Youtube comments of Antony Wooster (@antonywooster6783).
-
492
-
492
-
384
-
342
-
317
-
233
-
205
-
184
-
161
-
159
-
158
-
142
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
137
-
132
-
132
-
125
-
122
-
122
-
120
-
118
-
115
-
113
-
111
-
110
-
108
-
104
-
100
-
99
-
98
-
95
-
93
-
93
-
90
-
88
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
84
-
82
-
79
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
"It doesn't allow competition"
For once you are talking ignorant rubbish. About half the Chinese economy is private, The private sector makes about 40% of the GDP, employs about 60% of the work force. There is consequently a lot of competition. You are making a typically western mistake, you think that China is modelled on the USSR. It's not and it never has been. From well before the declaration of the PRC 2/10/1949. the communist part of China, has had a mixed economy, part state, part cooperative, part capitalist. The Chinese Communists, realized from the start of the revolution that they could not plan everything and it would be a bad idea to try, so they nationalized the foundations of the economy and left the rest to private enterprise. The result was many more of the peoples' needs were catered for than happened in the USSR. At the same time they ensured that the foundations of the economy, food, education, transport, electricity, medical services, roads, railways, canals, water supply, the military, the police and so on were under government control or were government owned, but most consumer goods were made by privately or cooperatively owned firms.
By the time I went to China, I had visited many of the countries in the Warsaw Pact and I had also been to Moscow and I knew of the poor selection of goods available or missing in those economies. I had worked for a while in the DDR, so I was rather surprised on first seeing China (In 1964.) The first thing that struck me was that everything looked freshly painted in bright colours! Then when I went shopping there was an amazing selection of goods on offer. It formed a rather odd contrast to the people, who at that time were all dressed in blue or grey Mao suits. But the variety of goods was certainly there. Now, of course, there is "rampant capitalism" as is, I would have thought, pretty well known. The difference from the West is that the capitalists are not allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Those that get carried away by their huge wealth and think that they can tell the government what to do, get put in their place fairly quickly. E.g. Jack Ma.
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
30:50 There is no advantage to the USA to be had in Ukraine. The purpose of the Ukraine war was, as you have said yourself, to damage Russia and to collapse the Russian economy and thereby to remove Putin from power. Also NATO in Ukraine would have a very menacing position for launching nuclear weapons towards Moscow, This is only of importance to people who think they can win a nuclear war. The importance of Ukraine to the US public is very small, it is only important, very important, to a small clique. The West, the population of the west would not be damaged at all, by a Russian victory in Ukraine, on the contrary, anything that reduces the power and prestige of the aforesaid clique, can only be beneficial to them.
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
9:16 I think this is characteristic of modern Western weapons. A Russian pilot I read, said that Western fighter jets were beautifully made, like Swiss watches, but like Swiss watches, very delicate. When I was an infantryman, for the first part of my service, we used Lee-Enfield rifles that, I should think, were of no later than 1914 vintage. I don't remember one of them ever going wrong. Towards the end of my time we were given FN (Belgian made) rifles which were lighter, easier to carry and fire, were self-loading, could fire multiple shots. (IIRC, officially, you could fire up to three shots in a burst, but if "fixed" it with a matchstick, you could fire the whole magazine (10 shots) in one burst.) It was more accurate, in match shooting on a firing range too. However, in a sandy environment it was forever jamming.
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
I want to point out that while this research was going on in Wuhan, it had previously been done, financed by Dr Fauci, in the University of North Carolina, in a place called Chapel Hill and that there are many similar reseach sites around America and throughout the Western World. For example the US has a very sinister sounding bio-lab in Tblisi, the capital of Georgia and at least 37 such labs in Ukraine. It has also stonewalled any investigation of its bio-labs in relation to the SARS COV 2 outbreak.
While it is true that very occasionally, viruses can "jump" from an animal host to a human being and then go on to infect other humans, it is very rare for this to happen while leaks from bio-labs are very common. It happens nearly every year. Natural viruses can be quite nasty enough, without humans making them even worse, deliberately. So I think there should be International Laws prohibiting such research and the penalties for breaking these laws should be very severe indeed. The only "Logical" reason for doing such research is Biological Warfare, which should (If it is not already.) be a "Crime Against Humanity". Such laws, could save humanity from being wiped out completely. No exaggeration!
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
50:45 The weakness of this discussion is that it ignores the way that there was an underlying sympathy in Britain (Churchill and many British aristocrats) and in America (General Grove, John Foster Dulles)) for the N*zis, which sympathy survived WW2 and was expressed not only in "Operation Paperclip" and the analogous Japanese operation, but also in the wholesale adoption and incorporation of the Gehlen Organization and its use to harass the Soviet Union, not only, but particularly in Ukraine. IOW this cultivation of the extreme right-wing elements in Ukraine is not something that started in 2014 but goes back at least to 1945. Nor should one, in this context, forget that the original idea to research the possibility of making atom-bombs, it seems was NOT "in case the Germans got there first" but in order to defeat the USSR.
Seeing how friendly NATO was with almost every F*scist dictatorship there was in the world, (Spain, Portugal, Egypt, Libya, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Greece, Vietnam, China, South Korea, Indonesia, Philippines etc., etc.) and how the US intervened in liberation movements to install F*scist governments, (Iran, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, etc.) it seems to me that the "Political West" was not some relatively innocuous aspect of Western Society or civilization, but more like a powerful F*scist crusade.
Put it another way: what would you call people who organize, finance, arm, protect and support in every possible way, F*scists? Liberals? Democrats? Philanthropists?
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
1:22:26 It seems to me that the insecurity that plagues the World and has done so since 1945, is almost entirely caused by a small group of warmongers in Washington DC and their hangers-on in London and Brussels. These people form what I call for lack of a better term (I think that no one has given this phenomenon a name previously.) a "vicious circle". It consists of a complex of several parts; the USG, the firms making military arms, the members of the Congress and the Senate and the lobbyist industy, insofar as it relates to the arms industry. These components form a self-reiforcing ring-structure, where the congresscritters and USG officials are investing in the arms industry and profit from its dividedends and the notorious "Revolving door". The arms industry, in turn pays the Lobbyists to keep the congress-critters in line, by subsidizing their election expenses and the USG fuells the whole set-up by extracting taxes willy-nilly from the US public.
It seems to me that so long as this Vicious Circle exists, there will be no peace in the World. Because it is very stable, ruthless and self-protective, it is very difficult for anyone or any ordinary organization to dismantle it. However, the present and the near future are far from ordinary times. As there is almost certainly going to be a Russian victory in Ukraine, it seems to me that the Russians would be in a position to insist on the dismantling of this Vicious Circle, which could be done by making an International law that said that all firms making military equipment, had to be state owned and that no private individual or corporation was allowed to own shares in such a firm. I think it might be much easier to get agreement to such a measure than to agree to complete disarmament.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
51:55 When I was a National Serviceman in the 1950s, I was for a while in a unit that had recently returned from Korea. Our Sgt said to us on one occasion: "If you are fighting alongside the Yanks, beware of this: Suppose you are held up by a machinegun post, the British way of dealing with it, would be to try to sneak a group in behind it and attack it from the rear while the rest of the platoon, company or regiment, kept it busy from the front. The Yank's way of dealing with it, would be to call up the airforce and give them the coordinates of this machinegun post and then the airforce would come and destroy it. However, if you ever do call up the US airforce, to deal wih such an obstacle, you had better make f'ing sure that you have some bl*ody good cover, because they will flatten the whole area, including you, if you arent careful!"
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
This war is not by any means or in any way, accidental. It was carefully prepared for some time, starting fairly early in the 21st century and worked on, together with a "perfect storm" of sanctions, using the war that the West knew they could provoke, to "justify" the sanctions. The purpose of the exercise was to cause the simultaneous collapse of the Russian economy and the defeat of the Russian armed forces on the battlfield, leading to unrest in Russia, leading to a color Revolution. The Collective West led by the US, seems to have been very confident that the plan would succeed and it seems that the planners assumed that the Russian government succeeding Putin's, would be more favourable to Western interests. The whole plan seems to have been founded on a totally false reading of the situation in Russia, the strength of the Russian armed forces and an equally false reading of the strength of the Ukrainian armed forces and the ability of the CW to sustain a war longer than a few months,
This scenario would explain why the CW was never interested in negotiations. They did not want negotiations, because what they wanted, was the defeat of Russia and Regime Change in Moscow. They are still not interested, so presumably, their aim has not changed.
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
@tommckellen4289 Another thing that people forget when they compare Hitler, Stalin and Mao, is that while Hitler and Stalin sent a lot of people to their deaths deliberately, Mao caused huge problems in the Chinese economy as a result of being fed "optimistic" results of harvest by officials who were afraid to ad mit that the harvests in their areas of responsibility had been poor. Also, as I mentioned, the Western powers, led by the US tried to make the "Famine" worse than it already was by banning grain exports to China.
I really think that anyone that wants to pontificate on China today, needs to at least read the books by Edgar Snow, Anna Louise Strong and Rewi Alley, about life in the Communist controlled areas of pre-PRC China. The foundations of much of what happens in contemporary China, were laid in the '30s and '40s of the last century. A lot of people talk as though China started in 1971!
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
When I was a child(a long time ago) there was an advert by the Wool Utilization Council, (of the UK) which proclaimed: "There is no substitute for Wool!" I oftern think that equally, or perhaps even more so, "there is No substitute for Information!". Alas, it is easier to find wool than reliable information. People like you and Alex and Alexander and Earl Grey and Gonzalo Lira,, ScottRitter, Jason Hinkle, and some half-dozen others are doing a really valuable service in providing different points of view from the MSM. In addition I find that the picture can also be filled out by WION and VFT although they are rather anti-Russian- and very anti-Chinese biased, do provide another view on the situation which is different from "our" MSM and consequently valuable. So, of course do Press TV, TASS and Global Times. I find the MSM almost unreadable because they usually strart off any article with such whopping lies that one feels inclined to disbelieve everything that follows and it feels like a complete waste of time.!
Also, unlike the MSM which seems to get its "Information" from a very few sources such as "an anoymous spokesperson for the State Department or Bellingcat or No.10 Downing St, you alternative sources collate, for internet browsers like myself, vastly more sources of info than I could ever hope to do. Thank you very much!
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
When the USSR collapsed, there was a referendum in Moldova to decide whether people wanted to remain part of the Russian Federation or become independent. They voted to remain part of the RF. The vote was, (Surprise, surprise!) ignored. There was, when the USSR was formed, and before Stalin got what is now Moldova, a Republic in what is now Ukraine and Transdniestria called the Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldova (or some such). When, post USSR, Moldova was declared independent the part that had been part of the SSRM (Transdniestria) fought to become independent of Moldova and there was a civil war. I do not know how it ended but it did and the peace was kept by Russian peacekeepers and has been ever since. Last time I saw it, about four years ago, it looked very peaceful, well-run* and moderately prosperous.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
25:19 You are absolutely spot on with your analogy to the British situation in 400AD! There is not one problem, there are a miriad and they have no skill in any of them! They have no diplomats not enough engineers, not enough skilled metal workers, not enough inspectors, not enough engineers and even management in Britain is mostly done by amateurs. (Only 1/4 of managerial staff in Britain had a formal qualification of any sort last time I heard.) They have no experienced generals and with the armed forces being so small, almost certainly, no corpus of NCOs. As I have said before, if you are going to make explosive devices, drones, no less than shells, you absolutely have to have skilled inspectors. Without them you will lose factories and everything in them.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
It seems that reactionaries tend to put their faith in Wunderwaffen. The Germans did it in WW2. First they thought that the Blitzkrieg, would bring the UK to the negotiating table. It nearly did but they reckoned without the hatred they had stirred up. Then they thought that their superior Luftwaffe would destroy the RAF. Because the UK had a brilliant General in Dowding and brave and generous pilots, that did not happen. Then they thought that the V1 would bring the UK to its knees. It didn't. Then the V2 was going to do it. It didn't. They were using some of their best scientist to research flying saucers and thought transference. They still lost the war. They even declared war on the US!
In Ukraine, the war was going to be decided by Javelins. (Some Ukrainians actually named their new-born children after this WW!) Then it was the Stinger. Then it was the Turkish Bayrackter Drone. Then the HYMARS. Now we have the Storm Shadow and the Patriot. After that comes the F-16. What the NATO forces really need is old fashioned artillery shells and this, it seems, is impossible to obtain in time. The Russians on the other hand have no Wunderwaffen. They have heavy, old fashioned, hardwearing artillery, masses of ammunition, masses of tough old fashioned tanks, masses of accurate guided missiles, masses of accurate guided bombs, masses of lethal drones and masses of observation drones and motivated soldiers and they are winning. None of the Wunderwaffen so far has helped to turn the tide of war, which the Russians have been "losing" all along. Strange that. Innit?
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
3:49 I was watching the Duran just now, and Prof. Morandi made the point that there is a sort of stand-off between the US and Iran, in which if the US attacks Iran, their camps and oil installations, in the mostly Iran-friendly countries of the Middle East, will be destroyed, together with their battleships. He made the point that the thing to look out for, is the US moving its ships out of harm's way, not their presence in the East Med or the Persian Gulf. Their presence there, being a sort of pledge, that they are NOT going to attack Iran!
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
The situation faced by Lord Ismay was different, in that China hardly figured in his calculations, even if it did at all. Talk of Europe taking on Russia, with or without US support, is ignoring the Elephant in the Room. Europe would not be taking on Russsia, but Russia +, who knows who else besides, but almost certainly China.
Today, I learned that the White house has made it still harder for Europe to boost its production of 155mm ammo, by putting on hold LNG terminals in Texas. Thus reducing Europe's potential energy supplies. (To avoid making global warming worse, you understand.)
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I wonder if Tisdal has considered this: if, say, Poland were to send units of the Polish army into Ukraine to attack Russian troops, would the Russians be constrained to not attack military targets in Poland? Or suppose, for example, were the British, to send units of the British army, openly into the conflict in Ukraine, would the Russians feel free to shoot down planes bring them into Ukraine or even into Poland?
Another thing I wonder is: how much 25mm ammo for the Bradleys does the US have? Or TOW missiles? Likewise, I wonder how plentiful the supply of 105mm ammo there is for the French AFVs ? I wonder how one goes about replacing artillery with AFVs and the like? With Great Difficulty, I should imagine.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
5:37 The whole problem stems from the USA's determination to remain the most powerful, country in the World, alias the World Hegemon. This stance suits the US MIC and practically no one else, except the NATO burocracy. Apparently the US has this fixation and suffers from "Projection", whereby they think that because they try to dominate any country weaker, economically or militarily than themselves, any country that managed to be stronger than them, economically or militarily, would try to dominate them. They even seem to regard any country that might become economically superior to them as an "existential" threat. Like, for example, Japan, Germany or Britain.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
The problem is not just gridlock in the US political system, the problem is mostly that the collective West cannot manufacture 155 mm shells as fast as the Ukrainians can fire them and the Russians destroy them. No amount of money can fix this problem in the short term. If you cannot make the shells, no amount of money will magically turn into shells.
In other words, in planning this war (Which they did!) NATO planners did not correctly evaluate what they were taking on. They expected the Ukrainian army, the largest and best equipped army in Europe, an army they had trained and that had been battle hardened for seven years, to wipe the floor with the Russian Army. Nor, apparently, did they make any plans for what to do, if their plans did not work out as they hoped. This suggests that NATO has a very poor standard of generalship. They lost in VietNam, they lost in Afghanistan, they lost in Iraq, or at least they did not succeed in doing what they said they were going to do. Now, they are losing in Ukraine and failing in Yemen.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
2:15 The whole discussion and Trumps speech is founded on a false prememise; namely the Idea that N@0 is a Defensive Alliance. It is not and it never has been. It has never "Defended" anyone or anything, It has only ever attacked, always in support of some USAmerican aggression. It is, in effect, the USA's "Foreign Legion" with these diferences from the French Foreign Legion, that the French pay 100% of the costs of theirs and they honestly admit that it is their mercenary organization dedicated to advance the interest of the French State.
If Trump thinks it is not "Value for Money, well, hip hip hooray! Let's abandon it! Good riddance! It was set up to help the US to conquer Russia. That is, in any case, now obviously impossible, so it's time to wind it up.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
1:20:50 Yes you are right to point this out. No doubt it would be better for the survival of the USA, in more or less its current form, but is that a good idea? I think that the only way the world is going to get peace, is if the US is forced to entirely reform itself, by which I mean drop the idea of "American Exceptionalism" and stop trying to prevent other countries (particularly China, but also e.g. Iran, Germany, Japan, India....) from developing economically and technically. I fear, I suspect, that the only way this will happen is if the US suffers a massive military defeat in the current conflict in Ukraine.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
11:57 What happened to the "Left" in Britain? The Communist party, the CPGB was at its strongest ever at the end of WW2. I don't know how it happened, but quite a number of communists and left-wing social democrats, got into the Education Corps during the war and had quite a radicalising effect on the armed forces, boosting the reputation of the Red Army. This effect was large enough to alarm Bevin and Bevan and the High command. Probably it was part of the reason why "Operation Unthinkable" never got off the drawing board. In the election immediately following the end of the war, which Churchill had expected to win, the Labour Party won. They introduced what they said was Socialism and was in fact a mixed economy. However, it was also a fraud, in that the state owned enterprises, were all charging large private industries rock bottom prices while the price to retail consumers was 4 -6 times higher and all the while the MSM kept up a contant mantra of "Socialism is all very well in theory, but inpractice it always makes a loss!!
Around 1952 the Conservative party managed to be elected and immediatly started whittling away at the "Socialism" first by declaring "The War on Drugs" and making prescriptions for addictive drugs no longer free. This was a really destructive move, because up until then, there was practically no "Drugs Problem." There were a very few people, who had been working in the Far East and had become addicted to opium and were on diminishing doses of other narcotics to get them off their habits. The MSM made a great fuss about "Ordinary folks subsidizing these evil peoples' habits!" This change opened a way for organized Crime to make a huge financial ,killing which has never stopped since and it provided funding for organised crime and the excuse for many more policemen with much greater powers.
"The Socialism" was used to take the old worn out industries, coal mining, iron and steel manufacture, road transport, railways, electricity generation and distribution, gas manufacture and distribution, Post Office including telephones, and modernise them at the taxpayers expense. These measures by Labour governments were followed by Conservative government that then sold off the refurbished enterprises to "friends" at rock-bottom prices. Very profitable for the moneid and very bad for leftwing thinking. In fact it was a very successful campaign by the Right and the Ruling Class.
I don't remember exactly when but some time after Stalin's death the CPSU(B) pronulated a new doctrine called the "Parliamentary Road to Socialism" .(As opposed to the revolutionary road that had been the doctrine since about 1917) the CPGB of course followed the Soviet lead but when the Chinese Communist Party objected, it split not just the World Communist movement but a split occurred also in the CPGB. After the split occurred and the more left-wing faction left the Party in disgust, the leftists did not unite, but split up into numeroud little groups which each claimed to be more Marxis-Leninist than all thee rest occurred, a My impression is, that probably all of them were infiltrated by the Special Branch and gradually everyone in them got fed up and resigned. At least, that is how it looks to me.
7
-
7
-
I have posted this (more or less) before but I think it is relevant here and I have been surprised that there has been almost no reaction to it. So, with apologies for posting old stuff here it is again:
Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. It consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry.
The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public.
This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would, I think, kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
1:02:43 The outcome of a "heavily armed, battle-hardened, belligerent Russia", would suit the warmongers in the West ONLY if they could benefit from it financially. In other words, only if they owned shares in the MIC. If, on the other hand they were taxpayers, like the rest of us, having been stripped of their shares, when the arms industries were all nationalized, then they would be as interesed in peace as anyone else. I hope, that the Russians will insist on this change, in any settlement of this war.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
" why is it difficult for Russia to stop them from advancing deeper inside Russia."
They stopped advancing some days ago.
Maybe, the Russians are content to to have them where they are. These are some of Ukraine's best, most experienced, most ideologically motivated, best armed, troops. Bottled up in a wild part of Russia, they cannot stop the Russian advance in Donbas, nor influence the battle there. They control a large number of Russian settlements. However, these settlements are so small that Google Maps does not mention them! (Don't take my word for it, look for yourself.) Even Sugia, (Суджа) about which so much is said, in peacetime, had a population of abour 6,500.
It seems, that the incursion into Kurst Oblast was intended to pull Russian trooops away from the battle in Donbas, but it did not do that. Instead it led to the mobilisation of troops, hitherto kept in reserve in Russia.
6
-
6
-
One of the many ironies in the present situation is, I suspect, that the huge US arms manufacturers have since the end of WW2, been buying up and closing down European and other competitors, meaning that the CW, is much shorter than ever before, of firms that could make up these deficiencies, rapidly. I also suspect, as I said at the start of the sanctions campaign, that ammonia is an important raw material, for making explosives, as well as being needed for other things such as fertilizer, and about 40% of the CW's ammonia, came from Russia and Belarus. The other point is, that explosives contain a large amount of energy and this energy has to come from somewhere. So, cutting oneself off from a source of cheap energy, is not a very sensible thing to do if you want to make a lot of explosives.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@BboyKeny Fasting means that the body goes into a state evolved to deal with starvation. This means that anything that is not essential tends to get used to replace the missing food and that includes things such as clots clogging blood vessels and (so it is alleged) cysts. It also, of course uses up fat stored in unwanted places, e.g. in the liver. So, counterintuitively, if it is not too prolonged, fasting can actually leave you healthier than you were before the fast.
Insulin, which is a hormone, a growth hormone, particularly in excessive amounts, can upset the functioning of all sorts of different organs and fasting reduces insulin levels allowing the affected organs a break, an opportunity to recover.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
54:45 On the subject of the US being able to overwhelm the Russian in an air war. I, like you am not a military expert, however, that does not preclude my having an opinion. The Russians have a lot of ballistic missiles, against which the West has but poor defences. A US air war would require well maintained airfields, which I think would be rapidly and efficiently denied to them by Russian missiles. That would mean that the US 'planes would have to operate from US (British?) aircraft carriers,which would be vulnerable to Russian submarines and , probably, ballistic missiles too. There is also the question of Russian anti-aircraft defences as well. How extensive they are and how effective I do not know but they would be an extra difficulty. Penultimately, there is the Russian airforce, which while I read is rather small, I don't know how small and whether the people who say it is small know what they are talking about. However, it has some pretty advanced 'planes and expert pilots.
Then there is the question of how this air war by the West would be fuelled? I imagine that there are fairly limited stocks of aviation fuel in Europe and what there is, would be vulnerable to Russian ballistic missiles. In any case it would be neccessary to land most aircraft to refuel them and even if aerial refueling were possible, the refuelling aircraft have to land to tank up and if the airfields are damaged that is going to be difficult too. In any case 'planes have to land for servicing, replenishing weaopons and for the pilots to sleep. that needs good runways. Extra supplies would, I imagine, have to come by ship, running the gauntlet of the Russian submarines.
Finally, if it looked as though the Russians were losing, I do not suppose the Chinese would stand idly by and watch them go down to defeat and they have a very large airforce already, which is growing rapidly.
In addition, there is the question of the supply of weapons? Does the US have the stocks of air-air missiles and other ammunition it would need? Or is it in the same position as it seems to be with artillery munitions?
