Comments by "Wom Bat" (@wom_Bat) on "The leopard 2 could be a game changer on the ground in Ukraine | DW News" video.

  1. A bunch of nato members have asked to send tanks but Germany keeps shooting it down, Spain wanted to send tanks months ago.
    8
  2. It's also in service in Portugal, Spain, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Poland, and Canada. It has had 13 upgrade packages since it first rolled into service in 1979. Why not hand over some with out of date upgrade packages, I'm sure there are some in the reserves or the mothballed stock to hand over.
    4
  3. It's better then the T-72 which is the main tank russia uses.
    2
  4.  @RationalQuestions  US has said their tank will only work with diesel. Ukraine would need a massive infrastructure overhaul to manage the logistics of Abrams. Meanwhile the Lepord 2 can run perfectly well on a majority Kerosene mix. Countries like spain have offered ti aend their tanks but Germany blocked them.
    1
  5.  @RationalQuestions  they also run on Kerosene. Did you read the whole thing? If i was unclear the mix is Kerosene with some Benzene.
    1
  6.  @Asghaad  Abrams runs on diesel, jet fuel, and marine diesel.
    1
  7.  @Asghaad  The main fuel USA uses for their Abrams is No.2 diesel. Diesel which would be a major logistic challenges. Leo 2 is better because it can run perfectly fine with Kerosene and Benzene. Which is what Ukraine uses for their russian tanks.
    1
  8. It would be better then any other tank on the battlefield
    1
  9. How so?
    1
  10. They were crumbly russian tanks though.
    1
  11. More then they do tanks. They have crews training in Canada, UK, Denmark, Poland, Spain, and a few other countries i believe.
    1
  12. Poutn claimed Canada's 2 largest islands are actually russian. He keeps sending military ice breakers around there to bother us. He even planted russian flags in their fjords. He wants anything he can reach out and touch.
    1
  13. Neither can the Kremlin.
    1