Comments by "Colonel K" (@Paladin1873) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
104
-
51
-
48
-
20
-
17
-
15
-
13
-
11
-
9
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joshmeijer4140 Your comment is off target, for I never said anything about winning WWII, much less winning it alone. But since you brought it up, let's take a closer look at some key events between 1939-45. The Soviets were not much involved in the war in 1939 except to greatly aid Hitler's invasion of western Poland by invading eastern Poland. Then Stalin turned his sights on Finland, which gave him such a drubbing that Hitler realized the Soviets could be defeated if he could mass enough forces to invade the USSR. The only problem was those damned stubborn Brits who kept harassing him instead of suing for peace. This drained resources, particularly those of the Luftwaffe, which would be sorely missed when Operation Barbarossa was launched in June of 1941. During the interim, from mid 1940 to mid 1941, it was Great Britain that stood alone fighting the Nazi juggernaut, but they could not have done it without a sympathetic US providing material aid in the form of direct purchases and eventually lend-lease. Had the US refused them, Britain might well have been forced to reach an accommodation with Hitler and left the war early, freeing up even more German resources for Barbarossa. Despite not having these additional forces, Hitler went forward with his plan, even though the Brits had caused him delays that forced a significant postponement of the invasion until June. This deprived the Nazis of some of the best invasion weather and compressed their timetable for victory. Even so, the Nazis nearly destroyed the Soviet Army and Air Force in the first six months of operations on the eastern front. Imagine how much more they might have achieved if they could have invaded earlier and with far greater resources at hand. Their problem was further compounded when the US entered the war at the end of 1941. More and more German resources were drained away from the eastern front to face the growing Allied threat of air, sea, and land campaigns. This greatly aided the Soviets and gave them precious time to reconstitute their own forces and go fully on the offensive. Other critical US aid to the Soviets came in the form of supplying them with badly needed materiel, among which were critically important aviation fuel additives and advanced electronic components that they were incapable of producing. That the Soviets engaged the lion's share of the Nazi forces in WWII is not disputed, but they could not do it alone. It was very much a team effort. The same can be said of the Pacific/Asian campaigns. The Soviet contribution there was negligible and occurred only in the last few weeks of WWII. It was the US that dominated the Pacific fighting, ably supported by the UK, Australia, and other allies. But this was largely made possible because of the fighting on the second bloodiest war front, China, which tied down millions of Japanese and Japanese allied forces. China could not go it alone, so the US, UK, and India provided much needed manpower and material assistance. Had it not been for the China Burma India (CBI) theater, the Japanese would have sent far more troops to fight in the Pacific campaign, making it that much bloodier for the Americans. So again, it was a combined effort that helped bring victory.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1