6
-
6
-
11:28 Even before the PRC was declared, the Chinese economy (The part under Communist control) was not anti-Capitalist. The PRC has always had a mixed economy. The Chinese flag has five stars, a Big star for Communist Party and four smaller stars. What these stars stand for, is interesting, in this context. They stand for: the Workers, the Peasants, the Soldiers and the Patriotic Capitalists. The Communist party realised early on in their revolution, that they could not organise everything from the centre, (The mistake the USSR made.) So they encouraged any one with an idea of how to make things, that would help the people survive the Japanese invasion, the revolution, blockades and natural disasters (All of which the Chinese between 1927 and the 1970s had in abundance.) to do so. They also encouraged groups of people to get together, in cooperatives to do and make things that were needed. At the same time they recognised that some things had better be done by and were better run by the government and the local governments.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
9:38 We are in a time of what is, I believe, called a state of "meta-stability", (in Europe) i.e. a state which in fact, although not moving much at the moment, is poised to move a very great deal. You know, like, say, the East Coast of Norfolk, UK, where every now and then a huge chunk of cliff collapses into the sea.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Calling this trouble in the US a "Cancer" seems to me to be a very good analogy.. It is embedded deeply in the substance of the US, in the central nervous system if you like. It further resembles a cancer in that as time goes on it takes more and more of the substance of the US, more of its lifeblood, if you like. It is also a very hard thing to break into, because it is circular in nature and very self-protective. I am sure that if anyone were seriously to threaten this cancer, their life would be in danger. The flow of money in it is circular but it all eventually comes from outside the cancer which consumes, but produces absolutely nothing , but trouble.
Being a vicious circle (A very vicious circle!), you cannot "start at the beginning", because there is no "beginning". So let's start with the Arms industry and the MIC. This is a series of very large companies and thousands of little companies that supply the big companies and their plants are spread in every state of the union. They all ultimately depend to a large extent, on orders from the USG. These orders are all more or less authorized, approved by or passed by or ignored by congress. The companies employ lobbyists to find out who will support the government in ordering large amounts of expensive equipment or expensive research from the MIC. The members of congress want the companies to prosper, because they provide relatively stable and well-paid work in their constituencies. As most of them have investments in the companies of the MIC they also like the fact that when these companies prosper, they themselves, receive large dividends from them. If a member of congress happens to land a position on a committee which has influence on what orders are placed with the MIC, when they retire, they will probably be offered a sinecure position on the board of one or more of these companies. When they are up for election, they will be given campaign contributions if they promise to support the arms program and if they do not so promise, their opponents will be given campaign contributions to run against them. The money that the lobbyists contribute, of course, comes from the companies of the MIC. Thus the circle is completed. For the people on the inside of this circle it is a very satisfactory set-up. For those on the outside it is really like a cancer in the body-politic.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I would not call this "statesmanship" by the US over the last few year; "Outstanding". I think the word "Egregious" would be nearer the mark! I cannot remember a more extraordinarily ham-fisted disply of incompetence and amateurism, the way US establishment has simultaneously tried to split the Russians and the Chinese apart and, at the same time attacked them, in all sorts of different ways!
At the same time, they have managed to alienate, all but their closest associates, by embracing wholeheartedly, the genocidal activities of their closest ally, Israel. Even some, who have been pretty closely associated with the US, even to the extent of ignoring the interests of their own countries to follow the US lead, such as the "G-7" have found it impossible to offer open support to the US's stance on the War in Gaza.
As though this were not enough, they having frozen the assets of Iran, Venezuela and Afghanistan, they gave, or rather made the British give, without the slightest legal justification, the Venezuelan gold reserves to their puppet Juan Guaido and then to cap it all, are now busy trying to find a "legal" loophole, which would allow them "legally" to steal Russia's reserves which were left in their "safe-keeping". All this when they are drowning in debt and an economic downturn, complicated by a strengthening dollar.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
35:25 The Grinding down approach has the merit that while the Ukraine army fights, it is using up the CW's stock of weapons at an extraordinary rate. It is using these weapons profligately, probably faster than better trained troops would and, probably, with less effect than better trained troops would. If this goes on much longer, the CW's arsenals are going to be so depleted that they will not be able to sustain US or UK or French or German "boots on the Ground. (BotG).
To sustain a war effort (and particularly if you are at the same time building ships as fast as you can) you need steel, lots and lots of it and not just any old steel either. You need alloy steel and for that you need, in addition to iron, nickel, chromium, vanadium, manganese and I dare say other, more exotic components. You will also need lots of titanium, copper, tin and aluminium. You would also need uranium for electricity, and for driving submarines.
Most of the iron foundries and steel mills that used to be in Germany, the US and the UK have migrated to China. Steel comes, I believe, mostly from China these days. The UK used to make iron and steel but most of that industry was closed down by Thatcher. The aluminium mostly comes from Russia as does most of the titanium. Some, at least of the European plants making aluminium have closed down for lack of cheap Russian gas. So you would have to make do with the output of Iceland and Norway (and Canada?) Uranium also comes from Russia.
You would also need a lot of oil, for fuel, for lubrication and to make plastics. My impression is that most plastics these days, come from China and, of course, oil can be a bit of a problem!
It all looks like a logistical nightmare to me.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
21:41 In the West, you could not have such a factory set up and ready to start producing, say, shells, because it would be privately owned. That would mean that the accountants and the shareholders would be complaining that it was non-working capital, tied up in a non-productive way. It would either have to be used for something else or it would have to be written off and scrapped and the factory used for something else or sold to a, preferably, non-competing company. Anyway, idle plant in private industry, is regarded as a waste of capital. This is why the west has too little ammunition and very little chance of making much more any time soon.
In addition, I suspect that shells are relatively unprofitable and making state-of-the-art weapons pays many times better. So making shells has been neglected, and the factories that made them have been sold off for office building or some much more profitable activity such as financing car purchases.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I forget where I saw it but someone was bemoaning the complete abscence of Naval Tenders, which the US Navy scrapped some time ago, as with nuclear engines, the carriers did not need refuelling,(?) This move had, apparently, not taken account of the fact that ships need more than just fuel and lubricants. So whereas, in the past, if a carrier on station needed some more supplies, a tender would come alongside and the goods would be offloaded by the tender into the carrier, now, when the carrier runs low on supplies, of almost anything, it has to go to a naval port to be resupplied.
5
-
5
-
41:14 This flexibility in the Russian High Command, contrasts with what I remember from WW2 and from my NS, in the '50s. For example, the Cambridge-based instrument-making firm called "Unicam", was charged with making gun sights for the Royal Navy. All through the war, Britain was very short of copper and Unicam found an aluminium alloy that stood up to sea water just as well as the bronze that was specified for these gun sights. They built an example and took it to the War Office and asked to be allowed to substitute the bronze, by this aluminium alloy. They explained that it was very difficult to find the neccessary material for these items, but they were told that the WO was quite satisfied with the sights made in bronze and as the Colonel who had designed them had died long ago, they had no one to authorise such a change and Unicam should simply fulfill the order as best they could.
In Cambridge, the Army decided to build a massive gun emplacement on the roundabout at the junction between Cherry Hinton Rd, Perne Rd and Mowbray Rd. Unfortunately, when they tried it out, they found that it had been built in slightly the wrong place! As a result, the gun could not get a clear shot down the road towards Cherry Hinton. So they cut down all the large trees on the North side of Cherry Hinton Rd.
At the time Britain had an acute shortage of fuel and wood and as many of these trees were very large the local inhabitants asked that they be given these trees. The reply they got was, that the army unit doing this work had orders to burn them and that was that! And they were burnt. It took many days to complete this waste of valuable resources.
I saw similar waste when my unit relocated from Italy to Germany, The Signal Platoon, had a large shed stuffed with high-tention batteries, to operate their radio sets. When we left, these were put in a roughly rectangular pile about seven metres long, four metres wide and four metres high and set on fire. I have simply no idea how much that cost the taxpayer, but it must have been quite a lot!
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
10:13 The research in question was not started in Wuhan, but was pursued for some years previously, in the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Laboratory. It was moved out of there to Wuhan, when the USG decided it was too dangerous and was it supposed to be closed down, but Dr Fauci and others arranged for the research to be continued in Wuhan.
I think it likely the Chinese agreed to this, thinking "we might as well know what is going on in the US Research into bioweapons, which this could well be". Particularly, as they had well-grounded suspicions that SARS, swine 'flu and Bird 'flu had been previous bio-weapon attacks on their agriculture. One of the funders of the research was the US Department of Defense and one of their laboratories was closed down for endangering public safety in late July or early August 2019. So yes, I should think it very probable that it was a lab-leak but I feel quite unsure which lab it was that leaked!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The importance of this statement by Reznikov is, simply that it unequivocally contradicts, repeated statements out of the West, that "Russia is attacking Ukraine", without reason, without justification. Multiple statements that "The Russians have No Reason to attack Ukraine" and so on and so forth. The Media war is an important part of this war, particularly in the Collective West, and that is what gives this statement, by a Ukrainian Minister of government, its importance, which, Emil, I agree, comes as no surprise to me or you!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The lack of weapons-making capacity made perfect sense, so long as the West did not instigate a conflict. Russia, China and Iran had no intention of starting a conflict. The lack of Weapons-making capacity (WMC) was covered up to disguise the fact that the chief product of the Arms industry was profits for the shareholders and officers of the Big Arms Companies such as Lockheed-Martin and Raytheon + a number of extremely expensive products for show and export.
As to "a staggering dereliction of duty and incompetance." you have to realise that as capitalist enterprises, WMCs are primarily responsible to their shareholders, not to the customers and not to the environment or the country. This is one good reason, why all such enterprises should be nationalized or at least be under very close governmt supervision. They should not have private shareholders. One has only to look at he situation in the USA, where you have the arms industry paying lobbyists, to pay congress-critters, to vote funds for the arms industry, who pay lobbyists and shareholders and the lobbyists, etc., etc. round and round, I'm sure you get the circular nature of this relationship, the whole set-up being financed by the taxpayers, while most of the money disappears into the pockets of the shareholders. Some might call it a "Merry-go-round" though I doubt many taxpayers would.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
1:44:20 The Rules Based International Order is propaganda slogan without any factual basis. No one has ever formally defined it , for the good reason that if one did formalize it realistically it would amount to "We make the rules and you obey them; or else." Naturally, no one could possible lend their support to such a formulation, so it has to remain undefined. It has to remain as an advertising slogan. It sounds good, just so long as you don't ask, what exactly it means.
The Atlantic Council Strategy Paper Series December 16, 2020 has this to say about it:
"The rules-based international system was constructed mostly by leading democratic allies at the end of World War II, and was deepened and expanded by many other countries over time. The system is predicated on a set of norms and principles pertaining to global security, the economy, and governance. It consists of: a set of rules encouraging peaceful, predictable, and cooperative behavior among states that is consistent with liberal values and principles; formal institutional bodies, such as the United Nations (UN) and NATO, that serve to legitimize and uphold these rules, and provide a forum to discuss and settle disputes; and the role of powerful democratic states to help preserve and defend the system. In the security realm, the system is characterized by formal alliances in Europe and Asia, in addition to rules that protect state sovereignty and territorial integrity, and place limits on the use of military force and the spread of weapons of mass destruction. In the economic domain, the rules-based system has served to promote an interconnected global economy based on free markets and open trade and finance. Finally, in the realm of governance, the rules-based system advanced democratic values and human rights. The system has never been fixed, but has evolved over time, with major periods of adaptation and expansion at major inflection points after World War II and at the end of the Cold War.
Note the last sentence: "The system has never been fixed," In other words "we make it up as we go along to suit our own convenience."
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I's a long list: Wheat, lumber, oil, aluminium, nickel, palladium, neon, deuterium, tritium, coal....... it goes on and on. I think the trouble is that the people in power in the west have graduated in political economy or media studies, or classical history or, you know, some other non-rigorous subject where imagination is more important than logical thought, appearance is more important than substance and no automatic application of scepticism is required. Add to that there is an almost complete lack of graduates in STEM subjects and apparently, no grasp of quantities and numbers. Worse, no grasp of the old discoveries that "action and reaction are equal and opposite" and "all actions have consequences."
4
-
31:13 Don't forget that these "bad decisions" were made by US puppets, in Brussels and NATO and were enthusiastically cheered on by the WoWs, the Warmongers of Washinton, who thought that their proxy Ukrainian army, was going to smash the Russian forces and bring about a Regime Change in Moscow, after which, with the help of a pliant Russian Regime, they would divide up Russia, into more managable sized countries, plunder them and live happily ever after on the proceeds. To anyone that doubts this scenario, as being more that my fantasy, I would say that this idea is not a secret! It was openly put forward in the 1980s and has remained as policy ever since. It is all published. I am not making it up.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"We", the Collective West are in Ukraine to further the US's plans to conquer Russia, to carve it up into smaller, more manegable-sized countries and loot it to their hearts content and get "wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice". We are doing this for reasons which are beyond stupid. This war could very easily spiral out of control into WW3. This war and the Sanctions that it is designed to justify, have wrecked the EU's economy, for years to come. The whole project is built on the West's own propaganda and wishful thinking. It is clear that NATO (The CW.) does not have the strength neccessary to conquer Russia, so what chance does it have against the Combo of Russia, China, Iran and North Korea? Not Very Good, I should think. Meanwhile the Ukrainian government, seems to go along with Lindsay Graham's idea of "fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian". Fine for LG, but an enormous, devastating tradgedy for Ukraine.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Alexander will be familiar with this but I would like Jimmy and Glenn to see it if they haven't already.
Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. It consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry.
The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public.
This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, and removing the built-in conflict of interest bedevilling the arms industry, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
So it is! However, to a large extent, the USA has always discouraged its satraps from buying weapons from their own MICs. See as an example, how the British have been discouraged from cultivating (Have gutted!) their own firms making fighter jets. The result is that to a large extent, the 13 countries are mostly limited to US made weaponry. This makes it a much less formidable combo than it would be were Russia facing 13/34 countries each capable of supplying all the needs of its own military.
The other thing that plays very strongly in favour of the Russians, is the lack of corruption in the process of procurement of Weapon-systems. The Russian MIC is almost entirely state-owned. This means that the question of making a profit does not arise. The firms making the Russian weapons can spend what is needed to produce the result they want to achieve. Its effect on next quarter's share price does not arise. No one needs to go to Moscow to lobby for funds to do this or that. Either the funds are available or they aren't, and if they aren't, trying to bribe some committee member to make them available is probably a BAD IDEA! You would probably, do better to go to talk to the minister. The firm's remit is to make as cheaply as possible a really tough, really reliable, easy-to-use and easy-to-maintain weapon. The decisions about which weapons to produce, is probably decided by a committee whose working are secret and, which in any case, do not enrich the members of Parliament.
Contrast that with the situation in the USA, where you have lobbyists paid by the arms manufacturers, to get members of Congress to vote for very expensive projects that can be made by their firm, preferably in every state of the Union. Weapons, which look impressive and are state-of-the-art, but which will soon need either replacement or very expensive repairs. Making run-of-the-mill items like 155mm artillery shells is not wildly profitable and tends to get neglected, as the Ukrainians are now finding out, the hard way.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I have posted this elsewhere, but I think it is appropriate to this discussion too, so I'll post it again. I would be interested to hear comments on it. It has elicited remarkably little reaction so far.
At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers, As the loop is circular in nature we can start anywhere, Let's start with the congress critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that hold the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle." OK?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
1: 58 This is not really a correct assessment of the situation, The "dwindling" supplies are not caused by lack of interest on the part of the Collective West(CW). The "Dwindle" is caised by the CW running out of armarments to send to the Ukrainians. Over the past decades the arms industries of the European countries, have largely been taken over by the US arms companies (Rationalization) and closed down to prevent them competing, with the result, that the manufacturing capacity has greatly diminished from what it used to be. Another cause, is the energy to drive these industries and a lot of the raw materials has been sourced from Russia and a lot of the supply chains have been sent to China to avoid making greenhouse gases in Europe and the USA.
Further, the CW's arms industries are run like almost all Western industries, by accountants and as a result, anything that was not particularly profitable, was either closed down and sold off or diverted into making something more profitable. So things like 155 mm shells, which were run-of-the-mill products, that fetched a not very high price and no "excitement" and for which, in the years of peace, following the Soviet collapse, there was only a small market, are now hardly made in the CW at all. New machine tools, needed for making shells, would need to be made anew and the majority of machine tools are currently made in China. To make things like shells you need skilled workers, skilled inspectors, tightly controlled factories, skilled engineers, and a whole gamut of other skills. Without these, you will lose whole factories, in a large puff of smoke. So, it will take time to rebuild the CW's capacity.
It might be much better, quicker and cheaper to negotiate a complete settlement and a comprehensive peace treaty, that would give everyone real security, so we could get on with the real, pressing problems we have that need world cooperation.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I wonder about the supply chain for increased production of artillery shells. I really have no idea what the quantities are involved, i can only assume that they are large. Artillery shells are, as far as I know, made with a projectile which is filled, typically, with explosive. How easy is it to increase the manufacture of explosives? I should think the rawmaterials are easy enough to come by but it would need a lot of energy. The other part, the part that stays behind when the shell is fired, seems to be made of brass (an alloy of copper and tin). How are the supplies of copper and tin and where do they come from? I think the price of copper is already high, presumably this would increase it. Then there is the mercury for the detonators, where does that come from? Last I heard, the world was running out of mercury and these days, you'll need all the electronics for proximity fuses and so on. Machine tools are, I presume still made in the USA, (?) but most are, I believe, made in China. It looks to me like a pretty horrible nightmare for the logistics people.
Then there is the fact you'll need not only the skilled workers, but very careful skilled workers; as slapdash workers are not useful in ammunition production. You will also need, for obvious reasons, highly skilled, very experienced inspectors, which in such an environment is a dangerous and immensely responsible job. One dud inspector can demolish a whole factory in a matter of seconds. So of course can a careless worker or a broken machine. To me, he idea of setting up production lines, in a hurry, to produce explosive devices sounds, like advanced lunacy or at any rate, an accident waiting to happen.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The problem in the West is that the US Military suppliers have bought up the other western makers of ammunition, closed them down and sold off their factories. Because until a very few years ago, there was very little demand for, e.g. 155 mm ammo, the machines to make it were, mostly, declared "redundant" by the accountants in these firms and sold for scrap. These firms being run by accountants, whose primary interest is PROFITS, they follow a policy of JIT working, (I.e. Anything that is not needed immediately is "stagnant capital" and needs to be sold off or used up as soon as possible. This saves borrowing from the bank and renting space.) The result is that the Collective West cannot quickly start making the ammo that Ukraine is using up at record speed.
Another problem is, that a lot of the raw materials come/came from Russia and China and most machine tools come/came from China.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Hello Emil. I would like to discuss an idea that I have had.
There is in Washington a set-up, which as far as I know has as yet no proper name. I will call it :The "Vicious Circle". It is a circulatory structure, hence the name, and it consists of various interconnected groups, These are: the amrs-making industries, the lobbyist industry, the members of Congress (The "congress-critters") & the United States Government (USG).
In action, the Congress-critters vote to tell the USG to order some weapons from the arms manufactureres. The USG then orders the arms from the arms manufacturers and send them money. The arms manufacturers then send some money to their employees, some to their shareholders and some to the lobbyists and use some for advertising themselves. (Many of the congress-critters and members of the USG are their shareholders. Many Ex-congress critters and ex military and ex-government people, are sinecured employees of the arms industry, the so called "Revolving Door".) The lobbyists use some of the moneyfrom the USG to pay their employees and their shareholders and some to persuade congress critters to vote the "Right" way to keep the money flowing to the arms manufacturers.
This whole "Merry-go-round" is financed by the Taxpayers, who have almost no influence on it at all.
This Vicious Circle is very powerful and completely ruthless and therefore very hard to break up - under normal circumstances.
However, we are approaching a very abnormal set of circumstances, or so it seems to me. What I am refering to, is that it looks as though, in the near future, the US (N@0) is going to be defeated by the Russians. This means that the Russians are going to have a once-in-a-century opportunity to be able to impose conditions on the US and its sattelites, vassals, proxies and puppets.
I suggest that if the Russians were to insist that all the arms manufacturers in the World had to be nationalized entities, and that no private individual or corporation would be allowed to have any share in an arms manufacturing industy or firm, then it would cut the financial lifeline of thw Warmongers in Washington, London, Berlin and Brussels (Or anywhere else.) and thus would destroy the Vicious Circle. This would I believe, be an enormous step towards bringing real peace to the World. What do you think?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
8:10 Listening to AC, I realised that the hunt for "Terrorists" exactly mirrors the medieval hunt for "Heretics" and later for "Catholics" and then, in turn for "Dissenters", "Diggers", "Levellers", "Anarchists", "Communists", & "Drug Pushers". It seems that the Ruling Class, always requires a "dangerous enemy" and lacking such, will always manufacture it. It does so because it is always afraid of its working classes and feels the need for extra protection against it. Hence the "Special Branch in Britan, and Homeland Security (and the other 16 or so 3-letter agencies) in the US.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
48:13 To put it in cartoonish terms it looks to me asthough the CW was a very large and proud, not to say "stuck-up" paper tiger, which thought itself invincible and went swaggering around poking a very large, real, flesh-and-blood bear, that it thought was weak and ill. Eventually it poked the bear once too often, in too sensitive a spot and got into a real fight. It is only now, that the paper is beginning to tear really badly, its wooden framework is starting to show through, its claws are blunted and its teeth have mostly dropped out, that it is starting to wonder, in a panic, "What comes next?"
"Ah! How are the mighty fallen!"
To put the cherry on the top of this mess, this poor, dilapidated beast has lined itself up with the most unpopular country in the world to help it commit unspeakable crimes which will, probably, haunt it for decades to come.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
15:32 It is precisely because the US has never worried about killing civilians that they whole-heartedly backed the g*nocid*l policies of their ally in the ME. They have never seen anything wrong with killing civilians and because they were perceived as being undefeatably strong they were allowed to get away with it. Since the failure of the "Multi-seasonal Offensive" in Ukraine, perceptions have changed, the fragile nature of the paper-tiger has come into focus and the whole edifice, which was held together by fear, has started to crumble away at an astonishing pace.
Another point is (I don't know how important it is) that the war in Gaza has elements of an inter-religious war, which means, that at least on the Muslim side, people may well be willing to take inordinate risks, "to defeat the invaders", thinking that even if they die in the cause, they will automatically go to Heaven as Matryrs.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
58:08 I am sure you are right. This is a demonstration of the importance these people put on WILL! The alternative, you see is too horrible to contemplate, the alternative being, that it is impossible to defeat the Russians! Surely, if only there were enough WILL put into it we couold find some tanks, guns ammo, javelins, stingers, triple7s, HIMAS, Storm shadows, Shovels, what have you, that would turn the tide in Zelensky's favour! Couldn't we?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1:26:56 The problem with the CW is that it is no longer (If it ever was) a proper democracy. Why do I say that? I say that because, to have a fuctioning democracy, the Demos, the voters iow, need access to reliable, accurate, information. The present set up is one where the source of "Information", for most voters is a monopoly of about six extremely wealthy corporations, who have their own firmly entrenched ideas, on what they want people to know and what falsehoods, they want people to believe. As there is, virtually no penalty, for telling the Demos complete lies, false suggestions and suppressing unwelcome news, the voting patterns are completely distorted in a way that is a mockery of the term"Democracy".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
All the countries of the Collective West are being "run" (If that is the right word!) by nonentities. There is a striking lack of anyone that could be fairly described as "great". Businesses are largely run by accountants, who are chiefly concerned the next quarter's figures. I have been increasingly puzzled by this phenomenon. I wonder, to what extent this is a symptom of a widespread addiction to cocaine amongst our rulers? I used to think that it was just me, getting fussy in my old age, but I find that there are other people who are noticing the same things and no one contradicts this viewpoint.
