Comments by "" (@MeanBeanComedy) on "The Decentralized Web Is Coming" video.

@coryc9040 so true. They're both unbearable.
2
@Gizziiusa "Don't understand what you're blathering about" You obviously don't. He's giving an explanation for why the search results appear like that. Most people in our country are white, so when they post a picture, and whatever image hosting site or stock image site will have it tagged as "couple" instead of specifying the most common race. When a minority race posts an image, or it's hosted on a stock image site, they're more likely to image tag it with the race. For an interracial couple, they're usually captioned "black and white couple." Now look at what those last two words are. There's your answer. You don't understand how search results work. They're not intelligently curated base on some AI reading the image and seeing what's within. They're based on tags and basic colors that basic algorithms can read. There's not some conspiracy here, and that's not an opinion. Besides, what the hell would that accomplish? Fuck nothing. What, showing only black and white couples is going to make people marry interracially? First off, who gives a shit? Second, it definitely won't. People aren't going to stop marrying who they want because Google has brainwashed them by showing pictures of interracial marriages. It's baseless paranoia and fearmongering. No one's trying to "replace you."
2
Mike Dunigan exactly. Ya gotta be smart. The more complicated the world gets, the more work it takes to get what you want. Takes knowledge!
2
@coryc9040 Fact checked it by searching in both Spanish and Chinese. Both showed prominently white couples. Myth busted!
2
I really didn't like it when the interviewer informed "Glasses Guy" that these sites aren't actually monopolies because there are successful competitors in the industry and the guy dismissed it by saying they're "monopoly-like." That's not a monopoly! This is an all-or-nothing classification!
2
Ha! Nice. Almost as good as the two economists and two turds joke!
2
@David-we3sb the joke doesn't just have to be about social media sites.
2
Cool.Hand Okay, so you have quite a bit wrong here, but I'll just hone in on two things: 1. Lobbyists aren't "anarcho-capitalists." I'm going to assume you done know what that term means, so I'll define it for you. Anarchists believe in no government. They support abolishing all forms of non-voluntary organizations and monopolizations on force like the state. Therefore, anyone involved in lobbying or working in the government can't be an anarchist of any strain, communist or capitalist. Utilizing the force they believe shouldn't exist to craft legoslation and regulation that benefits them prevents them from being anarcho-capitalists. An anarcho-capitalist lobbyist is an oxymoron. 2. If you're talking about Glass-Steagal, it did Jack shite. Every accounting professor I had at uni said life before and life after those regulations (there was another I can't remember off the top of the dome), since they were written in part by the very people who were dealing with them, allowing them to already know and exploit the loopholes right from the get-go. Your ignorance of what Anarcho-capitalism means leads me to believe you haven't done enough (or any) reading on the subject. I'd advise you to do some.
1