Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Dialogue Works" channel.

The US also tried Regime Change at least twice in China, Tien An-men and Hong Kong. They achieved it in Myanmar but the Army overthrew their government.
15
26:21 It was not just the people of Russia that the Soviet Union saved in WW2, it was the people of the World and the people of Europe in particular! They may may not appreciate it sufficiently Today, but that is a fact.
12
34:47 I agree that the 2-state solution is unworkable, because the Yunohus would invade the Palestinian state or make life in it impossible and the US would protect them from consequences.
10
In recent times there have been four attacks on embassies, all of them carried out by the US or its close allies: The attack on the Equadorian Embassy in London to seize Julian assange, the US seizure of the San Fransisco Russian consulate, the Equadorian attack on the Mexican Embassy and the Israeli attack on the Iranian Embassy in Damascus.
9
I have posted this (more or less) before but I think it is relevant here and I have been surprised that there has been almost no reaction to it. So, with apologies for posting old stuff here it is again: Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. It consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would, I think, kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
7
19:45 You ask, rhetorically, "What are we smoking?" I don't know what Washington is smoking, but in the UK, the Thames Consevators report, that the wildlife living in the River Thames, downstream from London, is sufferring from cocaine poisoning. (I'm sure I don't need to explain the significance of that to you.)
6
Well said Scott! I went to China a long time ago (years before Nixon) and I could see then, that it was on th up & up, I had the first impression that everything was upside down, but later I formed the view that common sense was in control to an extent I had never experienced in the West.
4
31:07 You have pointed out that a military solution is impossible and you are probably right. So that leaves two other solutions that occur to me: financial and pschological. The Yunohus as we all know are very focused on financial matters, it seems to have a greater importance to them as a group than it does generally. Are these possible lines to pursue?
4
34:50 I wonder how far the "Idiocy" of the current crop of Western leaders is innate or is it induced by blackmail, bribery or personal greed? If it is none of these, what causes them to, all (Except Orban, Fico and Vucic) behave in this fashion?
4
"Untermenschen" & "Goys" are really exactly the same concepts. The're are both NAZI ideas, whatever name they are given.
3
I have posted this elsewhere, but I think it is appropriate to this discussion too, so I'll post it again. I would be interested to hear comments on it. It has elicited remarkably little reaction so far. At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers, As the loop is circular in nature we can start anywhere, Let's start with the congress critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that hold the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle." OK?
3
My impression is that western politicians get very upset when too many US soldiers come home in body-bags, but Western commanders, particularly British comanders, have the attitude shown by Edward III, in the film "Brave Heart". In the depiction of the Battle of Bannockburn, Edward orders the archers to fire into a mass of English and Scottish soldiers engaged in hand-to-hand fighting. One of his lieutenants protests that this order will kill a lot of English soldiers. His reply is to the effect: "There's plenty more where they came from!"
3
What do you two think about the woman who was just behind Trump and just before the shot that hit his ear, turned towards the shooter and then started filming the back of Trump's head?!
3
Also a large measure of "projection". "If any country is stronger than us, they will, of course, behave towards us as we behave towards weaker countries."
2
36:20 The Israeli claim is not just to the land that the UN awarded to Israel and Palestine. They want the whole of what they allege was the State of Israel under King Solomon, or something of the sort.
2
Was the Chinese Embassy bombed on purpose? Well, that night the Chinese Embassy was holding the wreckage of the US's super secret Stealth jet that the Serbs had shot down earlier that day. Accident? Coincidence? I doubt it! You mean, that the CIA had NO IDEA where the Chinese Embassy really was? What do you take me for? A likely story, indeed!
2
The "failure of the Barrier" is, or at least looks like, the "failure" of the US security system on 11/9/2001.
2
What is particularly remarkable is that,at the same time the US is telling China not to support Russia, they are sanctioning Chinese products and openly trying to destroy their High Tech industry! Trying to "Keep Russia and China apart" and at the same time insulting and attacking both! It's sort of "raising, acting stupid to a fine art"!
2
I forgot to mention the US trying, simultaneously, to find a "Legal" way to steal the Russian's bank reserves and asking the Chinese to buy US debt!
2
27:39 What is even more staggering, is that the Chinese have grown rich without an empire to rob! Oh, &BTW, private enterprise was an important part of the Chinese scene from well before the declaration of the PRC. For example, the PRC's flag has four small stars on it as well as the big "Communist" star. These four stars represent the peasants, workers, soldiers and (Wait for it!) the patriotic capitalists. When I went to China in 1964, I was amazed at the diversity of goods in the shops and enquiring about this, I discovered that unlike in the USSR, there was a thriving privately owned industry, making anything that would turn a penny, with firms ranging in size, from one-man ops to firms employing hundreds or even thousands.
1
16:20 About the reporting of the "Attack" on Iran: it suggests that when the Russians defeat Ukraine/N@0, the Western MSM will declare a Ukrainian Victory and then move on to the US election or "Stormy Daniels revelations", a Royal Baby, or something of the sort.
1
28:46 Larry Johnson is very sound on US policy and on Russia, but he is way out of date on China. China has not only made commercial airliners, the first few are working commercially. It is designed to compete with the Boeing 737. It's called the C919 and they are working on the next version, which will be bigger. It is called C929. BTW, the engines in both are Chinese too.
1
11:12 Do you tthink they are fools or are they puppets? It looks to me as though they are rather mediocre people who have been trapped into doing whatever the USG tells them to. They seem also to believe that they have much more strength and power than they really have and they seem to worry much less than seems reasonable in the circumstances they find themselves in. All this, makes me wonder if they are permanently under the influence of cocaine. What do you, Pepe, think?
