But even these, taken to extreme, turn into monstrous things: people living on the streets only able to get food, clothing, shelter, transportation, and even day work at the beneficence of a church or the public assistance that is not even a penny on the tax dollar and still unable to afford any creature comforts. Not their own apartment or house, no belongings, no transportation resources, no toilet. No deodorant or razor. No bed but an army cot and wool blanket. No company but those in despair. No food but being required to experience a sermon that doesn't help you at all. Hierarchy also applies to the people whose job is to administer the public assistance. Job >no job, yet these employed have more than those they help. And either they aren't grateful, or they are truly afraid that there is a knife's edge between them and the people they serve. And yet these people have an income, a roof over their head, food to eat, a decent bed, a shower, a private toilet, and even more than one room where they live. Many A Wal - Mart employee can't say that. But at Christmas and holiday time, who holds back from their children if they can at all give them a gift? No one. Who is prevented from seeing the town lit up with delightful decorations? No one. Even turkey dinners are served at shelter dining halls. But it wouldn't happen unless people, under all the scrabbling to be "King of the Hill" didn't feel other people were important because they were people.
    3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 2
  620. Mr マックラ No worse that when the world started using metric. It's nothing for a British person to measure out 500 grams of flour for their recipe, 500 milliliters for milk. Scientists used to measure work in foot - pounds. 9.81 meters/sec/sec replaced 32 feet/sec/sec as the measure of gravity in SI units. A 2-liter bottle of soda easily replaces a half gallon measure for purchase. It would be nothing to declare SI units in base 12 or base 8 or any other base. It was the U.S. that resisted the metric system even to this day. All other countries legislated it like Canada and France. In fact, the original measurements of the SI units are kept in Paris France. Gallons of gas instead of liters. Pounds of flour instead of kilos (kilograms). It doesn't matter the measure. It matters the price. Engines are measured in liters now, not cubic inches. It would be nothing to buy liters of motor oil for your car. You would still pour in only up to the marks on the dip stick. The SI units would be recalibrated. The units would be changed. Dozmeter. Dozliter. Dozkilogram. 50 dozmeters. 5 dozkilos. 0.3 dozliters. Dozmeters per second (seconds wouldn't change; they're already in a dozenal system. A baker's dozen would be 11 dozenal. Easy. The only hard part would be conversion, as it always is. But if you buy a 2-liter in the store, you don't have to figure how many half - gallons it is; the company has already done it, and you can see the difference between your soda package and your milk package. And so on.
    2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. Nuclear is great under certain conditions. The conditions I prefer are fusion. Why? Because fissionable materials are rare and limited, however much energy they can release. And on the point of releasing energy, you can't get 100% usable energy from it. As you convert nuclear energy to heat energy, matter and energy is lost in the process. You can't let the fissionable material go as energetic as it can, or else we end up with Chernobyl and Fukushima. So you can't get the optimum energy from that due to the need for control rods. Further, in order to keep the reaction going, you need to slow down the neutrons released from one nucleus in order for it to be more likely to hit another nucleus. If you use control rods for this, that's kinetic energy lost. Then water requires 540 calories per gram to heat water to steam. More energy lost in the transfer to kinetic energy. Then in the turbine, kinetic energy is lost due to friction by the turning turbine and the steam hitting the turbine vanes. A necessary evil in order to produce electricity. And then there are the losses of energy the same as electricity from a hydroelectric plant before it gets to our homes. Non-renewable Large losses converting it to a usable form Rare fuel And causes disease such as cancer. Deaths alone aren't a reason to abandon nuclear fusion. But if people are exposed to nuclear waste, many people will developed different kinds of cancers. Animals can develop cancers, and the land in which nuclear waste is buried will become unusable. To me, there are just too many question marks over fission than any answers given have been able to satisfy. But fusion releases even more energy than fission. One big question I'd like answered, "How could we get higher amounts of usable energy from fusion?"
    2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680.  @MNHS16  Indeed! Catching it in time is the most important part of treatment. But sometimes it's hard to tell. I woke up one morning lying on my front. In adjusting myself for comfort, I felt a prominent, hard breast lump. I knew right away it was cancer. It was diagnosed stage II and I beat it. But not all cancers and cysts are like that. I had a mammogram and then an ultrasound biopsy of both breasts. On one breast, it was a clear pinpoint calcification easily aspirated. On the other it was a cyst that was deep enough in and soft that I couldn't even feel it. Not even when I poked directly on top of it. When I looked back on previous years, I remember times I checked, and it seemed part of my underarm was thickened, but at the time I didn't think it was anything. Now I know even that needs to be checked. Self-exams are necessary, but mammograms are much more diagnostic. I thank science for developing them and medicine for strongly recommending them. And all the health periodicals editors who wrote about breast cancer in the 1970's. Still, even though I caught my cancer early, my cancer had to be treated aggressively. Back in the 1970's, people with cancer were only diagnosed like at stage 4, either because they didn't know or they were afraid of a cancer diagnosis. They thought they would die. Or have to have a radical mastectomy. And many did. In the 1970's, there was a great public service campaign for people to check themselves for possible symptoms of breast cancer. The big thing was that if you found something that seemed like an early cancer, take it to a doctor to treat it early for a great chance of surviving it. This alone saved so many people's lives. I've seen some pictures of stage 4 cancer-ridden breasts, and they are horrific! Open wounds with tissues that seemed like someone caught their breast in a food processor! And these were in black and white! Cancer treatment is amazingly advanced these days, and treatments are developing all the time! If you have cancer, there has never been a better time than now to take care of it medically! It's not just pharmaceuticals. Chemicals from food known to fight cancer are being developed into treatments. Medicine is not ignoring nature. Tea, apples, cruciform vegetables, root vegetables, Avocados, tomatoes, dark green leafy vegetables, and more have such cancer fighting elements. And you don't have to wait for science to produce these. Immune support awaits you in the grocery produce section today! Bon Appétit!
    2
  681. I've definitely got the palmeris longus on both arms. I wasn't sure at first, but I wasn't flexing enough. And I checked and made sure it wasn't the other one. But during the test I wasn't sure if I did, and I wondered if it could be only on one side, and you showed that yes! It could be! But I'm a throwback. I'll leave that genetic change to the kiddos. And yes, I believe religion and science can coexist. In fact I think of someone commanding "Let there be light!" and the Big Bang with all its catastrophic splendor and cacophony happens! But science —The Standard Model —has been studied and built for thousands of years at least. And not only has evolution been going on these billions of years, we are seeing it in realtime. Any time a microbe changes genetics, that's evolution. Anytime a species dies out, that's evolution. We found out we have useless microbial DNA in our genome. That's evolution. We can use our own genome to track evolutionary changes of microbes as much as changes in our own phenotypes. That's evolution. Methylation has appeared, methyl groups placed on DNA that have to do with gene expression. That's evolution in realtime. That we are multicellular animals with cells that seem like prokaryotes slipped in and took up residence inside. Even mitochondria have their own interstitium and DNA. That is evolution. But we are aware of ourselves and our surroundings, and we as individuals are always studying "what makes me me?" what makes me different from you but the same as you? Why do we get along, take care of each other, and let each other - help each other - live? What is it about ourselves that can think of these things? Feel these things? Consciously grab and study things? What is consciousness? What is it that makes us live? Where does this come from? I can only think that contemplating such things is religion.
    2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. When I first read the situation, I yelled "Frivolous lawsuit!" and I could see the judge throw it out. A mediator might have been a better idea. Bees help keep plants strong with pollinating species with different varieties with different DNA. In fact, if the neighbor has an apple orchard, they might be glad of bees pollinating their trees with other varieties since apples will reject pollen they recognize is similar to its own DNA. (Another story.) Now if the plaintiff were growing roses of strict varieties, they might have a case. Even so, the plaintiff could leverage the bees if the plaintiff protected particular roses from pollination while letting bees pollinate certain exposed ones. They might profit from both true - breeding roses as well as chance new varieties they could develop. Both plaintiff and defendant could make money off of this. As far as the plaintiff getting stung as a child and they complain to the defendant, the defendant has the opportunity to educate the plaintiff on bees, their non - violent ways (unlike vindictive wasps), and the advantages of pollination for the plaintiff's own flowers. Then they could work together to come up with a mutual solution. They could even barter goods and services. Maybe the beekeeper in an excellent market with a big clientele desiring roses or poseys, and the beekeeper could help sell the neighbors flowers. Or the neighbor could sell honey alongside their flowers. Also what about the habits of bees? They often come out in early morning before ants get a chance to get at a flower's nectar. Dew is too slippery for ants, so honeybees have the advantage, with their wings. If the bees do come out in early morning and leave soon after, it could be a good opportunity to sleep in. Or spend time on a screened - in porch. Or have morning coffee. Even being on a concrete patio can keep bees from stinging you, because you don't step on them. Now if the plaintiff were culturing mosquitos and letting them roam free, that might up the ante for a case. Like training a dog to be vicious and letting them off - leash.
    2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. There are already entities in place to limit what you get. The USDA regulates the quality of food you get. The health of the animals or plants from which your food comes from. If you go to the market, would you rather shuck a corn husk and get a pristine ear of corn? Or shuck it and come face to face with a corn worm eating it? Or a cob with very few full kernels on it? Or rust (a fungus) on it? Would you want worms in your apples and have to play "apple roulette? Throw away most of your apples because birds or other animals got there first? How about a spread of E. coli O157 or worse because of unsafe working conditions for the harvesters? Diseases passed on by infected birds, chickens, pigs, cows and sheep because of the livestock infected by infected fields? OSHA does a lot of good for industry. And so do Unions. The EPA helps protect the environment, but in doing so protect us the consumers. In protecting us, they protect the best asset companies have: their consumers. Robust products create a robust market, and people will buy those high quality products. Companies benefit greatly from this, can actually cut costs without sacrificing quality, and everybody wins. What businesses these days don't understand—or at least many CEO's—is that you can't take all the profit off the top, not pay the people on the bottom, and stagnate the company improvement by hollering you have to pay the stockholders. It doesn't work like that. You have to reinvest most of your profits back into your company, take care of your frontline employees first because they are the money makers of the company as they produce the saleable product. Raises and bonuses. Incentives like on-the-spot bonuses for meeting exceptional quotas for a particular time limit. 401K or better retirement plans, support for schooling and continuing education. Medical coverage. Middle management is next because they are paid more money already and there are fewer of them. The company works gets a large cut because constant improvement is the mark of a great company with a great product. The stockholders get a cut because their holdings were the money invested in the first place, and they rightly expect investment returns. BUT investment returns should follow proportion of the profits after everything and everyone else has been paid. Yes, the CEO gets paid. And I'm not averse to someone getting a six-figure salary, even upwards of 900,000.00/year. But I know I don't need a six-figure salary for a good living including a home and a car. What would I do with a seven-figure one? (Don't answer that: it's a rhetorical question.) Want to know how to run a business? Here: (just remember the "machinery" includes the people working in it as I've said above) "Yankee Dood It" https://youtu.be/2auI6Uz3D8I?si=ih-CtWAuAsLb_hp9
    2
  749. 2
  750. Nothing to offer in the marketplace? That's not the fault of the elderly and disabled. That's the fault of the marketplace refusing to hire the experienced and talented elderly and alternately - abled people of society. This is not a market for the employee; it is a market for the capricious companies whose goal is not to hire for long term but to hire temporary employees and young people to whom they pay no benefits nor training. And they complain there is nobody qualified for their jobs. It takes about a year in a job for an employee to reach full potential in a career job (a cashier job is NOT a career), and most companies refuse to invest that time, effort, and cost, preferring to hire employees at poverty wages. (Walmart, I'm looking at you!) Time and again, too, the alternately-abled are overlooked in their talents and experience and abilities and knowledge. Our needs are looked at with disdain and revulsion, with fear that we with disabilities will want and demand a slice of pie bigger than the company can "afford" and then bring suit if the company doesn't comply. Or maybe they think we will become those disgruntled employees that get revenge. It simply isn't so. We who have disabilities have been systematically rejected, our needs ignored ("What? You can't work at a one - person job while sitting one foot away from your neighbor who is also working on a one - person job in a roomful of 100 people doing one - person jobs with a cacophony of a live warehouse as the office? With all the noise around and the neighbors talking incessantly next to you? How could you possibly need relief from that? After all, anxiety, mania, and depression are all in your head. Snap out of it and get to work! ") Business is not built for the individual and her needs.
