Youtube comments of Antony Wooster (@antonywooster6783).

  1. 492
  2. 492
  3. 384
  4. 342
  5. 317
  6. 233
  7. 205
  8. 184
  9. 161
  10. 159
  11. 158
  12. 142
  13. 140
  14. 140
  15. 139
  16. 137
  17. 132
  18. 132
  19. 125
  20. 122
  21. 122
  22. 120
  23. 118
  24. 115
  25. 113
  26. 111
  27. 110
  28. 108
  29. 104
  30. 100
  31. 99
  32. 98
  33. 95
  34. 93
  35. 93
  36. 90
  37. 88
  38. 87
  39. 86
  40. 86
  41. 85
  42. 85
  43. 85
  44. 84
  45. 84
  46. 82
  47. 79
  48. 72
  49. 71
  50. 71
  51. 70
  52. 69
  53. 68
  54. 67
  55. 67
  56. 66
  57. 66
  58. 66
  59. 65
  60. 65
  61. 64
  62. 64
  63. 64
  64. 63
  65. 63
  66. 62
  67. 62
  68. 60
  69. 60
  70. 59
  71. 59
  72. 58
  73. 58
  74. 58
  75. 57
  76. 57
  77. 56
  78. 56
  79. 54
  80. 54
  81. 54
  82. 53
  83. 53
  84. 53
  85. 52
  86. 52
  87. 51
  88. 51
  89. 51
  90. 50
  91. 50
  92. 50
  93. 50
  94. 49
  95. 49
  96. 49
  97. 48
  98. 47
  99. 47
  100. 46
  101. 46
  102. 46
  103. 45
  104. 44
  105. 44
  106. 44
  107. 44
  108. 43
  109. 42
  110. 42
  111. 42
  112. 42
  113. 41
  114. 41
  115. 41
  116. 41
  117. 41
  118. 40
  119. 40
  120. 39
  121. 38
  122. 38
  123. 38
  124. "It doesn't allow competition" For once you are talking ignorant rubbish. About half the Chinese economy is private, The private sector makes about 40% of the GDP, employs about 60% of the work force. There is consequently a lot of competition. You are making a typically western mistake, you think that China is modelled on the USSR. It's not and it never has been. From well before the declaration of the PRC 2/10/1949. the communist part of China, has had a mixed economy, part state, part cooperative, part capitalist. The Chinese Communists, realized from the start of the revolution that they could not plan everything and it would be a bad idea to try, so they nationalized the foundations of the economy and left the rest to private enterprise. The result was many more of the peoples' needs were catered for than happened in the USSR. At the same time they ensured that the foundations of the economy, food, education, transport, electricity, medical services, roads, railways, canals, water supply, the military, the police and so on were under government control or were government owned, but most consumer goods were made by privately or cooperatively owned firms. By the time I went to China, I had visited many of the countries in the Warsaw Pact and I had also been to Moscow and I knew of the poor selection of goods available or missing in those economies. I had worked for a while in the DDR, so I was rather surprised on first seeing China (In 1964.) The first thing that struck me was that everything looked freshly painted in bright colours! Then when I went shopping there was an amazing selection of goods on offer. It formed a rather odd contrast to the people, who at that time were all dressed in blue or grey Mao suits. But the variety of goods was certainly there. Now, of course, there is "rampant capitalism" as is, I would have thought, pretty well known. The difference from the West is that the capitalists are not allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Those that get carried away by their huge wealth and think that they can tell the government what to do, get put in their place fairly quickly. E.g. Jack Ma.
    38
  125. 38
  126. 38
  127. 38
  128. 37
  129. 37
  130. 37
  131. 37
  132. 37
  133. 36
  134. 36
  135. 36
  136. 36
  137. 35
  138. 35
  139. 35
  140. 34
  141. 34
  142. 34
  143. 34
  144. 34
  145. 34
  146. 33
  147. 33
  148. 33
  149. 33
  150. 33
  151. 32
  152. 32
  153. 32
  154. 32
  155. 32
  156. 31
  157. 31
  158. 31
  159. 31
  160. 31
  161. 31
  162. 31
  163. 30
  164. 30
  165. 30
  166. 30
  167. 30
  168. 30
  169. 30
  170. 29
  171. 29
  172. 29
  173. 29
  174. 29
  175. 29
  176. 29
  177. 29
  178. 28
  179. 28
  180. 28
  181. 28
  182. 28
  183. 28
  184. 28
  185. 28
  186. 27
  187. 27
  188. 27
  189. 27
  190. 27
  191. 27
  192. 27
  193. 26
  194. 26
  195. 26
  196. 26
  197. 26
  198. 26
  199. 26
  200. 26
  201. 25
  202. 25
  203. 25
  204. 25
  205. 25
  206. 25
  207. 25
  208. 25
  209. 25
  210. 25
  211. 24
  212. 24
  213. 24
  214. 24
  215. 24
  216. 23
  217. 23
  218. 23
  219. 23
  220. 23
  221. 23
  222. 23
  223. 23
  224. 23
  225. 23
  226. 23
  227. 23
  228. 23
  229. 23
  230. 22
  231. 22
  232. 22
  233. 22
  234. 22
  235. 22
  236. 50:45 The weakness of this discussion is that it ignores the way that there was an underlying sympathy in Britain (Churchill and many British aristocrats) and in America (General Grove, John Foster Dulles)) for the N*zis, which sympathy survived WW2 and was expressed not only in "Operation Paperclip" and the analogous Japanese operation, but also in the wholesale adoption and incorporation of the Gehlen Organization and its use to harass the Soviet Union, not only, but particularly in Ukraine. IOW this cultivation of the extreme right-wing elements in Ukraine is not something that started in 2014 but goes back at least to 1945. Nor should one, in this context, forget that the original idea to research the possibility of making atom-bombs, it seems was NOT "in case the Germans got there first" but in order to defeat the USSR. Seeing how friendly NATO was with almost every F*scist dictatorship there was in the world, (Spain, Portugal, Egypt, Libya, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Greece, Vietnam, China, South Korea, Indonesia, Philippines etc., etc.) and how the US intervened in liberation movements to install F*scist governments, (Iran, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, etc.) it seems to me that the "Political West" was not some relatively innocuous aspect of Western Society or civilization, but more like a powerful F*scist crusade. Put it another way: what would you call people who organize, finance, arm, protect and support in every possible way, F*scists? Liberals? Democrats? Philanthropists?
    22
  237. 22
  238. 22
  239. 22
  240. 22
  241. 22
  242. 22
  243. 1:22:26 It seems to me that the insecurity that plagues the World and has done so since 1945, is almost entirely caused by a small group of warmongers in Washington DC and their hangers-on in London and Brussels. These people form what I call for lack of a better term (I think that no one has given this phenomenon a name previously.) a "vicious circle". It consists of a complex of several parts; the USG, the firms making military arms, the members of the Congress and the Senate and the lobbyist industy, insofar as it relates to the arms industry. These components form a self-reiforcing ring-structure, where the congresscritters and USG officials are investing in the arms industry and profit from its dividedends and the notorious "Revolving door". The arms industry, in turn pays the Lobbyists to keep the congress-critters in line, by subsidizing their election expenses and the USG fuells the whole set-up by extracting taxes willy-nilly from the US public. It seems to me that so long as this Vicious Circle exists, there will be no peace in the World. Because it is very stable, ruthless and self-protective, it is very difficult for anyone or any ordinary organization to dismantle it. However, the present and the near future are far from ordinary times. As there is almost certainly going to be a Russian victory in Ukraine, it seems to me that the Russians would be in a position to insist on the dismantling of this Vicious Circle, which could be done by making an International law that said that all firms making military equipment, had to be state owned and that no private individual or corporation was allowed to own shares in such a firm. I think it might be much easier to get agreement to such a measure than to agree to complete disarmament.
