Comments by "Antony Wooster" (@antonywooster6783) on "West Faces Ukr Defeat, 2nd Challenger Destroyed; North Korea Nuclear Sub, Niger Calls ECOWAS Bluff" video.

  1. 5:16 1000 shells/day on an 800 km front = 1 shell per day for every 800m of front. (2 shots/day/mile) This sounds "remarkably" quiet, to me.
    22
  2. I do hope that its DU armor did not burn too!
    4
  3. 52:04 Can anyone doubt, that had the US had some "Wonder Weapon", with which they could enable Ukraine to win the war, they would have supplied it already?
    1
  4.  @QuattroSG  So. Some parts of the front are completely quiet?
    1
  5. 46:33 The Swedish writer you are talking about is "bolting the door after the horses have left the stable." The US "Guarantee" has been shot, some time since. It has been clear for some while now, that NATO did not have the strength to defeat the Russians in a conventional war. It is now time for the "small countries of Europe, if they really fear that the Russians are interested in conquering them, to consider making friends with the Russians rather than allying themselves to a "broken reed" organization which is antagonistic to Russia. The mystery to me is that the WoWs (Warmongers of Washington) do not seem to have made the logical extension to their proposed war with China. If they cannot defeat Russia, which has only minimal/zero Chinese support, why do they imagine they can defeat China which would have total Russian support? What is this? Compartmental thinking taken to an absurd extreme? Or is it a cover for something else altogether? How can one account for this? Do they still believe in their own invincibility? Have they so completely believed their own propaganda?
    1
  6. I have just read a comment by @Peanutbrain that points out that the US's MO is to instigate a war and support one side until both sides are weakened and the war is nearly over and then, to intervene very forcibly and claim the victory and the spoils thereof as their own. Is this what the US is planning, over Ukraine? Are they saving weapons for a “final strike”? It's a new aspect, that I had not thought about till now. What do you think?
    1