    2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. Michael Cook: I am not satisfied with the status quo. I am not satisfied with former Medieval practices of leeching, bleeding, strapping down (psychiatry), exorcism, and stigma attached to old medical practices that largely didn't work. I am already 13 years older than the 40 years people at that time used to live. I prefer the cultivated foods of today and developed supplements that augment nutrition. I prefer medicines we never had in Medieval times: everything from sulfa drugs to penicillin to fourth generation antibiotics to eye care to ear care, to electric toothbrushes to local and general anesthetics, and more. Every time I get a mammogram I celebrate because it means my cancer has not come back. I celebrate paramedic field medicine and research that showed that medical help administered to a heart attack victim within an hour ensures the best chance for survival. I am grateful for the iron lung that preserved the life of my dad when he was a teen with polio and paralyzed, and when he was a man of 38 when it saved his life from complications arising from his childhood infection with polio. He lived to 61 years old, one of the oldest few survivors of the 1953 polio epidemic. We benefitted from Apollo Space Program discoveries almost directly for his treatment and quality of life. His last iron lung, instead of being a monstrosity that took 10 firefighters to get into the house, was a tube the size of a couch seat and a compressor that was much smaller and more effective than the bellows on the older one. The latest one could be picked up by 2 people, and it allowed him and my mom to go tour Virginia in their van. So no, I am not satisfied with the status quo. I will always want better lifestyle and more options available to me.
    2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. Oops! Planes following the flight path (which is not quite circular because of takeoff and landing) do bank by automatic instruments. This makes them compensate for the centripetal force pulling the plane toward outer space. Using your merry-go-round analogy such that a person held out like in the picture, note that if that child were ever let go, the child would fly off in the direction perpendicular to the line that connected the child to the merry-go-round center. This is physics of angular momentum. A plane following the flight path takes a curved path where it is tethered to the Earth by gravity. It acts like you do in an amusement park Tilt - a - Whirl ride, where you are squished up to the outside wall. If that side of the ride car opened up, you would fly out the same way, perpendicular to the car side at the point of release. Same with a plane. Same with a ship. People on a sailing ship that leans to one side (it is listing) will lean to compensate for the ship's leaning so it feels more upright. In the same way, a passenger plane is designed to compensate by banking: leaning its wing to be perpendicular to the curved flight path so that it feels like it's just gravity working on you. This is why you can't prove only by a level, that the Earth is flat. Not all the force vectors are known and taken into account. Angular momentum is also how astronomers worked out the presence of planets in our solar system beyond Saturn. Apparent wobbles in the paths of planets we knew and plotted should be caused by an outside force. A planet was predicted to do that, and they later found a planet in the very spot that caused the wobbling. And the next and the next. And now we've found systems in which planets are not in an ecliptic plane. Some planetsorbiting around the stars' "poles" (the "pole points" being determined by the center of gravity between the 2 stars of a binary system in perhaps a number of star systems. And there are many such binary systems)
    2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. I'm from USA, so it's with outside interest that I look on UK's stats. In the US, or at least in my state of Kentucky, we've pretty well have determined that Omicron is moving through our population much faster than Delta could, though Omicron seems less virulent. What my question is, "How big is the population of England and Wales compared to Scotland, and how concentrated are the populations in each large city?" Like London and Edinburgh. Large cities in the US—New York City and Los Angeles, and even my city of Louisville have experienced higher numbers of Omicron infections, most notably in people who have not been vaccinated at all. Whether they protested mandates from the government or haven't had access (access has increased so that no one is an hour's drive from one), these are the people who are suffering in hospitals. And how are governments placing restrictions? Our most effective restrictions are to limit large gatherings: restaurants and bars (Pubs in UK). Also, people planning large gatherings like X-mas, New Year's Eve at Times Square, or family reunions were advised to limit them to 10 people or less. The original recommendations are still in place: #washyourhands #wearamask #sixfeetapart And I've seen a lot of people wearing masks and honoring the marks on grocery floors and in other places that are 6 feet apart (2 meters). These measures reduced Delta variant and nearly wiped out the Wild Type, but these variants were selected for by our own doing, and different efforts make a difference. Keep a people from going anywhere and people will mount a hostile protest. Take targeted measures —and compensate the businesses which are affected— and people will accept that.
    2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. No, no, no! Colors are not invented. Greeks did not say there was no color blue and Norse did not say there was no orange. And I know that there are blue violets, the ones that grew in my yard when I was a child were real purple. Purple, as the violet in the rainbow, are at a spectrum wavelength of 380nm from peak to peak. This is not made up. This is not a blue wavelength mixed with the red wavelength of the next rainbow as a double rainbow. Yes, rainbows are diffractions of white light. But because we cannot see most of the light in white light, there is a distance between the primary diffraction and secondary diffraction, so visible light spectra from the same light source cannot overlap. If you see purple, you are seeing the real deal. The reason pigments look purple is because the pigment absorbs ALL the visible light EXCEPT purple. That's why plants are green. Chlorophyll absorbs all but green wavelengths of visible light. Pigments can be "invented," that is a person can fool around with compounds that will reflect the color you are looking for, but colors themselves—the wavelengths of light cannot be created. Now if you can't see violet or indigo, I can't help if you're colorblind. I can see vivid purple myself very well. As for the cones on our retinae, the two kinds we have (red, blue, and green) have different sensitivities to any one wavelength of light. These receptors send the brain signals about the wavelengths, and the brain assembles them into the concept of a color that most of our species define the same way. We perceive wavelength 380 nanometers different ways, and the brain interprets them as purple. But no matter how we perceive them—none of us can see ultraviolet but I it's there and science uses it— we perceive them in the same way as each other. But violet/purple has always existed, orange has always existed, and blue has always existed. And you can't invent color. Don't confuse people with semantics.
    2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 1
  1025. I have a concern about fracking From a chemical point of view. If water is left in place of the shale, it wouldn't stay there but dissolve the rock around it, wouldn't it? It would leave a much bigger hole than was fracked out. What about artesian springs? And aquifers in general? Don't they both have shale layers to act as a kind of pipe to keep water in the limestone layer in-between? Like you said, the shale is the goal of fracking, and aquifers provide a lot of shale. We shall be disturbing this naturally clean source of water by putting holes in this natural pipe and losing good water at best, contaminating and making it undrinkable at worst. At a time when the Western US is in drought while flash floods destroy lands, people, and property East of the Mississippi River, don't we need, more than ever, to preserve our underground waters which have feed us in more ways than one? And as for a forest on top of a concrete piston, if you've ever looked at sidewalls next to trees or grass and noticed a buckling in the sidewalk or grass growing in the sidewalk, you know that Nature wins every time. Say a forest does grow on top of this piston: trees are notorious for seeking water. They crack water pipes of clay or plastic or any material. This is his we get dirt and the beginnings of soil. Say that a piston is good for 100 years. A tree growing on top of the piston would gum up the works in less than 20 years because it would grow down to the water beneath the piston through any space that offered, including the space—however small—between the piston and its cylinder. Surely you have seen pictures of boulders grown through by trees. Search for "how paper beats rock" and you can find a picture of a boulder the size of a man, cracked through by a gigantic tree. The caption is "This is how paper beats rock."
    1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. LIFT4POWER A theory is an explanation of ALL physical OBSERVATIONS, explains the reasons why things happen as they do, and predicts the consequences of the causes that are seen in observations, which are subsequently found as true. If consequences don't follow the predictions of the theory constructed, then the theory must be adjusted to say, "Okay, you can't explain the observation with that explanation. We need another explanation to cover this instance and still be valid for the rest of the observations we made. And this new explain —this new theory —should generate causal predictions that later observations will prove true. Thus is why we know that Einstein's theory of how gravity works is true. He predicted gravity waves that would, like waves from a stone dropped in a puddle, to come from the motion of all objects in the universe, which is spacetime warped like a trampoline. 100 years later (or 2016?), using a huge, protected laser interferometer, we detected the gravity wave of two black holes colliding. Einstein predicted it in his mathematics. 100 years later, we measured it with our tools. That is the power of the word THEORY. Theory is tantamount to fact. It means that the scientists who have studied it are 99.99999999999% sure they are right. BUT a scientist always allows for that 0.00000000001% possibility they could be wrong. If they didn't, science would become dogma and would not change even in the face of new, contradicting evidence. Science self - corrects. When an explanation doesn't cover all evidence, then the prevailing THEORY must be modified so it DOES cover all observations, evidence, and predictions. This is why science continues and why we need more scientists. To prove again and again that we are understanding and properly utilizing our new observations with the theory that COVERS it ALL!
    1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. I really wish someone would do a new study on how language learning works. Kids more often than not are in an environment from day one hearing their native language. It takes a while for their brain to wire up enough to articulate, and then they take a couple of years to learn how to talk. That's the babble phase: they are learning to talk. Then they say short words and phrases, and then over years they learn more complex language. We teach a language for at most 2 years on most schools in the US. My sister and her friend were the only 2 I ever knew who took 4 years of Spanish. They spent the whole year reading and translating books like Don Quixote to each other. I took 25 hours of German language in college, which would be one or 2 classes in each semester, and I only had 2 in conversational German: six hours. Truly, if I'd held on for 2 more classes, I would have completed a minor in German. There were circumstances, though. People say babies learn it more fluently. I took German for that long, and I speak the accent well. That's what I understand as fluency: being understood and accepted as a genuine, native speaker. I speak with a Baden Baden accent according to my German friend. She understands me and I... well, I understand rudiments. But I chalk that up to use it or lose it. I've even known her to search for a word in her native German. (She's an American citizen who lives near me.) However, she assures me that when I visit Germany I will do well. But if people come out of 2 years in a language and can speak well and natively, how is that any different from a toddler learning language? They still have to learn grammar, and that still happens in school at age five. Five years immersed and they still have need of refinement. Please! Someone! Analyze this further!
    1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. I'm so glad you had a good experience here! 🇺🇲🇷🇺 I like to think we in the US have nice things to offer. If I'm walking down the street in general and I pass someone I don't know, then I'll make short eye contact and nod slightly to acknowledge they are there, and then I go on. I'm not sure why, but that acknowledgement nod is important to me. If it's someone I know, I'll say, "Hi, how you doing?" If the other person does it, I'll answer "Alright, thanks. And you?" They'll say, "Fine, thanks." Except when I answer, it sounds more like "A'ight. You?" and "a'ight" rhymes with "tight." I smile slightly when I'm around people. When I'm talking to someone, I smile more, and the more engrossed I am in the conversation I am, the more animated my face becomes. I smile a lot with friends. I laugh at amusing things, too. When I worked at K-Mart (like Walmart but better IMO in its heyday) we at the cash registers were required to smile at everyone in line. It's not that I didn't want to, but for 6—8 hours, smiling is tough! There were plenty of days when I had to fake smile at work when I really didn't want to. I would do this a while, and then about an hour into work, someone would remark and say, "You have such a lovely smile!" and then I would melt inside and my smile would become real for the rest of the day. And because I would try to talk to everybody as I rang their order up, my relationships with my customers became a bit closer. Myy line would be always longer than any others, even though I was working quickly. People preferred to come into my line! That amazed me! Smiling makes a person feel good inside.