So, what is the reason? I have just watched a video made by an ex-marine (US) who is living in Thailand and he describes how the same thing is happening there and he shows how and why it is happening. You might find it interesting, so I give you herewith the address: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BkhYL6HNms&t=1363s
BTW, from the start of the Cold War, there never was a "Soviet Threat to invade Western Europe", only a plan of a counter attack, as was well known in NATO HQ. The purpose of the New Cold(?) War is the same as the first; to enrich the US arms industry.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sorry that was posted before ready!
DH is ignoring how NATO set a dilemma for Putin. After the coup in 2014, the Azov Brigade and other units of the U, were trained, supplied and financed by NATO and battle hardened by fighting the militias of the Russian-speaking Eastern provinces of Ukraine, by February 2022 they had killed 14,000 of them and were threatening to wipe out the rest. This left Putin with the choice of fighting the largest, best-trained, best armed NATO army in Europe (Effectively going to war with NATO) or being, probably, overthrown as a coward, by his own electorate. Is it fair to describe this as "Putin's Aggression"?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
52:23 Well, consider which of the states voting in the UNGA likes terrorism to the extent that they practice it? Which of them is sufficiently shameless to boast about it? There really are only very few that I can think of.
1) there is the United States which openly advocates torture, waterboarding, as a means of getting "Vital" information and is effectively getting its ally the UK to torture Julian assange at the moment, as well as the unfortunate, admittedly innocent inhabitants of Guantanamo Bay. 2) There is Israel, which is at the moment torturing the whole population in Gaza by depriving them of WATER! (And other things, such as life.)
3) Threre is Saudi Arabia which has various horrible means of putting people to death and is credibly alleged to have chopped up a journalist, with a saw, who was alive when they started.
I am not saying these are the only ones, there may well be others, but at least those are too ashamed of doing it to admit to it. (Shame being the wicked's tribute to virtue.)
However, that is by no means the only form of terrorism; Ethnic Cleansing is another and ther you can count Israel, the United States and the UK as practioners of that. (E.g. Gaza, West Bank and Diego Garcia.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
53:30 You say you cannot understand why the CW is continuing with this war in the fashion that it is. Well, for what it's worth, I think the CW is behaving like an unsuccessful gambler. They cannot stop supplying Ukraine with weapons, because if they did the Russians would have won and admitting defeat would involve too much loss of face. They cannot continue supplying Ukraine, because they are running out of the weaponry to supply it, so they are heading for a huge crash. They could see it if they could bear to look at it, but it is easier to think that maybe, something will turn up to save the situation. So they go on supplying what they can while averting their thoughts from what is coming. "Kicking the can down the road", so to speak. In fact, it is almost an exact parallel to the financial situation, re de-dollarization.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The key to China's rapid growth since November 1949 is the Communist Party. From the very beginning, from before they achieved victory and declared the PRC, the CPC understood that Education was the Philosopher's stone that would drive their development into a great power. They understood that having a great mass of ignorant people was a drag rather than an asset and though at first, desperately poor, they spent a large proportion of what they had, on building schools and universities and getting Chinese experts who were living overseas, to return and help to build up China. They also spent a lot on the healt of the people. Being desperately short of western-trained doctors, they mobilised the tradional doctors and set up research institutes to find out what was good and what was superstion in TMC. They They organised small teams of health workers to go out into the countryside to educate the peasantry in elementary health care measures (So-called "Bare-footed Doctors) and made teams of expert western-trained medics to go out into the villages to see for themselves what were problems and to tread diseases that the bare-footed Doctors had been unable to cure. They also fought large snd successful campaigns against numerous endemic diseases such as schistosomiasis, TB and syphilis They also understood, that the most destructive thing that hampers development in all societies, is corruption, and that corruption could be their Achilles's heel. Is spite of strenuous objections by their western "friends" they have stuck to their efforts to root out the corrupt. Anther great strength, has been their ability to find and apply the common sense solution to a problem. Unlike the USSR they waged a constant battle against dogmatism. Mao put it typically bluntly: "Dogma is more useless than dog-shit."
2
-
17:24 There is no doubt in my mind that when BoJo and Biden promised "Unlimited aid", until Russia was defeated, they meant it seriously. They believed, like nearly everyone else, that NATO was, vastly more powerful than it has turned out to be. They thought that NATO was a real Tiger and that Russia was a pussy-cat by comparison! Well that's what happens when you believe your own propaganda instead of doing the necessary calculations and research. They had no idea how many shells and drones and missiles and airplanes and helicopters the Russians had, nor how few the West had and they believed that the Russian forces were stupid, lazy, incompetent, corrupt, badly trained, badly armed, disorganized and mutinous. So of course, they thought the well-trained, battle-hardened, motivated, well-armed Ukrainians were going to wipe the floor with the Russians. Why would they not have thought that?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2:12 "Trump too aggressive". This is absolutely typical of this administration and of the MSM in general. If you want the truth, look at the "News" and believe the opposite and you will be much better informed than the average. Take as an example: all through the war in Ukraine it has been the innocent West, the Democratic Ukraine, the non-aggressive NATO and the Russian aggressors who suddenly one day, launched an unprovoked war on Ukraine and throughout, the war has been won by the gallant Ukrainians who have consistently beaten the demoralized, inefficient, ill-armed Russians who were always running out of ammunition, drones, missiles.
Only now, it is becoming clear that the Russians are winning, they are better trained, have better morale than the Ukrainians, that the West worked really hard to force the Russians into invading Ukraine. That the Russians are not so inefficient, that their arms are no worse than the western ones and in some ways much better and more robust and above all the Russians are not running out of weapons. No, it is the west that is scraping the bottoms of its arsenals to find weapons that the Ukrainians can use, left over from the Soviet Union in the warehouses of East European countries and even Africa! It promises hundreds of tanks to the Ukrainians, but then finds that this country can spare only a dozen and this one four or five and another can spare none at all! Finally Germany comes up with 87 old 1950s tanks (Leopard I s) which are considered too thinly armored to serve in a tank battle with modern or even old Soviet tanks.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
5:30 I agree with you, about attacking Belarus, provided you believe what Ukraine says.
The Ukrainians had the best-trained and the only battle-hardened NATO type armed forces. last February and they cannot defeat a small part of the Russian armed forces. The rest of NATO is running low on weapons, providing Ukraine with replacement weapons and ammo. Which NATO country is going to take on the Russians and who is going to supply them with the weapons they will need? Not the US! That's for certain! "Too risky"
Starting a nuclear war, taking into account the Russian's "Dead Hand" system is also certain death. So there is no point in discussing how a nuclear war would unfold. I think that, probably, in the end, we are looking at a security treaty which will give everybody security. I know that the US will struggle desperately against it, but I do not see that they have a viable alternative. If they cannot keep up with the Russians' production of armaments, what chance have they against China + Russia + Iran? Because if they push it, that is what they will face.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
4:52 Much as I respect Wang Yi, I disagree with him in this assessment. Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its eat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees ofthe weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry.
The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs thenpay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenseson condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public.
This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of: is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Again about population failing to replace themselves when they industrialise and "Civilise". Well, this is not neccessarily true. When I was a child, the Chinese had a population that was generally reckoned to be about 500 million. before 2000 they had so many babies that it was a cause for worry and the authorities imposed a so-called "One ChildPolicy". (The population was then said to be about one Billion!) What was it caused this increase in the population? To me, (No expert on such matters.) it looked like people could, suddenly, afford to have and bring up children and feed them and so, that is what they did.
In Europe and the US, after WW2, there was a period unti the 1970s(?) when there was what was called a "Baby Boom". which coincided with a period when a man's wage was enough to keep a family. Later, when it became neccessary to have two wages to keep a family, the population stopped expanding. Causal or coincidental? I don't know, but it seems to me, there could be a cause & effect connection.
I have also read that the sperm count of European males has been falling since the 1920s. I have never seen figures for other countries. I have seen recently statements that the (RDI?)reccommended daily intake of vitamin D is set far too low, and that majority of patients coming to one North American Clinic are found to have very low levels of vitamin D compared to people who work out of doors. Might this be related to very low levels of reproduction/fertility?
2
-
What I think is that the collective West is led by a small clique of WEF/Warmongers in Washington DC and administered by an almost incredibly incompetent or evil bunch of amateur nonentities in the European capitals. The crisis is caused by their attempt to destroy the Russian economy (a perfect storm of sanctions) which was intended to cause a color revolution in Moscow. Unfortunately for them, the Russians "saw them coming" and were prepared, so the Russian economy though somewhat damaged, did not collapse, but almost immediately started to recover.
Meanwhile, back in the Collective West, they discovered that they had cut themselves off from their cheapest supplier of fuel, fertilizer and food, without making sure that they had adequate back-up suppliers. Apologizing to the Russians and trying to make up with them, would be too embarrassing, so rather than do that, they are prepared to let their populations suffer and in some cases die.
They are all the more prepared to do this because, they have the religious belief that there are too many people in the world and they do not have hearts but rather swinging bricks. Their masters also want European industry bankrupted, to consolidate the hegemonic position of the USA. Europe, particularly Germany was too much competition. The USA has largely deindustrialized itself, moving much of its production to China and now finds itself short of productive industries and skilled workers. So an influx of German capital, knowhow and skilled workers would come in very handy! Keeping up with China is apparently an existential matter but is not going to be easy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1@21:26 All throughout the period, since very shortly after the end of WW2, the "THREAT FROM RUSSIA" has been played up, firstly to disable the threat from left wing and communist parties in Western Europe, particularly in France and Italy and later simply to enrich the MIC and its shareholders. This game has been played determinedly and diligently, for the best part of seventy years with considerable success. However, what with the advent of the internet the MSM has been less and less able to "Fool all the people all the time". This has become very obvious, since the start of the Pandemic. (Perhaps because more people had more time to look at the internet?) If you look back at the Chat Columns of yesteryear, this change is brought into sharp relief. One sign that things were changing, in a direction that the ptb did not like, was when such organs as "The Guardian" and "The Independant" cancelled ("Temporarily suspended") their chat columns. Nowadays, even in pro-government videos, where they have chat columns, the proportion of dissident voices is quite substantial and in some videos, almost 100%.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As the driving force behind this continual warmongering, is a vicious circle in Washinton, it seems obvious that the first problem is to break up this circular, self-sustaining system that consists of the arms industry, the lobbying industry, the congress-critters, the USG and back to the arms industry. This system is fuelled by the taxpayer, who has no choice in the matter and the system benefits the employees of the arms industry, the employees of the lobbyist industry and the shareholders of both industries. The problem is exacerbated by the fact, that many congress-critters and members of the USG are sharehoders in the arms industry and probanly, in the lobbyist industry too. This "group", (I am not sure if there is a proper name for such a set-up. I will refer to it as the "Vicious Circle" or VC.) is extremely stable and it is also ruthless, so it will be very difficult for anyone to dismantle it, but I think that until it is destroyed and "relegated to the Dustbin of History", the World will never know peace.
However, I think there is a chance of doing just that, or rather there will shortly be a chance of doing that, because the Collective West is going to be in a uniquely weak position in the near future, when the Russians achieve a victory in Ukraine, (As I am fairly certain they are going to do.) and the CW is out of conventional weapons. ( I hope no one will be suicidal enough to use, nuclear weapons.)
If one of the conditions that the Russians insisted on, was that all arms industries had to be state owned and no individual or corporation was allowed to have a shareholding in an industry making arms, I think it would go a long way towards destroying the VC and thus solving this problem. I would very much like to have Prof Sach's opinion on this idea.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What a pratt this Tobias Elwood is! There is no evidence that Huawei equipment is designed to spy on anyone. The German government reseachers were given the Huawei operating system to examine and after a year or two's reseach concluded that is had no "back doors " or other spy-type features, just as Huawei said.
I remember another Tory MP, of an exactly similar stripe called, IIRC, Tufton Beamish, who shortly after WW2 ended, came to our school and gave us a lecture on the menaceof the USSR and explained how the Western powers, cheifly Britain and the US had to re-arm, in order to defend "Democracy" all over the World from the Soviet Threat. After his lecture we were invited by the Headmaster to ask him questions and I asked him how he reconciled the West's "Defenxse of Democracy" with its support, against their own popiulations, of numerous dictators such as: General Franco of Spain, General Salazaar of Portugal, the Colonels of Greece, King Farouk of Egypt, King Idris of Libya, General Chiang Kai-shek of China and numerous others , who, without exception were vehemently Anti-Democratic. I was shocked by the cynicism of his answer. "Ah well, me lad! You'll find as you grow up, that it doesn't do to look too closely at your friends, or you may find you haven't got any!" While this may have been good "Life advice", It was an evasion of my question and no sort of basis for "Defending Democracy". His lecture was in fact, just scaremongering. The same as Tobias Ellwoods remarks on Huawei. Both of them strike me, as being US puppets.
2
-
9:08 In medieval times the Italians produced armour for knights which was totally unsuitable for battle, but which was intended to look wonderful in a parade. There is also the story that when our moustachioed friend vitisted Italy, Mussolini had a huge number of cardboard battle tanks built and had them stationed all along the railway line that the visitor's train would travel. He also had the entire Italian army, send everyone it could spare for the day, to stand around near the tanks, so that his guest, got an entirely false impression of Italy's military might.
Come to think of it, I once met a man who had been a tanker in North Africa during WW2. He told me that Italian tanks were much safer to be in than US or British tanks because they were made of such thin material that a bullet would pass straight tthrough them and unless you happened to be in the wrong place you were unhurt. Also they were much lighter and therefore much speedier than the lumbering giants of the allies, If you got hit by an anti-tank rocket the chances were that it too, would pass straight through without exploding, while if you were in an allied tank you would almost certainly be killed by the spray of molten steel that came into the interior.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
55:49 My impression is that the CW has all sorts of "plans" but most of them are so far-fetched that they are ashamed to talk about them! As the days tick by, it seems that yet another daft plan is exposed and so to say, bites the dust. Just recently, for example, there was the "plan" to get the Russians to agree to a ceasefire, so that Ukraine could be rapidly bundled into Neightoe and surruptitiously rearmed and then, would attack and defeat Russia! Problem is, that the Russians just refuse to go along with this! Then there was, a day or so before the most recent missile strike on Ukraine, (Which I should think has put paid to it.) the plan for European arms manufacturers, to take some of the seized $300billion and use it to set up an armarment industry in Ukraine! (A long way undergound, presumably?)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The obvious answer to the "problem" is for North Africa to industrialize. All that cheap power, sooner or later, should attract industrialists to come to where it is generated. Probably the Chinese will be there first! Industries such as aluminium, copper, steel and semiconductor raw materials, (Silicon, silicon carbide) extracting water and CO2 from the air, Computer servers, come to mind. All should be attracted to masses of cheap power and cheap land.
In any case, with rising sea levels, I think the towns, villages, and cities around the shores of the Mediterranean and connected seas will have to get together to dam the straits of Gibraltar, which will itself produce a lot of power and provide a land bridge to carry power via UHT overhead power lines to Europe without needing undersea cables.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This video starts off with a lie: The war did not start in February 2022, it started in 2014. By February 2022 about 10,000 peope had already been killed. It goes on in the same vein.
The "Great Mistake" that was made, was made by NATO, which thought that the Ukrainian Army, which they had built up, trained and armed over the previous seven years, was going to "wipe the floor " with the Russian Army and that the sanctions package that they had prepared, would cripple the Russian economy. They also thought, erroneously, that the collapse of the Russian economy and the defeat of the Russian Army would so anger the Russian public, that they would overthrow the "hated Putin Regime" in Moscow.
The "Great Mistake" that Russia made in February 2022, was in failing to understand that the Collective West was living in a fantasy land , where NATO, the greatest military machine that the World had ever seen, was something that no one would dare to stand up against, where Russia was "a Gas-station masquerading as a country", whose economy and Banks, were totally unprepared for the sanctions that were coming , whose army was in shambles, mutinous, ill-trained, ill-equipped with out-dated weapons, manned by stupids, badly officered, etc., etc. They also failed, in not understanding at first, that their enemies, were expecting to carve up Russia into manegable portions and then plunder it as they had done in the 1990s.
The combined effects of these mistakes is that NATO has been defeated militarily, for the first time, (Which is having a huge geo-political effect) the US has profitted from the partial collapse of the European Economies caused by the blow-back of the sanctions, and the Russian economy has profitted greatly from the "protectionist" effect of the sanctions! (Suddenly, the Russian industries found themselves freed of all Western competition!). Putin, so far from being overthrown, is more popular than ever. I don't know whether the US Intelligence agencies mis-informed the White house or whether they told them correctly what the situation was and were disbelieved. It rather looks as though, both believed their own propaganda.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The West lost its dominance as a result of the conflict in Ukraine. Yes, absolutely right! Before the conflict, NATO was regarded by most people as "the largest and most powerful military conglomeration the World had ever seen" and invincible. When it smashed itself, by attacking the Russians who had gone into Ukraine, and kept on smashing, unit after unit, weapon after weapon, trying to expel the Russians, the World gradually is coming to realize that it is not so all-powerful, after all. The result is, that the fear of offending the US has gone down a long way. It is a factor that plays a much smaller role in the decision-making process in poorer countries, and even in the capitals of Western Europe than it did before.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Основная проблема в том, что есть люди, владеющие акциями производителей оружия и получающие большие прибыли. Поскольку они очень богаты, они также и очень могущественны. Пока существует такая ситуация, в мире никогда не будет мира, потому что они наживаются на войнах, угрозах войн и слухах о войнах. Я надеюсь, что когда Коллективный Запад потерпит решительное поражение на Украине (что вполне вероятно и произойдет), русские введут закон, запрещающий кому-либо владеть акциями производителя оружия. Я думаю, что такое условие было бы лучше и легче реализовать и обеспечить, чем полное разоружение, потому что большинство правительств не нуждаются или не хотят войн, которые являются дорогостоящими и непопулярными.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Do I think NATO is a bit late to the party?
NATO is not "late to the party". Its problem is how to and whether to make the party happen. Since well before the end of WW2, powerful people, mostly in Washington and London, have been trying to work out a scheme to conquer the USSR/Russia. So far, either their schemes have ultimately failed or "they have done the maths" and decided that "the time is not yet ripe" to put their plan into action. This war in Ukraine is the latest failure.
NATO is a "defensive" alliance which has never defended anything! It has only ever attacked. Sometimes it gives lying excuses and sometimes it just attacks. Its permanent excuse is the allegedly "Aggressive" nature of Russia or the alleged human rights violations of those it wants to attack. Oddly, Russia's supposedly aggressive nature shows itself only when it is attacked, as e.g. in Georgia. Russia has one or two military bases in other countries and one peacekeeping operation. (I think.)
The supposedly "Peaceful" USA, by contrast has attacked about fifty countries around the world since 1950 and has about 800 military bases spread across the Globe. NATO has mostly fought peasant or third world armies and is not geared up to fight a peer competitor. Its MIC is used to screwing the US taxpayer and making wonderful weapons at fantastic prices and to making fabulous profits for its shareholders, but seems to be a bit lacking when it comes to basic things like heavy artillery and the ammo to use in it, anti-tank missiles, anti aircraft/missile defenses.
In conclusion, I would say this is not the right question. You should be asking do we need NATO and if so : what for?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
28:04 Its not just that the US benefits from the Nordstream sabotage (NSS), that Biden, Sullivan (Or was it Blinken?) and Nuland said they were going to NSS, that they had the means to carry out NSS, and that they also had the opportunity to do the deed, but that the site of NSS, was heavily patrolled by N@0 and any Russian Naval Vessel in those waters would have been closely watched. If that is not an "open & shut case", it must be pretty close!
So you have statement of intent, the opportunity, the means, the motive, and an alibi for everyone, else except those who might have done it for the US.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
21:21 It is even worse than you say! The US, I read, is still buying Russian oil, directly from Russia. How long before they sell some of it to Europe?
Another story; last year, the Chinese bought a long-term contract with US suppliers for LNG. At the moment, they have enough gas from Russia to not need this LNG from the US companies, so they have agreed to the Americans selling this gas to the Europeans, for them, at US prices! ( I can't give references, but I am not making this up, it's just that I am bad at taking notes when I read these things.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
25:16 Mislaid article; I have a similar problem, I have found that this is very helpful in keeping track of many diverse things. I have a file in "Open Office" (an analogue of "Word") I write a note of anything I want to locate, be it an article of clothing a tool, a video on the web, a book, an address... whatever; always with some keywords. Then if I want to locate it, I go to the file, go to the "search" mode (cntrl F) put the key word or anything that will be in the note, such as a date or a person's name or the colour of a pair of socks, press "Search" and in three or four key strokes at the most, I have the info I need. Typical entries are "Cables for the welder. In the toolbox beside the lathe. The Tartar Khan's Englishman, middle shelf, by the door, on the right." I find it saves me endless time trying to remember where I have put things. These files are endless so you will never run out of space and being machine-searchable, they are much quicker to search than real space.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In my opinion, in a free and democratic country, in disputes over wars in which the country itself is not involved, both sides should be free to demonstrate, (Peacefully, of course) under police protection, if needed. Exposing wrong-doing, such as torture, attacks on civilians, depriving civilians of food and or water, arbitary imprisonment, hostage taking, use of banned weapons and so on, should not be counted as a "Hate-Crime".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It occurs to me that, although it may look to us as though the PM is lying through his teeth, in fact the problem is with us, rather with than him. You see: in political discourse in your lifetime and mine, the meanings of terms has changed out of all recognition. For example: the terms "Left" and "Right", "male" and "female", "Marxist", "Communist", "Conservative", "Socialist" and "Fascist", do not mean at all, what they did just a few years ago. So. Perhaps "Safe" and "Effective" have new meanings that you and I have not caught up with?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If you were a policeman investigating a crime and you had one suspect who had said, at least three times, that he would commit this crime, he had motive to commit this crime, he was seen, around the time that the crime was committed, at the scene of the crime, he rejoiced publically that the crime had been committed, he benefitted financially from this crime in at least two ways, he and his friends were guarding the scene of the crime at the time the crime was committed, he had the means to commit the crime and nobody else had a motive to commit it, WHO would you suspect? I think at least you would make an arrest, "pending further investigation"!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
49:12 Of course it comes as a surprise to the Daily Telegraph and the like!! because early on in the conflict they determined that Brian Berletic, you, Alex and Col MacGregor, Scott Ritter and numerous other truth tellers, were all PUTIN SCHILLS. So, disbelieving everything they said, in fact, believing the exact opposite of what they said, became with them, an article of Faith, which it was unthinkable to doubt.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Are you sure that the "leaders" of the CW HAVE any plans? It seems to me, that they have blundered into this war, with a sort of belief that: "It will be alright on the Night" or "We will just play it by ear and make it up as we go along!" Can you discern any coherent strategic thinking from the very start of this op?
