Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

@mandarinandthetenrings2201 "America is net exporter of oil, it sells it's Texas light sweet crude oil for 20% above market value." So why the hissy fit over Saudi Arabia cutting oil output?
2
5:51 Look! It is no secret that Hamas was set up by the Israeli secret service to discredit the Palestinian resistence and the Palestinian nation as a collection of savages. They did not like the PLO because they were "too, rational, too civilised". So why is everyone surprised that Hamas behaved the way they did? They were doing their job. You speak of the events of 7/11 being "Theatrical". Quite right, that's exactly what they were; what you might call "Snuff theatre". These events were supposed to provide an "excuse", a "justification", for the genocide to take place in Gaza. This time however, the World has moved on a bit. It is fed up with the self-serving rhetoric coming out of Tel Aviv and its echos worldwide. There is now the internet and more people have wised-up, and it shows in the reactions of places like Barcelona, calling out five decades of double standards and hypocrisy, and taking actiom to make their point felt.
1
"Genocide is a crime which is very hard to prove" There are statements by Israeli government Ministers and other officials, including Benjamin Netanyahoo, if I am not mistaken, to the effect that the intention of the action of the IDF was to kill Palestinians. Bombing civilian targets such as hospitals and UN shelters, is hard to understand as anything other than as actions, intended to kill large numbers of Gazan, irrespective of what they had done or not done. How many does one have to kill for your actions to count as genocide? Can one legally "slide out from under" a charge of genocide, by showing that some members of the ethnicity concerned remain alive?
1
19:48 Surely, if it can be proved against one menmber of the Israeli government, that they had the intention of wiping out the population of Gaza, then all the others would be at least, accomplices. Wouldn't they? ?
1
@eduardosimoes2228 Maybe, you are a bit out-of-date?
1
@anon21qwerty17 Thanks for the clarification.
1
@tyy5557 So should a lot of other people! I could mention a few, but what's the point the US does not recognize the ICC. so they will never stand trial.
1
@eduardosimoes2228 Seems to be breaking free, at the moment. They have probably seen that, that ship is sinking and decided to jump, rather than go down with it.
1
"A Russian weaponisation of energy, cutting off supplies of gas and fuel to Europe" Oh! Come on Man! Who put the sanctions on whom? Did the Russians sabotage the NS pipelines? Did the Russians hold up the certification of the NS2? Did they hold up and finally sabotage the repair of the gas-turbines needed to pump gas along NS1? No they did none of those things. The Collective West cut off trade with Russia and stole its foreign exchange reserves where it could, to collapse the Russian economy and bring about a color revolution in Moscow. The Collective West's attack failed, dismally, and the results have hurt the Europeans, far more than the Russian, but the initiative was the West's, not the Russians'. It is illogical, therefore to blame the Russians for the trouble that Europe is suffering, and is really an Orwellian inversion of reality.
1