    1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. Trump's lawsuits are history-making because their results will not only affect him but would make precedent for law in the future because NOBODY in the almost 250 years this country existed has ever tested the extremes of the Constitution and Rule of Law. The Gentlemen and Ladies in office respect and acknowledge the Constitution and Rule of Law as 2 of the backbones of America. And these affect us citizens equally. It looks like fear of Donald Trump but it's not. It is trying Trump with the same laws that will be used for defendants for decades to come if not longer. Indeed! Protecting the inviolability of the jury and the respect of the court and officers therein is necessary to the proper dispensing of justice to plaintiff and defendant alike. And defendants in a criminal case must be treated as innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Because Trump is the first president to do what he did (allegedly), Trump represents not only himself but all of us in court now and for a long time hence. Yes, Trump is repugnant. What he has allegedly done is sickening, sordid, and wrong. (Also remember he is already adjudged a rapist) But the case law that springs from these cases—right down to what you can say and where— affects all American citizens. Not just him. Consider that some law that is cited in law documents were made as early as the 1800's. That speaks to the careful construction of laws that apply even today. The law that is created today and near future including precedent set in the process will apply to to you and me and all other United States citizens as much as Citizen Trump. And therefore all the "I" 's must few dotted and "T"' s crossed.
    1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. If I were a boss having somebody acting to cover up a plot, I think I would try not to talk too much or too long to my fixer. I'd want to make it seem that my relationship with this person who covers things up was such a casual contact that nothing could be made of it. For example: "Put the boss on, would you?" * 5-10 seconds pass * "hello?" "Yeah, Boss. [code name] here." "Go ahead." "Uh, that thing we talked about last time?" "Yeah." "Just now finalized it." "Good." "I'll keep you up to date." "Good." "yeah. Bye." "Bye." * hang up cuts off call * That can take 20 seconds. Ever have a minute of silence? How about a silent prayer? I'm a writer in a writers group. I wrote a character knocked on a door for five minutes. Another writer challenged me to knock on a door for five minutes. My hand felt like it was about to fall off, and the knocking was obnoxious. Wash your hands while someone times you for 20 seconds. It's a long time. Before Covid-19, I might have taken half that time. I still think washing my hands takes too long. (But I do it.) I've had a phone call or more in which I got information in which I said, "Uh huh. Uh huh. Uh huh. Uh huh. Okay, bye." I've had plenty of phone calls that were 30 seconds or less. On old cell phones, the counter was right where you would stare at it. Tracing a land line phone call could be done if you kept the target talking for about a minute. Keeping them talking for the trace time was difficult, and if memory serves, it took about a minute ans a half. Two subjects can be touched on in a minute-30.
    1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. I can write a better book than WB, even with some mundane things such as classes. Classes at school had meaning to me (all except American History, though I wrote a hella good research paper on Looney Toons 40's cartoons and their role in WWII). I have a story about a high school young lady who takes her fascination for science to a personal meaning and project for herself. A good book is one in which all the elements of a story move the action along. If the writing doesn't move the story along, or if it bogs down in description without being significant to the character, their back story, or the necessaries to complete the story, good writers cut it out or modify it. That's a big part of story writing. There are plenty of "shoot - em - up" games, either realistic or cartoon-y, that engage those who like to hit targets. There are puzzles a-plenty to challenge a person's logic, and plenty of sweet, animal - cuteness apps to appeal to the "awwww!" factor in people. The staying power of these is variety, moving the story along — or in case of the app "Klepto Cats", new cats bringing in new items for you as you let them in and out of your virtual home, and you earn and dress them in "kawaii outfits and cool accessories. Goals are immediate, even as they are in books (relatively), and even moreso in movies. The best apps aren't necessarily done by large companies. WB replied on its own reputation in the video industry, Looney Toons, and Harry Potter to promote their app, and it sucks. But Klepto Cats or Cut the Rope have engaging power. Though each has its engagement life cycle.
    1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. I'm not so sure about saying America is an empire, although I may be a biased American. The US is one country, not like the British Empire which comprised several countries (including Canada, India, and Australia). The British Empire had countries across the world. Now it recognizes much of its former colonies as sovereign nations, but each of them is loyal to the Crown. If not loyal, then friendly mates. America has supported Britain at war even as America has supplied allies with troops and arms, for better or worse. Indeed, America has been snidely called "Big Brother" after the governing body in the book 1984. Many commentators ("talking heads") have also upbraided the American Military as Big Brother, too. Throwing our military might around. There are checks and balances in the US government, and it is governed by not only the President, but also by Congress (House of Representatives and Senate) and Judicial (US Supreme Court of the United States and the lower systems of courts) branches. The President cannot declare war. Only Congress has that right. The House of Representatives can impeach a federal government office holder including and most well-known being the President, but only the Senate can try and convict threw one impeached. Different divisions have their specific duties and privileges. Besides that, The First Amendment gives the right to Americans of freedom of speech, something which has kept us together as a country since we started. How? By allowing people to let off steam. You can say, "The President is a fink!" and you won't get arrested and tried for treason. It has helped diffuse so much anger and disgruntlement. But freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of peaceable assembly, and freedom to redress grievances—and freedom of religion—have allowed Americans to come up with creative ways to grow this country. For instance, Muhammed Ali, famous boxer, Olympic gold medal winner, and humanitarian protested the Viet Nam War. He said he as a brown man was not going to another country to kill another brown man. Such was the controversy over that war. Americans all over the country protested it. Many did get arrested for supposedly rioting (not peaceable assembly, but the lines were blurred), but there was a lot of coverage by the American press, and Americans learned about it and made their own minds up about it. The American Founding Fathers made the decision not to allow or make tariffs from state to state because it would cost too much to transport goods from coast to coast where you could easily cross ten states from California to New York. I don't see America falling apart. We are bound economically, we're friendly with our neighbors Canada and Mexico, and we have never had to conscript soldiers since the 1960's. We have an all volunteer military! We have many things a lot of countries might be jealous of. We don't have a military culture. We don't have mandatory military service. We move freely between states. We vote for our leaders, and we have Rule of Law as much as adversarial counsel (lawyers; attorneys) in court. We also have checks on that, too. If a court cases lost, the person can take it to a higher court, who reviews it for proper procedure and presentation of evidence. There is so much in our United States Constitution about who does what, that it has been a successful blueprint for this country for nearly 250 years. I don't see our cohesive nation falling apart very soon.
    1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. Oh, yeah. I hope you were humoring him by saying "centrifugal force," because there is no such thing. "Centrifugal force" describes a force outward from a connected source that the object exerts. But there is no force the object exerts. We see that an object at rest stays at rest unless acted on by an outside force. This is Newton's first law, and it is proved on a billiards tabletop. None of the balls at rest start moving by themselves. Once a ball is hit (a force is applied) it starts moving, even if you make the lousiest hit. And it keeps on going til a force acts on it: it hits another ball; it hits the edge of a pocket and gravity pulls it in; friction of the table stops it; it hits a bumper; it is stopped by another outside force. It does not stop by itself. (a hockey puck on an ice rink demonstrates it better) Centripetal force is the proper term. Gravity affects all objects (and even light!) at all times. When an object is within Low Earth Orbit, Earth's gravity affects an object the most. This happens anywhere, but Earth is what we experience. Gravity is an acceleration, 9.8 m/s/s. Take the object of the International Space Station. In orbit around the Earth, it has an angular momentum, mass of the station times the velocity of the station. How? Gravity of Earth tugs on it. This tug gets the station to move in a certain direction. Because of where the station is when it gets tugged and the acceleration of gravity, the station goes outward. But the Earth acts on the station more, so the station is pulled to Earth in the next moment and the next moment and so on. Earth's outside gravity keeps tugging on the station while the station wants to hurtle into space in the direction it was tugged. But the Earth keeps accelerating it in an entirely different direction all the time, pulling the station constantly so that the space station is pulled into a circle around the Earth. The velocity of the space station, if Earth's gravity were nullified, would go in the direction of the last force acting on it (force being the station's mass times the acceleration of gravity), which is perpendicular to the direction of gravity, which is toward Earth's center, approximately. In contrast, the concept of centrifugal force says that if gravity were nullified, the space station would fly off in the opposite direction of the force on it by gravity. That is, at right angles to the observed direction our space station would take since it really would follow Newton's First Law of Motion.
    1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. You guys are helping support Putin by not including everything about Donald Trump. It is no small thing that he is up to his ears in court cases from now until at least November, 2024. He has had gag order upon gag order placed on him because what he said was threatening the lives of court personnel, witnesses, and officials. He was also skewing the information given inside the courtroom to the media. Essentially he was trying to turn his court cases into campaign stumping. And the courts are not allowing that. And those who were accused with Donald Trump are one by one abandoning him and giving testimony against him. Donald Trump is flirting with contempt of court which involved jail time. And while some have speculated about whether he can be president from jail, there are many lawyers who are pushing for the constitutional amendment 14 section 3 which, if applied in the case of a conviction of insurrection would bar that one so convicted from ever holding office again. These court cases are big news in America. I'm surprised that since you mention both Donald Trump and American election in the same breath, that you don't follow up with the court cases and what is at stake. If the American election is so important to other countries' involvement in Ukraine, how come you only mumble about the few details you give? Are your journalists on vacation? One can't help think Britain is getting a yellow streak up their back from what you say. We in America are not going to stop supporting Ukraine. Are you with us?
    1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. My kitchen dishes and bowls MUST be microwavable. Thick polypropylene is microwaveable. I have some polypropylene cups I picked up free from a local fair/festival that I microwave water in for hot beverages. I have heavy - duty kitchen scissors for all kinds of cutting jobs, even sometimes Yorkshire pudding and pizza. I started with one sauce pan and stock/pasta pot which took care of most soups, sauces, and pasta dishes. And I have made in the past 2 days two batches of borscht in my 5-quart stock pot. I have cast - iron skillets, presents from a friend, which I have grown up cooking with, and a steel - clad steel skillet I absolutely adore cooking in. (avocado burritos anyone?) A can opener, a church key (for juice cans), and a Gilhoolie—the best jar lid opener in the world! And a knife sharpener. I don't need steak knives, but a butcher knife, a utility knife, and a paring knife are my go-to's, as well as a good cleaver. And silicone dipper, spatula, and large spoon. My steel spatula is more efficient, though. And bowl scrapers. And bowls for my stand mixer my Mom gave me. Yes, I have a waffle maker, but it was a long - ago purchase and I'd rather keep it. And my slow cooker is quite useful. And so are YouTube channels like "The Magic Slow Cooker" I look for simple recipes (over five ingredients is pushing it), with ingredients that are familiar. I get herbs and spices in bulk. I get a large cut of meat and either have the butcher cut it or parcel it myself into individual cuts I wrap and freeze. I get dry favorite beans. I save the bone in a ham for green beans and other beans as well.