Insofar as there seems to have been any strategic thinking at all, it seems to have been based on a wildly inaccurate assessment of both the Russian internal situation ("Russia is very weak. One good push and it will collapse.") and of Russia's international relations (We can get all the rest of the World to go along with our sanctions.") and an equally faulty assessment of the feelings of the World outside the CW, towards the USA ("Leave us out of your quarrels, we don't want to be involved.) and crucially, a wild overestimate of the depth of NATO's arsenals and an equally devastating underestimate of the strength and extent of Russian preparedness. From appearing to be "The Greatest and Most Powerful Military Machine ever Assembled on the Face of the Earth" to looking like a "Paper-Tiger", took just a few weeks! Still today as I write, Ukraine is bleeding out the arsenals of the CW and nobody seems to have a strategy to stop it or even so much as a tactic to slow it down, never mind how to repair the reputational damage or to restock the weapons stores in a reasonable time. In fact, were the West to try to do the latter, could it overcome its reliance on Russia and China for so many of the required raw material inputs?. Not in any reasonable time-frame, i would guess.
Thank you so much for all your hard work, chasing down and making available to me, news that I would never otherwise hear about!
A Very Happy and Peaceful New Year to You and Your Family!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jonthomas9708 Yes, I agree that is a risk. However, I think that reducing the persuasive, attractive, seductive power of the MIC for people not directly involved in it, (shareholders) would be worth taking that risk for. It would also reduce the financial power and the incentive of/for warmongers to make propaganda for war. After all, that governments organized to defeat the Axis Powers, was only to be expected. That was a response to a real threat. The "Drive for War" that has afflicted US policy since the end of WW2, was not a response to a real threat, it war an artifact. Remove the financial muscle from the group that made that "Threat", and I think you would probably so;lve the problem which looks otherwise almost insoluble.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
31:00 As I see it, there is a small but powerful faction in the West that really HATES Russia and wants all day and every day to attack and destroy Russia, so that they can feast on the remains. They can't do it, because Russia is too strong, but the intention, the hope, the aspiration, is always there. Hence the constant establishment of new bases all over the World, since the end of WW2. Sometimes it is more hidden than at other times but it is a constant factor. It really makes "Negotiations", with the West pointless. What is needed is to make sure that Russia is strong enough, to keep the desires of this clique as just desires.
If I conclude anything from this, it is that the Russians should buck-up their propaganda and PR efforts, The Ukrainian war is, at least in part, the result of the West's underestimating the strength of the Russians, economically, politically and militarily. PR and propaganda, is MUCH CHEAPER than war and it may well be the alternative.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It is not that Europe does not know how to fight. There are a number of factors that makes Europe find itself in a position where it is not prepared to fight. For a start the European arms industry has been bought up and closed down by their US competittors. For the last 76-77 years there has been no real threat of a war in Europe except the one started by and largely waged by, the US in Yugoslavia. Another thing is, that the European arms industry is almost entirely privately owned, which means it is run by accountants. So, because there was very little demand for e.g. 155mm shells, the people who made them were mostly sacked and the machines that they were made on, were scrapped as "Stagnant Capital" and a "waste of space." Also, because of "Just-in-time -working" there are no stocks of arms. These too, would be regarded by an accountant as both "Stagnant Capital" and a "waste of space"
Because there was no real threat, young men were mostly looking for careers or livings more comfortable than the one typically enjoyed by a soldier or sailor or even an Airman. Without a real,live threat, who wants a life of being ordered around? Some do, but not that many.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:22 How did Zelensky think that Ukraine could defeat Russia. Look, Zelensky is an actor, a comedian. He has NO military experience. I have known only a couple of actors, but neither of them were interested in military matters or indeed anything outside their profession. I suspect Zelensky was the same. He was told by the representative of the British Government and the US government, something along the lines of "Tear up this agreement and we will give you enough weaponry to hand the Russians a bloody defeat. We will support you for as long as it takes!" Probably, he thought that BoJo knew what he was talking about. Bojo probably, sincerely believed, as did a majority of people at that time, that Neightoe was the Mightiest military machine that the World had ever seen and was effectively undefeatable, while "everyone knew" (or at least it was widely believed in government circles in the West) that the Russian army was in poor shape, mutinous, poorly trained, badly equipped with outdated machines and badly officered and lacking experience (and all the rest!), while the Ukrainian army was the largest Neightoe-style army in Europe and had been trained for seven years by US and European officers to Neightoe standards and was battle-hardened by seven years of war against the militias of LPR and DPR. So, one can see why he believed Bojo that Ukraine could win and why Bojo believed the same.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
27:39 What is even more staggering, is that the Chinese have grown rich without an empire to rob!
Oh, &BTW, private enterprise was an important part of the Chinese scene from well before the declaration of the PRC. For example, the PRC's flag has four small stars on it as well as the big "Communist" star. These four stars represent the peasants, workers, soldiers and (Wait for it!) the patriotic capitalists.
When I went to China in 1964, I was amazed at the diversity of goods in the shops and enquiring about this, I discovered that unlike in the USSR, there was a thriving privately owned industry, making anything that would turn a penny, with firms ranging in size, from one-man ops to firms employing hundreds or even thousands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
10:07 The problem is this: The Europeans have followed the USA down the rabbit hole into a severe slump, induced by cutting off Europe's supply of cheap energy from Russia and the USA is now demanding, that they contribute more to NATO, which in very fact is not and never has been, a "Defensive" alliance. (It has never come to the defenso of anyone except after 9/11 and that was a put-up job anyway.) It has always attacked other countries, that the US and Israel wanted reduced in power, no wonder they are worried.
The other point to condider is that armies are always the last resort of the ruling class to keep themselves in power. That is the principal reason why countries have armies. The threats of external enemies are very largely and most of the time, excuses for having them. NATO backs up the other five or six layers of protection that the ruling classes surround themselves with, the Police, the Education system, the MSM and publishing system, the burocracy. Dismantling NATO at a time when the farmers in various NATO countries look as though they might be considering going home for their pitchforks, is an alarming idea. Particularly given the parlous state of most of the armies in the CW.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:07:54 "Wouldn't that be real cool?" Like those criminally insane "Scientists" in Boston, USA who recently announced that they had produced a Covid-19-like virus which was, however, not 1% lethal in human-modified mice but, Whoopee!, 80%!!
Personally, though in general, I do not approve of the Death Penalty, if I had dictatorial powers, I would have them taken to the nearest suitable wall and shot.
I cannot see a justification for any "gain of function" research. Why do we need it? Viruses jump from Nature to humans from time to time and surely that is problem enough. When we make viruses which are more deadly than those occurring naturally, there is always a chance that they will escape the lab and infect the world outside. This seems to be an entirely avoidable risk and one that has remarkably little upside, unless you are TRYING TO MAKE BIOWEAPONS. (If you are, you should be an outlaw and there should be a bounty on your head.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Look, its very simple: China has an MIC so does the USA. The USA's MIC is capitalist, it is privately owned and run for profit. It is immensly rich and very profitable and it uses part of that profit to pay its shareholders, part on advertizing so that the MSM supports its every action and puffs up its reputation, it uses part to pay Lobbyists to bribe congress critters to vote for more arms orders and it uses part to pay ex civil servants and ex-military officers who persuaded the Government to buy arms, while they were serving (The so-called "revolving door".) for serving as members of the boards of MIC companies and part to pay dividends to shareholders. Many of the shares are owned by members of the government and congress critters. As a result, the goverment's foreign policy is largely dictated by the MIC. What the MIC wants is Wars, threats of wars and rumours of wars.
China, otoh, has an MIC which is wholly or mostly state owned, This means that the Chinese MIC does not make a profit, except by selling arms to another country and any profit it makes, just goes to reduce the amount the state spends on arms. The Chinese MIC spends nothing on persuading the Media to puff up its reputation. It has no or very few shareholders to pay and it spends nothing on persuading the government or lawmakers to change the foreign policy. There is no "revolving door". Consequently, it can produce many more arms for the same amount of money.
To sum up: In the USA the government collects taxes and the MIC makes foreign policy while in China, the MIC makes arms and the government makes policy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
12:20 To understand US foreign policy you have to bear in mind, all the time, that the aim and object of the policy is not to make friends, it is to achieve Global Hegemony. They cannot do it by out-competing the Eurasian bloc that they have succeeded in creating, so they are determined to do it by downgrading the Eurasians, China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. By hook or by Crook!
Actually, the BIGGEST OBSTACLE by far, at the moment, to their making Friends, at all, is their alliance with and support of Israel. Anyone looking at the genocide taking place there can be expected to think: "What is happening to the Palestinians Today, could just as well happen to us Tomorrow!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
6:20 The reason the government did not scrutinize the Neil Fergusson predictions, is simple and obvious. Our government and that of the US, is composed, almost exclusively, of politicians, i.e. people who have, in general, little to no scientific background or expertise. They have no training in any STEM subject or any training in logical thinking. I have the impression, that many of them have, in very fact, no idea what SCIENCE really is!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No need to trust what the Russian are saying about Ukraine selling US weapons on the Black Market. Anyone that cares to look, can find the weapons being sold on the dark web. It's not Russia's actions that are causing the crisis in Europe, no, it is the Western Sanctions which are causing ALL the trouble. Who, after all, refused to open Nordstream2? Why is Germany short of gas? Did the Russians refuse to supply it? No, the Germans closed down NS2 and then embargoed the repair of the gas turbines needed to operate NS1, Not Putin's fault but Scholtz's.
Was it Russia that mined Ukraine's ports? No, it was done by Ukraine. Was it Russia that stopped the ship carrying grain? No, that was done by Turkey at the request of Ukraine. And so on and so forth. You are supposed to be a news organization, you look more like a propaganda organ.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is a fundamental problem here. There is a Conflict of Interest, built into all privately -owned (Capitalist) pharmaceutical firms, namely that: "a customer cured is a customer lost". A capitalist firm has NO LEGAL obligation to its customers except to obey the local laws. In other words it is a case of "Caveat emptor" or "Let the buyer beware." The responsibility of a capitalist firm is to its shareholders. Its job is to make them money or go out of business. Sure, if you have been injured by their product, you can, in theory, sue the Big Pharmaceutical companies, if you can afford to go up against billion$ opponents, but you'll need a lot of luck, and very good lawyers and probanly a lot of money, if you try.
This problem has an obvious solution, though it is one that will attract a lot of resistence in the US. That is to Nationalize the whole of the Pharmaceutical industry.
Why? You may Ask.
While the ideal patient for a privately owned pharmaceutical company, is one whose illness can be "stabilised", so that he is not too ill to work, but is sufficiently unwell to need constant medication, the ideal for a government - owned pharmaceutical firm is a medicine which will permanently cure a patient, in the shortest time possible and with the least cost to himself and the health - care industry.
I had not thought about this before, but such a scheme would reduce the cost of living and hence the cost of goods manufactured in the USA. (Or any other country thay had its own pharmaceutical industry.) It would also, remove the suspicion, that "the pharmaceutical companies are sitting on cancer cures because cancer is so profitable."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The British government must be either the most ignorant bunch of clowns who ever posed as statesmen or they must be evil, almost beyond belief! If the problem is ignorance : they do not understand the dangers to the WHOLE WORLD of sending depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine.
When the war is over, who blew up which tank will be of interest to very few people, mostly to relatives of the Tank crews. However, Ukraine is (or was) the "Breadbasket" of Europe. In fact, it sends food all over the World.
DU ammunition is effective in destroying tanks, true, but when the round hits the tank, the depleted uranium catches fire, the smoke blows around and eventually settles in the soil. Food grown there, absorbs some of this uranium and when it is eaten by animals (including humans, of course) it lodges in the animal's cells like a time bomb waiting to go off. When this uranium is eaten by a pregnant mother, it can be incorporated in the baby. When one of these uranium atoms decays (Explodes) it can cause a mutation resulting in a stillbirth or worse, the birth of a hideously malformed child. Rishi Sunak and his Minister for Defence (There's a misnomer if ever I heard one!) are condemning the mothers of all countries that buy food from Ukraine to this monstrous possibility. If anyone thinks this is alarmist propaganda, they should ask the Iraqis or the countries of the former Yugoslavia.
If they don't know this, they are so ignorant that they should be nowhere near the "levers of Power". If they know this and go ahead with this diabolical plan, they must be some of THE MOST EVIL people who have ever lived.
It is extraordinary to me that there is so little outcry over this announcement! Extraordinary too, that Putin has not spelled out the danger of this move, in detail. It is not "just" a nuclear escalation, even if it does not result in a nuclear war (which it might) it condemns countless generations of children to the possibility, the probability of being grossly deformed or cancerous and condemns their mothers to grossly heightened worry around giving birth. This problem will not go away for HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS. The uranium in these shells, has a very long half-life.
In short, this announcement, is telling the World that one of the greatest "Crimes Against Humanity", is in the process of being committed.
1
-
That is true BUT, the Collective West believed their own propaganda, which had been propagated for years by the MSM. (Russia is a gas-station masquerading as a country. The Russian Army has no experience, it is officered by idiots, its troops are badly trained and badly equipped with out-of-date weapons. The Russian troops are badly paid and mutinous. As soon as the Ukrainians attack them the Russian troops will turn tail and flee.) Previously this did not matter much because the West was not at war with Russia. However, when they decided to get rid of "The Putin" by forcing his government into a war, with the biggest, best-trained NATO-style army in Europe and at the same time putting a huge number of crippling sanctions on the Russiaan economy, it led them into thinking that this would cause his downfall very quickly. Unfortunately for them, and absolutely disasterously for the people of Ukraine, they badly miscalculated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The whole idea of this Ministry of Truth, whatever the government may call it , that is what this is, is frighteningly Orwellian. It makes a total mockery of all criticism of "Dictatorships" and "Oppresive" governments for censoring free speech. It makes it clear that our government, in this so-called free-speech area, is frightened of the truth. It has never criticized the mass media for spreading absolute rubbish, it could not care less, what misinformation the MSM spread, so long as it does not contradict their narrative! I lived all through the Cold war and the MSM produced a constant barrage of misinformation about the USSR, China and the Warsaw Pact Countries, some of it utterly ludicrous, and I cannot recall a single government protest about it.
To cap it all, much of what the government told us about the Pandemic, the treatments and medicines for it and the supply of PPE was untrue and the CDU said not one word against any of it! They are not the slightest bit worried by lies, what worries them is the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This program so far is a whitewash. If you were a policeman investigating a murder and you had a suspect with motive (and he was the only suspect with a motive!), opportunity and means, who was seen in the relevant area in the three days before the deed took place; who would you suspect? Let me guess!
In case you don't know (Sarcasm.) the US is determined to maintain its hegemony and it took down Japan when it got too competitive and it is now in the process of taking down Europe in general and Germany in particular. In all probability, the war in Ukraine was started to provide an excuse to sanction Russia. Had those sanction destroyed the Russian economy and brought about a regime change, as was intended, perhaps Germany might have been spared, for now. As it did not work, Plan B came into operation to take down Germany and Europe.
The war has not gone as expected either, but what is clear is that the leaders in Washington care not a whit for Ukrainians. My bet would be, that when they have lost, they will be abandoned, just as the Afghans were.
1
-
1
-
Yeah! We have Freedom of speech! Freedom to say anything they like! Big Pharma is a particular hate of mine.
On another channel I wrote this. I thin it might interest you.
The need to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry
It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years!
The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease.
Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it.
Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks worth running.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:15:52 I realise that this, whole idea, may well be wide of the mark, but I have heard about some psychological research on a group of monkeys, in which the leader was an alpha-male and when he was removed, he was replaced by another alpha male. However, when all the alpha-males of the group were removed, they were not replaced as leaders by beta-males, but by females. I also read that the populations, of practically all the western world, are deficient in zinc and the sperm-count and sperm-virilty (activity) is declining at about 1% per year(!) and that the quantity of testosterone in the blood of most males in the western world is also declining at the same rate. Zinc is also important to female fertility.
Testosteron, the "male hormone" (Though females have some testosterone too.) is connected with, among other characteristics, aggression (Using the term in the sense of iniatiatve as well as belligerence) physical strength and leadership, among monkeys. Since humans are closely related to monkeys, it seems reasonable to assume that the same is true in human beings. Would this perhaps account for the current singular absence of outstanding leaders in the CW? As well as the declining birth-rate.? Might it also (I ask myself) also account for the rise of "wokeness" in the CW?
Another thing tending to produce "softer" males in the CW is the tendency of parents to keep their children at home, insted of letting them go out to play with other children in the street, because it is no longer considered safe to allow them to do so. This it seems, (according to some psychologists) to produce males who are less accoustomed to fighting and are more afraid of getting hurt.
As I said above, this maybe nothing to do with the case, but the absense of effective and competent leaders in the CW seems to be almost total and lacking in any rational explanation, so I offer it as a suggestion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People in NATO countries have frequently blamed NATO for causing the War in Ukraine. Hardly surprising! Considering how hard NATO worked at so doing. From 2014 to February 2022 the NATO trained and led Ukraine army, attacked the Russian-speaking provinces of Ukraine, killing 14,000 of them in the process, about 10,000 of those being civilians. Then in Feb 2022 they announced that they were going to clear the Russian-speaking provinces (The Donbas) of all Russian-speakers either by driving them out or by killing them. This left the Russian government the choice of either:
A) going to the rescue of their fellow Russian-speakers or standing by and letting them be killed or driven out and seeing a NA*I-led, NATO-affiliated government in Ukraine or
B) going to war with NATO.
The first choice would have been domestically politically impossible for the Russian government, the second choice looked (To many Western observers and particularly to NATO strategists:) suicidal. As it turned out, the Russians were not so weak, corrupt, incompetent, rebellious, inefficient, badly led, badly trained, badly-armed, etc., etc. as they had been portrayed in Western propaganda. The expected easy victory for "the largest NATO-trained and armed army in Europe", has failed to materialize and we are now looking at a possible Russian victory.
1
-
Yes, I feel for your feeling let down by the scientific peer review system. I myself experienced a similar let down in the integrity of scientists in a different field back in the '60s. It is disappointing, one would think that scientists would be more or less immune to groupthink but they aren't. Maybe all science teaching should continuously drum into all students, the fundamental LAW : IT AINT NECESSARILY SO!
I myself, translated a very interesting book on the structure of globular proteins, which I am convinced to this day was a quite possible solution to what is, still, today a matter of ongoing discussion, but when it was published, it received almost no discussion, but was dismissed as a phantasy, although it showed that for example, one could, from the chemical analysis of the protein, assuming this model to be true, predict the length of the molecule and its polar moment to within a very few percentage points, It also explained how such molecules denatured when heated and how if not heated too much could repair themselves, when cooled down. Instead of discussing the hypothesis, the alleged character of the author was attacked! When it was pointed out that another "reputable" scientist was a co-author of the book, it was waved away with: "I can't think how she comes to be mixed up with that man!". The trouble was, that the author of a rival theory, which explained nothing about the behavior of globular proteins and could predict nothing about the dimensions of the molecule from the analysis of it, had shortly previously won a Nobel Prize.
It seems that there is an exactly similar situation in Archeology, regarding ancient giant humans and civilizations predating the Sumerians, by hundreds of thousands of years. I have no expertise in either subject, so my opinion is simply an opinion, but it seems that any "reputable" archeologist is likely to lose his academic status AND ANY HOPE OF FUNDING, if he interests himself in either field!
1
-
1
-
3:20 This business of shuffling the time slots and beinng surprised that nothing much changes; i.e. no increase in ratings: seems to me like a houswife, with a sack of "past sell-by date" potatoes. She has already served her family the edible potatos, (TC) and now she keeps shufflibg through the sprouting ones, looking (without success) for something interesting, something edible, to serve her family. "They" can't do what Tucker did, tell the truth, because that is taboo! But they cannot find a substitute, because, in very fact, there is no substitute for truth. People in general, like the detective in the old serial "Dragnet", "Just want to get the facts!" Until, unless, the MSM acknowledge this they will, I predict, go on losing audience numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
44:51 What they are "clinging to" is the bedrock of US policy since, I don't know when, but certainly back to WW2, at the latest; which is to destroy, dismantle and loot Russia and China for the Great Glory of the USA, after which they will live happily ever after, for ever and ever, Amen. This is so fundamental to their thinking, that it is no wonder, no surprise at all, that they cannot give up on it. It will take a Regime Change in Washington for that to be contemplated and as yet there is no sign of that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You speak of the CW running out of weapons to send to Ukraine and indeed, it is difficult (for me) to see how that can be avoided if the war continues for much longer. Nor do I see how the neocons can really, stop sending arms before they run out of weapons to send to Ukraine. But what then!?! I would be very interested to hear what you think could/would happen if we find ourselves in a situation where the Russians are facing a NATO that is critically short of arms to defend itself.
It seems to me that the safest course for the CW, would be for the current governments to resign and for opposing (I.e more rational) governments be elected on a ticket of negotiating a real peace with the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, the Syrians and maybe others. This would , of course, only work if the Russians etc. were willing to "play along" (which I think they might.) If they were not, it seems to me, that all bets are off! I wonder what would be their minimum conditions?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3:47 In general I agree with your attitude on government interfering with my risk-taking, e.g.whether I get vac*inated against a certain disease or not. However, there is an aspect of the seatbelt controversy that you may not have considered,
A long time ago, when seatbelts had been introduced for motorists, but were not yet compulsory, my mother was very keen on them and so, I and my family wore them. I had a crash, when I took a corner too fast and landed up with my car straddling a roadside hedge. (In a village in Yorkshire, UK) We sat there for a few minutes, to check that we were all unhurt and a policeman came over to the car. I wound down the window and he asked if we were OK. When I told him we were, he exclaimed: "Oh, thank God for that !" He then said: "Sometimes I go to investigate crashes and they have their heads stuck through the windscreens and as though that were not bad enough, when you try to get them out, you can't! Because, they have somehow managed to get the windscreenwiper stuck though their neck! It really turns me up and I can't sleep for days after!"
So, you see, it does not affect only you, if you choose not to wear a seatbelt when driving in a car. BTW, I have been in several crashes, including one where I was teaching someone else to drive and he turned the car over, but I have never been even slightly injured in any of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
27:16 In the USA you have a number of enormous pharmaceutical firms. These are capitalist organizations. Their primary aim is to make a profit. What do they need to do that? Slice it any way you like, THEY NEED SICK PEOPLE! "A cure is a lost customer."
Think about that. What can you do about that? It's not difficult to see that governments want healthy people! So. It is not "Rocket Science" or "Brain Surgery" to see that you need to move the ownership of the pharmaceutical companies from private industry to the government. This would immediately abolish the conflict of interest that, at present, exists. It also removes, from the cost of the health service, all the money that the governmeny pays to Big Pharma that goes to PROFIT. I.e. Most of it! It removes the block on proper testing of cheap medicines, "Because there is no money to be made from them" It prevents the replacement of medicines which work, "because they competes with a more expensive alternatives." It would also remove the block to finding a cure for cancer. (Which is, make no mistake, wildly profitable for Big Pharma.) There are also other benefits, which you can probably work out for youself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The effort to put NATO into Ukraine is part of an effort to keep the USA as the World's Hegemon. It was part of an effort to be able, credibly to threaten Russia with a decapitation strike. The ruling class of the West is OK with this effort, or if they are not, they go along with it, probably because they dare not oppose it. The weakening of Europe is part of the same effort to keep the USA as the pre-eminent country; economically, militarily, politically. Probably, with the US economy being in economic decline, the rulers in WDC decided that it would not "do" to have Europe more prosperous & economically stronger than the US.
