General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
CNN
comments
Comments by "" (@MeanBeanComedy) on "The compounded tragedy of Covid-19 vaccine skeptics dying from the virus" video.
E E Demanding bodily autonomy isn't "complaining." Neither is downvoting propaganda.
39
@utube012341 "All?" Wasn't it just one DJ? Bit of a hyperbole, that.
14
@littleghostfilms3012 Metadata analysis showed a benefit. If you refuse to do a basic scholar search, you'll never know and you'll always be this fucking ignorant. And people are being prescribed it by doctors and taking the actual pharmaceutical.
10
@jayobrok4502 The vaccine was created months ago. Ivermectin has been used safely for decades. Horrible comparison; you should feel very stupid for making it.
8
@moonshoes11 You think you're so smart because CNN told you ivermectin was horse dewormer. Technically, it is, but that's like saying "Don't drink water! That's a fire suppressant!" It's been used in humans for decades.
8
@littleghostfilms3012 That's dumb. It's an antiviral. Read for yourself, don't be a sheep.
6
@kiabtoomlauj6249 You're acting like research scientists and doctors are all against ivermectin. That's not the case. You HAVE to be intentionally ignorant.
6
Can someone link me these long-term phase 4 trials? I'm stuck in the year 2021 and can't find the 2024 studies!
5
@Alexander_MD It's FDA-approved for use in humans, so stop calling it horse medicine. That's just a lie. And ivermectin has been safely used by people for decades. This mRNA drug is brand new. If you don't understand how novelty increases danger, I'm not sure how to help you.
5
@shroom6426 But it has been approved for use in humans, meaning it's not "horse dewormer," like the lying scum media and their smooth-brained acolytes have been proclaiming. And ivermectin has shown to function as an antiviral. We've known this since 2015 or so.
4
@giftedboi Again, this is a human medication prescribed to humans by doctors. You'd know that if you spent lest time gumming your own knob and more time reading.
4
Add another to the bin of refuse that doesn't understand natural selection. When an 80 year-old grandpa dies, that's not natural selection.
3
@Spencer-vq7se It dies feel that way. Too many details in some spots, too few in others.
3
Again, leave it to leftists to not understand evolution. An 80 year-old great-grandpa dying isn't "natural selection." Do you feel intelligent? You're not. You're barely a Midwit.
3
@goofnutgav That's not "karma." It's coincidence. Thousands of people have advised caution about the vaccines and haven't died. Thousands have supported the vaccines and died. It's just confirmation bias you're falling for.
3
As a Christian, you're meant to have prudence and reason. Trusting elites who've proven they don't care about you is neither.
3
@jessthemullet It's a human medication. You'd know that if you had bothered to read about it instead of blindly believing what MSM tells you.
3
@e-man1634 I already linked one in this thread, you illiterate mong.
3
@e-man1634 That's not how studies work. I linked a metadata analysis. You linked a brochure.
3
Again, leave it to leftists to not understand evolution. An 80 year-old great-grandpa dying isn't "natural selection." Do you feel intelligent? You're not. You're barely a Midwit.
2
@James Mason It's Orwellian. If you don't agree with the Cathedral, you're the propagandist. You must agree with the regime of managerial Midwit elites, otherwise you're a propagandist!
2
Why TF would he take the vaccine? He's young and healthy.
2
@ciege5109 You don't know what trolling means.
2
@Demontrigger14K It's murder. 100% of them end in a death of an innocent. If you're trying to draw some parallel to this, it fails due to that fact.
2
@utube012341 That's not illiterate. You just don't articulate yourself well.
2
@evensteve284 Statistically insignificant. Small-minded people search for anecdotes that affirm their biases.
2
With bullets that kill you 0.00001% of the time at my age.
2
You think God sends people to hell for not patronizing Big Pharma?
2
@Alexander_MD Not in vivo. They're already long past in vitro studies.
2
@shroom6426 No, it functions as both.
2
@e-man1634 People have been using it for about a year. Doctors have been proscribing it for as long. You're just incredibly out of the loop and uninformed and you're smug about it. Listen to yourself. You know fuck-all about this, but you're running your mouth in an attempt to be snarky. If you had any self-awareness, you'd feel like a damned fool for your ignorance, but that would be expecting too much out of you.
2
@greggalexander8216 It has been studied for COVID. You just haven't read about it.
2
@joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 No, it's not. Have you never looked at the data? It's still NJ at #1 and NY at #2.
2
@gsdgsdgdhsadds Oh wow! Studies?? EPIC! 😎👍🏻 I love reading bad science by managerial midwits with unfettered power! 😎😎👌🏻👌🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
2
@sleepy7604 We're not keeping you from getting over it. Your leaders are. They love the power grab.
1
You really can't see the difference?
1