Comments by "" (@MeanBeanComedy) on "Medical implications if Roe v. Wade is overturned" video.

  1. You're not Pro-Life, then. If you believe it's a human being being killed, you're either okay with it or you're not. If you believe it's murder, you shouldn't support it. The government's job has always been to protect people from murder, so it 100% has a right to step in. I'm against murder. That means I won't murder anyone, but it also means I support laws outlawing murder.
    12
  2.  @scotthorvath5146  If you don't think ending the life of an innocent human being is murder, you're not Pro-Life
    8
  3.  @pucciann  The baby growing inside her isn't "her body."
    8
  4. No, it doesn't. You've obviously never read the rulings of Roe, Casey, and whatever they'll call this one.
    4
  5. You don't have a right to kill your kids.
    4
  6. Pro-lifers: "Life begins at conception." Pro-Abortion activists: "DURR THAT MEANS SEMEN IS BABIES!!" You do realize that sperm that never meets an ovum isn't actually a conception, right?
    3
  7. A woman can still control her pregnancy. She just can't kill her children.
    2
  8. Hundreds of thousands each year.
    2
  9. No, they won't. The only thing that changes is you can't kill your kids.
    2
  10.  @AriLegall  Interracial marriage is pretty clearly protected by the 14th.
    2
  11.  @deenice4367  No, we're not going to let "mothers" choose to kill their kids.
    2
  12.  @victoriaanderson7954  You're forgetting that a majority of pro-lifers are women. They vote against abortion each cycle. If you want to force men to care for their kids, great. It's already called child support, though.
    2
  13. Oh yes it did. 😎 Get used to it. We're growing. We don't kill our kids, so our numbers are getting better every year.
    2
  14.  @yumemiruuuu  No, you can't kill innocent people. That's what I'm saying.
    2
  15.  @twintrbo92  Then he/she/it is wrong.
    2
  16.  @dsta9996  It's because "let us kill babies because we want to use their organs for 'research'" isn't quite as compelling.
    2
  17.  @yumemiruuuu  Again, you always have to use the tiny % of edge cases. That's less than 1% of abortions. And death during childbirth is less than 0.001%. If you could defend the murder of unborn children without relying on extremely rare examples, you would.
    1