    22
  244. 22
  245. 22
  246. 22
  247. 21
  248. 21
  249. 21
  250. 21
  251. 21
  252. 21
  253. 21
  254. 21
  255. 21
  256. 20
  257. 20
  258. 20
  259. 20
  260. 20
  261. 20
  262. 20
  263. 20
  264. 20
  265. 20
  266. 20
  267. 20
  268. 20
  269. 20
  270. 20
  271. 20
  272. 20
  273. 19
  274. 19
  275. 19
  276. 19
  277. 19
  278. 19
  279. 19
  280. 19
  281. 19
  282. 19
  283. 19
  284. 19
  285. 19
  286. 19
  287. 19
  288. 19
  289. 19
  290. 18
  291. 18
  292. 18
  293. 18
  294. 18
  295. 18
  296. 18
  297. 18
  298. 18
  299. 18
  300. 18
  301. 18
  302. 18
  303. 18
  304. 18
  305. 18
  306. 18
  307. 17
  308. 17
  309. 17
  310. 17
  311. 17
  312. 17
  313. 17
  314. 17
  315. 17
  316. 17
  317. 17
  318. 17
  319. 17
  320. 17
  321. 17
  322. 17
  323. 16
  324. 16
  325. 16
  326. 16
  327. 16
  328. 16
  329. 16
  330. 16
  331. 16
  332. 16
  333. 16
  334. 16
  335. 16
  336. 16
  337. 16
  338. 16
  339. 16
  340. 15
  341. 15
  342. 15
  343. 15
  344. 15
  345. 15
  346. 15
  347. 15
  348. 15
  349. 15
  350. 15
  351. 15
  352. 15
  353. 15
  354. 15
  355. 15
  356. 15
  357. 15
  358. 15
  359. 15
  360. 15
  361. 15
  362. 15
  363. 15
  364. 14
  365. 14
  366. 14
  367. 14
  368. 14
  369. 14
  370. 14
  371. 14
  372. 14
  373. 14
  374. 14
  375. 14
  376. 14
  377. 14
  378. 14
  379. 14
  380. 14
  381. 14
  382. 14
  383. 14
  384. 14
  385. 14
  386. 14
  387. 13
  388. 13
  389. 13
  390. 13
  391. 13
  392. 13
  393. 13
  394. 13
  395. 13
  396. 13
  397. 13
  398. 13
  399. 13
  400. 13
  401. 13
  402. 13
  403. 13
  404. 13
  405. 13
  406. 13
  407. 13
  408. 13
  409. 13
  410. 13
  411. 13
  412. 13
  413. 13
  414. 13
  415. 13
  416. 13
  417. 13
  418. 13
  419. 13
  420. 12
  421. 12
  422. 12
  423. 12
  424. 12
  425. 12
  426. 12
  427. 12
  428. 12
  429. 12
  430. 12
  431. 12
  432. 12
  433. 12
  434. 12
  435. 12
  436. 12
  437. 12
  438. 12
  439. 12
  440. 12
  441. 12
  442. 12
  443. 12
  444. 12
  445. 12
  446. It seems that reactionaries tend to put their faith in Wunderwaffen. The Germans did it in WW2. First they thought that the Blitzkrieg, would bring the UK to the negotiating table. It nearly did but they reckoned without the hatred they had stirred up. Then they thought that their superior Luftwaffe would destroy the RAF. Because the UK had a brilliant General in Dowding and brave and generous pilots, that did not happen. Then they thought that the V1 would bring the UK to its knees. It didn't. Then the V2 was going to do it. It didn't. They were using some of their best scientist to research flying saucers and thought transference. They still lost the war. They even declared war on the US! In Ukraine, the war was going to be decided by Javelins. (Some Ukrainians actually named their new-born children after this WW!) Then it was the Stinger. Then it was the Turkish Bayrackter Drone. Then the HYMARS. Now we have the Storm Shadow and the Patriot. After that comes the F-16. What the NATO forces really need is old fashioned artillery shells and this, it seems, is impossible to obtain in time. The Russians on the other hand have no Wunderwaffen. They have heavy, old fashioned, hardwearing artillery, masses of ammunition, masses of tough old fashioned tanks, masses of accurate guided missiles, masses of accurate guided bombs, masses of lethal drones and masses of observation drones and motivated soldiers and they are winning. None of the Wunderwaffen so far has helped to turn the tide of war, which the Russians have been "losing" all along. Strange that. Innit?
    11
  447. 11
  448. 11
  449. 11
  450. 11
  451. 11
  452. 11
  453. 11
  454. 11
  455. 11
  456. 11
  457. 11
  458. 11
  459. 11
  460. 11
  461. 11
  462. 11
  463. 11
  464. 11
  465. 11
  466. 11
  467. 11
  468. 11
  469. 11
  470. 11
  471. 11
  472. 11
  473. 11
  474. 11
  475. 11
  476. 11
  477. 11
  478. 11
  479. 10
  480. 10
  481. 10
  482. 10
  483. 10
  484. 10
  485. 10
  486. 10
  487. 10
  488. 10
  489. 10
  490. 10
  491. 10
  492. 10
  493. 10
  494. 10
  495. 10
  496. 10
  497. 10
  498. 10
  499. 10
  500. 10
  501. 10
  502. 10
  503. 10
  504. 10
  505. 10
  506. 10
  507. 10
  508. 10
  509. 10
  510. 10
  511. 10
  512. 10
  513. 10
  514. 10
  515. 10
  516. 10
  517. 10
  518. 10
  519. 10
  520. 10
  521. 9
  522. 9
  523. 9
  524. 9
  525. 9
  526. 9
  527. 9
  528. 9
  529. 9
  530. 9
  531. 9
  532. 9
  533. 9
  534. 9
  535. 9
  536. 9
  537. 9
  538. 9
  539. 9
  540. 9
  541. 9
  542. 9
  543. 9
  544. 9
  545. 9
  546. 9
  547. 9
  548. 9
  549. 9
  550. 9
  551. 9
  552. 9
  553. 9
  554. 9
  555. 9
  556. 9
  557. 9
  558. 9
  559. 9
  560. 9
  561. 9
  562. 9
  563. 9
  564. 9
  565. 9
  566. 8
  567. 8
  568. 8
  569. 8
  570. 8
  571. 8
  572. 8
  573. 8
  574. 8
  575. 8
  576. 8
  577. 8
  578. 8
  579. 8
  580. 8
  581. 8
  582. 8
  583. 8
  584. 8
  585. 8
  586. 8
  587. 8
  588. 8
  589. 8
  590. 8
  591. 8
  592. 8
  593. 8
  594. 8
  595. 8
  596. 8
  597. 8
  598. 8
  599. 8
  600. 8
  601. 8
  602. 8
  603. 8
  604. 8
  605. 8
  606. 8
  607. 8
  608. 8
  609. 8
  610. 8
  611. 8
  612. 8
  613. 8
  614. 8
  615. 8
  616. 7
  617. 7
  618. 7
  619. 7
  620. 7
  621. 7
  622. 7
  623. 7
  624. 7
  625. 7
  626. 7
  627. 7
  628. 7
  629. 7
  630. 7
  631. 7
  632. 7
  633. 7
  634. 7
  635. 7
  636. 7
  637. 7
  638. 7
  639. 7
  640. 7
  641. 7
  642. 7
  643. 7
  644. 7
  645. 7
  646. 7
  647. 7
  648. 7
  649. 7
  650. 7
  651. 7
  652. 7
  653. 7
  654. 7
  655. 7
  656. 7
  657. 7
  658. 7
  659. 7
  660. 7
  661. 7
  662. 11:57 What happened to the "Left" in Britain? The Communist party, the CPGB was at its strongest ever at the end of WW2. I don't know how it happened, but quite a number of communists and left-wing social democrats, got into the Education Corps during the war and had quite a radicalising effect on the armed forces, boosting the reputation of the Red Army. This effect was large enough to alarm Bevin and Bevan and the High command. Probably it was part of the reason why "Operation Unthinkable" never got off the drawing board. In the election immediately following the end of the war, which Churchill had expected to win, the Labour Party won. They introduced what they said was Socialism and was in fact a mixed economy. However, it was also a fraud, in that the state owned enterprises, were all charging large private industries rock bottom prices while the price to retail consumers was 4 -6 times higher and all the while the MSM kept up a contant mantra of "Socialism is all very well in theory, but inpractice it always makes a loss!! Around 1952 the Conservative party managed to be elected and immediatly started whittling away at the "Socialism" first by declaring "The War on Drugs" and making prescriptions for addictive drugs no longer free. This was a really destructive move, because up until then, there was practically no "Drugs Problem." There were a very few people, who had been working in the Far East and had become addicted to opium and were on diminishing doses of other narcotics to get them off their habits. The MSM made a great fuss about "Ordinary folks subsidizing these evil peoples' habits!" This change opened a way for organized Crime to make a huge financial ,killing which has never stopped since and it provided funding for organised crime and the excuse for many more policemen with much greater powers. "The Socialism" was used to take the old worn out industries, coal mining, iron and steel manufacture, road transport, railways, electricity generation and distribution, gas manufacture and distribution, Post Office including telephones, and modernise them at the taxpayers expense. These measures by Labour governments were followed by Conservative government that then sold off the refurbished enterprises to "friends" at rock-bottom prices. Very profitable for the moneid and very bad for leftwing thinking. In fact it was a very successful campaign by the Right and the Ruling Class. I don't remember exactly when but some time after Stalin's death the CPSU(B) pronulated a new doctrine called the "Parliamentary Road to Socialism" .(As opposed to the revolutionary road that had been the doctrine since about 1917) the CPGB of course followed the Soviet lead but when the Chinese Communist Party objected, it split not just the World Communist movement but a split occurred also in the CPGB. After the split occurred and the more left-wing faction left the Party in disgust, the leftists did not unite, but split up into numeroud little groups which each claimed to be more Marxis-Leninist than all thee rest occurred, a My impression is, that probably all of them were infiltrated by the Special Branch and gradually everyone in them got fed up and resigned. At least, that is how it looks to me.
