Comments by "" (@MeanBeanComedy) on "The Twitch Safety Council is पागल..." video.

I don't think this is classified as censorship, because they're a private company. They still shouldn't be silencing people, though.
7
@jetmemes3265 There's no need to be a prick. You don't accomplish anyone by misgendering someone. It's just a way to needlessly be an asshole to someone.
4
@skelly1111 Let's all agree once and for all to stop using that line! https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/264449/ It's Time to Stop Using the 'Fire in a Crowded Theater' Quote
3
@SisterRose Exactly. Why do people like that come to this channel? Why is he trying to prove the point of the person he's supposed to be arguing against? It's nauseating. They have to see it, right?
2
@Tommy Jahns You aren't, and very few people actually believe that. They're just a very loud, very vocal, very small minority of the population. Just ignore them and treat people with respect and as equals and you'll be fine.
2
@jetmemes3265 Factually incorrect. Estrogen is not affecting her voice. You sure are confidently stating facts for someone who doesn't know what he's taking about, aren't you?
2
Muta hitting that autotune @ 6:00. T-Pain up in this joint, bruuhh.
2
@skelly1111 Right. I'm taking two points here: 1. Twitch should probably not be as restrictive on expression, as should most online social media platforms. 2. They should not be forced either way, though, as they're private companies. I'm a free speech absolutist, so I support basically no speech restrictions by the state, but I also believe in private property, meaning Twitch owns its servers. (You already seem to get this, so I'm moreso just putting these two completely coherent points side-by-side to show they're not contradictory, since many seem to think they are.)
2
@ArtTasticCreations They aren't taking away your rights. You're welcome to say whatever you want. You just can't say it on their property. You've never had a right to free speech that ensured your ability to host your videos on YouTube's property. Your rights to free expression protect you from government punishment. They don't include a demand that YouTube host your content. For example, in my home town, we have black nationalists that preach pretty racist shit on the streets. They're allowed to. It's their right. But they can't go into a store and keep doing it, because Target can ask them to leave, and has every right to. You don't have a right to someone else's property and resources.
2
@ArtTasticCreations That's not the point, chief. YouTube isn't silencing you or taking away your right to speak. They're just not letting you in their group. They just don't want you as a customer. That is their right. You don't have a right to their services and products. You aren't owed a YouTube account, and it's not a human right to use YouTube. They are not the government, and they can choose to associate with whomever they want. If it's a public institution, the principles of free speech apply. If it's a private institution, they can allow whoever they want and kick off whoever they please. That's the whole point of a terms of service. It's literally not about free speech. They're not censoring you. They're just not selling to you anymore, which is THEIR right to freedom of association. Otherwise, you're demanding they let you on their private community they don't want you in, and in your world, they are going to be forced (I guess through legal force?) to allow anyone on their platform, even if they don't want you there. In that scenario, YOU are abusing YouTube's rights. You don't have the right to use their property. It's just like if you told a guest to leave your home because you didn't like how he was behaving. He can't refuse to leave and scream "free speech!" Whenever you try to kick him out. That's what you're doing by refusing to respect freedom of association and private property rights and demanding a private organization host you regardless of their wishes.
2
That's actually pretty sweet. Very empathetic. 🤗😁👍💯
1