    1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. I was going to vote for Bernie Sanders. I really wanted to vote for him instead of Hillary Clinton because I preferred his policy. When he dropped out before the Democrats' primary, I was so upset I was going to write him in. My friends tried to talk me out of it saying it was essentially a vote for Trump. I said I didn't think so, that everyone should vote their heart. I reacted vehemently against their outcries. How did I vote? I voted for Hillary Clinton against Trump. And I did not regret that decision, though I was very sad on Primary Day and General Election Day. Did I vote that way because of my friends' arguments? No. Did I vote in reaction to Trump? maybe a little. But I mainly voted because I knew deep down that in 2016 Trump was a menace to society. I couldn't let that happen. So I joined the side that gave the popular vote to Clinton, but the electorate to Trump. (We really need to get rid of the Electoral College.) TL;DR I look back, now, and I know I was right in making my own decision in voting for Clinton. Not because it was a vote against Trump. Not because I would have been on the side of destroying this country. But because Clinton did offer a viable and workable alternative to Bernie Sanders' policy. We may disagree on how to do it. And we may disagree on how to fund it. But people in Congress (at least before 2016) were willing to at least debate policy. And the message by John McCain said it best when a woman called Obama an Arab. McCain said, "No ma'am." that Obama was a decent man that McCain just had differences of opinion on policy but that McCain liked him. Obama even said he would like to share a bourbon with Mitch McConnell, and that he could always count on McConnell to tell him just how Republicans would vote. I'm sure that Biden has a much tougher time with Republicans today because of MAGA. To wit: the security issues addressed by the aid package to Ukraine legislation that gave Republicans everything they asked for. But when Donald Trump said to vote against it, Republicans scuttled it. As a Chinese curse exhorts, we live in interesting times.
    1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. Lukashenko sounds a lot like American President Trump. I figure Trump read Lukashenko's and Putin's playbook and tried to implement it in USA. TL;DR There are several reasons why it didn't work 1. We weren't going to be divided as a country by creating a "Middle Eastern and Mexican refugee haters" faction. Black Americans have been awakening people to care about all peoples rights including theirs. More people advocate for black and brown people now than ever in history. 2. Despite inherent bias against non- white people, both blacks and whites and other ethnic groups have protested successfully without being jailed. It is our right, written straight into our Constitution: "Congress shall make no law ...forbidding the freedom of speech or of the press..." All the 50 states have similar writing in State Constitutions. No protesters peaceably assembled should be jailed, and for the most part, they weren't. 3. We have real elections and more than 1 party. For example, the Republican party, the Democratic party, the Green party, and the Libertarian party. Each party has a party election to choose whom the people want to represent them. These are Primaries. The General Election is where people vote for the one candidate they want to lead as President. This grab for power didn't work for Trump, even though he tried to sabotage mail-in ballots by having the Postmaster General remove mail-sorting machines. He also tried to command vote counters to stop counting votes. Didn't work. Government workers swear service to the Constitution and by extension, the Rule of Law, not to a President. Violating that brings fines and jail time. 3. President Trump tried to persuade both the Governor of Georgia and VP Pence to first cut out a fixed number of pro-Biden ballots that would allow Trump to win a second election. He told VP Pence to not certify the election. And you can't tell my he didn't whip up his followers to storm the Capitol building. 4. Our president would have tried to introduce a bill to abolish the limitation on the number of Presidential terms they can serve. (the irony is that Trump's party had put in the term limitation against the Democrats because of the only president to sit more than 3 terms, Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. 5. All the things dictators and monarchs do at the expense of their people, like profiting materially and monetarily from being in office (besides the salary paid to office-holders) are specifically prohibited by the Constitution. This also includes trying to pin wrongdoing on potential election rivals. Donald Trump was impeached twice for these violations, and he even now faces civil and criminal charges against him that he committed while in office, and even before he'd become president. President Trump threatened to call on the US Military to prevent the peaceful transfer of power we have enjoyed these past 252 years. The military said they will respond to that person who becomes president on Inauguration Day. The military also swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, that document which defines exactly how government officers are chosen and how they conduct themselves in office. Not any one president. 6. The free press—the free media—are allowed to scrutinize government officers. They have this unabridged right to record everything in government and report it to the American People. Because of all these reasons and more, Trump's ruse to turn the US into a dictatorship with undefined limits was foiled. We the People weren't fooled. If anything, Trump did a great service for us by galvanizing Americans to the causes we felt were important. There were masses of women in pink kitty-ear hats, masses of scientists motivated out of their ivory towers, and masses of black people who peacefully protested at Washington D.C. ,as it was their right—my right, too—to redress grievances, assemble peaceably, and say what we want with few exceptions. “Politicians are like diapers. they need to be changed often, and for the same reasons.” —Mark Twain
    1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. To anyone who thinks voters can cheat, I invite them to take the training for working the polls AND to work the polls on Election Day when picked. Then you can see firsthand the safeguards put into place. You will see you cannot vote illegally. There are actual lists of voters in every state in the US. In order to get a ballot, a voter must SIGN a roll whether it be a physical, paper rollbook or signing electronically. You must say who you are. The drivers license is to show you are you. There are poll workers who have worked in their neighborhoods since time immemorial, and they know most if not all the people who come up to vote. It used to be that a poll worker was allowed to recognize their voters on sight. That's because most poll workers come from their own neighborhood, not from across town. They had to show that by marking a little bubble by the choice of "recognized by poll worker." And they were responsible for that. Personally, I think that's the strongest identification. But they took it away. NO poll worker is going to take responsibility for someone they don't know. And don't say Democratic poll workers will deny Republican voters. WRONG! There's a SEPARATE rollbook and a separate voter line each for Democrats and for Republicans. Voters are ID'd by a PICTURE ID. They are tallied by signature on the books. There is NO WAY you can vote more than once once your name is signed off. Before you get a ballot, the poll worker writes the number of the ballot next to your name. Even if you spoil a ballot, the spoiled ballot is kept in a separate, large envelope and logged on the envelope. The number of it stays on your signature in the rollbook, and the new ballot number is written beside it. There is no way to cheat and vote multiple times, nor is there any way for a person not on the rolls to vote at all. Illegal immigrants cannot vote. Legal immigrants who are not citizens cannot vote. All these instances are covered. It just cannot be. ESPECIALLY when Republicans purge the voter rolls regularly. So anyone who claims voters vote illegally, even by dead "voters" is lying or has no idea how the voter system works.
    1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. I have said—and I stand by this—that Russia and Ukraine could have had an exceptional economic and commercial relationship, as each country has amazing resources! Russia could have such with the Baltic states as well! But Russia's leaders are so fixated on securing themselves and their borders that they do not trust anyone, and trust is the major factor in economic and commercial growth. Even as sordid as some of American transactions are, there is trust created by merchants and customers. Things like money-back guarantees. Government FDIC protection of investments by certified participants. Trust by customers that services and products are as advertised or even better, and if it's not, they have a channel to redress their grievances. Customers and patrons trust that their complaint is heard and honored. People put their trust in the government when they buy a U. S. savings bond that they will get their money back at a later date with interest for using that money during that time. The same with stocks. We trust that our financial institutions handling our IRA's, 401K's, and other investments will do their very best to invest in stocks that will yield good returns with the best possible strategies. We trust that there is truth in advertising. (But not so far as merchants can abuse our trust indiscriminately.) We trust our officials-from president down to census clerk - "... to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic,..." a trust demonstrated by their affirmation saying these exact words. We trust and honor contracts. we also make sure a trial by jury is available along with legal counsel. And we have grown from a country on the Eastern Seaboard of the U. S. across to and beyond our West coast and northern border. And this is due in no small part to the agreement and trust between all 50 states for freely-traversed interstate traffic and commerce. Each one of our states could have in themselves become a sovereign country. Even our smallest state is larger than the sovereign state of Monaco and could have become an independent country. In all we do as a nation, our United States of America are truly united states.
    1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558.  @Canofasahi  It can be done and is being done. The ban on chlorofluorocarbons or CFC's inn the last 1970's has healed the ozone layer significantly. California used to have pollution so bad that it was trapped by weather patterns there. The smog was such that you could not see through it. Inn the late 1970's a nationwide mandate was issued to require the drivers of cars of the day to curb our polluting emissions. There were converter add-ons tio modify cars to do this. New cars were required to have a greatly-reduced emissions output. Ten years later smog has disappeared in California because of these Federal mandates. Another mandate inn the late 1970's was for emissions from factories from smoke stacks were required to have scrubbers on the stacks to remove sulfur dioxide and other noxious pollutants. This removed even more pollution from the air. These nationwide mandates and the creation and strengthening of the EPA corrected much of the damage from our polluting habits. Curbside recycling came from a grassroots effort. First it started with paper drives by the Boy Scouts of America. In the early 1970' Boy Scout troops came around our neighborhoods collecting the most prominent discarded recycleable item, newspapers. Sunday newspapers were always three inches thick and larger dimensions than nowadays. The Boy Scouts would pile the papapers in the back of a van, and the troop leader would drive the van tio the paper recycling plant. I was excited when Coke and other soda companies changed fr making thetheir cans from a tin alloy to all aluminum. Then soda cans could be taken to a recycling company and get paid about 30 cents per pound. I remember the refund got up to fifty cents a pound once. They even advertised the refund amount on a billboard they owned. In the 1980's, my city started curbside recycling, finally getting the idea that recycling is good for us. And that's when companies started making their cardboard packaging from 50% to 100% recycled cardboard.
    1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. I agreed with every move Judge Merchan made, even the extra leeway he gave Trump. He didn't want a mistrial—something Donald Trump so desperately would love to have seen. A mistrial would automatically put the re-trial beyond the general election. And I wanted to see at least some justice served. This conviction made Trump a felon. And if I heard correctly in one of the interview shows, the media automatically have to refer to Trump as a felon. That matters in some voters' minds. As it should, IMO. It also speaks to Merchan's skills as a judge that the way he picked through Trump's landmines was masterful. His addressing of the gag order violations danced right on the edge of too far, but he hasn't forgotten, as he still has to sentence Trump. I am satisfied for the moment that Trump is a convicted felon. It already has consequences ahead of the election. My hope is that any MAGA activities are limited to picnics and barbecues in parks, whatever their views. To enjoy the freedom to be out in the summer sun and the government-protected parks. Also NOT taking cross-country trips to places they can't afford, to create havoc they can't afford, to getting jail time they can't afford, and maybe spending their summer in a low-light cell that you can hardly walk around in, subject to a hundred restrictions they've never had to bear as an enfranchised, free American. I can hear some of the Karens, whatever their gender, yelling about their rights and then being told by the proper person that jail takes away some, if not all, of those rights.
    1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. I remember my little sister telling about basic training in the Army National Guard with things like pummeling with pugel sticks yelling, "kill!" And crawling through sand pits so she was blowing sand boogers for days. To receive mail, a recruit had to do 10 pushups for each piece of mail. She had done 50 pushups for five pieces of mail, and she asked, "Permission to recover, Drill Sergeant?" and the Drill Sergeant said, "No! Ten more pushups!" She asked again, but again, "No! Ten more pushups!" Her reward was seven letters that day. I was on the receiving end of one of her moves. She grabbed me on my shoulders from behind and pulled me down as she dropped, cushioning my head with her arm. Yes, the American military train hard and well. When I picked her up at graduation, she looked as chiseled as the men were! I couldn't tell them all apart! I think it is amazing we the US have an all-volunteer military! But the people who join do indeed join because they have a fierce love of their country and a fierce desire to protect it. The training is specific and applicable. I don't think they are subjected to anything not necessary. My sister was taking down code over the radio, and from the corner of her eye she saw everyone stiffen up. She finished her work before she stood up and greeted the visiting Colonel and said, "Sorry I didn't come to attention right away." "That's okay, Soldier," said the Colonel, "I'd rather you be doing your job." Another time my sister apologized for her short legs and not being able to run fast. "That's okay, Soldier, I'd rather have you fighting beside me in the field than running away!" My Uncle's niece was in the Navy, and she was beckoned over to a table where 2 generals sat. They asked her what she thought of a certain Drill Sergeant. "Cupcake, Sir. " meaning she thought this Drill Sergeant was very easy. This proves to me that the US military wants its Soldiers , sailors and Marines to use their initiative to make good decisions on their own as much as rely on their training. Unlike Russian forces.