    7
  663. 7
  664. I have posted this (more or less) before but I think it is relevant here and I have been surprised that there has been almost no reaction to it. So, with apologies for posting old stuff here it is again: Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. It consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would, I think, kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
    7
  665. 7
  666. 7
  667. 7
  668. 7
  669. 7
  670. 7
  671. 7
  672. 7
  673. 7
  674. 7
  675. 7
  676. 7
  677. 7
  678. 7
  679. 7
  680. 7
  681. 7
  682. 7
  683. 7
  684. 7
  685. 7
  686. 7
  687. 7
  688. 7
  689. 7
  690. 7
  691. 7
  692. 7
  693. 6
  694. 6
  695. 6
  696. 6
  697. 6
  698. 6
  699. 6
  700. 6
  701. 6
  702. 6
  703. 6
  704. 6
  705. 6
  706. 6
  707. 6
  708. 6
  709. 6
  710. 6
  711. 6
  712. 6
  713. 6
  714. 6
  715. 6
  716. 6
  717. 6
  718. 6
  719. 6
  720. 6
  721. 6
  722. 6
  723. 6
  724. 6
  725. 6
  726. 6
  727. 6
  728. 6
  729. 6
  730. 6
  731. 6
  732. 6
  733. 6
  734. 6
  735. 6
  736. 6
  737. 6
  738. 6
  739. 6
  740. 6
  741. 6
  742. 6
  743. 6
  744. 6
  745. 6
  746. 6
  747. 6
  748. 6
  749. 6
  750. 6
  751. I think I see how this situation has come about. Over the last few years there have been two groups of people in our ruling class. There have been the politicians with practically zero military experience and the arms manufacturers. The arms manufacturers have grown accustomed to getting large amounts of money to engage in producing very expensive research and development projects, rather than building up stock of “boring ol' e.g. 155mm shells or run-of-the-mill equipment”. They did this because they understood that the Russians and the Chinese were not going to initiate a war and they thought (Mistakenly as it has turned out) that the politicians would have more sense than to push the Russians or the Chinese to the point that they felt they had to resort to arms. The politicians on the other hand, believed their own propaganda and having no practical experience of running a war, did not understand how small the depth of stored supplies was, nor how the facilities needed to make the materiel needed to wage a war had become obsolete or had gone out of existence nor even how little they understood about the problems they were going to face. Finally, they got so carried away with their own imagined power and prowess that they forced the Russians into a situation where they had, actually to either respond militarily to the western provocation or suffer a political backlash in Russia that might have overthrown the government.. The rest as they say, is history. That is how, IMHO we got to where we are today.
    6
  752. 6
  753. 6
  754. 6
  755. 6
  756. 6
  757. 6
  758. 6
  759. 6
  760. 6
  761. 6
  762. 6
  763. 6
  764. 6
  765. 6
  766. 6
  767. 6
  768. 6
  769. 6
  770. 6
  771. 6
  772. 6
  773. 6
  774. 6
  775. 6
  776. 6
  777. 6
  778. 6
  779. 6
  780. 6
  781. 54:45 On the subject of the US being able to overwhelm the Russian in an air war. I, like you am not a military expert, however, that does not preclude my having an opinion. The Russians have a lot of ballistic missiles, against which the West has but poor defences. A US air war would require well maintained airfields, which I think would be rapidly and efficiently denied to them by Russian missiles. That would mean that the US 'planes would have to operate from US (British?) aircraft carriers,which would be vulnerable to Russian submarines and , probably, ballistic missiles too. There is also the question of Russian anti-aircraft defences as well. How extensive they are and how effective I do not know but they would be an extra difficulty. Penultimately, there is the Russian airforce, which while I read is rather small, I don't know how small and whether the people who say it is small know what they are talking about. However, it has some pretty advanced 'planes and expert pilots. Then there is the question of how this air war by the West would be fuelled? I imagine that there are fairly limited stocks of aviation fuel in Europe and what there is, would be vulnerable to Russian ballistic missiles. In any case it would be neccessary to land most aircraft to refuel them and even if aerial refueling were possible, the refuelling aircraft have to land to tank up and if the airfields are damaged that is going to be difficult too. In any case 'planes have to land for servicing, replenishing weaopons and for the pilots to sleep. that needs good runways. Extra supplies would, I imagine, have to come by ship, running the gauntlet of the Russian submarines. Finally, if it looked as though the Russians were losing, I do not suppose the Chinese would stand idly by and watch them go down to defeat and they have a very large airforce already, which is growing rapidly. In addition, there is the question of the supply of weapons? Does the US have the stocks of air-air missiles and other ammunition it would need? Or is it in the same position as it seems to be with artillery munitions?
    6
  782. 6
  783. 5
  784. 5
  785. 5
  786. 5
  787. 5
  788. 5
  789. 5
  790. 5
  791. 5
  792. 5
  793. 5
  794. 5
  795. 5
  796. 5
  797. 5
  798. 5
  799. 5
  800. 5
  801. 5
  802. 5
  803. 5
  804. 5
  805. 5
  806. 5
  807. 5
  808. 5
  809. 5
  810. 5
  811. 5
  812. 5
  813. 5
  814. 5
  815. 5
  816. 5
  817. 5
  818. 5
  819. 5
  820. 5
  821. 5
  822. 5
  823. 5
  824. 5
  825. 5
  826. 5
  827. 5
  828. 5
  829. 5
  830. 5
  831. 5
  832. Calling this trouble in the US a "Cancer" seems to me to be a very good analogy.. It is embedded deeply in the substance of the US, in the central nervous system if you like. It further resembles a cancer in that as time goes on it takes more and more of the substance of the US, more of its lifeblood, if you like. It is also a very hard thing to break into, because it is circular in nature and very self-protective. I am sure that if anyone were seriously to threaten this cancer, their life would be in danger. The flow of money in it is circular but it all eventually comes from outside the cancer which consumes, but produces absolutely nothing , but trouble. Being a vicious circle (A very vicious circle!), you cannot "start at the beginning", because there is no "beginning". So let's start with the Arms industry and the MIC. This is a series of very large companies and thousands of little companies that supply the big companies and their plants are spread in every state of the union. They all ultimately depend to a large extent, on orders from the USG. These orders are all more or less authorized, approved by or passed by or ignored by congress. The companies employ lobbyists to find out who will support the government in ordering large amounts of expensive equipment or expensive research from the MIC. The members of congress want the companies to prosper, because they provide relatively stable and well-paid work in their constituencies. As most of them have investments in the companies of the MIC they also like the fact that when these companies prosper, they themselves, receive large dividends from them. If a member of congress happens to land a position on a committee which has influence on what orders are placed with the MIC, when they retire, they will probably be offered a sinecure position on the board of one or more of these companies. When they are up for election, they will be given campaign contributions if they promise to support the arms program and if they do not so promise, their opponents will be given campaign contributions to run against them. The money that the lobbyists contribute, of course, comes from the companies of the MIC. Thus the circle is completed. For the people on the inside of this circle it is a very satisfactory set-up. For those on the outside it is really like a cancer in the body-politic.
    5
  833. 5
  834. 5
  835. 5
  836. 5
  837. 5
  838. 5
  839. 5
  840. 5
  841. 5
  842. 5
  843. 5
  844. 5
  845. 5
  846. 5
  847. 5
  848. 5
  849. 5
  850. 35:25 The Grinding down approach has the merit that while the Ukraine army fights, it is using up the CW's stock of weapons at an extraordinary rate. It is using these weapons profligately, probably faster than better trained troops would and, probably, with less effect than better trained troops would. If this goes on much longer, the CW's arsenals are going to be so depleted that they will not be able to sustain US or UK or French or German "boots on the Ground. (BotG). To sustain a war effort (and particularly if you are at the same time building ships as fast as you can) you need steel, lots and lots of it and not just any old steel either. You need alloy steel and for that you need, in addition to iron, nickel, chromium, vanadium, manganese and I dare say other, more exotic components. You will also need lots of titanium, copper, tin and aluminium. You would also need uranium for electricity, and for driving submarines. Most of the iron foundries and steel mills that used to be in Germany, the US and the UK have migrated to China. Steel comes, I believe, mostly from China these days. The UK used to make iron and steel but most of that industry was closed down by Thatcher. The aluminium mostly comes from Russia as does most of the titanium. Some, at least of the European plants making aluminium have closed down for lack of cheap Russian gas. So you would have to make do with the output of Iceland and Norway (and Canada?) Uranium also comes from Russia. You would also need a lot of oil, for fuel, for lubrication and to make plastics. My impression is that most plastics these days, come from China and, of course, oil can be a bit of a problem! It all looks like a logistical nightmare to me.
    5
  851. 5
  852. 5
  853. 5
  854. 5
  855. 5
  856. 5
  857. 5
  858. 5
  859. 5
  860. 5
  861. 5
  862. 5
  863. 5
  864. 5
  865. 5
  866. 5
  867. 5
  868. 5
  869. 5
  870. 5
  871. 5
  872. 5
  873. 5
  874. 5
  875. 5
  876. 5
  877. 5
  878. 5
  879. 5
  880. 5
  881. 5
  882. 5
  883. 5
  884. 5
  885. 5
  886. 5
  887. 5
  888. 5
  889. 5
  890. 5
  891. 5
  892. 5
  893. 41:14 This flexibility in the Russian High Command, contrasts with what I remember from WW2 and from my NS, in the '50s. For example, the Cambridge-based instrument-making firm called "Unicam", was charged with making gun sights for the Royal Navy. All through the war, Britain was very short of copper and Unicam found an aluminium alloy that stood up to sea water just as well as the bronze that was specified for these gun sights. They built an example and took it to the War Office and asked to be allowed to substitute the bronze, by this aluminium alloy. They explained that it was very difficult to find the neccessary material for these items, but they were told that the WO was quite satisfied with the sights made in bronze and as the Colonel who had designed them had died long ago, they had no one to authorise such a change and Unicam should simply fulfill the order as best they could. In Cambridge, the Army decided to build a massive gun emplacement on the roundabout at the junction between Cherry Hinton Rd, Perne Rd and Mowbray Rd. Unfortunately, when they tried it out, they found that it had been built in slightly the wrong place! As a result, the gun could not get a clear shot down the road towards Cherry Hinton. So they cut down all the large trees on the North side of Cherry Hinton Rd. At the time Britain had an acute shortage of fuel and wood and as many of these trees were very large the local inhabitants asked that they be given these trees. The reply they got was, that the army unit doing this work had orders to burn them and that was that! And they were burnt. It took many days to complete this waste of valuable resources. I saw similar waste when my unit relocated from Italy to Germany, The Signal Platoon, had a large shed stuffed with high-tention batteries, to operate their radio sets. When we left, these were put in a roughly rectangular pile about seven metres long, four metres wide and four metres high and set on fire. I have simply no idea how much that cost the taxpayer, but it must have been quite a lot!
