Comments by "" (@MeanBeanComedy) on "David Reich – How One Small Tribe Conquered the World 70,000 Years Ago" video.

  1. ​ @indyzaga  It's usually with regards to "Native Americans," who fight DNA testing, because it would show they're not that related to Clovis peoples and the people buried near where they live, since they were largely nomadic, and didn't traditionally live where they live now. It kinda hurts the "this land is our land for generations" thing when it's shown that's not the case. That's my understanding of it. 🤷🏼‍♂️
    23
  2. ​ @twinblessings2125  Because Indo-European languages don't come from Sanskrit. Sanskrit is a type of Indo-European language, like English or Latin or Persian. They all descend from a common tongue, including Sanskrit, so Sanskrit can't be what it descends from.
    16
  3. ​ @fromabove422  Definitely not. 80% Heritable.
    7
  4. ​ @ashleigh3021  It means nothing. It likely just means one of them is Canadian and the other is American, so he tried to group them together, despite our dissimilarities.
    5
  5. For real. This has to be one of the hardest fields to work in during modern times for this very reason! Genetics are inherently wrongthink. I wish him the best, though! 😁👍🏻
    4
  6. ​ @PalermoTrapani  Exactly. It's not exactly arbitrary. The clusters exist. They're not a bad thing!
    4
  7. ​ @NP1066 I doubt it. They usually cope like this. I've seen them say they totally knew how to do agriculture, they just didn't want to.
    3
  8. Uralic isn't connected to the Tungic languages.
    3
  9. Slower speed would make him slur more...
    2
  10. I picked up on that, too! 😆😉🤫
    2
  11. That's possible. But would Bantus, Nilotes, Capioids, and Cushites all be from the same group? Because that doesn't make sense.
    2
  12. ​ @TheMrgoodmanners  No, it wasn't. It was a universal; Europeans just decided to be done with it by the AD period.
    2
  13. ​ @r.ladaria135  Thank you! It's nonexistent in most of the country, and barely a factor in other regions.
    2
  14.  @occamraiser  You need help. Go touch grass and stop believing what the television tells you. You sound like a boomer wine aunt.
    2
  15. ​ @mkirsia  It would have had even more, based on DNA we already have from before then
    2
  16. ​ @acaydia2982  I think even 3,000 years ago it wasn't.
    2
  17. ​ @ashleigh3021  Gotta do better than 10%.
    2
  18. ​ @alisterdirector1475  They still come from that small founding group.
    1
  19. That sounds fair. Men create the tales that the women tell their children. It's sweet! 😊☺️
    1
  20. ​ @chetisanhart3457  Someone else gets it!
    1