    1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. I have been written up at work. The writeup involved the mistaken testing of two persons' blood samples; I pulled the wrong numbered sample for the wrong test. The writeup was very businesslike, and I responded in a businesslike fashion. I took the instruction graciously, and I did understand that was not the time or place to protest. The writeup, though succinct, did not have any followup to do except to be more vigilant when I pick out the samples. I did send computer messages to him and marked them such that I would be sent a notice that they had been read. And I printed them out. I requested review training, and I asked for training I had been previously promised for my edification. I got no responses, and I printed out that they had gotten read. Then I was given busy work that had nothing to do with the lab testing that was my job. Then I was called in by my supervisor, and his supervisor, and another supervisor. I can't remember the wording of it, but they dropped a file folder on the table and said that's why they were firing me. I didn't look at the contents of the folder or even pick it up. I was devastated and horrified, and I knew if I picked it up I would cry horribly over it, and I was barely hanging on with my game face. I asked them calmly what it was, was it more samples I missed? No. What then? I did not receive any more explanation, and I didn't ask. They gave the suggestion, "Go get a job at a gas station and find out what's wrong" with myself. They fired me and denied me unemployment. I got a hearing at the unemployment office appealing my denial. I was scared shitless. I kept my game face and I brought my pile of printouts. I expected the company would send their meanest exec to "shout me down" and cause my denial to stick. I met with the arbitrator calmly and businesslike. We waited till appointment time and possibly a little after. Then he turned on his recording machine and dictated the hearing, the date, time, parties, the arbitrator, and the presence of each party. He dictated I was there, and when he said the company party was not there, it seemed to me he put quite a bit of emphasis on it. After his preamble, he had me give my side of the story. I told it, explained what it was and what I did afterwards. I gave over my pile of printouts, and I pointed out the salient messages and that they had been read but ignored. He concluded his recording with a few more notes, and we shook hands at the end. A short time later, I was awarded unemployment. This is one possible reason why you do not want to quit or ask for severance pay: it could screw you up for unemployment that they would be fined for. In retrospect, when I looked at the situation from what I knew then and what was brought up at the time, I did right. They did not, and they acted this way as a matter of course. I had seen a number of good people come and go from that place with no explanation, and I have my suspicions. I learned a few things. 1. You could be doing the best job anyone could do and still get fired. 2. Just because they fire you doesn't mean you particularly are in the wrong. 3. Arbitrators at the Unemployment Office who conduct hearings aren't monsters, and parties necessarily must be cordial to each other. 4. Keep a paper trail. Any messages sent, keep hard copies. Send messages in such a way you get a message back that says it's been read. E-mail has that ability to get a read receipt. 5. By the same token, keep a journal of what happens at work. I would include what I have done, good and bad, and what they did. 6. Always apply for unemployment. You don't get if you don't apply.
    1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. Lifelessness to life! This is one thing that is being continually studied today! It is studied in many situations where probable primordial environments are based on early Earth resources. Oxygen was rare, but methane was abundant. It was found that these elements, especially C, H, N, O, form organically active, amino - acid - like chains that can even replicate themselves in a rudimentary sense. Indeed! Science News updates I've seen seem to demonstrate that RNA—that replicating, transcribing, translating, messengering, and DNA checking molecule— may be responsible for much more than we know about. It is even suggested RNA predates DNA as the original replication molecule with DNA coming later in Earth's history. And today, the all - popular tube worms who live at lava and magma deep - sea vents show Sulfur metabolism for their energy, and their unusual properties have led to some of the new thinking on RNA as well. And in no way should this (or can this!) be dismissed, for this is current evidence which can be even obtained personally with deep - sea scuba diving training and knowing what you're looking at. And yet, even the Bible hints at science being involved in planning. I point to the story of Joseph, next youngest son of Jacob, whom was sold into slavery but whose talents were used to save the Egyptians from famine, and also Jewish folk during those famines. How science? It has to do with how grain grows in areas on the edge of bodies of water that are drying up. Calcium deposits from receding waters produce an interesting phenomenon that has been detected at true crop formations. These true crop formations have been found at drying bodies of water. The heads of the grains have been changed by radiation in the area, and these heads of grain are successfully grown, generation after generation, up to seven generations, producing abundant, robust, and nutritional grain to last the seven growing seasons. Bible readers would be interested to know that the years of plenty numbered seven, and the abundance of this grain allowed the Egyptians and surrounding folk to survive. The years of plenty were not a fortune - telling phenomenon. They indicated something the Egyptians dealt with a lot: dried - up waters. The years of plenty signaled when they needed to stockpile their grain for especially bad times. And so they knew how many years they could get out of their crops, and how much they needed to put back.
    1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. President Biden is too much of a gentleman to use the immunity decision. That just goes against the President's creed. Besides, even if Trump was sentenced with a possible death penalty which he would not get because this is his first adjudged crime, Trump would not get the death sentence anyway. It would just be too easy on him. However, he might already feel like he is dead and in Hell. Forced to sit in court, ignored by everyone. Confronted with 34 guilty verdicts. Confronted by the people who got sick of his betrayals and broke their silence. Trump's loyalists leaving. The people in his cult who would go where he said and do what Trump implied; they left and told others what he does. Trump's base is falling apart. That must be Hell for him. He just wants to blame his whining on Democrats and "Never-Trumpers." I never saw a "Never-Trumper" lose anything career-wise. I never saw an escapee of Trump's cult die, or I'm sure the MTN would bring it up. Trump thought he had a flock of sheep at his beck and call. But many of them, including J6 perpetrators, have taken responsibility for their actions and warned others online. They called out the Trump cult and said get out before it's too late. On Fourth of July, they might have sat easily in their back yard and cooked a lovely cookout to enjoy. Perhaps Porterhouse steaks medium rare on a new Williams -Sonoma grill they bought with money they would have spent road-tripping to Washington D.C. What an exercise of freedom to celebrate! Freedom from crime! Freedom from control! Freedom from a wannabe dictator! I hope they will join me at the polls as I hope you all will, voting for Biden and Harris as well as voting Blue downballot. Because the President isn't enough. Congress is equally important. And judges at the county and state level, since they mete out justice directly. Rarely do cases appealed get to the Supreme Court.
    1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. Works for me. Trying to find truth is very difficult and requires a lot of testing and evaluation. I did wonder if the fragment writing showed grammar of the time or not. For example, once in English history it was common to say "four and twenty," whereas now we say "twenty - four" here for the same number 24. Who knows what it will be in two centuries? Two dodec or 20 base 12? Or even subject (S) , verb (V) , and object (O) order. American and British English go SVO. German is mostly SOV. IIUC, Japanese is OVS. In Latin and Romance languages, conjugations lead to a separate verb for each form of pronouns: In English, I love You love He, she, or it loves We love You (plural) love They love. In Latin, respectively: Amo Amas Amat Amamus Amatis Amant And Latin has a completely different set of words for the same verb in past tense, future tense, past perfect tense, future perfect ("I will have done that), Vocative ("O Dave!"), the subjunctive or hypothetical ("If I were to do that, then...."), and others. What, then, were the grammar and syntax of the time? Edit: it was not just one set of conjugations like above that Latin had. Conjugation was the act of parsing out verbs for pronouns. But it also meant a group of verbs to which this same method was used: Those words using - o, - as, - at, - amus, - atis, - ant were for the first conjugation (group). The second conjugation had words that used different endings. There are at least five or six conjugations, and nouns also had groups and endings, called declensions. All of these must be considered when trying to forge a document. Personally, I think it's too much trouble to do for a fleeting moment of fame.
    1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. The whole point of a vaccine is to challenge the immune system in order for the immune system to be ready to fight off any infections. Vaccines these days are more effective now than 50 years ago. And the tools these days like CRISPR and other DNA research machines make even more precise vaccines than ever before. What's the difference between vaccines and illness parties? The parties spread the full strength virus while a vaccine has either heat-killed or live/attenuated (weakened) virus. A vaccine can give you symptoms similar to the illness, but it won't give you the actual illness. While the vaccine causes symptoms because the immune system acts as it would against an actual virus attack, there is no actual replicating virus, only the little bit that gets eaten up by your ready immune system. With the full virus, it is multiplying and killing cells and spreading as fast as it can. Besides causing symptoms, the virus can cause secondary illnesses, like encephalitis that was mentioned in the newscast. Scarlet Fever can cause a heart murmur if untreated. Polio causes muscle weakness and an array of secondary illnesses, including paralysis. Upper respiratory infections are sometimes secondary infections, and Covid-19 attacks heart, lungs, brain, and other organs. With illness parties, your immune system is not ready to take on the full virus: it takes about a week after the immune system is challenged by virus or vaccine to be ready for the virus. By the time that week has gone by, the virus gotten at a party could spread through the body.
    1
  1850. 1
  1851. Measles, polio, and smallpox resurgences have proved that you cannot truly eradicate diseases. This is why we need vaccines and boosters. To prevent our ever contracting these diseases. I wish there could be a vaccine to prevent encephalitis, but that is caused by a number of illnesses. It seemed to me in the 1970's (🇺🇸) that vaccines were just a thing along with getting Back-to-School supplies. I thought everybody got vaccinated. I lined up with all my grade school classmates in front of the school nurse where each of us—vaccine record card in hand—waited to each get our shot of the Vaccine Du Jour. Mom talks about the time she was nervous about us 3 daughters catching polio until we got the polio vaccines. My own dad had had polio, and it caused him many health problems throughout his life. More often than not I'd seen him take Keflex (4th gen cephalosporin) for upper respiratory infections. His lung capacity had been greatly reduced by polio, and URI's, though common, did him no favors. And when I attended college in the mid '80's, I think, the news said polio was eradicated. I knew that was the wrong thing to say. And I think that might have started an era of eschewing vaccines, because the diseases vaccinated against had not appeared for a couple of generations. So come the 2000, there were hints that polio was coming back in other countries, but it had been eradicated here—as if country borders could stop the spread of disease. Then 20 years later comes Covid-19, and ignorance took over again. We got a vaccine so fast it whipped our hair as it flew by, and people were so slow on the uptake I wanted to shake them all! It was hard for me to feel empathy for people who had fears about taking the shot. This was a vaccine so innovative it was created by a DNA coding machine! How much more precise could you get! It was a vaccine brought to the people faster than for any pandemic.
    1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. I do have an electric kettle that I got after my old, very useful Hotpot was stolen when I was on vacation. According to your analyses and calculations, the plastic electric kettle was closest to the fancier electric kettle in boiling time. I'd wager the plastic electric kettle gives a much bigger bang for the buck, as I don't think the fancier electric kettle is less than 15 bucks, which I purchased my electric kettle for. Nope, it's not. The fancy induction hot plate is also expensive. Half of 4 minutes isn't going to bother me. 4 minutes plus 2 will. You still have to make the tea. It takes water time to boil even if you put it in your mug in the microwave for a minute and a half to 2 minutes. So you're still tapping your foot by the time it's finished. Then tea takes 3-10 minutes to steep (I prefer ten). So getting tea takes time. This is unlike a drip coffee pot when the coffee is ready when the drips finish. (Those smart people making Bunn coffee pots!) Cheap and quick beats most of them, but one thing I can do with a cheap electric kettle I can't do with a microwave is set it up on my bed nightstand. It is near an outlet such that I only need a surge protector to connect it to the wall. A surge protector has a much thicker wire such that electricity through it has very little resistance so energy can all go to the kettle. To me, energy efficiency, convenience, short boiling time, portability, automatic cutoff, and low price all behoove me to award my "Best appliance for the money" award to the plastic electric kettle. It's just one of those things the best since sliced bread!