    5
  894. 5
  895. 5
  896. 5
  897. 4
  898. 4
  899. 4
  900. 4
  901. 4
  902. 4
  903. 4
  904. 4
  905. 4
  906. 4
  907. 4
  908. 4
  909. 4
  910. 4
  911. 4
  912. 4
  913. 4
  914. 4
  915. 4
  916. 4
  917. 4
  918. 4
  919. 4
  920. 4
  921. 4
  922. 4
  923. 4
  924. 4
  925. 4
  926. 4
  927. 4
  928. 4
  929. 4
  930. 4
  931. 4
  932. 4
  933. 4
  934. 4
  935. 4
  936. 4
  937. 4
  938. 4
  939. 4
  940. 4
  941. 4
  942. 4
  943. 4
  944. 4
  945. 4
  946. 4
  947. 4
  948. 4
  949. 4
  950. 4
  951. 4
  952. 4
  953. 4
  954. 4
  955. 4
  956. 4
  957. 4
  958. 4
  959. 4
  960. 4
  961. 4
  962. 4
  963. 4
  964. 4
  965. 4
  966. 4
  967. 4
  968. 4
  969. 4
  970. 4
  971. 4
  972. 4
  973. 4
  974. 4
  975. 4
  976. 4
  977. 4
  978. 4
  979. 4
  980. 4
  981. 4
  982. 4
  983. 4
  984. 4
  985. 4
  986. 4
  987. 4
  988. 4
  989. 4
  990. 4
  991. 4
  992. 4
  993. 4
  994. 4
  995. 4
  996. 4
  997. 4
  998. 4
  999. 4
  1000. 4
  1001. 4
  1002. 4
  1003. 4
  1004. 4
  1005. 4
  1006. 4
  1007. 4
  1008. 4
  1009. 4
  1010. 4
  1011. 4
  1012. 4
  1013. 4
  1014. 4
  1015. 4
  1016. 4
  1017. 1:44:20 The Rules Based International Order is propaganda slogan without any factual basis. No one has ever formally defined it , for the good reason that if one did formalize it realistically it would amount to "We make the rules and you obey them; or else." Naturally, no one could possible lend their support to such a formulation, so it has to remain undefined. It has to remain as an advertising slogan. It sounds good, just so long as you don't ask, what exactly it means. The Atlantic Council Strategy Paper Series December 16, 2020 has this to say about it: "The rules-based international system was constructed mostly by leading democratic allies at the end of World War II, and was deepened and expanded by many other countries over time. The system is predicated on a set of norms and principles pertaining to global security, the economy, and governance. It consists of: a set of rules encouraging peaceful, predictable, and cooperative behavior among states that is consistent with liberal values and principles; formal institutional bodies, such as the United Nations (UN) and NATO, that serve to legitimize and uphold these rules, and provide a forum to discuss and settle disputes; and the role of powerful democratic states to help preserve and defend the system. In the security realm, the system is characterized by formal alliances in Europe and Asia, in addition to rules that protect state sovereignty and territorial integrity, and place limits on the use of military force and the spread of weapons of mass destruction. In the economic domain, the rules-based system has served to promote an interconnected global economy based on free markets and open trade and finance. Finally, in the realm of governance, the rules-based system advanced democratic values and human rights. The system has never been fixed, but has evolved over time, with major periods of adaptation and expansion at major inflection points after World War II and at the end of the Cold War. Note the last sentence: "The system has never been fixed," In other words "we make it up as we go along to suit our own convenience."
    4
  1018. 4
  1019. 4
  1020. 4
  1021. 4
  1022. 4
  1023. 4
  1024. 4
  1025. 4
  1026. 4
  1027. 4
  1028. 4
  1029. 4
  1030. 4
  1031. 4
  1032. 4
  1033. 4
  1034. 4
  1035. 4
  1036. 4
  1037. 4
  1038. 4
  1039. 4
  1040. 4
  1041. 4
  1042. 4
  1043. 4
  1044. 4
  1045. 4
  1046. 4
  1047. 4
  1048. 4
  1049. 4
  1050. 4
  1051. 4
  1052. 4
  1053. 4
  1054. 4
  1055. 4
  1056. 4
  1057. 4
  1058. 4
  1059. 4
  1060. 4
  1061. 4
  1062. 4
  1063. 4
  1064. 4
  1065. 4
  1066. 4
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071. 3
  1072. 3
  1073. 3
  1074. 3
  1075. 3
  1076. 3
  1077. 3
  1078. 3
  1079. 3
  1080. 3
  1081. 3
  1082. 3
  1083. 3
  1084. 3
  1085. 3
  1086. 3
  1087. 3
  1088. 3
  1089. 3
  1090. 3
  1091. 3
  1092. 3
  1093. 3
  1094. 3
  1095. 3
  1096. 3
  1097. 3
  1098. 3
  1099. 3
  1100. 3
  1101. 3
  1102. 3
  1103. 3
  1104. 3
  1105. 3
  1106. 3
  1107. 3
  1108. 3
  1109. 3
  1110. 3
  1111. 3
  1112. 3
  1113. 3
  1114. 3
  1115. 3
  1116. 3
  1117. 3
  1118. 3
  1119. 3
  1120. 3
  1121. 3
  1122. 3
  1123. 3
  1124. 3
  1125. 3
  1126. 3
  1127. 3
  1128. 3
  1129. 3
  1130. 3
  1131. 3
  1132. 3
  1133. 3
  1134. 3
  1135. 3
  1136. 3
  1137. 3
  1138. 3
  1139. 3
  1140. 3
  1141. 3
  1142. 3
  1143. 3
  1144. 3
  1145. 3
  1146. 3
  1147. 3
  1148. 3
  1149. 3
  1150. 3
  1151. 3
  1152. 3
  1153. 3
  1154. 3
  1155. 3
  1156. 3
  1157. 3
  1158. 3
  1159. 3
  1160. 3
  1161. 3
  1162. 3
  1163. 3
  1164. 3
  1165. 3
  1166. 3
  1167. 3
  1168. 3
  1169. 3
  1170. Alexander will be familiar with this but I would like Jimmy and Glenn to see it if they haven't already. Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. It consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, and removing the built-in conflict of interest bedevilling the arms industry, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
    3
  1171. 3
  1172. 3
  1173. 3
  1174. 3
  1175. 3
  1176. 3
  1177. 3
  1178. 3
  1179. So it is! However, to a large extent, the USA has always discouraged its satraps from buying weapons from their own MICs. See as an example, how the British have been discouraged from cultivating (Have gutted!) their own firms making fighter jets. The result is that to a large extent, the 13 countries are mostly limited to US made weaponry. This makes it a much less formidable combo than it would be were Russia facing 13/34 countries each capable of supplying all the needs of its own military. The other thing that plays very strongly in favour of the Russians, is the lack of corruption in the process of procurement of Weapon-systems. The Russian MIC is almost entirely state-owned. This means that the question of making a profit does not arise. The firms making the Russian weapons can spend what is needed to produce the result they want to achieve. Its effect on next quarter's share price does not arise. No one needs to go to Moscow to lobby for funds to do this or that. Either the funds are available or they aren't, and if they aren't, trying to bribe some committee member to make them available is probably a BAD IDEA! You would probably, do better to go to talk to the minister. The firm's remit is to make as cheaply as possible a really tough, really reliable, easy-to-use and easy-to-maintain weapon. The decisions about which weapons to produce, is probably decided by a committee whose working are secret and, which in any case, do not enrich the members of Parliament. Contrast that with the situation in the USA, where you have lobbyists paid by the arms manufacturers, to get members of Congress to vote for very expensive projects that can be made by their firm, preferably in every state of the Union. Weapons, which look impressive and are state-of-the-art, but which will soon need either replacement or very expensive repairs. Making run-of-the-mill items like 155mm artillery shells is not wildly profitable and tends to get neglected, as the Ukrainians are now finding out, the hard way.
    3
  1180. 3
  1181. 3
  1182. 3
  1183. 3
  1184. 3
  1185. 3
  1186. 3
  1187. 3
  1188. 3
  1189. 3
  1190. 3
  1191. 3
  1192. 3
  1193. 3
  1194. 3
  1195. 3
  1196. 3
  1197. 3
  1198. 3
  1199. 3
  1200. 3
  1201. 3
  1202. 3
  1203. 3
  1204. 3
  1205. 3
  1206. 3
  1207. 3
  1208. 3
  1209. 3
  1210. 3
  1211. 3
  1212. 3
  1213. 3
  1214. 3
  1215. 3
  1216. 3
  1217. 3
  1218. 3
  1219. 3
  1220. 3
  1221. 3
  1222. 3
  1223. 3
  1224. 3
  1225. 3
  1226. 3
  1227. 3
  1228. 3
  1229. 3
  1230. 3
  1231. 3
  1232. 3
  1233. 3
  1234. 3
  1235. 3
  1236. I have posted this elsewhere, but I think it is appropriate to this discussion too, so I'll post it again. I would be interested to hear comments on it. It has elicited remarkably little reaction so far. At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers, As the loop is circular in nature we can start anywhere, Let's start with the congress critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that hold the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle." OK?