Many years ago, an old woman who had been a servant in the house of the Chairman of the local Conservative Party, told me how at meetings in this house she had heard in 1947, discussions on how to roll back the measures of "Socialization" introduced by the Attlee government. "They were really keen" she said "to get back to a situation where they could hire a servant for half-a-crown a week." ("Half-a-crown" or one eighth of a pound sterling, was about a fortieth of a living wage at the time.)
Our rulers are not discussing amending the economic situation of ordinary people because they "are too busy sticking it to Putin". They are not discussing it, because they are quite happy with the situation of ordinary people, for whom they have hatred and contempt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason there was so much pushback against people who questioned anything about the vaccines is clear. It is not hard to see. As always: FOLLOW THE MONEY!!. What do I mean? Pfizer (a notorious criminal organization, recently fined $2.3 billion) makes a huge profit by selling vaccines. It is a huge advertiser and it exerts enormous pressure on all the media outlets that it advertises in. It is also a big source of finance to Medical associations, the CDC, the WHO, the MSM, university medical colleges, etc., etc.. All of these organizations know that if they allow anyone to use their space to sow any sort of doubt about the Vaccines' safety, it will impact the profitability of Pfizer, Pfizer will be annoyed and will take revenge i.e. Pfizer will cut their funding. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is not a theory it is a fact.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
27:39 What is even more staggering, is that the Chinese have grown rich without an empire to rob!
Oh, &BTW, private enterprise was an important part of the Chinese scene from well before the declaration of the PRC. For example, the PRC's flag has four small stars on it as well as the big "Communist" star. These four stars represent the peasants, workers, soldiers and (Wait for it!) the patriotic capitalists.
When I went to China in 1964, I was amazed at the diversity of goods in the shops and enquiring about this, I discovered that unlike in the USSR, there was a thriving privately owned industry, making anything that would turn a penny, with firms ranging in size, from one-man ops to firms employing hundreds or even thousands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Even if it had been true a few years ago that the Russians and the Chinese deeply distrusted each other, the actions of the US, wouldhave driven them, willy-nilly into each others' arms!
They would have been forced, by the US to realise that they needed each other for support against the hostile actions of the US. The whole situation is rendered ridiculous by the US asking the Chinese for help against the Russians and asking them the buy US debt (!) at the same time placing sanctions on the Chinese and the Russians, stealing the Russian bank reserves and trying to prevent the the Chinese from progressing in commerce and technology. Asking them at the same time to buy US made chips and preventing theiir own companies from selling advanced chips to China, refusing US companies permission to use Chinese made telephone equipment and prohibiting the Dutch, Japanese and South Koreans from exporting EUV chip making equipment to China and putting huge tariff barriers on Chinese exports of cars and solar panels to the US.
As though that were not enough, they are encouraging, arming and inciting the "Independence" movements in Taiwan, Tibet and Hong Kong and their proxies are attacking (killing) their engineers working in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Myanmar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:47 In spite of the "Conventional medical opinion" that there is no cure for age related dementia, there is an alternative view that Alzheimer's disease is, in fact, diabetes type 3 (I.e. diabetes of the of the brain). And is caused like DT2 by insulin insensitivity, which is to say that the brain has had so much insulin over a long time, that it has developed an insensitivity to insulin and the result is, that the brain cannot make use of the glucose in the blood, to provide energy for thinkng. However, since the brain can also function on ketones, which are derived from fat, if you stop eating foods which produce blood glucose, such as sugars and starches, and substitute fats such as lard, tallow, mutton fat, coconut oil you can reduce the insulin in the blood and the brain will then work normally, but running on ketones instead of glucose. There are several accounts of this in the internet, with people claiming to have cured their relatives' Alzheimer's disease in this way. I wonder if this is being tried on JB?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JosephBisio "Uigurs slaughtering 1000 Han Chinese in the last few days", correct. They did not do that "a few says ago, they did that sort of thing some decade or so ago. Whether they took hostages too, I don't know. Nowadays, all the reports I see from Xinjiang, are of a safe and pleasant place. The Organization of Islamic States' reported on Xinjiang and said that the Chinese government was doing a good job in dealing with terrorists and they were satisfied that the majority of Muslims were content with the government. The UN sent a rapporteur to look at Xinjiang and the US refused to let the UN publish her report. They said it was "Biased", or something.
In any case, the US, which has been slaughtering Muslims in large numbers for decades and decades and has locked up admittedly INNOCENT Muslims in Guantanamo bay for more than ten years, is in no position to criticize ANYONE for abuses of Human Rights. As they pretend to be so bothered about the Chinese record in this respect, why are they silent on the treatment of the Palestinians?
1
-
1
-
!:34:38 When one learms about "science" and the "Scientific Method"; one learns that, in scientific work, one first observes and tries to draw conclusions to explain the thing observed. The explanation is called a hypothesis. One then devises experiments to test the conclusions, to test the hypothesis. One then observes the results of the experiments and either they confirm the hypothesis or they don't. If they do, one devises other experiments to test the hypothesis further. If they don't, one make a new hypothese to explain all the results and then test the new hypothesis and so on until you feel satisfied that you understand whatever it is you are studying. At that point your hypothesis, is dignified with the appelation of a theory. All the time, you have to keep in mind that you may be overlooking something important and that all conclusions are subject to revision, when newly discovered facts do not fit the theory. (I.e. "It ain't neccessarily so!")
Now, in the West, most politicians are not scientists nor are they scientifically trained. This is shown up, by such episodes as the recent spate of sanctions on Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela and many others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
7:07 If the British "Defence" budget last year, was £50 Billion. where was most of it spent? How big is the British Army? How did it do in Afghanistan? Wasn't it part of N@0? Didn't N@0 fight the Russians in Ukraine? How well did that go? And now he wants the CW to fight, not Just the Russians, not just the Russians and the Chinese, Not just the Russian, the Chinese and the Iranians, but he want the CW to fight the North Koreans as well! Yes, I should Koko!! Last time the British fought the North Koreans, alongside the US forces and the Turks, they found them hard to beat. In fact they were fought to a standstill. And in those days (1951-53) Britain was a lot stronger, all round, than it is today and so was the US.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The absolutely fundamental and crucial Problem is that the US regards itself as the Hegemon of the World. This is something that the World does not need! The World does not need or want a self-appointed policeman. This attitude, of the US's is, I think, a hangover, an outdated behaviour, inherited from the Evangelical Christians, who starting at the time of the collapse of the Roman Empire, felt it their duty to go out into the World and "teach the natives how to behave and how to live".
This may have been, in its time, (a long time ago) a Good Idea (TM 1066 & All That) but it does not suit, when they try to impose this on countries that have civilizations that are far older than that of the US. (E.g. China, Iran, India, Russia) Particularly when it is accompanied by buckets of self-satisfied hypocrisy and assumed "superiority" and an appropriated "High Moral Position."
Another problem, is the US's assumption that they have an inalienable right to be the most prosperous and advanced economy and their consequent assumption that anyone that looks as though they might become more prosperous and technically advanced than the US, (or even a moderate competitor, e.g Japan, Germany) is a "THREAT"!
From their point of view, it seems to me, their most difficult problem must be that with a failing economy & gigantic debts, they have around 800-1000 overseas bases to maintain.
All this at a time, when in FACT, there is no real threat to them. They have weak neighbours to the north and south of them and a huge ocean to both the East and the West of them and NO-ONE wants to attack them. Their "problems are all of their own manufacture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
21:20 Again I think that Prof. Mearsheimer does not take into account, the shifting perception among ordinary people, of the US/NATO. The governments of the Collective West may be more united than ever, but I don't think that is true at the grass roots level. I think things are shifting. For one thing the perception of NATO as the Invincible Almighty Military Machine, the Greatest Military Machine the World has ever seen, the Power that can obliterate ANY opposition without breaking sweat, which was, I think, the generally prevailing view, has gone the way of the Dodo. True Ukraine was not formally "In NATO" but it trained alongside NATO, it fought alongside NATO in Afghanistan and Iraq, it was trained, advised and armed by NATO, so it was, to all intents and purposes, about as close to being a part of NATO as could be, without the formalities and Article 5. This, change in perception, is I think, is the primary reason for the neutral stance of so much of the Global South.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:17 The Collective West seems to be concerned to damage the economies of all the countries except that of the USA. The Worst case, is, of course the German economy, where the source of Germany's former prosperity, Cheap Russian energy, has been nestroyed by "persons unknown". (So called!) However, the other thirty odd countries are suffering too, as they too benefitted from the supply of cheap and reliable supplies of Russian oil and gas. As of now, the misguided attempt to cause regime change in Russia, has left them paying about three to four times as much for US LPG and Russian oil bought through Indian middlemen.
Messing with China, is an even stupider idea, but they seem to be unable to resist US pressure to go down that route. If our "leaders" don't soon wake up, it will end very badly for them and all of us in the Collective West. They will go down in history as the worst collection of patsies, incompetents and traitors ever to hold power in Europe. Of course by far and away the worst sufferers, are the Ukrainians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russia has food, fuel, fertilizer, men, up-to-date arms, a huge industrial base, vast natural resources, China as a backer, Iran as another potential ally, more than half the world is either on Russia's side or does not care about the "European's war". The Russians are seeing the West as an existential threat. (The West has made no secret of its desire to break up Russia!) The Russians are not having trouble finding recruits to fight in Ukraine.
The West is evidently unwilling directly to fight the Russians. The west has a problem with its economy, with raw materials, with finding enough suitable recruits, with finding enough and suitable weapons and ammunition to send to Ukraine. It also lacks the heavy industry to make a lot of heavy weapons, or even enough ammunition, in the near term,
If Russia conquers Ukraine, it poses no direct threat to any other country. If NATO defeats Russia in Ukraine, that poses a direct threat to Russia. The Russians have a plan, the War party in Washington DC, seems to have not consulted the military about this war, nor, it seems, did they war-game this conflict, but concentrated on sanctions that they convinced themselves would crush the Russian economy. They then set about provoking the Russians into invading Ukraine, believing, apparently that the Ukrainians (who had been trained for eight years by NATO) would easily destroy the Russians and bring about "Regime Change" in Moscow. I think it is obvious who will win.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In my honest opinion, anyone making DU ammunition, after the terrible experience of Iraq and Serbia is guilty of a Crime Against Humanity. The US sending DU ammunition to Europe is another vile attack upon all European people now and for the long-term future. The use of these weapons will contaminate the soil of what has, in the past, been dubbed "The Breadbasket of Europe" and make sure that anyone who eats food grown in this area will be at risk of producing deformed children.
In general I am against the Death Penalty, but for people making, advocating, sending or using such weapons, I would think it highly appropriate. Humans, after all have the right to defend themselves and these weapons are not, cannot be, aimed at anyone in particular, but attack humanity in general.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If Saudi Arabia chooses the US, they are choosing to go down with the loser. However long it takes, the US is not going to be able "to contain China". Can't be done! Ghina has four times the population of the US. It graduates around nine times as many STEM experts per year as the US does. It has a much better educational system than the the US. It has a meritocratic governance system. Imagine that! If you are bad at your job you don't get promoted. In the US, who your parents are largely determines what job you get. Very often, if you fail at your job, you get promoted! In the US If you want to get elected you have to say the right things and please the right donors, after you are elected, you can ignor the policies that you promised the electorate. What you cannot ignore are the wishes of your donors. In China, the government does not, in general, change much, however, the policies do. In the US the government changes every four or eight years, but the policies change hardly at all.
All of this and many other factors will ensure that China gets wealthier and stronger, while the US will get weaker and poorer. The Saudis probably know this and will decide accordingly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What people have to realise is that news outlets ( WSJ, NYT, The Times, NYP, etc.) are all profit-making organizations (At least in principle!) and therefore, they print what is profitable. If being a government propaganda outlet is the most profitable or the safest option, then that is what they will be. There is, absolutely, no legal requirement for them to tell the truth about anything. (Libel and slander excepted.) There are no penalties (Except, perhaps, losing readers.) on them for telling lies. The penalties on social media for "Misinformatin" are ALL levied for telling, not lies, but Truths that the authorities or the advertizers, do not want generally known.
1
-
How could Xi Jinping do other than support Russia to the limit of China's ability and strength? The USA has made it clear, that they want to dominate the World and that they regard China, Russia and Iran as obstacles in their way to doing that. China knows full well, that if Russia falls, it will be their turn next. The same is true of Russia, it has no choice, but to support China over Taiwan. Both of them will support Iran, if that country is attacked, for exactly the same reason.
Russia was provoked into invading Ukraine, to provide an excuse for the rafts of sanctions which were designed to crush the Russian econmy and bring about a regime change in Moscow. This policy was based, not on reality, but on the picture painted by Western propaganda and wishful thinking. That is why it is now coming unstuck. Blame it on Xi Jinping if you like, but I tell you. that is the wrong person to blame.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
These are "crazy" plans all right, but they are persistent, Governments change, but the new governments accept the same "Crazy" plans. I think you have to follow the command structure and the old adage: CUI BONO? If this is a Younohuish revenge on the Russian/the Christians (?) for being thrown out of Khazaria,1200 years ago, however absurd that idea sounds, it would explain the consistency. I mean, this is not new, it goes way back to the 19th Century at least. The excuses for the unremitting hostility vary, Russian imperialism, Communism, being "too large", not having the "Right Values" and so on but the hostility is constant. Look at the ethnicity of thr Hostiles, they are mostly of one type and or married to a spouse of that same ethnicity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason why no war movement in the USA was able to stop a war and, at a guess, even Trump will be unable to stop a war, is the tightly bound, self-reinforcing structure in Washinton, that I have written about previously, calling it a "Vicious Circle", (VC) consisting of the MIC, the congress, the USG, the lobbying industry, the shareholders and employees of the MIC, the lobbying industry and its shareholders and employees.
This VC structure is very tightly bound, self-protecting and quite ruthless. It has survived and only grown in strength, since the end of WW2. (at the latest.) Until and unless it is totally destroyed, it seems to me, the World will never achieve peace, because the VC needs war and threats of war to survive and it is deternined to survive. Of course even if it were destroyed, war could still break out, but the chance of it happening, would be very much reduced.
The best way to permanently destroy it, would be to Nationalise all the arms manufacturing industries and make it illegal for any person or corporation (other than a government), to hold shares in an arms manufacturing company.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason why the Russians get so much more "bang for their buck" is this: The Russian MIC is largely state owned, its remit is to make robust, effective, long-lasting , tough weapons which are easy to use and service in the field, as cheaply as possible.
The USA's MIC by contrast, is (nearly?) all privately owned and its remit is to sell to Congress and the USG, weapons which will look wonderful and make a lot of money for the board and the shareholders, many of them congress-critters. Whether they work and are effective or whether they can be easily serviced, are other, not very important, questions. "Long-lasting" is a distinctly bad idea. A "fire and forget" weapon is a much better prospect. The long-range (100km) gun, that cannot be fired as its shells are too expensive (!) and the marvelous fighter, the F-22, that cannot be flown because it costs $68,000 an hour to fly are cases in point. There are many other examples.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, maybe it rhymes and maybe the behavior is going to be similar on the US side, but, leaving an angry and victorious Taliban in possession of the battlefield is one thing and leaving an angry and victorious Russia in possession of the battlefield is a very different situation. If it happens and I don't see how else this ends, how are the Russians going to proceed? How is the US going to react to being openly defeated ? Those are THE questions!
There are, of course also other very important questions such as the sequilae of the Pandemic and questions around the actions of the medical authorities, both in the USA and in Europe and in the WHO, who will have to fight accusations of, together with Big Pharma, causing more deaths than the gang of four in the White House. These accusations seem set to ripen just about simultaneously with the revelation to the US and European public of the defeat in Ukraine. Add to that the growing financial crisis. Truly: "The air is full of chickens, coming home to roost!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hello Kim. about the permanent warmongering. I would like to discuss an idea that I have had. I have posted very simil comment before on various sites but have never got ANY feedback! So, I hope you don't mind that I post it again here.
It will be impossible to change the present rotten system unless the problim outlined below is dealt with. I apologise for the fact that I have posted the following before but I think it bears repeating.
There is in Washington a set-up, which as far as I know has as yet no proper name. I will call it :The "Vicious Circle". (VC) It is a circulatory structure, hence the name, and it consists of various interconnected groups, These are: the arms-making industries, the lobbyist industry, the members of Congress (The "congress-critters") & the United States Government (USG). Since it is a circular structure one cannot start at the beginning, it does not have a beginning, it roes round and round. In action, the Congress-critters vote to tell the USG to order some weapons from the arms manufactureres. The USG then orders the arms from the arms manufacturers and sends them money. The arms manufacturers then send some money to their employees, some to their shareholders and some to the lobbyists and use some for advertising themselves. (Many of the congress-critters and members of the USG are shareholders. Many Ex-congress critters and ex-military and ex-government people, who have helped the MIC while in office, are sinecured employees of the arms industry, the so called "Revolving Door".) The lobbyists use some of the money from the USG to pay their employees and their shareholders and some to persuade congress critters to vote the "Right" way to keep the money flowing to the arms manufacturers, if the congress-critters do not promise to vote "the right way", the lobbyist will support their rivals who will.
This whole "Merry-go-round" is financed by the Taxpayers, who have almost no influence on it at all. The Shareholders and employees of the arms mfgs and the lobbying industry, thus have a vested interest in wars and threat and rumours of wars, because these justify the way they vote. This Vicious Circle is very powerful and completely ruthless and therefore very hard to break up - under normal circumstances. However, we are approaching a very abnormal set of circumstances, or so it seems to me. What I am refering to, is that it looks as though, in the near future, the US (NATO) is going to be defeated by the Russians. This means that, perhaps, the Russians are going to have a once-in-a-century opportunity to be able to impose conditions on the US and its sattelites, vassals, proxies and puppets. I suggest that if the Russians were to insist that all the arms manufacturers in the World had to be nationalized entities, and that no private individual or corporation would be allowed to have any share in an arms manufacturing industy or firm, then it would cut the financial lifeline of the Warmongers in Washington, London, Berlin and Brussels (Or anywhere else.) and thus would destroy the Vicious Circle. This would I believe, be an enormous step towards bringing real peace to the World. What do you think?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I made this comment in reply to another correspondent on a different program the other day but I think it is relevant here.
At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers. As the loop is circular in nature, we can start anywhere, Let's start with the Congress Critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that holds the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle.
1
-
If The people who made this program, would look into the Chinese political system, as closely as they look at the Chinese space program, they might find that the label "Autocratic" is not a really very enlightening term. This label, suggests that the whole of China's space efforts, are the result of Xi Jinping's whims. Needless to say, they are a bit more grounded in reality than that and that the Chinese politcal system, though very different to the US's, is more, not less, responsive to the peoples' wishes than is the US's democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think that there is a spectrum of intelligence in the newly-born. A child can become more capable of thinking correctly or less, depending on how it is educated by the people in its environment. Undoubtedly there are some extremely stupid and extremely intelligent people and this seems to be inborn rather than the result of their education or lack thereof. I myself, have met a quite extraordinarily cunning man with an uncanny ability to know what lies he could get away with on a particular mark, or in a particular situation, or to turn the situation to his own advantage, who had only an elementary school education, and I have seen also the quite self-destructive stupidity of a famously "wise" professor of Physics at a university College in London, UK.
People who stop thinking and just obey orders for a long time, as happens to some low-ranking soldiers, seem to suffer atrophy of the thinking abilities, to a quite alarming degree.
The Dunning-Kreuger syndrome is also relevant to this discussion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Do you think that De-Dollarization is a Russsian ploy? It seems to me, that while the Russians are not, in the least, averse to helping it along, when they can, most of the "real push" is being provided by the US itself! Stealing Venezuela's gold and giving it to Juan Guaido, slapping sanctions on almost everyone, even their allies, building up enormous, unrepayable debts, failing to defeat the Russians in Ukraine and finally threatening to steal the Russian Central Bank's reserves! What more disincentives can they think of to make countries wary of relying on dollars?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Very interesting video. It is extraordinary how slow some governments are to appreciate the importance of railways. Personally, I have for many decades thought that this was due to the malign influence of the big oil companies and the big motor manufacturers, In Britain we had, when I was a child, a very extensive railway system which had a station in most villages. Yes, really. It is true that it was old fashioned in that the tracks were old and not very smooth and the engines were nearly all steam powered and the carriages were also old-fashioned and not very comfortable, for the most part and the trains did not move very fast, but you could go from almost any part of Britain to almost any part of Britain by rail. Likewise you could send a parcel from any part to any part and the railway would send a van to pick it up from your house and deliver it to where it was going at the destination. It was prettycheap too.
However, when we got a Conservative government sometime in the 1960s, they employed a consultant called Dr Beeching (Hoochh! Spit!) who said that the network was "far too big" and a "waste of space" and he advised "pruning" the network to just the main lines, which the government, who I am sure were invested in or bought by, the big oil companies, agreed with his plan and the lines to smaller towns and villages were closed down, sold off and torn up. A lot of their friends got very rich off the land they acquired from the sale of railway land and the roads became very crowded, because to go to anywhere except betweeen big towns you needed a car. At the time Britain had a very complicated road system and no motorways. To go from Cambridge to London you had to go from one village to another to Royston and then to Baldock, from there to Stevenage, when you could get on the Great North Road which took you into London's Hampstead. It took a good many hours and was a fairly frustrating experience.
Because the small railway lines had fed passengers and freight into the main lines, when they were "axed" the main lines were starved of passengers and probably freight too and lost a lot of revenue. Later, another Conservative Government, sold off the railways piece by piece, to private companies. The Banks were very cunning, they bought the track and the carriages and rented both out, to the companies which had bought the franchises for various parts of Britain. They leased these out to the "Railway" compaies at very high prices, so that travelling by train in Britain now is extremely expensive, but the blame goes to the Companies not to the Banks, because hardly anyone knows this. The banks have also "economised", very heavily, on maintaining the tracks, so that the railways are much less safe now than they used to be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I wonder if you two much respected doctors would agree with this that I wrote some time ag during the pandemic?
The need to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry
It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years!
The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them and failing to test repuposed drugs because there id no profit to be made from their sale. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease.
Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it.
Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks worth running
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have had doubts about the "Moon Landing" for a long time. As time goes on it looks less and less probable. There is the flimsy nature of the craft in which they (Allegedly) landed, there is the difference in the condition of the travelers when they returned, there is the way that NASA "forgot" how to do it(!), and the extraordinary ease with which the calculations involved were done with so little computing power, the number of NASA records that got accidentally erased. Finally, there were silly things like the Astronaut who gave the King of Holland (Or was it?) Belgium, a "piece of Moon rock" that turned out on examination to be fossilized wood.(!)
Against all that, there was the massive amount of evidence that "they really were there", the amount of testimony by astronauts that they really had done that and samples of Moon rock and finally the lack of any debunking by the Russians.
You can suppress truth, but you cannot alter it. It is always there and if you lie about it, it can always pop up at the most awkward moment.