    1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. Art itself proves that the Earth is round, not flat, simply by perspective. It is commonly accepted now that perspective rightly represents real life, as depicted in the Mona Lisa. The city stretches out below her in the background, giving the illusion of depth. There is a well - accepted principle of perspective called the Vanishing Point, the imaginary point in a perspective picture where all the lines — streets, buildings, sky, ground — converge. If you or anyone draws a picture, there is a hint of this in all of them. And sky is always up, and ground is always down. But how far down? Pictures of ground and sky — even in the most rudimentary pictures by children who have developed the eye to draw a rudimentary house and people have their objects on the ground. The ground is at the bottom of the paper. In most classic still art, this is where the streets, ground, plants, and bottoms of buildings are. Follow the point where all lines converge, though, including tops of buildings: the Vanishing Point is nowhere near where the artist put the ground. The Vanishing Point is somewhere in the middle or higher on the picture, where we are seeing infinity. In a flat plane, infinity is still on that plane. If the Earth were flat, the whole perspective would show us looking up wherever we go, because the Vanishing Point is everywhere. Streets would not "meet" but be lines lines that "stand" like ladders in our perspective against "walls" that would be how we see the ground. Our own existence might not even be 3-D because of this. And if our existence were 2-D, then we would have an even greater difference in perspective. We see, from our perspective, a limit to our perspective, and if you asked anybody where the ground was, no one would point upwards of 90° from their perpendicular stance (mountains and hills and trees notwithstanding). When you look out and see the horizon, an edge, "below" you, you are actually looking off into space along a line that connects to the Earth only at one point, the Vanishing Point. The only way this can happen is if the object it connects is not flat. Beyond that, infinity is in space. And wherever you go, you can still find this Vanishing Point in any direction you turn. Because you can do this anywhere and everywhere, the Earth cannot have any flat, angular faces. These would be perceived as a wall. And it would not be consistent worldwide. Even in the Bayeux Tapestry which depicts Halley's comet in 1066, while people are depicted turned to the side with their heads practically facing forward, the ground is on the bottom of the tapestry and the comet is above them and the sky is above them. There is no wall that depicts the ground. Primitive as this art is, it still presents a vanishing point low to the ground. I realize I've already turned off "Flat - Earthers" well before this point, but the point is that even as we depict the world around us, we have already —if unconsciously— proved the world is round, however we deny it.
    1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. Russian citizens don't care! To a person when interviewed, they say "I don't get into politics." How can you have a revolution when people don't care? Most of the people who would change their country have already fled. Good for them; bad for Russia. We, citizens of Western Countries and NATO, value our freedoms and will fight tooth and claw to preserve them, most importantly freedom of speech. When you aren't allowed to speak against the regime without being summarily and inexorably hauled off to prison, one of things can happen: 1. Fight. Many protesters, even with nothing on their signs, were dragged off to jail. 2. Flee. This is what potential revolutionaries and smart people did when they saw the "hand writing on the wall." This leaves the rest who do 3. Freeze. They stay in place; they mourn the conscription of their sons; they accept the edict of never badmouthing the regime under threat of jailing or worse. And they do what they can to protect their meager way of life. They are rewarded with the perception that their sons died when conscripted. They sometimes get money when told their sons are dead. When told their sons are captured but alive and what to do to get them home, they are still afraid and are reluctant to even go to their son's commanding officers to put their sons on exchange lists to be swapped for Ukranian soldiers. Imagine being deathly afraid to free a family member when all you have to do is show a video of your son and say he's alive! Could you? I wouldn't think anything of doing so! I would follow the chain of command to my Commander in Chief, my President. Governors, representatives, and senators would assist because that's who they are bound to: the will of the People. Captured Russian soldiers who have a message to other potential conscripts tell them to flee and hide. How can you live when you must constantly look over your shoulder?
    1
  1951. 1
  1952. The movie The China Syndrome came out around at this time, and it was really unfortunate. It only played on the fear people felt as we were told nothing. That was also the beginning of the end of Pres. Carter's administration. It's too bad because he is a smart, kind man. I wanted nuclear power to succeed. I was in 8th grade and all excited about it. Then the 3 Mile Island accident happened, and I was so disappointed. And I also got swept up in No Nukes, but my concern was Nuclear Weapons. And I was so relieved when Pres. Carter negotiated SALT I&II. As for nuclear energy, I knew nuclear fission was only a stepping stone to nuclear fusion. As little fissionable material it takes to make a whole lot of energy, this is still a limited resource. It is also hard to find, as clumps of it are scattered far and wide. A much bigger resource is hydrogen for fusion. Not just that there is more of it, but that fusion produces 4x more energy for the same mass of nuclear fission, and 4 million times for the same mass of fossil fuels. The thing I think is quite alluring is that fusion produces no radioactive waste, and the products are helium and energy. I'm glad to see that nuclear facilities have been changed because of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. And personally, I was glad to see that Fukushima opened up to the ocean to cool down their potential hot mess accident. Better that than a radioactive "elephant foot." As we explore the asteroid belt and mine the rocks there—and also from mining comets— we will also find more deuterium and tritium. I think there's such on the moon, too. Another reason why we need to return to the moon and establish a base. That is, besides the moon being an excellent base for foundries of metals there, even abundant supplies of rare earth metals, IIRC.
    1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. Is that all there is? Can there be no more? No higher form of living? Neo awoke to a combination of dystopia, computer simulation plug-ins—physically connecting themselves to the simulation—and creating their own tools by computer plug-ins that they've coded themselves. Neo is, himself, a programmer. Would a writer be reached the same way? Or would it be more like The Neverending Story? Where Bastian realizes that his life is mirrored by and connected to Atrayou? Or Quaid in Recall who was a (de-) construction worker who was enticed by the promise of a more exotic life through memory manipulation and trinkets and souvenirs given to him after the implant? (I still think he ended up really discovering the outside world.) No matter what, each of us is individual, and what appeals to one individual must needs differ from the next whether to create a simulation or allow a real life. But I don't think that waking up to a real life means waking up to a dystopia. It might be waking up to a holodeck or holosuite: recreation environments created for enjoyment of one thing or another. And consciously experienced so that you San leave at any time. If it is a military-style life outside, it might or might not be a desirable life. If it is a life in which all hunger and life insecurities are wiped away, that might be desirable. Or if you decide you want to learn how to play the Blues on your harmonica, reality drops you in the middle of nowhere, and you have to struggle to get to your goal. Whether your goal is noble or personal, does it matter where you learn it? Maybe you have to earn your way out of it. That's a bit of how I perceive my religion Eckankar, where karma and reincarnation play a big role. The Earth is considered a very coarse and rough life with many experiences given to learn the ultimate: that God is love and Soul exists because of God's love. People often ask, "Is this all there is?" Maybe they feel like a big fish in a little pond and few grown past what is offered here. Maybe the next level offers more or different experiences. Another layer peeled back. Another level offers more and another layer peerless back. With so many opportunities, could we truly say we've experienced it all? Did we ride all the rides at the amusement park? Is there anymore? I think in some way both are true, breakout is possible, but This Earth has valid and legitimate experiences to learn from.
    1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. Another saber rattle about First and Second Amendment rights. 🙄 I am a bleeding heart liberal who believes in fair chances for all, and justice. I agree that there are real life needs for people to have guns. Protection from animals threatening ranchers and people and people who live off the lands in wilderness in Alaska where they have few W ways to share commerce with the Lower 48. But no one needs repeater assault weapons, not even in wilderness conditions. If you shoot at an elk and miss, automatic assault rifles would tear up the animal and make it unusable for anything. I don't like the Second Amendment, but I am not coming for your guns. What I want is responsible gun ownership including enforced cool-off periods and background checks. And it wouldn't be a bad idea to have a background check every year. Everyone receiving government program money is examined every year to prevent financial fraud (always based on a model suggested by former President Ronald Reagan that never, ever happened and never will). I think it's not unreasonable to do background checks, and to hold gun owners responsible for any crime the gun was used in, which should enforce the owner to care for the guns' security. The Second Amendment and all following amendments ultimately derive from the First Amendment. A certain 45 has indeed successfully claimed First Amendment rights so many times! So yeah, the Justice Department is keenly aware of affording First Amendment rights. (and a former president becoming president elect will not be 47th president because it's people that are counted, not terms. 4*47 = 188 years. That's 61 years unaccounted for. Many presidents have had double terms. Grover Cleveland, up to this point, is only president who has served 2 terms but not consecutively. Nevertheless it is certainly possible and allowed. But even Grover Cleveland served as only one person. 13 other presidents served a second term; many didn't finish their second term.
    1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. TL;DR Kyle shot too much ; WI law allowed weak acquittal. In KY acquittal would be strong. Reasonable retreat not possible while surrounded; more harm if tried to. KY law allows open carry; concealed carry with license. KY has "stand your ground law" superseding castle law. I don't like stand your ground, but it is reasonable and might protect black people. Opinion My personal view is that Kyle shot too many bullets for his purposes. But he was retreating from a mob intent on hurting him. Of the drop - kick guy I feel Kyle was in the right for self - defense and he had no way to retreat, not only because he was surrounded (!) by people intent on hurting him (he could reasonably expect that), but that rolling away from drop - kick guy would have put himself in danger of other attackers, and possibly hurting himself with his own gun. In my state KY we do have a "Stand Your Ground" with no duty to retreat that supersedes castle doctrine. The more I think about "Stand Your Ground," the more justified I think it is. I don't like it, but I think it's reasonable. Under WI law I think the verdict was weak. But I see no way for it to be anything but murky. Under KY law, Kyle would be more likely to be acquitted under "Stand Your Ground." KY has an open carry law (it's allowed) and licensing of concealed carry. Conceivably it might be too strengthen cases to defend black people when they might kill a white person. Such laws shouldn't have to exist, and one could argue that no laws should need to be written. But this is not Paradise, and the spiritual law of love isn't respected universally.
    1
  2181. 1
  2182. You forgot the shipment of PPE from China that Trump blocked even though health professionals absolutely needed it. Trump was setting coalitions against each other by "whispering" into their ears that the other coalition is out to get them 😮 Then he'd sit back with his popcorn and watch them fight. 😡 It was all I could do not to take on the anger that he fomented. Trump blocked remedies right and left that affected people personally! That's the kind of thing that could convince someone. The facts that affected them directly. Injecting bleach into one's veins to "clear out the virus." and other ridiculous remedies. The meetings on the Great Lawn that became super spreaders. The blocking of Dr. Fauci's and WHO's recommendations. Every video, something Donald Trump did or said undermined the fight against Covid-19. He didn't care about if anyone died from doing what he said. I had not heard anything about if anyone injected themselves with bleach, but we might not have heard of any cases, right? Maybe no one lived to tell the tale if they did it. But that's speculation. Still, it might not be hyperbole considering the situation. One thing that did give me pause was how fast the vaccine was developed. I felt it was too fast. But I learned of the advantages in place: the research that was already done on other corona viruses, and the DNA sequencers. These were amazing tools. These were tools we never had in any other pandemic in history. And any progress we made, Donald Trump ran roughshod all over it and the people who developed it. And then he disrespected every demographic of people who received the vaccine. But who got monoclonal antibodies when he himself was sick with Covid-19? Trump. You know who could ill - afford such treatment? Everyone else who needed it.
