Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Cracks in the NATO Narratives and NATO Unity - Chas Freeman, Alexander Mercouris u0026 Glenn Diesen" video.

4:47 Sorry Mr Freeman! Not Yeltsin, Johnson!JJk
8
\i find it incredible that Mr Freeman does not understand that the interests of the American population and the clique running America are different. Clearly, he is right that a neutral Ukraine, forming a buffer state between N@0 and Russia would have been in the interests of the USA population, but the desire of the clique running the US is to destroy Russia, divide it up into half a dozen states and loot it..
3
1:03:50 If you don't have the vocabulary, you don't have the concepts and without the concepts you cannot think clearly about the subject in consideration. So losing the vocabulary of diplomacy is a very serious matter.
2
25:12 With Biden being POTUS how can anyone imagine that the President of the USA is "Running America"? I mean! Could he run a sweet shop? This provokes the question: does the POTUS run the USA or is he a figurehead?
2
Mr Freeman speaks of there not being much evidence of thought. We have no one among the European leaders that strikes me as being a thinker.
1
36:10 I remember a year or two back, an American "Statesman" (I forget his name.) saying approvingly of an aircraft carrier that had been sent to threaten somewhere, that it was "100,000 tons of diplomacy", (!)
1
21:58 The Purpose of N@0 FROM THE VERY BEGINNING was to destroy Russia. The purpose of putting bases all around Russia was/is to get into a position to be able to overwhelm Russia with attacks from as many directions as possible. This purpose did not change when the USSR collapsed because, the purpose remained the same. The objection to the USSR was not that it was communist, or authoritarian, but that it was Russia.
1