1
-
That is upside-down and inside-out! It was the US that wanted Ukraine to fight Russia. It was the USA that stage-managed the Maidan coup, and having prepared the Ukrainian army for seven years convinced itself that the Ukrainians could easily defeat Russia. When, in March-April 2022 the Ukrainians looked set to settle with the Russians, the Warmongers in Washinton and London, sent Boris Johnson to talk them out of it, because they still thought, that with their help, the Ukrainian army could easily defeat the Russians. Partly, they fooled themselves that the Russians were an undisciplined rabble, who would run away when they saw the Ukrainians coming, that the Russians were badly led, stupid, unwilling to fight, disorganised, had incompetent officers and NCOs, poor arms, old outdated weapons, no reserves of shells and missiles and other things of a like nature. They believed these things, probably, because they had read this sort of thing for years in the MSM, who were parroting what their leaders said!
If the Western Intelligence organizations knew different, they did not say so, because their bosses did not want to hear that sort of thing!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
24:45 To my mind the point is this: both the pharmaceutical companies and the media are capitalist or privately owned concerns. Their primary interest is in making money for their shareholders. The pharmaceutical companies have only a vague, largely moral, responsibility to the public and the media companies have no legal responsibility at all to tell the truth about anything, except occasional cases of libel and slander. Relying on them for medicines that cure or truth about what is going on respectively, is relying on "broken reeds".
Big pharma can sell the public stuff for years that turns out to be much worse than useless, e.g. thalidomide and if they are punished at all, they can write it off to the "Cost of doing business. The MSM can tell the public anything they like about , say, China or Iran or Russia or the USA, without suffering any penalty at all, except, possibly, loss of readers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The statement in he Economist that "Putin cannot be trusted" reminds me of Matilda in the morality poem by: Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953) "MATILDA WHO TOLD LIES, AND WAS BURNED TO DEATH
MATILDA told such Dreadful Lies,
It made one Gasp and Stretch one's Eyes;
Her Aunt, who, from her Earliest Youth,
Had kept a Strict Regard for Truth,
Attempted to Believe Matilda:
The effort very nearly killed her,
And would have done so, had not
She discovered this infirmity."
Maybe, just maybe, people are starting to think that attempting to believe Zelensky may be similarly dangerous!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Whilst I agree with you about the PlanA, I think you are discounting, unduly, (Or at least omitting) the western false belief in the feebleness of the Russian military. I think they thought that when the Russian forces came up against the Ukrainian forces, which had been "trained to NATO Standards" (Ra! Ra!) for eight years and battle=hardened by conflict with the Donbas Militias, they would turn tail and run or be cut to pieces in short order. After all, their "intelligence" agencies had be regaling their governments and people with stories of Russian military inefficiency, insufficiency, inadequate weaponry, cowardice and corruption, for years and by 24/2/22 their governments probably believed it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@danieljoseph4625 Almost, but here's a start:
US ATTACKED China in 1945-46, US ATTACKED Japan in 1944
US ATTACKED Korea in 1950-53, US ATTACKED China in 1950-53
US ATTACKED Guatemala in 1954, US ATTACKED Indonesia in 1958
US ATTACKED Cuba in 1959-60, US ATTACKED Guatemala in 1960
US ATTACKED Belgian Congo in 1964, US ATTACKED Guatemala 1964
US ATTACKED Dominican Republic 1965-66, US ATTACKED Peru 1965,
US ATTACKED Laos 1964-73, US ATTACKED Vietnam 1961-73,
US ATTACKED Cambodia 1969-70, US ATTACKED Guatemala 1967-69,
US ATTACKED Lebanon 1982-84, US ATTACKED Grenada 1983-84
US ATTACKED Libya 1986, US ATTACKED El Salvador 1981-92
US ATTACKED Nicaragua 1981-90, US ATTACKED Libya 1986
US ATTACKED Iran 1987-88, US ATTACKED Libya 1989
US ATTACKED Panama 1989-90, US ATTACKED Iraq 1991-2002
US ATTACKED Kuwait 1991, US ATTACKED Somalia 1992-94
US ATTACKED Croatia 1994 (of Serbs at Krajina)
US ATTACKED Bosnia 1995, US ATTACKED Iran 1998 (airliner)
US ATTACKED Sudan 1998, US ATTACKED Afghanistan 1998
US ATTACKED Yugoslavia 1999, US ATTACKED Afghanistan 2001-02
US ATTACKED Iraq 2002-06, US ATTACKED Libya 2011
US ATTACKED Syria 2013-19
1
-
1
-
26:16 The US Military, consistently, for many years past, in fact back to 9/11, come to think of it, have used the "presense of IS, ISIS or ISIL as an excuse, to be in a place where the localinhabitants do not welcome them, "to combat ISIS". (E.g. Eastern Syria & Iraq.) If anyone still remembers the events of 2013-2016, they will recall that the US fought ISIS with such vigour, that the apparently unstoppable terrorists, carved out a large and rapidly expanding Califate, until the Russians pricked that bubble.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:17 To fix this problem you have to fix the two things which are draining your economy, that can be fixed. So what are they? In my view they are the cost of healthcare and the cost of being the World's Hegemon.
Let's deal with health first. Why are medicines and healthcare so damned expensive in the USA compared to other countries? It is because, in the US, both of them are Privately owned. Why is that a disastrously bad idea? Simple! Think about it. There is a built-in Conflict of Interest in Both! Put Crudely, the problem is that "A cure is a Lost Customer!" The Pharmaceutical Industry is a number of Capitalist concerns. Well, what's wrong with that? What's wrong with that, is that the Primary Duty of a capitalist concern is to its shareholders. Its primary Duty, is to make a profit. Apart from laws to protect employees, customers, visitors to the company's premises and the environment, the capitalist company has No legal obligation to the country or its inhabitants. It is, however supposed to make a profit or go out of business. This leads to the pharmaceutical industry refusing to make medicines which ar known to work, because they compete with other medicines which do much the same, but sell for a higher price. Worse, it leads to the Industry trying to suppress cures to diseases which are highly profitable to treat! ,
A text-book example of this is Stomach Ulcers. For many many years, millions of people, world-wide, suffered (and died) of stomach ulcers and many were kept alive, though sufferring, by palliative medications, which they took every day for years and years. This was, from the point of view of the Pharmaceutical Industry, an Ideal Situation. The patients were not so sick that they could not work, but they needed daily doses of their product. What's to not like!?
Then in 1982, in Austrailia, Professor Marshall, 54, and Dr Warren, 68, Discovered that these ulcers were caused by a quite common bacterium called Helicobacter Pylorii and these ulcers could be cured by a combination of bismuth and antibiotics, in a couple of weeks! They struggled for many years, to get this information out to the World, but they were blocked at every turn by the Pharmaceutical companies, which threatened the medical journals and the MSM with the withdrawal of advertising, if they dared to publish this news.I do not know if it was the BBC that brought this into the open bu in "Horizon: Ulcer Wars. BBC Two logo. BBC Two · Mon 16 May 1994, 20 ... Marshall found that it was the bacterium Helicobacter pylori that caused ulcers, treatable .." They published it and that was how I heard about it and was able to save three relatives from a life of misery! Finally in 2005 (!) these medical heroes, were cited for "their 1982 discovery of “the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease.” (BMJ. 2005 Oct 8; 331(7520): 795) After that The surgical operations to treat the condition gradually died out as doctors gradually got the message.
Qute clearly, the cure for this situation, is the Urgent Nationalization of the Pharmaceutical industry. The current situation is totally unacceptable. It is, for example, the cause of the present case being brought by the AG of Kansas, against Pfizer, which by the looks of it, will uncover one of the biggest crimes in History. The point is that a nationalized Pharmaceutical Industry would be interested in Cures, rather than Treatments. It would favour Public Health. It would not be constrained by costs in testing promising medicines, "because there is no profit to be made selling it". Another point in favour of the nationalization of this industry, is that it would not need to make a profit and so would have funds to research treatments and cures for "Rare Diseases" which cannot currently be reseached, because "there would be too few patients to be profitable".
The same argument applies to the Arms industry. (With knobs on!) One of the biggest US expenditures is on the Military Industrial Complex. On the face of it, this is ridiculous! There has not been a real threat to the security of the US since WW2. The "Soviet Threat" was manufactured by NATO. They knew from early in the Cold War that here was no Soviet plan to invade Western Europe, let alone the US, only a plan to counter-attack if invaded. The US has a vast ocean to its East and a vast ocean to its west and friendly (Much weaker) neighbours to the North and the South, so how could it be threatened and by whom? So why the constant hysterical worry about "National Security"? Quite obviously, the answer lies in the old Roman adage: "QUI BONO?" (Follow the money.) This industry has effectivly bought congress through the lobbying industry and the government through the "Revolving Door" and the MSM through advertising. It thrives on wars, rumours of wars and threats of wars, so the US has an endless supply of these and it is bleeding (Correction! has bled) the national coffers dry, There will be no peace in the World until all arms producers are nationalized, world-wide. Government are not "Naturally" warlike unless they are really criminal organizations. On the whole, they do not like imposing taxations because it makes them unpopular. Whereas, Arms manufacturers, like Pharmaceutical concerns are interested in PROFITS and nothing else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:05:00 Personally, I feel that logically, the defeat in Ukraine ought to lead to the winding up of NATO. After all, Nato was sold to the participating countries, as being this great, invincible, Military machine, "The greatest Military Machine the World has ever seen" (No less!), which no mere Russia would ever dare to attack, That, which if anyone did dare to attack any member, all would pile in to defend the victim, et hic genus omne. Having de-militarized NATO and the US, I would hope that the Russians would insist on something, more like what they were talking about in Gecember 2021.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The difference is in the relationship of the MIC of the two countries to their respective governmens. I have written about this before but since you ask I will repeat it.
. Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the US taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees while the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. The Vicious Circle consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry.
The Vicious Circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders, employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round, with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public.
This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their respective country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I worked as a contract technician for various Philips companies in the 1970s to the 1990s, in the UK. The thing that struck me was the quite extraordinary inefficiencies in their ways of working. The first experience I had of this was a job for , I think it was called Pye Telecom. The job was manually inputting stock records into a computer database. This involved not writing numbers into a table, as one might expect, but writing, one character at a time, such entries as :
34,000 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.0 Ohm.
240,000 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.1 Ohm.
242,500 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.2 Ohm.
240, etc !
Then I worked for another Philips company that made Cellphones, Pye Telecom. There my job was rectifying cellphone guts that had been inspected by a computer-controlled machine and came with a readout that said such things as :
R1 wrong value
R23 WRONG VALUE
R96 WRONG VALUE
C5 WRONG VALUE
TR 7 WRONGLY INSERTED and so on.
I wondered how to find R1 on this very crowded board and went to my supervisor and asked him how to find itand after a bit of searching through a lot of papers he cam up with an A4 sized map, which he allowed me to photocopy. I went back to my desk and started by drawing a 1cm grid over the photocopy and writing an identifying number against the lines parallel to one side of the paper and identifying letters against the lines at right-angles to them. I then set about writing a list of the coordinates of the various components while I was thus engaged my supervisor came ocer to me and asked: "WHAT ARE you doing!? You are supposed to be working!!" I told him I was working and I was doing what ought to have been done for all who had to do this job abd that what I was doing would save the company a lot of money. "Uh, yes, I see what you mean" he said in a less aggressive tone "But, take care not to let George see what you are doing!" (George was his boss.) "Look!" I said, "Let's go and talk to George and I will explain what I am doing and why and then you won't have to worry about him seeing me working on this map."
So we went and saw George and I explained why I was doing and why and he listened to me and when I had finished he thought about it and said: "Yes, go ahead and finish your map, but for God's sake don't let Ken see what you are doing!"
I had a friend, another contractor who worked in the same plant. He asked me when he met me there, what I was doing and I asked him the same question. "I work in the Recycling Department" he said. "What do yo do there?" I asked. "I throw away about £100k/year of components!" "You joke, surely!" I said "No, I really do." Of course I asked how and why and he explained that when Pye Telecom received an order for, for example 1,000 cellphones, they orderd the components that they would need from the central suppliers or firms Like Farnell and when the batch had been completed there were always components left over. For example, 220k, 1/2W resistors might come in a box of 10,000 and the job only needed 5,000. that would mean that 5000 were unused at the end of the batch and they would be sent to the Recycling Department, which had nowhere to store them and simply put them in the dustbins. "But why don't they put them back in the stores?" I asked. "They can't do that because the computer only recognizes whole boxes." Likewise with wire or cable, the computer could recognize only whole reels.
Then I worked for Pye TVT which made TV transmitters. The first morning when I turned up and asked what work they had for me the person in HR said "How would you feel about assembling a TV transmitter?" "Well!" I said a bit nonplussed, "I expect if you give me the parts and a drawing I can assemble it." So he took me to the shop where the transmitters were assemble and handed me over to the foreman. He took me over to a pile of parts, on the floor and said: "There you are." I looked at the pile to find the drawing, but I could not see it. "Where's the drawing?" I asked. "Oh, I'm afraid there isn't a drawing." he said. "No drawing?" I queried, incredulously. "No. I'm afraid , we've been waiting six weeks for the drawings. and the Drawing Office still haven't given them us." "So, how am I supposed to know what goes where? I've never built a TV transmitter before!" "I'll tell you what" he responded, brightening up a bit "They're dismantling one in the packing department just now, you can go and look at that and it'll give you an idea of how it goes together." So, for the next six weeks I trotted to the Packing Department and back again with parts in my hands, trying to remember how they fitted into the rest of the apparatus that I had assembled. Then one day I went to lunch in their canteen and found myself sitting next to a man who said he worked in the Drawing Office. "Ah! You're just the man I want to meet! Can you tell me why I there are no drawings for the transmitter for Sweden that I am assembling? I've been assembling one for the last six weeks and I cannot, for the life of me, think why there are no drawings for it." "There are drawings for it." he said. "Well, why doesn't the Model Shop have any then?" I asked "We're a bit tied up with ITV at the moment."
Another almost incredible inefficiency in this factory was the obtaining of parts that one needed for the job. Philips had instituted a universal numbering system for, more or less, everything in the galaxy or at any rate everything that Philips might ever use. Everything had been given a number, whether it was an M6 hex-headed bolt,15 cms long under the head or a 100W 240Volt, pearl, Edison screw light bulb, or whatever it was, it was identified by a (IIRC, 7-digit) code number which used all ten numbers and all 26 letters. Now, if you wanted, say, 6 off M4 hex. plated steel nuts you had to write out an application form for that number of those nuts and take it to the foreman. The foreman would then sign it as approved and you took the signed application to the office where they would give you a printed slip for 6 of whatever was in the bin with the corresponding number that they had put on the slip. You then went and queued up at the stores where they would give you six of whatever was in the bin with the corresponding number. If you were lucky, you got what you needed, but if not, you had to start all over again!
So, I'm not surprised that Philips is on its way out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Seems to me that what Putin says is straightforward and common sense. The only surprise in what he says, is how different it is to what we are told he says, by the MSM. When you listen to what he says, it makes sense and it is clear that he is in full control of his senses and he does not appear to be hiding anything. Furthermore, he does not evade questions, he answers them. The widely spread idea in the West that he is on some drive to conquer the World, does not bear examination. (To me it looks like what the psychiartists call "projection". I.e. thinking that other people are thinking or doing what you yourself are doing or thinking. Like a man planning to murder his wife, imagining that his wife is planning to murder him.) In the case of Russia planning to conquer the World, one has to ask: "Who has about 900 military bases all over the World and why? Who has the largest military budget in the World BY FAR ?" (Bigger than the next 9 or 10 countries put together and some of those are allies!) Who has attacked and largely wrecked, at least 50 countries since 1950. Is it Russia? No, it isn't. Russia has one of the lowest population densities in the World (About 30 times less than the UK.) it has no need of more land. So why do so many people in the West think that Russia is on some drive to conquer the rest of Europe and after that the rest of the World? It is because, that is what they are told, over and over again. That repetition is a fact, but however many times a lie is repeated it does not make it true.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:45 I hold no brief for Lindsey Graham, but he has really shown up Lloyd Austin as too cowardly to come out and make the "Politiccaly incorrect" statement, that dropping atomic bombs on surrendering Japan, was a monstrous, unforgivable War Crime, though it is pretty clear that that is what he would like to say. As he doutless knows, the intention, behind the decision to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was to frighten the USSR. To shorten the war, so that the USSR did not invade Japan, which they were about to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, absolutely right and important! I would add that Dr A.J.P. Martin NP, after he retired from being Professor of Chemistry at some Swiss University, I don't remember which, was researching a powerfully curative chemical, which he believed was to be found in fermented, unpasteurized milk. In the course of his studies, he infected himself with various diseases and then, drank fermented unpasteurized milk, or an extract thereof and then gave himself a fever by immersing himself in a bath of very hot water. As far as I know, he successfully cured the disease each time
I don't think he ever succeeded in isolating this substance (if it exists) but he did discover, that eating something while you have a fever, is a way of developing an allergy to the eaten substance.
(This would seem to chime in with of the folk saying: "Feed a cold but starve a fever.")
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree with almost everything you say about this war; however, I think you seem to have too high expectations of the MSM! The MSM is not primarily, a distributer of information. No. It is primarily, from its inception, a means of making money and hence, distributing information is strictly a secondary activity and not neccesary at all, except to keep the readership/viewers interested. There is, in addition no great penalty for distributing misinformation, "fake news", or outright lies. The only thing they really have to avoid, is spreading real information, that the powers-that-be want to suppress.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@voraxe3032 "sounds like a racket to me just eat decent" Type 1 Diabetes is a failure of the pancreas to produce insulin, which means you cannot clear glucose from your blood. Glucose is the breakdown product of sugar and starch. It is a genetic defect. You need supplementary insulin to replace the insulin that your pancreas is not producing. (Or this new Chinese treatment.)
Type 2, means that, for too long, you have eaten too much sugar and starch and produced so much insulin, that the cells in your body have stopped responding to it and stopped absorbing glucose to make energy and fat. "Eating decent" is not helpful, if what you eat, contains sugar or starch. If you have type 2, you need to go on a keto diet and cut out as much sugar and starch as you can. Fortunately, if you get most of your calories from "decent" fat (Butter, Tallow, mutton fat, Lard, chicken fat coconut oil, real olive oil (and NO seed oils, NO Margarine!) you will feel hungry much less often and full much sooner. The reason for that is, when you eat sugar and you get glucose in your blood, your pancreas produces insulin and your muscles absorb the glucose and turn it into glycogen, which can be used later to make muscular energy. When the muscles have made all the glycogen they need, the fat cells turn the remaining glucose in the blood, into fat and store it. That leaves the insulin, that was produced to deal with the glucose, that has been stored, still in your blood and that makes you feel hungry! This is why sweet things make you want more sweet things. In other words, sugar and starch are highly addictive drugs which, when taken in excess, are very damaging. The Big Food Companies are the biggest pushers around! Read the labels on the food.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Maybe there are a few people in Washington, London, Brussels and Warsaw who would just LOVE to start WW3, using any excuse!
The SMO in Ukraine, has shown, beyond doubt, that NATO is a) unwilling to meet the Russians on the battlefield and b) unable to produce the necessary volume of arms to defeat them if they ever did get to fight them. Mao was right! "All reactionaries are Paper Tigers!" NATO is, in my view, hamstrung by the MIC which is intent on making, not usable, robust weapons, which can stand up to battlefield conditions, but weapons which look impressive, sound impressive, and make a lot of money for the MIC (and never mind the performance! In any case, they are not supposed to be USED!).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JosephBisio " What about that little Russian invasion of 2/24/22 ?? " That Invasion was provoked by the US whose proxy, the Ukrainian army, after spending seven and a bit years attacking the Russian-speaking Eastern provinces of Lugansk and Donetsk and killing thousands of them, threatened to wage an all out war on them and either etnicly cleanse the two provinces or masscre the inhabitants of them. The invasion was a pre-emptive strike to prevent this happenning.
" What about Chinese threats vs, Taiwan," Taiwan is a province of China, as even the USG admits. The Chinese "threat" to invade its own province (?) is that if the province declares itself an independent country the Chinese government will invade to put it back under central government control, (Which, I should think, is what any government would do in their place!) but the Beijing government has always stated that they would much rather negotiate a peaceful union with two seperate systems in the mainland and Taiwan.
" What about Chinese threats vs, Philippines, and Vietnam." Well what about them ? the relations between China and Vietnam are pretty good on the whole, true they have border disputes so do many other states in the region. The Chinese are not threatening to invade Vietnam. As to the Philipines there too the situation is similar. Until the Communists triuphed in China the US stated clearly that the islands and reefes that are disputed were Chinese. The Philipines have a new government which wants to please the US so they are upping the dispute over some islands. Thats about par for the course.
Please detail Iran's threat against Israel. How do they compare to Israels genocidal actions and threats in Gaza?
1
-
1
-
1
-
Since 1945 there have been many wars and threats of wars. I have not done the detailed research to be sure of the exact figure, but at a guess, I would say that the US was involved in about 95% of them. That is to say it provoked about 95% of them. If war breaks out over the status of Taiwan, it will be the US's fault and no one elses's. (Except its lapdog the UK!) The "Taiwan problem" is a hangover left from the Chinese civil war. The US supported the fascist regime of Chiang Kai-shek against the Communists who were led by Mao Tse-tung. In 1949 Chaing lost decisively and fled with all the treasures his forces could carry to Taiwan. The US Seventh Fleet stopped the Communists from pursuing them. That is to say the US was poking its nose into Chinas internal affairs. It has been doing that ever since.