    3
  1237. 3
  1238. 3
  1239. 3
  1240. 1: 58 This is not really a correct assessment of the situation, The "dwindling" supplies are not caused by lack of interest on the part of the Collective West(CW). The "Dwindle" is caised by the CW running out of armarments to send to the Ukrainians. Over the past decades the arms industries of the European countries, have largely been taken over by the US arms companies (Rationalization) and closed down to prevent them competing, with the result, that the manufacturing capacity has greatly diminished from what it used to be. Another cause, is the energy to drive these industries and a lot of the raw materials has been sourced from Russia and a lot of the supply chains have been sent to China to avoid making greenhouse gases in Europe and the USA. Further, the CW's arms industries are run like almost all Western industries, by accountants and as a result, anything that was not particularly profitable, was either closed down and sold off or diverted into making something more profitable. So things like 155 mm shells, which were run-of-the-mill products, that fetched a not very high price and no "excitement" and for which, in the years of peace, following the Soviet collapse, there was only a small market, are now hardly made in the CW at all. New machine tools, needed for making shells, would need to be made anew and the majority of machine tools are currently made in China. To make things like shells you need skilled workers, skilled inspectors, tightly controlled factories, skilled engineers, and a whole gamut of other skills. Without these, you will lose whole factories, in a large puff of smoke. So, it will take time to rebuild the CW's capacity. It might be much better, quicker and cheaper to negotiate a complete settlement and a comprehensive peace treaty, that would give everyone real security, so we could get on with the real, pressing problems we have that need world cooperation.
    3
  1241. 3
  1242. 3
  1243. 3
  1244. 3
  1245. 3
  1246. 3
  1247. 3
  1248. 3
  1249. 3
  1250. 3
  1251. 3
  1252. 3
  1253. 3
  1254. 3
  1255. 3
  1256. 3
  1257. 3
  1258. 3
  1259. 3
  1260. 3
  1261. 3
  1262. 3
  1263. I wonder about the supply chain for increased production of artillery shells. I really have no idea what the quantities are involved, i can only assume that they are large. Artillery shells are, as far as I know, made with a projectile which is filled, typically, with explosive. How easy is it to increase the manufacture of explosives? I should think the rawmaterials are easy enough to come by but it would need a lot of energy. The other part, the part that stays behind when the shell is fired, seems to be made of brass (an alloy of copper and tin). How are the supplies of copper and tin and where do they come from? I think the price of copper is already high, presumably this would increase it. Then there is the mercury for the detonators, where does that come from? Last I heard, the world was running out of mercury and these days, you'll need all the electronics for proximity fuses and so on. Machine tools are, I presume still made in the USA, (?) but most are, I believe, made in China. It looks to me like a pretty horrible nightmare for the logistics people. Then there is the fact you'll need not only the skilled workers, but very careful skilled workers; as slapdash workers are not useful in ammunition production. You will also need, for obvious reasons, highly skilled, very experienced inspectors, which in such an environment is a dangerous and immensely responsible job. One dud inspector can demolish a whole factory in a matter of seconds. So of course can a careless worker or a broken machine. To me, he idea of setting up production lines, in a hurry, to produce explosive devices sounds, like advanced lunacy or at any rate, an accident waiting to happen.
    3
  1264. 3
  1265. 3
  1266. 3
  1267. 3
  1268. 3
  1269. 3
  1270. 3
  1271. 3
  1272. 3
  1273. 3
  1274. 3
  1275. 3
  1276. 3
  1277. 3
  1278. 3
  1279. 3
  1280. 3
  1281. 3
  1282. 3
  1283. 3
  1284. 3
  1285. 3
  1286. 3
  1287. 3
  1288. 3
  1289. 3
  1290. 3
  1291. 3
  1292. 3
  1293. 3
  1294. Hello Emil. I would like to discuss an idea that I have had. There is in Washington a set-up, which as far as I know has as yet no proper name. I will call it :The "Vicious Circle". It is a circulatory structure, hence the name, and it consists of various interconnected groups, These are: the amrs-making industries, the lobbyist industry, the members of Congress (The "congress-critters") & the United States Government (USG). In action, the Congress-critters vote to tell the USG to order some weapons from the arms manufactureres. The USG then orders the arms from the arms manufacturers and send them money. The arms manufacturers then send some money to their employees, some to their shareholders and some to the lobbyists and use some for advertising themselves. (Many of the congress-critters and members of the USG are their shareholders. Many Ex-congress critters and ex military and ex-government people, are sinecured employees of the arms industry, the so called "Revolving Door".) The lobbyists use some of the moneyfrom the USG to pay their employees and their shareholders and some to persuade congress critters to vote the "Right" way to keep the money flowing to the arms manufacturers. This whole "Merry-go-round" is financed by the Taxpayers, who have almost no influence on it at all. This Vicious Circle is very powerful and completely ruthless and therefore very hard to break up - under normal circumstances. However, we are approaching a very abnormal set of circumstances, or so it seems to me. What I am refering to, is that it looks as though, in the near future, the US (N@0) is going to be defeated by the Russians. This means that the Russians are going to have a once-in-a-century opportunity to be able to impose conditions on the US and its sattelites, vassals, proxies and puppets. I suggest that if the Russians were to insist that all the arms manufacturers in the World had to be nationalized entities, and that no private individual or corporation would be allowed to have any share in an arms manufacturing industy or firm, then it would cut the financial lifeline of thw Warmongers in Washington, London, Berlin and Brussels (Or anywhere else.) and thus would destroy the Vicious Circle. This would I believe, be an enormous step towards bringing real peace to the World. What do you think?
    3
  1295. 3
  1296. 3
  1297. 3
  1298. 3
  1299. 3
  1300. 3
  1301. 3
  1302. 3
  1303. 3
  1304. 3
  1305. 3
  1306. 3
  1307. 3
  1308. 3
  1309. 3
  1310. 3
  1311. 3
  1312. 3
  1313. 3
  1314. 3
  1315. 3
  1316. 3
  1317. 3
  1318. 3
  1319. 3
  1320. 3
  1321. 3
  1322. 3
  1323. 3
  1324. 3
  1325. 3
  1326. 3
  1327. 3
  1328. 3
  1329. 3
  1330. 3
  1331. 3
  1332. 3
  1333. 3
  1334. 3
  1335. 3
  1336. 3
  1337. 3
  1338. 3
  1339. 3
  1340. 3
  1341. 3
  1342. 3
  1343. 3
  1344. 3
  1345. 3
  1346. 3
  1347. 3
  1348. 3
  1349. 3
  1350. 3
  1351. 3
  1352. 3
  1353. 3
  1354. 3
  1355. 3
  1356. 3
  1357. 3
  1358. 3
  1359. 3
  1360. 3
  1361. 3
  1362. 3
  1363. 3
  1364. 3
  1365. 3
  1366. 3
  1367. 3
  1368. 3
  1369. 3
  1370. 3
  1371. 3
  1372. 3
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. The key to China's rapid growth since November 1949 is the Communist Party. From the very beginning, from before they achieved victory and declared the PRC, the CPC understood that Education was the Philosopher's stone that would drive their development into a great power. They understood that having a great mass of ignorant people was a drag rather than an asset and though at first, desperately poor, they spent a large proportion of what they had, on building schools and universities and getting Chinese experts who were living overseas, to return and help to build up China. They also spent a lot on the healt of the people. Being desperately short of western-trained doctors, they mobilised the tradional doctors and set up research institutes to find out what was good and what was superstion in TMC. They They organised small teams of health workers to go out into the countryside to educate the peasantry in elementary health care measures (So-called "Bare-footed Doctors) and made teams of expert western-trained medics to go out into the villages to see for themselves what were problems and to tread diseases that the bare-footed Doctors had been unable to cure. They also fought large snd successful campaigns against numerous endemic diseases such as schistosomiasis, TB and syphilis They also understood, that the most destructive thing that hampers development in all societies, is corruption, and that corruption could be their Achilles's heel. Is spite of strenuous objections by their western "friends" they have stuck to their efforts to root out the corrupt. Anther great strength, has been their ability to find and apply the common sense solution to a problem. Unlike the USSR they waged a constant battle against dogmatism. Mao put it typically bluntly: "Dogma is more useless than dog-shit."
    2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2:12 "Trump too aggressive". This is absolutely typical of this administration and of the MSM in general. If you want the truth, look at the "News" and believe the opposite and you will be much better informed than the average. Take as an example: all through the war in Ukraine it has been the innocent West, the Democratic Ukraine, the non-aggressive NATO and the Russian aggressors who suddenly one day, launched an unprovoked war on Ukraine and throughout, the war has been won by the gallant Ukrainians who have consistently beaten the demoralized, inefficient, ill-armed Russians who were always running out of ammunition, drones, missiles. Only now, it is becoming clear that the Russians are winning, they are better trained, have better morale than the Ukrainians, that the West worked really hard to force the Russians into invading Ukraine. That the Russians are not so inefficient, that their arms are no worse than the western ones and in some ways much better and more robust and above all the Russians are not running out of weapons. No, it is the west that is scraping the bottoms of its arsenals to find weapons that the Ukrainians can use, left over from the Soviet Union in the warehouses of East European countries and even Africa! It promises hundreds of tanks to the Ukrainians, but then finds that this country can spare only a dozen and this one four or five and another can spare none at all! Finally Germany comes up with 87 old 1950s tanks (Leopard I s) which are considered too thinly armored to serve in a tank battle with modern or even old Soviet tanks.