    1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. Some arguments that Flat Earthers put out are so complicated in their unpacking I would say, "Okay, you need 12 years of public school science plus a college course of basic physics in order for me to explain it to you. Or to watch all 13 episodes of Carl Sagan's Cosmos: a Personal Journey. One video showed about a spirit level not moving or changing on an airplane while in the air. How to explain that? I thought it was because the plane was flying parallel to the ground and following the curvature. It is, but other things obfuscate the situation. Planes, with their complicated electronics, fly mostly on autopilot. The autopilot makes little changes in the airplane's attitude to compensate for accelerations due to curving flight paths. You never lean when the plane is turning because the electronics compensate for that and keep the acceleration forces pulling you to the floor of the plane. Yes, I got that from Neil Degrasse Tyson (smart man), but I have learned enough science and physics in K-12 and college to compare this information to the science experiments I did throughout that time, and I find it fits with the Standard Model of Physics. Also, were I to suggest an experiment for a Flat Earther to do, it would require them to know geometry and algebra. I speak of Eratosthenes' observations of shadows of the well in Syene on June 21 at noon (13:00 Daylight Savings Time) compared to a well in Alexandria. With smart technology of today and a trusted friend at both places, these observations of wells in Alexandria and Syene on June 21 could be made, since most people have trusted friends, and most people take it as an axiom that smart technology works. After all, GPS is consistent and gives verifiable results. People can and do prove that every day with their own senses. And thus, these days, Eratosthenes' ancient measurements can today be taken simultaneously.
    1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274.  @renee3356  He puts out a blast campaign with a lot of money soon before elections. He's also incumbent, and incumbents are hard to unseat. Democrat - registered voters are more liberal in their thinking and take their I individual vote seriously. Republican - registered voters vote the Republican line exclusively, hook, line, and sinker. Democrat voters have trouble getting voters out on election day despite carpool drivers, campaigning, and good weather. I don't know why. But I will say that we had a very large voter turnout in the Democratic primary this yet because of absentee voting by mail, early voting at the Office of Elections, and one place to go for all the precincts in my country of Jefferson, and Louisville, KY. Many criticized KY for only one polling place. But it is a very accessible place and very large: the Kentucky Fair and Exposition Center, where the State Fair is held each year. Many states are asking our Governor how they can make it work for them. We had record-breaking turnout because of all these methods. And now our president wants to slow down the post office. And so does Senator McConnell. Do you wonder why? Several states have absentee voting by mail as a matter of course. Like Ohio, e.g. The more accessible voting is, the more likely minorities and women will vote. And the more likely we won't let Sen. McConnell get away with his shenanigans. Our Governor Andy Beshear wants us to have this for the General Election. McConnell does not. See any parallels? Do you wonder why precinct collections of ballots get lost from places where Black people and Hispanic people have their precincts? Four years ago many minority precincts were closed or moved at the last minute, forcing many minority folk to miss out on voting. Votes were lost from other minority precincts. There's been an insidious and systemic and systematic culling of votes by those in power to keep the Republicans in high office. All I have is one vote. But I will vote it. And I hope to be able to again vote by mail. Thanks for your support.
    1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. My beef with common core is that some of the basics like multiplication tables aren't taught. The basic, unchanging foundations are not taught. I'm a biologist and want children to know what is inside their bodies and how the environment works with them in it, the creatures that are part of this world and how they work together and, like human beings, have a family tree that can be understood by the Evolutionary model, which continues to predict new and exciting things and creatures to find, based on our keys from the past: geology, fossils, and paleontology. And we keep finding stuff in the past, too! Also, unless it's an alternative way to understand how arithmetical ciphering works (adding and subtraction on a number line), these children are taught to jump around the line like trying to golf at a tee and somehow ending up at the answer. It's crude, slow, confusing, and makes no sense. It doesn't teach place place values, and it doesn't teach you why it works. When I grew up, what I was taught was what what most people I know use. This is what was called "New Math" in the 1950's, that which Tom Lehrer sung about. This is the place value understanding and borrowing from the next place value up. Numbers are stacked up, one on top of the other with place values aligned, and ciphered top to bottom with all arithmetic functions and kind of, in a way, with division. This is like an accountant with a paper ledger. All numbers are processed this way, and that is why the lines are where they are. This also can teach significant figures, rounding (properly!), truncating, and decimal places.
    1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. There is much more that needs to be done besides pay people a UBI (which seems a good idea on the surface). First, there must be universal Healthcare coverage for everyone to get all the Healthcare one needs regardless of income. Second, there needs to be intensive, round the clock public transportation. Well - kept neighborhoods and streets with an eye to preserving vegetation. Third, there must be support for people taking jobs, such as travel to the place where the job is. Many times a job is offered so that a person cannot take it because they cannot afford to move in order to take the job. As a person who makes $1000.00 per month through non-taxable Social Security, I pay for Medicare, and I would have to pay more for the insurance I need for dental and visual without Medicaid assistance. My insurance is around 10% of my income. I have my home through the Section 8 Homeowners Program, which requires me to pay about 30% of my income into housing and utilities to own a home whose mortgage payment cost around $750.00 per month. The utilities are my condo fee of $255.00 plus electric about $35.00 per month. Understand that this is a 2-bedroom, 2-bath condo of 1000 square feet, not a 2-story, four bedroom house of 25 thousand square square feet. I have had breast cancer and chemo and radiation plus ongoing treatment to prevent it coming back. I would have sundered and completely lost everything if I did not have the help of Medicaid and the support of breast cancer societies that provide materials that promote healing and recovery. And cancer is one of the biggest killers today. Consider that a chemo treatment is $5,000.00 (x 12) and radiation is, I think, $3,000.00 (x 12), and that doesn't count doctor follow-ups, extra surgery for adding an intravenous port and correcting that port, and the breast cancer surgery, biopsies, ultrasounds, and mammogram necessary for initial treatment, easily in the tens of thousands of dollars. Medicare and Medicaid paid for the majority of that. And I still have the small nest egg I was able to scrimp over the years through an IRA and a few savings bonds. I rarely buy new clothes. I don't have cable or satellite. I pay a minimum for Internet and for my smart phone. I provide for me and one cat. I am able to get around by bus (I sold my car years ago), but even that is limited. Many times I have had to rely on rides from friends. I can pay my bills and have groceries, including a few fun things like a X-mas ham that will last me the rest of this month or longer. I can get a few fun extras, too, like a book or a few discount movies, and occasionally an addition to, or replacement in, my electronic collection. I do small repairs myself, like replacing toilet levers and flush mechanisms and front door backset, and even some PVC pipe plumbing behind the wall. I have to most times because a repair professional is prohibitive to my budget. There is much more to a standard of living than you can throw money at, though if you want to throw some my way without denying my or others' benefits, I will happily and gratefully receive it.
    1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. Red meat is no more expensive than chicken. I prefer getting pork from the meat case. Look for manager's specials that can save you up to 50‰ off the price. Around X-mas time, hams go on sale for 50% off and become cheaper, pound for pound, than hot dogs. I always get one, and this year I had the opportunity twice (December and February) to get a spiral - sliced jam, and I have chunk ham for beans still. Yum! Eat red meat as you desire or not. Your reasons are your own. For instance, the logic that vegans use to justify their diet can be and are debunked. The health of a meat diet might be questionable, but humans get a lot of important elements of nutrition (whole proteins)efficiently from meat that cannot easily be extracted from a plant diet. And I eat red meat for mental health reasons, too. Someday somebody might research why, but as a bipolar mental health consumer, I eat red meat at least on occasion because I can get anxious and squirrelly without it. I don't know why, but I do. Get a bone - in roast or shoulder or loin. They are cheaper than boneless, and they go on sale more often. If you like pork chops, don't buy them even in "family packs." Get a boneless pork loin and have the butcher cut them into butterfly pork chops of your desired thickness. Even boneless is cheaper than single or packages of pork chops. I also wrap them in freezer paper to use them one at a time from the freezer. If I think I'll want one, I'll throw one in the fridge earlier in the a day. Also get a bone-in shoulder. The butcher can't cut boneless steaks off it, but you can with a very sharp knife and safe technique. Bone-in shoulders are too big for my slow cooker, so I'll cut off boneless steaks and sometimes stir-fry chunks till the shoulder is small enough to get into my slow cooker. (about 3-4 lbs.) For chicken, I will pay the extra price for a few things. For one, there is way too much fat BETWEEN the meat and it's gross! Two, I'll pay so I don't have to skin and bone them myself.
    1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. Amazing story! What a tragic life she lived. Interesting she should be discovered soon after a wealthy family became ill. And she became vilified and infamous. And no other carrier seemed to be as notorious as she was. I see the hand of the wealthy in all this, that those with means would have Miss Mallon stopped and shamed and persecuted and jailed and isolated by means of power, authority, or sheer wealth they wielded. And it would have truly been a much different story if she had, say, met with Florence Nightingale who had insisted that Civil War doctors-- wearing aprons as bloodied as a butcher's-- wash their hands between each patient. This along with personal toilet hygiene would have gone far to protect her employers and anyone else. Now we know that keeping cooked and raw meats separate and contaminated surfaces disinfected as well as using gloves protectors restaurant patrons from all manner of disease- causing entities. However, I have seen many more than one food handler wipe their nose with a gloved hand and then use that gloved hand on food b creating possible instances of transferring rhinoviruses to patrons. But most contamination comes from not washing hands before handling foods normally eaten raw, leading to outbreaks of E. coli , recalls of tons of fresh vegetables, and mostly diarrhea in those ininfected. Not since E. coli O157 has there been reported such a wicked outbreak of a deadly form of E. coli . Yet the fear lingers on. All it takes is one person mishandling this food to pass on this contamination. This might be from some workers not being allowed to handle their elimination needs except in the fields where they work. I'm looking at you, Big Ag!
    1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. So, let me get this straight: those called "snowflakes" are the current generation born around 2000-2010? This who use Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, and other social platforms to express their offended sensibilities? Maybe I'm looking through 1980's-colored rose glasses, but everything old is new again. People are discovering The Beatles, Pink Floyd, and the Rolling Stones again. Information generated to the 2000's is easily available through the Internet. Through the Internet people organized the "Pussy Hat" March and the Science March. Through the Internet people learn university courses from Harvard, Yale, MIT, and highly visible professionals. And the "Snowflake" Generation is getting this information faster than any generation before, in more detail than was ever known before. The "Snowflake" Generation is doing movies, recording music, and publishing books and media and finding opportunities through the Internet that was never possible before the 1990's. We have the Go-Pro and quad copter drones cheap so anyone can have them. We have crowd funding to help back great ideas better than Walt Disney could ever dig up in backers because trillions of people have worldwide access to the Internet. And the so - called "Snowflakes" — like the generations before them who have identified shortcomings in our society —are calling them out to deal with them. Even as Equal Rights Amendment proponents wanted women and men to be awarded the same as men for the same work at the turn of the 1980's; even as the LGBTQ+ community came out to stop the spread of then - lethal AIDS by grassroots campaigns in the 1980's; even as the Civil Rights Movement saw the beginnings of dealing with inequities and hidden oppression brought into the open in the 1960's; and the creativity of each of these even - decade periods pushing three edge of "decency" of the times, these "Snowflakes are gearing up with their knowledge of the times, the stagnated dogma, and ideals to strive for for a better world for all of us. Compassion. Quality. Diversity. Environment. Global community. These are what I see people who are called "Snowflakes" are doing. To follow the logic of the label you put on them, remember that enough snowflakes gathered up can make an avalanche crashing down with nothing to stop it. Grassroots movements are powerful forces.