1
@PhiloSurfer Yes! They keep trying and at the same time try to drive a wedge between China and Russia and ask the Chinese for help with their debt crisis! and ask the Chinese to buy their low-grade chips and refuse to sell them high-grade chips and prevent Holland, Japan and South Korea from selling chip-making machinery to China. One really, really could not make this stuff up!
1
27:39 What is even more staggering, is that the Chinese have grown rich without an empire to rob! Oh, &BTW, private enterprise was an important part of the Chinese scene from well before the declaration of the PRC. For example, the PRC's flag has four small stars on it as well as the big "Communist" star. These four stars represent the peasants, workers, soldiers and (Wait for it!) the patriotic capitalists. When I went to China in 1964, I was amazed at the diversity of goods in the shops and enquiring about this, I discovered that unlike in the USSR, there was a thriving privately owned industry, making anything that would turn a penny, with firms ranging in size, from one-man ops to firms employing hundreds or even thousands.
1
38:00 Trump's 1st experience and Joe Biden show that the "Power of the POTUS" is very limited. Trump the "C-in-C of the US armed forces", ordered the US army to get out of Syria. They stayed put. Joe Biden is visibly incapable of running anything as complicated as a sweet shop, but the US is still somehow functioning, so presumably, someone else is running the USA. That Someone Else is not up for election.
1
@Just_username_3161 Yes. Without the Soviet intervention and eventual defeat of the Wehrmacht, The Reich would have had the resources of the USSR at its disposal and would quite probably gone on (As they intended to do) to conquer the rest of the World.
1
51:46 The US supporting geno*ide in Gaza, is a warning to the World, that this country is OK with geno*ide, so any talk about their opponents' geno*ide is BS. Talk of "Cultural geno*ide" is obviously, Propaganda & nothing more. Their attitude to Ukrainian casualties is another illustration of the same. (As if one were needed!)
1
I see in uk.yahoo today that Britain too is selling arms to Israel. I suppose that given the ethnicity of our noble foreign secretary, that is inevitable.
1
1:49 I 2022 the Ukrainin army had also been battle-hardened in seven years of fighting the Donbas militias.
1
45:19 I think the US was hamstrung in its effeorts to split Russia and China, by not understanding the ideological underpinnings of the quarrel between the two parties. The Chinese accused the Russian party of becoming bourgeois and liberal in their thinking and my impression is that the US rulers (being both liberal and bourgeois themselves) never understood, what this really meant and that this was about the greatest condemnation/insult that one Communist could offer to another! (Incidentally, I think that the Chinese Communists were right in their assessment.) When the Russians stopped calling themselves "Communists" the way was clear, for the resumption of friendly relations between the two powers.
1
27:49 After the end of WW2, NATO was set up to help the US defeat the USSR. When it became clear that doing that was too expensive (No one wins a nuclear war.) NATO became an organization to keep the US MIC in profitable work. It has been doing so, ever since. That is why NATO was not wound up after the end of the Cold War. Wars are one way of doing this, threats of wars are another and rumours of wars to come, are a third. There may well be others. The US MIC is as you say not about making weapons it is about making profits. It is run by accountants. Idle machinery or idle factories are stagnant capital. Hence the lack of a "surge capability".
1
@SaundraRaynor Thank you.
1
@SaundraRaynor Yes, I agree with you. I think that perhaps they have mostly not seen it, previously, as a "circular", self reiforcing structure and they need time to think about it, before commenting? I don't know, maybe, as you suggest, they see it as an insoluble problem? Whatever, I see it as the principal problem, the problem without which being dealt with, the USA will just go on warmongering until it achieves a nuclear war or gets utterly crushed by a conventional war or its economy implodes.. Or something similar.
1
29:22 "Everyone is against Israel now". The thing that alarms me, is that the polls inside Israel are said to show that 75% of Israelis support what the IDF is doing in Gaza! This seems to indicate that the Yunohus are largely a bunch, a population even, of Homicidal Maniacs! If it is true, how can anyone countenance a state of such people, armed with nuclear weapons? What can one say of countries that support such a state?
1
33:27 Not quite right. In 1870 the British invaded Afghanistan and the Afghans allowed them to get to Kabul, (together with their wives and children.!) and then they attacked and killed all except one man, whom they sent back to India to tell the British what had happened.
1
32:25 If Nato gets to put 60,000 troops into Ukraine, to fight the Russians, what are they going to use as weapons?
1
15:24 David Cameron was simply applying Dr Goebels's maxim that "If you are going to lie, you have a better chance of being believed, if you make it a big one."
1
50:00 The MIC, the lobbyists, the voters, the congress critters and the USG, together form a loop. What you might call a "vicious circle". This loop is self protecting, it has the MSM to help it and to prevent its exposure and it has internal mechanisms, like the "revolving door" to give it strength. It is highly destructive to anyone that tries to attack it. As time goes on it seems to get stronger. I don't see how it will be defeated.
1
22:26 The Muslims think they can win because of the failure of the Ukrainian forces.
1
@iRelevant.47.system.boycott That could well be! However, I have no info on that.
1
10:08 What about the civilians who are deprived of water? People can survive 40 days or so without food provided they have water to drink, but without water they will start to die in eight (8) days. That time is about up, NOW!
1
The USA is a great and important country. Unfortunately, its government has been hijacked by its MIC and the MIC's shareholders who have taken control of the country and are running it for their own benefit. So long as this situation persists, the World will not know peace.
1
@riverstone1492 Sorry! I did not make a note of it! It was one of many videos shown immediately after the event.
1
@riverstone1492 Dr Jerome Corsi says in a Stephen H. video that she is a high official in the FBI.
1
That should have been "Stephen Gardiner"
1