    2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 4:52 Much as I respect Wang Yi, I disagree with him in this assessment. Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its eat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees ofthe weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs thenpay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenseson condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of: is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
    2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. What I think is that the collective West is led by a small clique of WEF/Warmongers in Washington DC and administered by an almost incredibly incompetent or evil bunch of amateur nonentities in the European capitals. The crisis is caused by their attempt to destroy the Russian economy (a perfect storm of sanctions) which was intended to cause a color revolution in Moscow. Unfortunately for them, the Russians "saw them coming" and were prepared, so the Russian economy though somewhat damaged, did not collapse, but almost immediately started to recover. Meanwhile, back in the Collective West, they discovered that they had cut themselves off from their cheapest supplier of fuel, fertilizer and food, without making sure that they had adequate back-up suppliers. Apologizing to the Russians and trying to make up with them, would be too embarrassing, so rather than do that, they are prepared to let their populations suffer and in some cases die. They are all the more prepared to do this because, they have the religious belief that there are too many people in the world and they do not have hearts but rather swinging bricks. Their masters also want European industry bankrupted, to consolidate the hegemonic position of the USA. Europe, particularly Germany was too much competition. The USA has largely deindustrialized itself, moving much of its production to China and now finds itself short of productive industries and skilled workers. So an influx of German capital, knowhow and skilled workers would come in very handy! Keeping up with China is apparently an existential matter but is not going to be easy.
    2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. As the driving force behind this continual warmongering, is a vicious circle in Washinton, it seems obvious that the first problem is to break up this circular, self-sustaining system that consists of the arms industry, the lobbying industry, the congress-critters, the USG and back to the arms industry. This system is fuelled by the taxpayer, who has no choice in the matter and the system benefits the employees of the arms industry, the employees of the lobbyist industry and the shareholders of both industries. The problem is exacerbated by the fact, that many congress-critters and members of the USG are sharehoders in the arms industry and probanly, in the lobbyist industry too. This "group", (I am not sure if there is a proper name for such a set-up. I will refer to it as the "Vicious Circle" or VC.) is extremely stable and it is also ruthless, so it will be very difficult for anyone to dismantle it, but I think that until it is destroyed and "relegated to the Dustbin of History", the World will never know peace. However, I think there is a chance of doing just that, or rather there will shortly be a chance of doing that, because the Collective West is going to be in a uniquely weak position in the near future, when the Russians achieve a victory in Ukraine, (As I am fairly certain they are going to do.) and the CW is out of conventional weapons. ( I hope no one will be suicidal enough to use, nuclear weapons.) If one of the conditions that the Russians insisted on, was that all arms industries had to be state owned and no individual or corporation was allowed to have a shareholding in an industry making arms, I think it would go a long way towards destroying the VC and thus solving this problem. I would very much like to have Prof Sach's opinion on this idea.
    2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. What a pratt this Tobias Elwood is! There is no evidence that Huawei equipment is designed to spy on anyone. The German government reseachers were given the Huawei operating system to examine and after a year or two's reseach concluded that is had no "back doors " or other spy-type features, just as Huawei said. I remember another Tory MP, of an exactly similar stripe called, IIRC, Tufton Beamish, who shortly after WW2 ended, came to our school and gave us a lecture on the menaceof the USSR and explained how the Western powers, cheifly Britain and the US had to re-arm, in order to defend "Democracy" all over the World from the Soviet Threat. After his lecture we were invited by the Headmaster to ask him questions and I asked him how he reconciled the West's "Defenxse of Democracy" with its support, against their own popiulations, of numerous dictators such as: General Franco of Spain, General Salazaar of Portugal, the Colonels of Greece, King Farouk of Egypt, King Idris of Libya, General Chiang Kai-shek of China and numerous others , who, without exception were vehemently Anti-Democratic. I was shocked by the cynicism of his answer. "Ah well, me lad! You'll find as you grow up, that it doesn't do to look too closely at your friends, or you may find you haven't got any!" While this may have been good "Life advice", It was an evasion of my question and no sort of basis for "Defending Democracy". His lecture was in fact, just scaremongering. The same as Tobias Ellwoods remarks on Huawei. Both of them strike me, as being US puppets.
    2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. This video starts off with a lie: The war did not start in February 2022, it started in 2014. By February 2022 about 10,000 peope had already been killed. It goes on in the same vein. The "Great Mistake" that was made, was made by NATO, which thought that the Ukrainian Army, which they had built up, trained and armed over the previous seven years, was going to "wipe the floor " with the Russian Army and that the sanctions package that they had prepared, would cripple the Russian economy. They also thought, erroneously, that the collapse of the Russian economy and the defeat of the Russian Army would so anger the Russian public, that they would overthrow the "hated Putin Regime" in Moscow. The "Great Mistake" that Russia made in February 2022, was in failing to understand that the Collective West was living in a fantasy land , where NATO, the greatest military machine that the World had ever seen, was something that no one would dare to stand up against, where Russia was "a Gas-station masquerading as a country", whose economy and Banks, were totally unprepared for the sanctions that were coming , whose army was in shambles, mutinous, ill-trained, ill-equipped with out-dated weapons, manned by stupids, badly officered, etc., etc. They also failed, in not understanding at first, that their enemies, were expecting to carve up Russia into manegable portions and then plunder it as they had done in the 1990s. The combined effects of these mistakes is that NATO has been defeated militarily, for the first time, (Which is having a huge geo-political effect) the US has profitted from the partial collapse of the European Economies caused by the blow-back of the sanctions, and the Russian economy has profitted greatly from the "protectionist" effect of the sanctions! (Suddenly, the Russian industries found themselves freed of all Western competition!). Putin, so far from being overthrown, is more popular than ever. I don't know whether the US Intelligence agencies mis-informed the White house or whether they told them correctly what the situation was and were disbelieved. It rather looks as though, both believed their own propaganda.
    2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. Do I think NATO is a bit late to the party? NATO is not "late to the party". Its problem is how to and whether to make the party happen. Since well before the end of WW2, powerful people, mostly in Washington and London, have been trying to work out a scheme to conquer the USSR/Russia. So far, either their schemes have ultimately failed or "they have done the maths" and decided that "the time is not yet ripe" to put their plan into action. This war in Ukraine is the latest failure. NATO is a "defensive" alliance which has never defended anything! It has only ever attacked. Sometimes it gives lying excuses and sometimes it just attacks. Its permanent excuse is the allegedly "Aggressive" nature of Russia or the alleged human rights violations of those it wants to attack. Oddly, Russia's supposedly aggressive nature shows itself only when it is attacked, as e.g. in Georgia. Russia has one or two military bases in other countries and one peacekeeping operation. (I think.) The supposedly "Peaceful" USA, by contrast has attacked about fifty countries around the world since 1950 and has about 800 military bases spread across the Globe. NATO has mostly fought peasant or third world armies and is not geared up to fight a peer competitor. Its MIC is used to screwing the US taxpayer and making wonderful weapons at fantastic prices and to making fabulous profits for its shareholders, but seems to be a bit lacking when it comes to basic things like heavy artillery and the ammo to use in it, anti-tank missiles, anti aircraft/missile defenses. In conclusion, I would say this is not the right question. You should be asking do we need NATO and if so : what for?
    2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 2
  1873. 2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. 2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911. 2
  1912. 2
  1913. 2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. 2
  1917. 2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948. 2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. Are you sure that the "leaders" of the CW HAVE any plans? It seems to me, that they have blundered into this war, with a sort of belief that: "It will be alright on the Night" or "We will just play it by ear and make it up as we go along!" Can you discern any coherent strategic thinking from the very start of this op? Insofar as there seems to have been any strategic thinking at all, it seems to have been based on a wildly inaccurate assessment of both the Russian internal situation ("Russia is very weak. One good push and it will collapse.") and of Russia's international relations (We can get all the rest of the World to go along with our sanctions.") and an equally faulty assessment of the feelings of the World outside the CW, towards the USA ("Leave us out of your quarrels, we don't want to be involved.) and crucially, a wild overestimate of the depth of NATO's arsenals and an equally devastating underestimate of the strength and extent of Russian preparedness. From appearing to be "The Greatest and Most Powerful Military Machine ever Assembled on the Face of the Earth" to looking like a "Paper-Tiger", took just a few weeks! Still today as I write, Ukraine is bleeding out the arsenals of the CW and nobody seems to have a strategy to stop it or even so much as a tactic to slow it down, never mind how to repair the reputational damage or to restock the weapons stores in a reasonable time. In fact, were the West to try to do the latter, could it overcome its reliance on Russia and China for so many of the required raw material inputs?. Not in any reasonable time-frame, i would guess. Thank you so much for all your hard work, chasing down and making available to me, news that I would never otherwise hear about! A Very Happy and Peaceful New Year to You and Your Family!