The US, seems to think, quite sincerely, they tell us so very often, that they are and should be for evermore, Top Dog. They are, the country which is so good, so perfect, has such wonderful Democracy, freedom, values, that all the world should do as they say. They mean it and they seem unwilling to listen to anyone who wants to tell them that "it aint neccessarily so!" If anyone does not understand this their message, they send their army or an army of their proxies, to convince them of the error of their ways.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:31 "Its economy, under the Communist Party, ephasises state control," The CPC emphasises State control over the basic industries, roads, railways, Electric power, iron and steel, water, education, food, and so on. From the get go, though, they were not against private enterprise. Except for a hiccup during the Cultural Revolution,there has been a mass of small businesses supplying the needs that people have. the mistake of trying to plan all production, made by the USSR, was not made by China. There is an outward sign of this in, of all places, the National Flag. There are five stars there: the Big gold star representing Communism, and four small stars which represent the Peasants, the Industrial Workers, the Soldiers and the Patriotic Capitalists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
7:15 The idea that you are peddling, that the war on Ukraine by Russia was a Russian initiative, is , franky, Fake News. That the Maidan Coup was orchestrated by the US, by Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt, the US ambassador to the Ukraine, is hardly a secret. After this, under US tutelage, Ukraine so alienated the Russian speaking regions of the Donbas, that they rebelled and demanded autonomous status. The Ukrainian army then attacked them and were defeated and had to be rescued by Angela Merkel by the negotiation of a ceacefire; which was the result of the "Minsk Agreement 1" which was constantly violated, mostly by the Ukrainian government side and was followed by the second Minsk Agrrement. which was also constantly violated, mostly by the government forces. Later, Merkel and Hollande admitted, even boasted, that they had negotiated the Minsk agreements with Russia simply to give NATO time to build up, arm and train the Ukrainian forces to be able to defeat Russia. By February 2022, NATO thought that the Ukrainian army was ready, so they faced Russia with a horrible choice: either Ukraine would launch an all out attack on the Russian-speaking Donbas and would wipe them out or expel them, or if the Russians would come to the aid of their Russian-speaking brothers in Ukraine, they would face the largest and best armed, best trained, best equipped NATO-style army in Europe (backed by NATO). This choice was made more dfficult for Putin by the fact that he knew that if he left the Donbas residents to their fate, the Russian people would be furious and would throw him out of power. As by February 2022, 10,000 residents of Donbas had already been killed, it left him very little choice. It is not as though Putin woke up one day and decided: "Let's go and invade Ukraine!" There is much more I could say that is relevant, but I think that is enough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:13 The World is not in Chaos, it is the process of breaking free of US domination. The ill-advised provocation of Russian intervention in the war, started by the US in Ukraine in 2014, taken together with the defeat after 20 years in Afghanistan, has shown, in stark relief, the limits of US military power and the ill-advised attack on the Russian financial system by sanctions and stealing its foreign reserves, after stealing the financial reserves of Venezuela, has shown the folly of continuing to trade in dollars or trusting Western Banking. That's not chaos, that's awakening! Ironically, the wake-up call came from the White House itself!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:06:07 The purpose of the persecution of the Russophone people of the Donbas was not to prevent them having autonomy, no, it was to provoke the Russians into protecting them by invading Ukraine, as they eventually did. This invasion was intended (By the CW) to justify the sanctions that they were anyway going to levy on Russia. The refusal of autonomy and the verbot of the use of the Russian language, were not conviction driven acts, they were a means to an end. Namely to get the Russians to invade Ukraine. This was part of a plan, (To crush Russia and divide it up and loot it ,a la 1990s.) which was based on faulty beliefs in the weakness of the Russian military and the Russian economy and the weakness of the political standing of President Putin, in Russia. Like many a plan based on faulty beliefs and information before it, it has cone unstuck. In your account of it, you make the mistake of taking the excuses that the Ukrainian Junta made for their actions, as the real reasons behind their actions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have been saying for a long time now, that there is a clear conflict of interest in a private pharmaceutical firm. The firm has a clear, legal duty to its shareholders, Its duty to its customers is less clear, is moral not legal and is legally unenforceable. A cured customer is a lost sale. The best result of a product, is the "stabilization" of a chronic disease, where the patient is on the drug for the rest of his long life. (Better still if it is addictive.)This was made very clear to me by the case of Dr Barry Marshall N.P. who discovered that stomach ulcers (remember them?) were caused by Helicobacter Pylorii and could be CURED in a fortnight with antibiotics. It took him TEN YEARS to get this accepted by the medical profession as a result of the blocking tactics of the pharmaceutical industry. No doubt there are numerous other examples. They were able to do this because they own the Medical Journals through advertising and the Medical schools through sponsorship. Who can doubt that they own politicians too.
As you say, we need the government to nationalize the production of generic pharmaceuticals, but I would go much further. I would say that Private pharmaceutical industry is an essentially bad idea. A bad idea in principle, What is needed is national pharmaceutical industries or better an international pharmaceutical industry funded by all governments. (The reason is simple: for the pharmaceutical firm the ideal medicine produces a customer who is sick of a chronic disease, while from the government's pov, the ideal medicine is one that produces a cured patient.) Nationalization would avoid price gouging, suppression of cures, and neglect of rare diseases among other advantages. It would prevent the suppression of medicines that work because they compete with newer, more profitable medicines which do the same or less. It would avoid a huge number of drawbacks that are built into private pharma. It would undoubtedly save billions. (Both meanings!) It would also free the medical journals to publish interesting papers without wondering if their advertisers would approve. Probably, the industry should be run, or at least supervised by a committee of practicing doctors, without more than the minimum of junior burocrats involved.
Boy! Can you imagine the opposition such a proposal would meet?!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SaundraRaynor Yes, I agree with you. I think that perhaps they have mostly not seen it, previously, as a "circular", self reiforcing structure and they need time to think about it, before commenting? I don't know, maybe, as you suggest, they see it as an insoluble problem? Whatever, I see it as the principal problem, the problem without which being dealt with, the USA will just go on warmongering until it achieves a nuclear war or gets utterly crushed by a conventional war or its economy implodes.. Or something similar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Japanese used things very like modern high-explosive shells in the Battle of Tsushima in the Russo-Japanese War of 1905. A long time ago I read a very interesting book called: "Tsushima, the Death of a Floating City" written by a man who was an engineering officer on a Russian battleship, of the Baltic Fleet, who was captured in the battle that effectively destroyed the Russian navy, at Tsushima, which is somewhere between Japan and China. He reported that the Russian shells, which were filled with black powder, "merely took the paint off" Japanese ships when they hit them, which was not that often. While Japanese shells, were filled with high-explosive and destroyed the Russian ships, when they hit, with most shells hitting what they were aimed at.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have posted this contribution to the discussion in a few other threads but I think it is worth doing so again, as, as faras I know no one else seems to thik along the same lines (Or circles.)
Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, and its shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. The Vicious Circle consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry.
The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public.
This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead. At least I hope it would, I think it would.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@feydrautha012 As you no doubt know, that story has many, many more inconsistencies than that. It is a really weird mixture of unproven allegations, insinuations, non-sequiturs, improbable coincidences and a weird poison (Deadly to all who come into contact with it!!) that sometimes kills people, sometimes makes people ill and sometimes doesn't. Murderers who seem able to kill at a distance and spend the night before doing their very complicated and dangerous work partying! A poison that is fatal except for a policeman who touched the doorknob, a cat and two guinea pigs which were in the house but were not noticed by the police search of the crime scene (!) but which necessitated the removal of the roof of the house that had it smeared on the front doorknob (!!), You really would not make this stuff up, I mean, not if you had any respect for your audience.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:38 What is this "Chinese Threat"? What are the Chinese threatening to do? They are threatening to be bigger and stronger than the US. That is a "Threat"? In what way is that a threat? That that is a "Threat", is pure projection. The USA is /was bigger than every other country and it spent most of its time in existence, bullying other countries. That is not the usual Chinese modus vivendi. What makes the USG think that the Chinese are going to behave like them? Projection. "We are the Normal. Therefore everybody behaves like us. Therefore we have to prevent anyone becoming strong enoug to resist our bullying. Since we bully and suppress anyone who might become stronger than us, everybody/anybody who becomes strong enough, will bully us!"
It's paranoia. You cannot cure this by argument because it is not rational. It is an "Article of Faith" You can no more convince the Warmongers in Washington of the lunacy of their thinking, than you can convince Fundamentalists of any religion, that God does not exist. You can try, but you are on a hiding to nothing. As far as I can see, nothing but a real, solid overwhelming, military defeat will do the job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You cannot say that the "Chinese are not interested in diplomacy"! They are very, very, active in diplomacy and are making much more headway in it than is the US. De-dollarization, for example is a field where the Chinese diplomacy is having huge effects. The Belt and Road initiative, involving 140 countries, is a product of Chinese diplomacy, as is the new accord between Saudi Arabia and Iran. It is the US which has, apparently, forgotten what the word "diplomacy" means. One US general was quoted about a year ago as saying that a US aircraft carrier steaming towards the Middle East, was "100,000 tons of diplomacy". (!)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:12:22 Thinking about logistics; one of the reasons that the West is so strapped for production facilities to send more weapons and ammunition to Ukraine is the adoption by the West (and I suspect to a far lesser extent by Russia) of the philosophy of "Just-in-time Working". JITW implies no surplus anything; no surplus raw materials no surplus of half-finished goods, no surplus workers, no surplus space, no unused machines and that is just what they have! Add to that a lot of the raw materials and semi-finished goods they would need to supply materiel to Ukraine are sourced from Russia and China.
It is interesting to ask: "What is the attraction of JITW?" It is a bean-counters version of common sense. Any surplus raw material represents "unused capital", i.e. capital tied up and not earning interest. The same is true of surplus half-finished goods. Unused machines are unused capital, Un- or under-used workers are just an un-necessary expense. Surplus space, could be rented out for someone else to use or if it can't be rented out it may attract tax, so better destroy it/sell it. Probably, this reasoning cuts less ice in Russia? In the West, the overriding concern of bean-counters and directors is the bottom line and the stock market price. Probably, the Russian are working on a longer timeline.
1
-
1
-
1
-
24:03 For many years past, I had a plaque where my carotid arteries divide in two, 25% blocked on one side and 35% on the other side, both very slowly getting worse. Last summer, having read that vitamin K2 caused the calcium in plaques to be deposited in bones, thus removing the plaque, I decided to try taking about 8,000 units of Vitamin D3 and 100micrograms of vitamin K2, daily. In December I had an echographic examination of my carotids and the plaques had completely disappeared.
I know that correlation is not proof of causation, but I achieved what I intended so, I was satisfied.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is silly! It is so obvious that it was NATO or a NATO member country that it is a no-brainer. The USA said, through its officials, at least three times in public, that it was going to destroy the NS pipelines. They had opportunity to do the sabotage, US and British ships were in the area at the time of the attack. They have the means to carry out such an attack and they had the motive. (Sell expensive US LPG to the Europeans, sabotage the European economy.) To cap it all, you have Liz Truss, British PM sending a message to Biden a minute or so after the blast saying: "It's done!"
So you have a "suspect" who has means, motive, capability and opportunity and who has stated clearly that they had the intention and you talk about "suspicion"? Come On, Man!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What is needed by everybody except a very few, though powerful, warmongers, is peace and security treaties, meeting everyone's need for peace. War is such a waste of people and resources! It is the stupidest way of settling arguments. In general, it does not settle arguments it just stores up resentments and postpones the Next War. The Russians submitted their requirements for peace in the months before February '22, but the Western countries led by the Warmongers in the USA and Stoltenberg, would not even discuss the proposals, they wanted WAR. Well, they got war and now they wonder what to do about it. The longer they delay finding a way to stop the war, the worse they will find the Russians' demands are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The one you mention are/were executives. They are/were not the cause of the problem, which is the US's program of attacking and wrecking many different countries, in the name of bringing freedom and democracy to them. E.g. Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Yemen, sudan, Somalia and all the rest. If these countries had been left to themselves in peace, they would not need to send all their most active sons to seek their fortunes in Europe. Merkel, Von der Leyen, Junker, Blair and all those other nameless, people were administering the mess created by the "War on Drugs" and then "The War on Terror", which were dreamed up in Washinton DC.
(A side note: Before the "War on Drugs", we hardly had a drugs problem. Before the "War on Terror, there was much less terrorism.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
8:05 NATO is not weaker than it was, in February 2022, BUT, its real weakness has been exposed, like never before. "The mightiest military Machine the World has ever seen", with its massive armies, fleets of aircraft, thousands of tanks, limitless fleets of armoured vehicles of every sort, massive fleets patrolling the World's oceans and with the US at least, with military bases all over the World, etc., etc., that existed in the public imagination, has been shown to lack, not merely ammunition, but the ability to produce it in the quantities needed, in the requisite time-frame! It's expertise, has also suffered a terrible dimuniton in public estimation, for its reckless and frankly stupid, overestimation of the Ukrainians and its underestimation of the Russians. Its planning and forethought have also been shown to be severely deficient by the disaster that was the long-touted Offensive and its obvoius lack of any plan of what to do now that it is losing the war. ("Oops! We did not think of that!")
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@peterrinas3862 As Kissinger put it: (Or words to that effect) "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, to be a friend is fatal."
I am older than you, I worked in many dying companies in Britain. Post Margaret Thatcher, there were many of them. I applied for a job in a company that was not dying (It made machinery for making pet food.) I submitted a resume of my previous jobs, the interviewer said:" There is one thing I don't like about your resume, nearly every company you worked for has gone bankrupt!" I had to explain to him, that when companies were going out of business, staff left, but they still had orders to fulfil, so they had to employ people like me, on a temporary basis, to finish off the work.
Many of the companies I worked for, were in the process of moving their work to Germany. I think you were 30-50 years ahead of us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is no limit to the hypocrisy of the collective west. The "International Rules-Based Order" is a prime example. So long as the action is performed by the US or to support the US, it is OK with the rulers of the Collective West. The CW is very hot in support of "Human Rights", just so long as the human are not the original inhabitants of Diego Garcia, who under the International Rules-Based Order, it seems, have no rights at all!
Equally, Julian Assange has been imprisoned for many years, in England, that Great Bastion of Human Rights, for being suspected of being a publisher! (He has not been tried.) Then again, in the "Home of the Brave & the Land of the Free", Chelsea Manning has been imprisoned for many years for refusing to denounce Julian Assange.
This business over Afghan opium does not surprise me one bit. It is par for the course. As is, paying Tunisia to keep out refugees, most of whom are refugees because, in their so-called "War on Terrorism", the CW wrecked their countries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years!
The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease.
Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If, for example, a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it.
Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks well worth running.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Hur (Should that be "Hur?") verdict shows beyond all reasonable doubt, that the president, who it seems would be hard-pushed to run a sweet shop, is not running the USA. This means, that US "Democracy" is nothing of the sort, as the man elected to be in overall control is not. It also seems, that the woman elected to be his deputy, his stand-in, his vice President, is not running things either. As far as I can see (and I am largely ignorant of US Politics) the people who appear to be running the country's affairs, are all apointees. If it is not Nuland, Blinken, Sullivan and Burns who are in control, I wonder who is? Hunter?
1
-
I donot agree with this assessment of NATO at all.
After WW2 there was a very powerful MIC in the US and a lack of customers for it. The MIC itself was almost entirely privately owned. It needed customers to survive. It therefore invented "the Soviet threat", to persuade the population of the Western countries that they needed to buy large quantities of weapons to defend themselves from the imaginary threat posed by the Soviet Union. I say "imaginary" because at Yalta, Stalin, Churchill and FDR had carved up the World into sphere of influence which all of them, religiously, stuck to until the USSR finally collapsed.
At some time after the end of WW2, I don't know exactly when it happened, the practice of Lobbying (Bribery) was legalised and the MIC was effectivly able to buy Congressional support and with that, to buy the US government, which has been the situation ever since. Since that happened, the foreign policy of the US has been determined by the interests, not of the US people, but the interests of the MIC! It still is. Being a collection of greedy capitalists and their shareholders, it is willing to take horrendous risks with the safety of the World merely to increase their quarterly returns. Expanding NATO simply increases the revenue stream. It is an odd phenomenon. I cannot think of another example of the same or an analogous phenomenon in history, nor even from evolution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It occurs to me that the studies on hunter=gatherers are probably skewed, because modern hunter-gatherers are living in deserts, e.g. the Kalahari Desert, having been pushed out of more fertile places by farmers and pasturers, Prehistoric Europe, for example with a very low population, at least at first, must have been teeming with game of all sorts and sizes and far more vegetables and nuts that a dersert would offer. Hence it could have been, probably was, far less strenuous a life, than that of a modern hunter-gatherer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
53:00 Since when has the USA developed this dislike of dictators? As you yourself will be very aware, the USA supported the Colonels in Greece after WW2. In addition, they supported and protected a lot of dictators such as Franco in Spain, Salazar in Portugal, the Shah of Iran, King Farouk of Egypt, King Idris of Libya, Peron of Argentina and later his wife Evita, Marcos of the Philippines, Chiang Kai-shek of China, Syngman Rhee of South Korea, a succession of dictators in South Vietnam and so on and so forth. All of these were unashamedly Dictators. In addition the CIA has installed other dictators in other countries. So what has changed? Is it, perhaps, that dictators now are not Woke enough? Don't they like LBGTXVZ manifestations? Or are they opposed to installing separate toilets for 72 different genders? Perhaps someone in these comments can inform me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
9:51 It is not often I disagree with you, but I don't agree that the US objective of "Containing China" began around 1965. Even just after the end of WW2 when Chiang Kai-shek was fighting the Communists in China's revolution, the arms that Washinton gave to Chiang was just about enough to stop him losing (Or so they thought!). I think the fact is, traditionally, Great Powers do not want new Great powers. I don't think for example that Joseph Stalin was all that keen on having another Great Power in the World, even if it was another "Communist" power and therefore, presumably, an ally. The US thought, (I think) that the fight with the Chinese Communists would leave Nationalist China so exhausted that they would be very dependent on the US and Stalin started the Korean war and then backed out of it, believing that the US and China would weaken each other to his advantage, making China dependent on the USSR. As things turned out, it is clear that they both grossly underestimated the Chinese Communists and People. (Washington still does.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What is absolutely clear, is that suppression of free speech is anti-scientific. Without the freedom for anyone to express unpopular views, "Science" cannot progress. This has been shown over and over again. It really should not be neccessary to point it out now! It should never be forgotten that any censorship is like the ripples on a mill-pond, that show, that under the surface, something is going on! In other words, it is a confession, by the censor, that there is some TRUTH which needs to be covered up.
Anyone who reads the MSM will see on any and every day, stories which are obviously untrue. They almost always pass without anything being said about them. However, publish something true, that the government or the Big Pharma companies want suppressed, and you WILL find yourself in trouble .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lorenzomagazzeni5425 China is a country about the same size as the US. It use to be the case that some parts were so far from the main centres of population that it took weeks or even month to get there. With enemy organizations always trying to stir up trouble, it made it easier for them if the centre was weeks away. It was difficult to develop the outer parts of the country, because it was so hard to get people and things into and out of the far away places. If someone fell seriously ill, in some parts of old China, they would die before a doctor could get to them or they could get to a doctor (See a book by Josh Horne called "Away with all pests!") To develop the economy and to raise all people out of poverty it was neccessary to enable everybody to be able to trade with each other. So the government built roads to every village, masses of bridges to shorten routs and then railways. Evidently, they thought that while they were building a railway they might as well make it a high speed one. The result is that the interior of China is now developing rapidly. Instead of weeks it now takes a matter of hours to get from one end of the country to the other. People in remote villages can sell stuff on the internet by post and they do.
The problem with the wheels of an HST, is that the centrifugal force on a wheel rotating that fast is huge and unless the wheel is very strong it will fly to pieces. If you make it as a solid lump of steel the noise is terrible. The other problem is the bearings which have to be quite special, as otherwise they might seize up and derail the train, or as happened once in Germany a composite wheel came apart in the course of a journey, the rim of the wheel unrolled and came up through the floor of the carriage, passing between two people sitting there! The train left the track and IMMSMC hit a bridge. Quite a lot of people were killed.
Obviously, the railways are an important strategic asset too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem with western commentators is that they did not listen to what Putin said at the start of the SMO. To a western mind, the important thing in a war is how much territory is won. This war was/is not about territory, well, not primarily anyway, it is about political alignments. As Putin put it at the start of the SMO it is about "Demilitarizing, de-NA*Ifying and neutralizing Ukraine." Nothing about "conquering territory".
As the Russians regard Ukrainians as "Russians" they have tried, as far as winning the war will allow, to avoid civilian casualties, concentrating on hitting military targets with very precise missiles and guided bombs. The SMO, has killed fewer civilians in two-&-a-bit years, than Israel killed in two weeks in Gaza,
These factors explain why the Russians have been "so slow"! It's not that they are so weak, it is that they went slowly deliberately.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Privately-owned pharmaceutical firms have a built-in conflict of interest. They make their money from sick people. Their really ideal customers are those who are chronically sick but not so sick as to be unable to work. Being capitalist enterprises they have a duty to make as much money as possible for their shareholders. This in turn means that they have to be opposed to anything that tends to promote public health. A cured customer is a lost sale. A cure for a common disease is a thing to be avoided, what is needed (What they need.) is something which alleviates the suffering, costs a lot of money and does not cure the illness. In short, privately owned pharmaceutical companies are an OBVIOUSLY BAD IDEA.
Letting a body owned by privately owned pharmaceutical companies (Like the WHO.) make the laws for all countries, is self-evidently self-destructively stupid. Just ask yourself: "In whose interests are they going to work?" We should all oppose it!
Ideally, pharmaceutical research organizations would be owned by the governments of the World and private research would be strictly controlled and its results would be available to the World's pharmaceutical manufacturer. Apart from this, pharmaceutical research would be a monopoly of the international organization. This would solve a lot of problems, but crucially it would remove the conflict of interest. Governments, like ordinary people, want cures, not "treatments". They want healthy populations. There are also other benefits of international research organizations doing the research for the pharmaceutical industry. It removes all the problems over patents. It ensures equal access to all countries to the medicines their population needs. It means that there would be no "orphan" diseases, diseases that are too rare to be profitable to treat. There would be no incentive to replace satisfactory medications with newer, more profitable ones, just because they are more profitable. Above all, there would be no incentive to suppress cures.
Of course there would be disadvantages too. There would, no doubt, be complaints that the organization was "too burocratic" and inflexible, but the advantages would outweigh all the drawbacks. In my view, this arrangement must come, sooner or later. People must see and avoid the stupidity of the present set-up eventually.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reginaldmcnab3265 The MIC is the Military-Industrial Complex. It was noted by Eisenhower in his final speech as something that needed to be carefully watched. And Boy! Was he ever correct!
It should really be called "the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Media-Lobbying Complex". I call it "The Vicious Circle". It is a circular structure which is parasitic on the taxpayers and consists of the arms mfgs, the lobbying industry, the congress critters, the Media and the US government.
Money comes into Vicious Circle (VC) by government taxation and goes out to the media, as advertising by the arms mfgs, as wages and salaries to the employees and shareholders of the, arms mfgs, to the employees and shareholders of the lobbying firms and as election expenses to congress-crittters paid by the lobbyists, to those who vote (Or agree that they will vote) "the right way".
The congress-critters vote for the government to buy arms, the government pays the arms mfgs, the arms mfgs pay the lobbyists who tell the congress critters that if they vote the way they are told to vote, the lobbyist firm will help with their election expenses and that if they don't, the lobbyist will fund their opponent.
In addition, people who have important goverment or Military jobs during their working lives and use their positions to help the arms mfgs, get well-paid sinecures with the arms mfgs and consultancy fees from the MSM after they retire. This is known as "the Revolving Door".
This VC, is a group of relatively few people, but it is very, very rich, quite ruthless and extremely powerful. Its income depends on war, threats of wars and rumours of wars. Breaking it up will be extremely hard, but until it is and the arms-making industry is nationalised (preferably internationally) the World will never know peace.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2:04 There is not much mystery about how Hamas got its weapons. Hamas is a totally fraudulent organization. It was set up by the CIA and the Israeli secret service, to discredit the Palestinian cause. It is, in that, like all the other Jihadist, fanatical Muslim sect-based organizations, such as Al Qaida, IS, ISIS, ISL, The Taliban, Boko Haram and no doubt many others. None of them are really fighting for the Arabs or for Islam, they are all dedicated to creating fear and chaos, preventing the area from developing, increasing arms sales and providing an excuse for the US to come in and "Provide Security".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are so right! Since the beginning of the Cold War, the USA and the collective West, have known that there was no Soviet/Russian plan to conquer the rest of the World, not even a part of Western Europe. The "Russian Invasion Sccare", was always a means to direct money towards the US's MIC. It still is.
The "Chinese scare" is a rather newer fraud, but it is just as fraudulent. The real fear of the Warmongers of Washington, is that China will grow stronger economically and militarily, than is the CW. Why is that scary?