    1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. You might not even need men for society to carry on. There are plenty of Animal Kingdom examples where females become male and can take over fertilization requirements. Biology lesson incoming: Know in utero that the same tissue that creates ovaries in genetic female embryos makes testicles in genetic male embryos. There is such a thing called sex ratio, the relationship between population of males and females that adjusts in different environments. If more males, the ratio is greater than one. If more females, then sex ratio is less than one. This is an observable fact in any species population: If the niche—the environment a species can thrive in—is large, the species will spend more energy to birth more males. If the niche is small and narrow, the species will invest in more females. In the first instance, the species can flourish and has the freedom to diversify. In the second, the species must conserve its extra energy, and it births more females. If the male in a harem of any one of several species of fish dies, the females fight, and the dominant one turns male. Every cell in a human being has a full complement of DNA. There is no reason that a female can't become a functioning male. Impossible? Look at how some birds do it. Many birds don't have a penis. They put together their holes called cloacas (cloh-AKE-uh). Cloacas accommodate elimination of all body fluids. It's less sure, but think about how many pigeons are out there. It is a successful species survival technique. So is the laying of eggs in water with sperm from the male as a cloud in water settling on the eggs. Frogs are plentiful. There is what is referred to as junk DNA in our genome. We don't know what it does, although we've traced it back to existing microbe species. DNA and physical traits are never removed from a species unless, and only unless, retaining them would cause us to not survive. Everything we have has been necessary at one time or another for us to survive as Homo sapiens sapiens. Some of that DNA could have been necessary at one time or another when we as a species had no males. Men and women both have male and female hormones. In order to make these hormones, the "female" hormone progesterone must be present, for all sex hormones are made from it. Testosterone and other androgens included. There are plenty of mechanisms for any species to change to ensure species survival. They are so successful that they have appeared over and over in different species at different times throughout the fossil record. Wings, for example. Or crab species. And know this: the Y chromosome is not necessary to create male physical characteristics. There are few things it does. Suffice to say that species find ways to survive even when severely limiting events happen.
    1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. Russian people not only aren't for Russian forces to conquer Ukraine, they aren't for Ukraine being triumphant, either. Every Russian asked what their political opinion is have—to a man; to a woman—insisted they don't get into politics. Whether interviewed on the streets of Moscow or talked to by Ukranian journalist Volodimir Zolkin—soldier POW and family alike—deny the invasion was Russia's fault. And they say Putin is right. They leave their basic human rights at Putin's feet and take their chances. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure there is no American who fails to stress the importance of the Constitution's Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments in Annerican life. Some point to the First Amendment as the signal principle of the Constitution. Others defend vehemently the Second Amendment, which touches on the ownership of weapons. Russians don't defend their country. Americans do. And so do Ukranians. Both understand the importance of expressing freedoms—even as many other countries do—in order to preserve them. We all participate in politics because that is the responsibility that goes along with freedom. Russians, who have never participate in politics, abdicate this responsibility and prefer to leave Human Rights to a megalomaniac who stomps all over them. The people of the largest country in the world refuse to put themselves, their words, actions, and lives on the line to attain their birthright! This is the craziest mindset I have ever seen! Yet it is as true as it is tragic. This war needs to be fought to reestablish NATO-accepted Ukranian borders. But also it needs to be fought to wake the Russian people up to the responsibility they have to fight for their own rights. They need to see the importance of participating in their government they elected and got, and they must require the stewards of these high offices to use them to edify and grow their people.
    1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. So the State wants the defendants to suffer as part of their penalty? Fine. That's reasonable. And both sides say the judge must abide by the law. That's fine, too. There are 3 penalties under the law: hang by the neck until dead. Serve a 14-year sentence. Or life imprisonment with no parole, no chance of release. Fine. What could possible be suffering if hanged? Momentary or maybe a longer period of suffering decided by whether the defendants' necks snap or they die of suffocation. N.B. A person hanging and suffocating to death would go unconscious before death due to the starvation of the brain of blood supply. After the defendants die, there is no more chance whatsoever of rehabilitation or restitution. And no death has ever served as a "lesson" of consequence to force or even encourage compliance with the law. Remember these two defendants felt themselves above the law. It would be useless as a societal lesson. These are my arguments against death penalty. Also my personal abhorrence to killing in cold blood, which the death penalty is. I couldn't pull the gallows lever, throw the electric chair switch, or administer the lethal injection. I defy anyone who cares about mercy and justice to be able to do this without themselves hurting. Both sides agree on removing the defendants from society. Death penalty undermines suffering and produces Momentary satisfaction and expression of passionate anger. It doesn't make them suffer as much as the state and probably the plaintiffs want. What would? Leaving them alive. If the judge chose a 14 year sentence, that would give these young defendants a very long time to experience a life in which NO ONE is above the law. 14 years is a long time to be taken down a peg or 2. It is possible —even for these cold - blooded, immoral murderers —to learn society's lessons. And it is possible they could return to society. I've seen at least one person in what I feel is a comparable position. If a permanent separation is taken, this does not preclude rehabilitation and learning. It just separates them from society permanently. And if my taxes pay for jailing, a cot, and three squares a day for the rest of their natural lives, to me it is tax money well spent. I vote for life sentence with no parole. Also, more and more restorative justice is being served which seems to help victims heal, and it forces perpetrators to face what others have suffered from their crimes. Community service also is part of it. Even if they do not return to society, the defendants can still do community service.
    1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. Not dying will put a lot of pressure on the Human species and the environment around them. If we don't die, then we as a species will strip the world of even the resources to regenerate the food and materials to sustain us. Our species would change to even subvert long life: things like cannibalism when no other food is available abs using human bones to create structures to live in. So, humans live forever, then all the Earth's resources are consumed and their regeneration capability extinguished. Nothing left but cannibalism. Read Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal," and one way is to eat the offspring because women can have them once right after the other and singularly suckle many of them. Then the ability to keep a species alive is depleted due to depletion of mothers because they die of thee wasting away of the mothers' own nutrition and the non - replacement of mothers because girls are sacrificed for eating. Do it the other way and eat the old, and you have defeated the goal of living forever. However, eating the old in this case would also remove the pressure on the environment, and then Nature in infinite variety will provide new life to cling tenaciously to the small niche opened up to it. Then Nature, being a clever Gaea, will have some new scourge that makes its way into human beings that will shorten their lifespan, once again creating a balance between living and dying, between being flush with resources and being impoverished, between predators and prey, and so on.
    1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. Integrals and derivatives describe many factors in a situation. The first time I saw this was in connection with physical chemistry. I hadn't had the Calculus of partial differentials, but my understanding was enough to see that they described different interrelated and interacting vectors: pressure, temperature, and particle or mass content. PV =nRT has 4 dimensions; four variables to determine in a given small volume (vicinity, really) in which other factors can be ignored. (gravity, e.g.) Now that it has been shown that gravity waves exist and they affect matter, it can be yet another vector to be considered. In architecture, much can be done by treating a design as a series of cantilevers and points of rotation, but a skyscraper requires consideration of weather factors, forces of buffeting winds, earth movements, differential heating from the sun, and support inside and outside the building. The dynamics of water pressure. The air movement in the building, and electric components all affect the design one way or another. Each has its partial differential with respect to all the others. Fluid dynamics is concerned with flow —how fast fluid moves through a channel —and flux —the cross section of that flow through the channel. But it is also concerned with other dynamics like eddies and waves. These are affected by channel size, but also the gradient of that channel: what cross - section of channel do you need to minimize or maximize the presence of fluid anomalies. So Calculus can be thought of as a series of related factors that need to be solved with respect to one another. This goes beyond finding the gradient of a 3-D graph hill (which you can do with a pencil: place it where it doesn't roll off).
    1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. Good explanation on an aspect of elbows I didn't know! Now here's something I learned from Medieval re - creators in SCA: An advanced archer told me and showed me men and women are different in their forearms: Men's forearms are straight when —like you said—you look at them for holding a bow. Women's are angled in that position and their elbow gets in the way of the string and arrow. But women can twist their elbow out of the way of the string and arrow! That blew my mind when I did it! (and my werble was reduced) Does it have something to do with this exercise for flexibility, too?: Take an arrow (I can do it with a plastic hanger) and hold it at the ends with your fingers and put it behind your head and as far down your back as you can. I was able to put it behind my head, behind my shoulders, and, with a little work, behind my back and behind my behind. 😊 He was only able to put it behind his shoulders. Maybe carrying angle is involved there, too? Another example came from my grandmother when she worked at a distillery. Many women worked there alongside men. One thing she said was the women could carry on their arms more flasks than the men could because of women's crooked arms. I'm assuming that she meant on her supinated arms because that's how she gestured. After all, Bourbon flasks nest into each other, making them easier to carry together. In fact, I've done that kind of thing lining up paperbacks on my arm to carry them (and some books not so light! It worked like a charm!
    1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. I went to a convention once, but when I prepared my clothes, I found I had dropped 2 sizes and truly had nothing to wear! I had to wait till the next day and I anxiously waited for the doors to open. I fairly ran to the proper department, and I told the lady at the department, "I have a hundred dollars; dress me for a weekend! She helped me find coordinate pants (2 pair) and blouses (3). She also showed me how I could rock a smaller size than I thought I had to purchase, and the set was sweet not only for that convention but also for Sunday service, and even everyday looks and work. As long as I fit it, I looked great in it for many situations, including my friend's wedding. As for weddings, they don't need to be soirees. My friend, a riverlorian for the Belle of Louisville Steamboat, got his license to marry people. That would be a sweet an inexpensive cruise to get married on a boat! You can get married outside the courthouse. In my hometown, there is a beautiful square outside the courthouse where I have seen several happy couples married by the Justice of the Peace. They were wearing a beautiful dress of the season (one lady in peach and frills!) and a suit. Both outfits can be used in many occasions! Wedding gifts don't need to be big! I remember a punchbowl gift I knew was about $10.00 (because I sold them at K-mart), but it was just as gracious and loving a gift as those who bought me more expensive gifts. And shower gifts don't need to be big; practical. Utensils, towels, pots and pans, all can be gotten at discount places; some at dollar stores. Baby items? Look at the Dollar Tree first as well. Baby shower cards? Forget them. For the price you pay for them, you can get a children's book. Then you can write your message inside that. The book is a much better card than any card. Better yet: I've seen Dr. Seuss books in baby - style board books. For some $5.00 I think! How appropriate! Don't spend $80.00 on materials to make a wreath for X-Mas because Martha Stewart told you to! Get apps for coupons for the craft stores and get your materials for half-off retail. The wreath she described could be made for $30.00 or less by a shrewd crafter. Don't pay for pine cones. Gather them. Stuff like that. There are also times when online beats the store and vice versa. Always check. And always do your own math. Sometimes the shelf labels are wrong. And anybody who does their own math when comparison shopping is doing algebra whether they know it or not. They're just not using any symbols.
    1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. Education is very important in reining in runaway conspiracy belief. And yet, even age-appropriate education misses a lot of technology in our world that children need to know about in their environment. For instance, one of the experiments I've seen posted was to take a spirit level on board a plane with you and watch what happens when you take off. The person in the video placed its ends from port to starboard. When they did, on takeoff the level didn't change. I thought they should have pointed it from nose to tail. The level would be affected this way on takeoff and landing. What he should have used was a circular level and placed it flat on a level surface to begin with. Any force on the plane would be detected by a circular level. However, the video was crafted very carefully, too. I suspect it was done to try to convince people of a flat Earth. TL;DR He might see, though, that his circular level stays steady throughout his flight. Why? He would figure it was because it was over a flat Earth. However, there is technology in the autopilot in passenger planes that keeps the plane in an attitude where people feel forces inside the plane as if on the ground. Could this be done on a plane traveling on a flat Earth? Yes. Is there a difference? Yes. When you fly on a globe, you are traveling parallel to the Earth below wherever you go. Gravity works the same on the plane as in Earth. When you look out the plane window, the ground you see below is as if you looked out of a second story window from a house firmly on the Earth. (Just a bit higher.) Would it be the same If you flew above a flat Earth? No. To fly on a flat Earth, you are flying in a circle anywhere you go. If you go East to West, the force on the plane goes in the starboard direction and would be greater than Earth's gravity. To compensate, the plane would have to tilt 90° with the bottom of the plane pointing due south. The ground outside the window would appear like a wall on the starboard side of the plane, and the port window would be pointed to the sky. You don't see that. You can even show this with swinging a bucket on a rope slowly versus fast.
    1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1