    2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071. 2
  2072. 2
  2073. 2
  2074. 2
  2075. 2
  2076. 2
  2077. 2
  2078. 2
  2079. 2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099. 2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. Look, its very simple: China has an MIC so does the USA. The USA's MIC is capitalist, it is privately owned and run for profit. It is immensly rich and very profitable and it uses part of that profit to pay its shareholders, part on advertizing so that the MSM supports its every action and puffs up its reputation, it uses part to pay Lobbyists to bribe congress critters to vote for more arms orders and it uses part to pay ex civil servants and ex-military officers who persuaded the Government to buy arms, while they were serving (The so-called "revolving door".) for serving as members of the boards of MIC companies and part to pay dividends to shareholders. Many of the shares are owned by members of the government and congress critters. As a result, the goverment's foreign policy is largely dictated by the MIC. What the MIC wants is Wars, threats of wars and rumours of wars. China, otoh, has an MIC which is wholly or mostly state owned, This means that the Chinese MIC does not make a profit, except by selling arms to another country and any profit it makes, just goes to reduce the amount the state spends on arms. The Chinese MIC spends nothing on persuading the Media to puff up its reputation. It has no or very few shareholders to pay and it spends nothing on persuading the government or lawmakers to change the foreign policy. There is no "revolving door". Consequently, it can produce many more arms for the same amount of money. To sum up: In the USA the government collects taxes and the MIC makes foreign policy while in China, the MIC makes arms and the government makes policy.
    1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. There is a fundamental problem here. There is a Conflict of Interest, built into all privately -owned (Capitalist) pharmaceutical firms, namely that: "a customer cured is a customer lost". A capitalist firm has NO LEGAL obligation to its customers except to obey the local laws. In other words it is a case of "Caveat emptor" or "Let the buyer beware." The responsibility of a capitalist firm is to its shareholders. Its job is to make them money or go out of business. Sure, if you have been injured by their product, you can, in theory, sue the Big Pharmaceutical companies, if you can afford to go up against billion$ opponents, but you'll need a lot of luck, and very good lawyers and probanly a lot of money, if you try. This problem has an obvious solution, though it is one that will attract a lot of resistence in the US. That is to Nationalize the whole of the Pharmaceutical industry. Why? You may Ask. While the ideal patient for a privately owned pharmaceutical company, is one whose illness can be "stabilised", so that he is not too ill to work, but is sufficiently unwell to need constant medication, the ideal for a government - owned pharmaceutical firm is a medicine which will permanently cure a patient, in the shortest time possible and with the least cost to himself and the health - care industry. I had not thought about this before, but such a scheme would reduce the cost of living and hence the cost of goods manufactured in the USA. (Or any other country thay had its own pharmaceutical industry.) It would also, remove the suspicion, that "the pharmaceutical companies are sitting on cancer cures because cancer is so profitable."
    1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. The British government must be either the most ignorant bunch of clowns who ever posed as statesmen or they must be evil, almost beyond belief! If the problem is ignorance : they do not understand the dangers to the WHOLE WORLD of sending depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine. When the war is over, who blew up which tank will be of interest to very few people, mostly to relatives of the Tank crews. However, Ukraine is (or was) the "Breadbasket" of Europe. In fact, it sends food all over the World. DU ammunition is effective in destroying tanks, true, but when the round hits the tank, the depleted uranium catches fire, the smoke blows around and eventually settles in the soil. Food grown there, absorbs some of this uranium and when it is eaten by animals (including humans, of course) it lodges in the animal's cells like a time bomb waiting to go off. When this uranium is eaten by a pregnant mother, it can be incorporated in the baby. When one of these uranium atoms decays (Explodes) it can cause a mutation resulting in a stillbirth or worse, the birth of a hideously malformed child. Rishi Sunak and his Minister for Defence (There's a misnomer if ever I heard one!) are condemning the mothers of all countries that buy food from Ukraine to this monstrous possibility. If anyone thinks this is alarmist propaganda, they should ask the Iraqis or the countries of the former Yugoslavia. If they don't know this, they are so ignorant that they should be nowhere near the "levers of Power". If they know this and go ahead with this diabolical plan, they must be some of THE MOST EVIL people who have ever lived. It is extraordinary to me that there is so little outcry over this announcement! Extraordinary too, that Putin has not spelled out the danger of this move, in detail. It is not "just" a nuclear escalation, even if it does not result in a nuclear war (which it might) it condemns countless generations of children to the possibility, the probability of being grossly deformed or cancerous and condemns their mothers to grossly heightened worry around giving birth. This problem will not go away for HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS. The uranium in these shells, has a very long half-life. In short, this announcement, is telling the World that one of the greatest "Crimes Against Humanity", is in the process of being committed.
    1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. Yeah! We have Freedom of speech! Freedom to say anything they like! Big Pharma is a particular hate of mine. On another channel I wrote this. I thin it might interest you. The need to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years! The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease. Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it. Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks worth running.
    1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1:15:52 I realise that this, whole idea, may well be wide of the mark, but I have heard about some psychological research on a group of monkeys, in which the leader was an alpha-male and when he was removed, he was replaced by another alpha male. However, when all the alpha-males of the group were removed, they were not replaced as leaders by beta-males, but by females. I also read that the populations, of practically all the western world, are deficient in zinc and the sperm-count and sperm-virilty (activity) is declining at about 1% per year(!) and that the quantity of testosterone in the blood of most males in the western world is also declining at the same rate. Zinc is also important to female fertility. Testosteron, the "male hormone" (Though females have some testosterone too.) is connected with, among other characteristics, aggression (Using the term in the sense of iniatiatve as well as belligerence) physical strength and leadership, among monkeys. Since humans are closely related to monkeys, it seems reasonable to assume that the same is true in human beings. Would this perhaps account for the current singular absence of outstanding leaders in the CW? As well as the declining birth-rate.? Might it also (I ask myself) also account for the rise of "wokeness" in the CW? Another thing tending to produce "softer" males in the CW is the tendency of parents to keep their children at home, insted of letting them go out to play with other children in the street, because it is no longer considered safe to allow them to do so. This it seems, (according to some psychologists) to produce males who are less accoustomed to fighting and are more afraid of getting hurt. As I said above, this maybe nothing to do with the case, but the absense of effective and competent leaders in the CW seems to be almost total and lacking in any rational explanation, so I offer it as a suggestion.
    1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. Yes, I feel for your feeling let down by the scientific peer review system. I myself experienced a similar let down in the integrity of scientists in a different field back in the '60s. It is disappointing, one would think that scientists would be more or less immune to groupthink but they aren't. Maybe all science teaching should continuously drum into all students, the fundamental LAW : IT AINT NECESSARILY SO! I myself, translated a very interesting book on the structure of globular proteins, which I am convinced to this day was a quite possible solution to what is, still, today a matter of ongoing discussion, but when it was published, it received almost no discussion, but was dismissed as a phantasy, although it showed that for example, one could, from the chemical analysis of the protein, assuming this model to be true, predict the length of the molecule and its polar moment to within a very few percentage points, It also explained how such molecules denatured when heated and how if not heated too much could repair themselves, when cooled down. Instead of discussing the hypothesis, the alleged character of the author was attacked! When it was pointed out that another "reputable" scientist was a co-author of the book, it was waved away with: "I can't think how she comes to be mixed up with that man!". The trouble was, that the author of a rival theory, which explained nothing about the behavior of globular proteins and could predict nothing about the dimensions of the molecule from the analysis of it, had shortly previously won a Nobel Prize. It seems that there is an exactly similar situation in Archeology, regarding ancient giant humans and civilizations predating the Sumerians, by hundreds of thousands of years. I have no expertise in either subject, so my opinion is simply an opinion, but it seems that any "reputable" archeologist is likely to lose his academic status AND ANY HOPE OF FUNDING, if he interests himself in either field!
    1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. The absolutely fundamental and crucial Problem is that the US regards itself as the Hegemon of the World. This is something that the World does not need! The World does not need or want a self-appointed policeman. This attitude, of the US's is, I think, a hangover, an outdated behaviour, inherited from the Evangelical Christians, who starting at the time of the collapse of the Roman Empire, felt it their duty to go out into the World and "teach the natives how to behave and how to live". This may have been, in its time, (a long time ago) a Good Idea (TM 1066 & All That) but it does not suit, when they try to impose this on countries that have civilizations that are far older than that of the US. (E.g. China, Iran, India, Russia) Particularly when it is accompanied by buckets of self-satisfied hypocrisy and assumed "superiority" and an appropriated "High Moral Position." Another problem, is the US's assumption that they have an inalienable right to be the most prosperous and advanced economy and their consequent assumption that anyone that looks as though they might become more prosperous and technically advanced than the US, (or even a moderate competitor, e.g Japan, Germany) is a "THREAT"! From their point of view, it seems to me, their most difficult problem must be that with a failing economy & gigantic debts, they have around 800-1000 overseas bases to maintain. All this at a time, when in FACT, there is no real threat to them. They have weak neighbours to the north and south of them and a huge ocean to both the East and the West of them and NO-ONE wants to attack them. Their "problems are all of their own manufacture.
