Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "Alexander Mercouris"
channel.
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
The situation faced by Lord Ismay was different, in that China hardly figured in his calculations, even if it did at all. Talk of Europe taking on Russia, with or without US support, is ignoring the Elephant in the Room. Europe would not be taking on Russsia, but Russia +, who knows who else besides, but almost certainly China.
Today, I learned that the White house has made it still harder for Europe to boost its production of 155mm ammo, by putting on hold LNG terminals in Texas. Thus reducing Europe's potential energy supplies. (To avoid making global warming worse, you understand.)
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I wonder if Tisdal has considered this: if, say, Poland were to send units of the Polish army into Ukraine to attack Russian troops, would the Russians be constrained to not attack military targets in Poland? Or suppose, for example, were the British, to send units of the British army, openly into the conflict in Ukraine, would the Russians feel free to shoot down planes bring them into Ukraine or even into Poland?
Another thing I wonder is: how much 25mm ammo for the Bradleys does the US have? Or TOW missiles? Likewise, I wonder how plentiful the supply of 105mm ammo there is for the French AFVs ? I wonder how one goes about replacing artillery with AFVs and the like? With Great Difficulty, I should imagine.
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8