It is Scary because of "Projection". The USA bullies other weaker nations, because it can without dire consequences to itself and it is advantageous for the US to do so. They think therefore, that if any country becomes more powerful than they are, that country will treat them similarly. Personally, I am convinced that neither Russia nor China will behave in that way. It looks as though we are going to find out fairly soon!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is a comment I have made elsewhere, but I'll risk showing it again. I agree with what you are saying in this video entirely.
It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers, before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks with barium and antibiotics, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years!
The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders, the job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease.
Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it.
Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks, worth running.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I drove an A35 for many years, I endorse everything you said about this. They were very similar cars, they looked very similar but irritatingly, they were just slightly different, so a bit of the bodywork of an A30 could not be used to substitute damaged parts on the A35. I swapped the engine (I think it was about 1litre) for that out of a Triumph. Iirc it was a1240cc engine, and I also swapped the brakes with disc brakes from the Triumph too, as I got so fed up with replacing the brake pads in the front drum brakes. There was no problem doing the swap, as they were identical parts in both cars. It would go 60mph, but not for long as the valves would burn out at that speed pretty quickly. On the whole, treated correctly, a reliable and convenient car and very easy and economical to drive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:32:20 The Conflict did not begin (as I know you know) in 2022 but in 2014. I wonder why the Russians are demanding security for everyone in EUROPE? By the time Russia has defeated N@0 in Ukraine, it will in effect, have defeated N@0 altogether, so why not, while they are at it, demand security guarantees for everybody? As I have said before, there is one easily identifiable threat to World Peace, which is privately owned arms manufacturers. They have a built-in need for wars, threats of wars and rumours of wars to maintain their profitability. They are not a neccesary part of society and, in my view, should be banned world-wide, They also have a clear record, particularly in the modern United States, but I dare say, that if one looks carefully, you can find their malign influence going back into ancient history. Until they are banned, I fear that the World will not know peace for any great period of time. I am not alone in understanding this, General (President) Eisenhower too, understood this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
32:51 I heard a somewhat similar story from two men who fought in the Resistance in WW2 in Belgium. There was a coal mine which had all its machinery driven by compressed air to avoid sparks that might cause explosions and to provide ventiliation at the same time. This mine was particularly important, because the coal was suitable for producing fuel for Jet Fighters. The Resistance was given orders from London, to destroy the functioning of the mine , but in a way that would not permanently disable it, "As the owners of the mine, who were in London would not allow that" (!).
The compressed air was produced by a turbo-compressor, driven by an electric motor and it was housed in a small building near the entrance to the mine. The entrance to the mine and the compressor house, were inside an electrified barbed wire fence guarded by a unit of the Gestapo. The Resistance men did their research and found that the electricity that supplied the compressor, went from the sub-station for the mine to the compressor house by a tunnel which was blocked at both ends.
They gambled that the Gestapo did not know of the existence of the tunnel and to make sure that the great majority of the guards would be watching the fence they distributed leaflets announcing that they were planning a mass attack on the mine on the night they were planning to attack it.
On the night in question, about five men IIRC, went along the tunnel and lifted the manhole cover that gave access to the inside of the compressor house and overpowered the two men looking after the compressor. They then put 1kg explosive charges on both ends of the compressor and another on the exposed bearing of the electric motor and two more inside the crates containing the spare compressor. (The owners of the mine had contacted the Swiss firm that made the compressor to ensure that no spare would be supplied before the end of the war.) They then set time fuses and left the same way they had come, taking the two mechanics they had captured with them. When the explosives went off, the turbine disintegrated and the flying turbine blades killed a large number of the Gestapo guards.
One of the men telling me this story said: "And one of the most satisfying things about it was, that when I went later with an American unit, to Aachen we passed dozens of Messerschmitt 262s in hangars on the roadside, that had not been used, that could not be used, because there was no fuel for them."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The whole of the working people of Poland are under attack. Farmers and fishermen are the foundations of society. They do not have the prestige, the recognition they deserve, because they are literally the MOST IMPORTANT people in society. The most basic "human right" is to food and water. Without a reliable supply of food, nothing can take place. Unless the supply of food is assured, nothing very constructive can happen, because everyone will be too busy looking for food. Therefore, all the working people of Poland should unite to either force the government to change their policy, or, probably, better, to resign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't know. I am not privy to the Chinese government's thinking, but it occurs to me to ask what is their cumulative death from Covid figure now and are their excess deaths running high or are they normal? Since I suspect, that the coyness of our (UK, US) governments over the vaccination status of people dying these days in the west, is connected to a suspicion that the deaths and the dead's Covid status are related, and as the Chinese have overwhelmingly been (where vaccinated at all) vaccinated with non-mRNA vaccines, it would make an interesting comparison. (Apologies for the length of that sentence!) It is also notable that the authoritarian Chinese government has not imposed any mandates on people to get vaccinated and have on the contrary, told employers that forcing their employees to get vaccinated is illegal.
Last time I saw a figure for the cumulative, Chinese, death from Covid total, it was very, very much smaller than other countries'. I imagine that if this is still true, this is their rational for continuing with their apparently counter-productive "Zero Covid" policy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
20:17 "there hasn't been the incentive to keep those factories" Yes, there hasn't, because the heads of government and NATO, knew, despite all their scary rhetoric, that the Russians were not planning on invading the West. Not even a weeny little bit! If they had thought that the Russians were really planning what they said they were planning, they would have been guilty of a gross dereliction of duty!
The late Victorian governments faced much the same problem with respect to the production of small arms. When they had a small colonial war, they had to go to the manufacturers of rifles (sporting gun manufactures) and get them to produce a large number of rifles in a short space of time, with all the problems you could expect from that MO. In particular, having all these guns from different manufacturers, meant that it was not possible to cannibalize damaged rifles, i.e. use parts from one damaged piece to repair another damaged one. Around 1880, they decided that they had to solve this problem, once and for all and they decided that the Royal Arsenal at Woolwich should make the army's rifles. They sent a commission to Massachusetts to buy the most up-to-date and accurate machinery available. This arrangement solved the problem and was only ended in the 1950s, when the same machines were still making the bolt action Lee-Enfield rifles used by the British army at that time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
20:25 "We have to be able to defend ourselves." Against whom? You can't conquer a country with aircraft, you need boots on the ground. So who are you afraid off? Is it the Mexicans? The Canadians? You have the Pacific Ocean one side and the Atlantic Ocean on the other. The statement is self-serving rubbish. It is cover, for the delusional feeling that the Americans have allowed themselves: that they have to be the TOP Dog in the World. This I think, is pure "Projection". The Americans think, that because they use their strength to bully other countries, if any country became strong enough to be able to resist them, they would do the same to the Americans. It is a form of psychological illness.
However, this "Illness" is very difficult to treat because the "Elite" are in the Vicious Circle, I have described earlier and it is very profitable to them. They, not the voters, control US Foreign Policy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
About the decision of the British government to send depleted Uranium weapons to Ukraine. This may look like a decision which may have a very damaging effect on the people of the Ukraine and Russia. What the "people" who made this decision may not have taken into account is that a lot of food that is grown in Ukraine is eaten in Europe. The danger of DU is that when a tank is hit by a DU shell, the DU catches fire and DU smoke settles on the ground. It then becomes part of the soil and some of it s absorbed by the plants that grow there. This food may be eaten directly by humans (e.g. as bread or flour) or it may be fed to animals, Either way, it may end up in an unborn child and if a single atom decays in a cell of that child, it may cause a mutation resulting in a hideous mutation, as Iraqis are finding out at the moment. Since DU is only mildly radio-active, it has a very long half-life, so this incredibly evil decision, may have consequences all over the world, for centuries to come, but particularly in Europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
31:37 I agree with Col MacGregor about the Donors, absolutely. These are at the heart of the existential problem facing the World. I have posted this idea elsewhere on the net and I would be very interested to hear comments on it.
At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers, As the loop is circular in nature we can start anywhere, Let's start with the congress critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that hold the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This WSJ report is codswallop! It an obvious attempt to cloud the waters and hide their guilt. The story that it was done by amateurs is ridiculous! The account that is most believable, is the one published by Cy Hersh, which though it may be wrong in minor details, is almost certainly basicly right overall. US officials, including President Biden, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland , and another state Department official, I forget whether it was Admiral Kirby or Jake Sullivan said it was going to get rid of the Nordstream pipelines. Biden said it twice! They had the motive. They had the means. They had the opportunity. They controlled the area. They had the professionals with the expertise needed to do the deed. Does one need more? Even if it were true that Ukraine, was involved, it would not signify, because Ukraine is run by a US puppet government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Everyone who has been interested in the War in Syria, has known from a long time back, that ISIS, ISIL, IS, Al Qaida and all the rest of these bodies were US proxies.
At the start, in 2011, it seemed that angry Syrians were attacking the government of Syria and then, that this group suddenly became overpoweringly powerful. The alarmed US came in to fight them, (uninvited) but they continued to gain ground, in spite of the best efforts of the US to halt them. Over the years from 2011 to autmn 2015, ISIS got stronger and stronger and ruled a larger and larger Califate carved out of Syria, Jordan and Iraq. No one could stop them! The US bombed them continuously, but they continued to grow and to conquer more territory and to control a bigger population. The greatest mystery though was : who was financing them??? No one seemed to know!
Then the Russians came to the aid of the Syrian government and ISIS (or whatever it was called at that time) started to lose ground. Then the Russians showed aerial photos, of the convoys of hundreds of oil tankers, carrying Syrian oil off to Turkey and Israel and the mystery of ISIS's finances was solved! The US "bombing of ISIS was shown up as make-believe and shadow-boxing, and ISIS as a US proxy. The rest is better known.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Until NATO started really "Poking the Bear" hard, there was no danger to guard against. The German government policy was rational until very recently. Of course, if you are going to provoke an armed conflict with a neighbour, it is as well to find out how capable he is before you start! It seems that the Collective West, made the potentially fatal mistake of believing their own propaganda about Russia's feebleness, corruption, stupidity, laziness, cowardice, disorganization, dud equipment, "a gas-station masquerading as a country" and so on and so forth. They, obviously thought, that the barrage of sanctions, they imposed, would crash the Russian economy and the Ukrainians would crush the Russian army, (if the Russians even had the nerve to respond militarily to their challenge, (which was massacring 14,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians between 2014 and 24/2/22 and threatening ethnic cleansing of the rest.) They thought, apparently, that the crashing economy and the military defeat would lead to a "color revolution" in Moscow that would remove Putin and install a pro-western government. They were wrong on all counts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes. I am sure you are right in this video, but what hubris! What arrogance this betrays! These people in WDC must either have some "secret weapon" that none of us have any inkling of or they are right out of touch with reality. Firstly what sort of "wedge" do they think they are going to use to separate Russia from China? For a start, both countries know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that they "either hang together or will hang separately". Together, they are probably at least equal to the US militarily. Economically, they are much stronger than the US. Economically, the USA are very dependent on supplies of vital raw materials from both. Financially, they have just, gratuitously, shot themselves in both feet! Truly a case of "Whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem the NATO forces (Which is what the Ukrainian forces really are) have, is they are being trained in a style of warfare appropriate to Iraq or Serbia. This war differs from any previous war in that both sides can see the other side's every move, there are hundreds, or maybe thousands of drones in the air at any time, watching the enemy. There are satellites, on both sides, watching the battle space and relaying information back to their controllers constantly. There is no such thing as a "Surprise Attack"! The Ukrainians have not found a way to overcome the minefields, in front of the Russians defensive lines. When (if) they do and they get to the first Russian defense line, the real, hard, fighting will start.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"How does the anti-war and anti-us movement get labeled as FAR RIGHT??"
The NA*Is were/are Far Right and that gave the term "Far Right" a bad name. Therefore, the Powers That Be and their MSM, label as "Far Right"any entity (Person or organization) they don't like. "Far Right" is just another "Cuss-word". It has nothing to do with the policies of the entities so designated. Twisting the political terms around in this fashion, is all part of a deliberate, Owellian effort to make politcal discussion difficult and confusing.
In the same way and at the same time, as part of the same effort, "Left Wing" which used to be associated with Workers' rights, womens' rights, minority rights, peace movements, National Liberation movements, Revolutionary movements, trade unions, etc., has now been twisted around to mean precisely the opposite!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The point that you, and all Western commentators seem unable to grasp, is that the Russians are not all that interested in taking and holding territory. At the start of the "SMO", Putin stated the Russian aims as "prevent Ukraine joining NATO, to de-militarise Ukraine and to de-NA*Ify Ukraine". Nothing, about gaining a lot of ground. Unlike the Ukrainian government, which seems to have an obsession about holding onto "every millimetre of territory", even when it costs a mountain of killed and wounded, as was seen in Bachmut, the Russians have looked at the disposition of forces and when they saw that they were locally weak, they withdrew to a more easily defended position.
In the result the Russians have largely done what they set out to do. Not only is Ukraine de-militarized, but NATO seems to be very short of weapons, most of the NA*I battalions are dead and Ukraine is not (Officially) part of NATO. Maybe the Russian aims are now changing, we shall have to wait and see, but there can be very little doubt they have done what they set out to do. It's mostly over, bar the shouting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nickiemcnichols5397 Ignorance is popular because people are often very lazy, particularly about thinking and searching. In the modern world it is possible to get away with being lazy, albeit at a fairly low level unless you inherit wealth.
Some months ago, I read a very interesting article (or saw a very interesting video, I forget which) about why the Chinese are so tough and so smart. The idea of this piece was that the ancient Chinese system was ruthlessly meritocratic, unlike most societies you did not automatically inherit your father's position in society. E.g. if your father was a duke you did not inherit his title you had a lesser title and unless you earned merit, you son would inhert a still less important title and so on. Jobs in the civil service, (the main route to wealth) could be gained only by passing exams. So, if an obviously bright child was born he would be schooled to pass the exams. This was expensive, so in a poor family, the extended family would all rally round to pay for the child's education, because having a relative working in the civil service benefitted the whole family. The law meanwhile, was very hard on anyone who tried to prevent anyone from sitting for the entrance exam.
At the same time getting married was also expensive and poor men had a poor chance of getting married. So to pass on his genes, a man who could not pass the exams, had to work very hard to be able to afford a wife. The stupid and the lazy often did not manage to do that. So, for several thousand years, you had a ruthless weeding out of the stupid and lazy and a promotion of the bright. It shows!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Interesting and important program. What I wonder is how far back does this group's control of the West go? Prof Hudson, in his book, "Forgive Them Their Debts" points out that the Babylonian, Sumerian and Egyptian civilizations lasted for thousands of years. The Roman Empire lasted a much shorter time and all the European Empires since, have collapsed after a few hundred years at the most. The reason the older civilizations lasted so long, he says, is because every now and again, the King or Emperor would declare a Jubilee, which meant that all debts were cancelled. This meant that even people who were slaves through indebtedness, were freed and that very rich, who were owed a lot of money, were suddenly much less rich and hence, less powerful. The Romans broke with this tradition and it has never been revived since. Each Empire since, has collapsed in indebtedness and corruption. It looks to me as though the Collective West is going the same way. The group I am thinking about, seem to really really hate the Babylonian Empire, even after all this time! I wonder why? Did they also take over the running of the Roman Empire before it collapsed? Have they been controlling every Western Empire since? It looks to me as though they took control of the British Empire after the collapse of the British Revolution of 1644. Somethime around 1700.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't know how it is in the RAF, but in the army, to become an officer you need to be from a rich family. The way poor, bright, lads are filtered out, is very simple, officers' mess fees are more than a second lieutenant's salary. So already, the intake is restricted and the result is a quite extraordinary number of really stupid people in senior positions. In my NS, I met only one really intelligent officer and one moderately intelligent one and far too many prize idiots. The intelligent one, whose mother, BTW, was Indian, left to join the Gurkars. These days, I see only soldiers turned politician and those that act as TV pundits and they are no more impressive than the officers I encountered as a squaddie,
Do you, by any chance, understand why the British government is so obssessive about capturing Crimea? Is it something to do with revenge for the defeat in the Crimean War? If not, what is it about?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You describe this report as hard-hitting. To my mind it is not hard-hitting enough. It is abundantly clear that unless there were some simply amazing coincidences, some people were aware not only that a pandemic was, so to say, "in the works" but when it was going to strike. For example there was a conference involving Bill Gates which gamed the pandemic about three months before it struck and at least one pharmaceutical company was working on a vaccine against it, before the pandemic started.
On another point it is certainly true that some of the scientists who were working on gain-of-function research have admitted as much and if I remember correctly, the REASON that the NIH sent the research to Wuhan was that GoF research had been outlawed in the US!
The labs that the Russians discovered in Ukraine had been working on organisms which Victoria Nuland was alarmed might fall into Russian hands. Vide her congressional testimony under oath.)
Also there were numerous published (Sic!) papers on closely-related viruses both by the Wuhan Lab and by the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill laboratory.
There are "secret" bio-weapons research labs all over the world (Mostly like the one in Ukraine, funded by the US Department of Defense) and this pandemic could potentially have come from any of them. There are of course, others funded by other countries. To my mind the dangers of a really dangerous virus coming out of Nature by accident are vastly less than the dangers of a Lab-Leak of really dangerous pathogens designed to kill people coming from bioweapons research labs. I think therefore, that research should be rigorously confined to finding ways of dealing with, that is curing, the diseases that we already suffer from. The alternative is ridiculously dangerous. Engaging in such evil research should be considered a crime against humanity.
1
-
The governments over the years have followed policies that have come back to bite them now. They have failed to fund the development of tidal power, which while not continuous in any one place can be effectively continuous, because the tides happen at different times in different places. It has failed to fund adequately, the development of geothermal power, which is continuous, it has failed to build new nuclear power stations in time and to cap it all, it has had a lot of bad luck, in that the French nuclear power stations, which supplied a lot of cheap power to Britain, cannot do so at the moment because the drought affecting France has left the power stations there bereft of cooling water, while the Norwegian hydroelectric power stations are affected by drought also, as are, I imagine, British hydroelectric power stations too. On top of that wind turbines have produced less than expected because of a lack of wind. Then of course there is the issue of sanctions - a strictly, and willfully self-inflicted injury if ever there was! Probably, most of the British government's policy on power generation can be explained on the assumption that it was was designed to suit the major oil companies, as for example the decision to sell off the North Sea oil and gas fields to them. No doubt, they are large contributors to the Conservative party's funds and, maybe the Labour party's also.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There needs to be an international law against private arms manufacturers. They have proved over and over again that they cannot be trusted. The business of all private capitalist firms is to make money. Arms manufacturers make most money when there is a war or the threat of a war. Therefore they work assiduously to stir up trouble, the more the merrier!
Governments on the other hand, (When not corrupted) are concerned to spend as little money as possible. Therefore, government owned arms firms are concerned to produce arms which are effective, robust, easily serviced, cheap to produce, easy to use or better still (if possible given the political situation) to downsize!
Another idea, perhaps, easier to achieve, is a law banning politicians or politicians' families from owning shares in arms companies or "working" for them, even after they retire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I worked for a short while in Central Instrument-making workshop of the Akademie der Wissenschaften in Ardlershof, Berlin. In the DDR at that time, they had difficulty in getting the screws they needed, so they made their own. They had a huge encyclopedia-like book called "Deutscher Industrie Normen" Which specified, in enormoous detail the dimentoins and tolerances of everything imaginable. It even specified the radius of the bevel on the edge of the screwdriver-slot in the head of a screw. The tool that they used for making these screws was a special lathe, the headstock of which, together with the chuck gould slide towards or away from the tailstock. On the outer end of the headstock you could mount what they called "Ein Patron" (a cartridge) which was an externally threaded tube made of hard steel. about 3cms in diameter, this cartridge was matched by another piece, I think it may have been bronze which was half a nut of the same pitch. This half-nut was easily mounted on an arm which pivoted about a shaft mounted on the lathe bed. The simple v-shaped or square-shaped cutting tool was mounted on the cross-slide, which had a simple handle to push the cross-slide in as far as the adjustable stop would allow. In use, the stop was set for the first cut, the tool was pushed as far as the stop would allow, the headstock was set to rotate and the half-nut was engaged with the cartridge. The work piece then moved forward towards the cutting tool and the first cut was made. When the half nut was disengaged from the carteidge, the headstoch was pulled back to its resting place and the cutting tool was retracted at the same time Then the stop was reset and and the next cut was made. The screw-blanks were made on a standard capstan lathe as a seperate operation. It was surprisingly quick and easy to use this machine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The usual avoidance of mentioning SANCTIONS! What a load of misleading cobblers'! Russia ha s been a very reliable supplier right up to the present year and the recent rise in the price of gas was caused, not by Russia cutting supplies , but by the bean-counters in Brussels thinking that they could buy gas cheaper on the spot market, than the price Russia charged for long term contracts. It was true that SOMETIMES it is possible to buy gas cheaper on the spot-market, but one cannot rely on it. Just as one can sometimes buy almost anything cheaper on the spot market, so one can sometimes get gas at a bargain price, but industry needs a reliable supply and that is exactly what Russia has been, even all through the Cold war. Europe has put sanctions on Russia, thinking, even saying, (!) that they thought it was going to crash the Russian economy and lead to "Regime Change" in Russia. Well, it didn't work and now we, the people of Europe have to live with the consequences of our Masters' foolishness. So far, the only Russian retaliation ha s been to say: "if you want our gas you'll have to pay for it in roubles." which is nothing to what they could have done. If our leaders keep poking them, we may soon find out. They a) do not rely on selling gas to live and b) they will have no trouble selling gas and oil outside Europe and the USA. Incidentally, the USA, for all its earnest warnings, is itself, busy importing Russian oil as I write.
The obvious cure for the "problem" of the gas shortage is to cut the cr*p and open NS2.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
55:21 Before the 1880s, the UK government used to get into a war and then find it did not have enough e.g. rifles. So, at vast expense to the taxpayer, it would dish out contracts (No doubt to the right people) to manufacture rifles. Then when the war stopped the orders would cease and the companies either went bankrupt or turned to making something else. Sometime in the 1880s Parliament decided to set up a commission to look into ways of improving this situation. One of their particular requirements was that the rifles should have interchangeable parts. I.e. if a two rifles were damaged beyond repair the undamaged parts from both could be cannibalized to make another rifle, This required a degree of precision that British machine tools of that time did not have. Eventually, the commission decided that the idea of sourcing standardized rifles from different private companies was a non-starter and they said that the manufacture of guns should be nationalized and the work be given to The Royal Arsenal. They also found that they could get machine tools capable of the required precision, from the machine tool factories in Massachusetts. These machines were bought and installed in the Royal Arsenal and produced rifles and other guns throughout the WW1 and WW2 and were still in use when I started doing my National service.
In the 1980s I worked in the maintenance department of an English factory, employing about 150 people. I was told that the department had no current head, as the young, newly qualified Engineer who had been given the job, had been shown the department's only lathe (made sometime during Victoria's reign) and had asked: "But where is the keyboard?" On being told that that was not the way it was controlled he had resigned.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BertoxolusThePuzzled The universities such as Cambridge and Oxford, Paris, Heidelberg, and Padua were, as you say, founded by the RC Church. However, as they were set up to study everything, not just how to be a priest, they naturally, over time, caused the people in them to question things and spot the contradictions in the Bible. (Which most "ordinary" people did not ever read for themselves). This led to disputes over dogma and eventually to the "Reformation".
1