    1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. Hello Kim. about the permanent warmongering. I would like to discuss an idea that I have had. I have posted very simil comment before on various sites but have never got ANY feedback! So, I hope you don't mind that I post it again here. It will be impossible to change the present rotten system unless the problim outlined below is dealt with. I apologise for the fact that I have posted the following before but I think it bears repeating. There is in Washington a set-up, which as far as I know has as yet no proper name. I will call it :The "Vicious Circle". (VC) It is a circulatory structure, hence the name, and it consists of various interconnected groups, These are: the arms-making industries, the lobbyist industry, the members of Congress (The "congress-critters") & the United States Government (USG). Since it is a circular structure one cannot start at the beginning, it does not have a beginning, it roes round and round. In action, the Congress-critters vote to tell the USG to order some weapons from the arms manufactureres. The USG then orders the arms from the arms manufacturers and sends them money. The arms manufacturers then send some money to their employees, some to their shareholders and some to the lobbyists and use some for advertising themselves. (Many of the congress-critters and members of the USG are shareholders. Many Ex-congress critters and ex-military and ex-government people, who have helped the MIC while in office, are sinecured employees of the arms industry, the so called "Revolving Door".) The lobbyists use some of the money from the USG to pay their employees and their shareholders and some to persuade congress critters to vote the "Right" way to keep the money flowing to the arms manufacturers, if the congress-critters do not promise to vote "the right way", the lobbyist will support their rivals who will. This whole "Merry-go-round" is financed by the Taxpayers, who have almost no influence on it at all. The Shareholders and employees of the arms mfgs and the lobbying industry, thus have a vested interest in wars and threat and rumours of wars, because these justify the way they vote. This Vicious Circle is very powerful and completely ruthless and therefore very hard to break up - under normal circumstances. However, we are approaching a very abnormal set of circumstances, or so it seems to me. What I am refering to, is that it looks as though, in the near future, the US (NATO) is going to be defeated by the Russians. This means that, perhaps, the Russians are going to have a once-in-a-century opportunity to be able to impose conditions on the US and its sattelites, vassals, proxies and puppets. I suggest that if the Russians were to insist that all the arms manufacturers in the World had to be nationalized entities, and that no private individual or corporation would be allowed to have any share in an arms manufacturing industy or firm, then it would cut the financial lifeline of the Warmongers in Washington, London, Berlin and Brussels (Or anywhere else.) and thus would destroy the Vicious Circle. This would I believe, be an enormous step towards bringing real peace to the World. What do you think?
    1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. I made this comment in reply to another correspondent on a different program the other day but I think it is relevant here. At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers. As the loop is circular in nature, we can start anywhere, Let's start with the Congress Critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that holds the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle.
    1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. Very interesting video. It is extraordinary how slow some governments are to appreciate the importance of railways. Personally, I have for many decades thought that this was due to the malign influence of the big oil companies and the big motor manufacturers, In Britain we had, when I was a child, a very extensive railway system which had a station in most villages. Yes, really. It is true that it was old fashioned in that the tracks were old and not very smooth and the engines were nearly all steam powered and the carriages were also old-fashioned and not very comfortable, for the most part and the trains did not move very fast, but you could go from almost any part of Britain to almost any part of Britain by rail. Likewise you could send a parcel from any part to any part and the railway would send a van to pick it up from your house and deliver it to where it was going at the destination. It was prettycheap too. However, when we got a Conservative government sometime in the 1960s, they employed a consultant called Dr Beeching (Hoochh! Spit!) who said that the network was "far too big" and a "waste of space" and he advised "pruning" the network to just the main lines, which the government, who I am sure were invested in or bought by, the big oil companies, agreed with his plan and the lines to smaller towns and villages were closed down, sold off and torn up. A lot of their friends got very rich off the land they acquired from the sale of railway land and the roads became very crowded, because to go to anywhere except betweeen big towns you needed a car. At the time Britain had a very complicated road system and no motorways. To go from Cambridge to London you had to go from one village to another to Royston and then to Baldock, from there to Stevenage, when you could get on the Great North Road which took you into London's Hampstead. It took a good many hours and was a fairly frustrating experience. Because the small railway lines had fed passengers and freight into the main lines, when they were "axed" the main lines were starved of passengers and probably freight too and lost a lot of revenue. Later, another Conservative Government, sold off the railways piece by piece, to private companies. The Banks were very cunning, they bought the track and the carriages and rented both out, to the companies which had bought the franchises for various parts of Britain. They leased these out to the "Railway" compaies at very high prices, so that travelling by train in Britain now is extremely expensive, but the blame goes to the Companies not to the Banks, because hardly anyone knows this. The banks have also "economised", very heavily, on maintaining the tracks, so that the railways are much less safe now than they used to be.
    1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. I wonder if you two much respected doctors would agree with this that I wrote some time ag during the pandemic? The need to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years! The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them and failing to test repuposed drugs because there id no profit to be made from their sale. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease. Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it. Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks worth running
    1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 5:17 To fix this problem you have to fix the two things which are draining your economy, that can be fixed. So what are they? In my view they are the cost of healthcare and the cost of being the World's Hegemon. Let's deal with health first. Why are medicines and healthcare so damned expensive in the USA compared to other countries? It is because, in the US, both of them are Privately owned. Why is that a disastrously bad idea? Simple! Think about it. There is a built-in Conflict of Interest in Both! Put Crudely, the problem is that "A cure is a Lost Customer!" The Pharmaceutical Industry is a number of Capitalist concerns. Well, what's wrong with that? What's wrong with that, is that the Primary Duty of a capitalist concern is to its shareholders. Its primary Duty, is to make a profit. Apart from laws to protect employees, customers, visitors to the company's premises and the environment, the capitalist company has No legal obligation to the country or its inhabitants. It is, however supposed to make a profit or go out of business. This leads to the pharmaceutical industry refusing to make medicines which ar known to work, because they compete with other medicines which do much the same, but sell for a higher price. Worse, it leads to the Industry trying to suppress cures to diseases which are highly profitable to treat! , A text-book example of this is Stomach Ulcers. For many many years, millions of people, world-wide, suffered (and died) of stomach ulcers and many were kept alive, though sufferring, by palliative medications, which they took every day for years and years. This was, from the point of view of the Pharmaceutical Industry, an Ideal Situation. The patients were not so sick that they could not work, but they needed daily doses of their product. What's to not like!? Then in 1982, in Austrailia, Professor Marshall, 54, and Dr Warren, 68, Discovered that these ulcers were caused by a quite common bacterium called Helicobacter Pylorii and these ulcers could be cured by a combination of bismuth and antibiotics, in a couple of weeks! They struggled for many years, to get this information out to the World, but they were blocked at every turn by the Pharmaceutical companies, which threatened the medical journals and the MSM with the withdrawal of advertising, if they dared to publish this news.I do not know if it was the BBC that brought this into the open bu in "Horizon: Ulcer Wars. BBC Two logo. BBC Two · Mon 16 May 1994, 20 ... Marshall found that it was the bacterium Helicobacter pylori that caused ulcers, treatable .." They published it and that was how I heard about it and was able to save three relatives from a life of misery! Finally in 2005 (!) these medical heroes, were cited for "their 1982 discovery of “the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease.” (BMJ. 2005 Oct 8; 331(7520): 795) After that The surgical operations to treat the condition gradually died out as doctors gradually got the message. Qute clearly, the cure for this situation, is the Urgent Nationalization of the Pharmaceutical industry. The current situation is totally unacceptable. It is, for example, the cause of the present case being brought by the AG of Kansas, against Pfizer, which by the looks of it, will uncover one of the biggest crimes in History. The point is that a nationalized Pharmaceutical Industry would be interested in Cures, rather than Treatments. It would favour Public Health. It would not be constrained by costs in testing promising medicines, "because there is no profit to be made selling it". Another point in favour of the nationalization of this industry, is that it would not need to make a profit and so would have funds to research treatments and cures for "Rare Diseases" which cannot currently be reseached, because "there would be too few patients to be profitable". The same argument applies to the Arms industry. (With knobs on!) One of the biggest US expenditures is on the Military Industrial Complex. On the face of it, this is ridiculous! There has not been a real threat to the security of the US since WW2. The "Soviet Threat" was manufactured by NATO. They knew from early in the Cold War that here was no Soviet plan to invade Western Europe, let alone the US, only a plan to counter-attack if invaded. The US has a vast ocean to its East and a vast ocean to its west and friendly (Much weaker) neighbours to the North and the South, so how could it be threatened and by whom? So why the constant hysterical worry about "National Security"? Quite obviously, the answer lies in the old Roman adage: "QUI BONO?" (Follow the money.) This industry has effectivly bought congress through the lobbying industry and the government through the "Revolving Door" and the MSM through advertising. It thrives on wars, rumours of wars and threats of wars, so the US has an endless supply of these and it is bleeding (Correction! has bled) the national coffers dry, There will be no peace in the World until all arms producers are nationalized, world-wide. Government are not "Naturally" warlike unless they are really criminal organizations. On the whole, they do not like imposing taxations because it makes them unpopular. Whereas, Arms manufacturers, like Pharmaceutical concerns are interested in PROFITS and nothing else.
    1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. The difference is in the relationship of the MIC of the two countries to their respective governmens. I have written about this before but since you ask I will repeat it. . Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the US taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, shareholders and employees while the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. The Vicious Circle consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The Vicious Circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders, employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round, with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their respective country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead
    1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. I worked as a contract technician for various Philips companies in the 1970s to the 1990s, in the UK. The thing that struck me was the quite extraordinary inefficiencies in their ways of working. The first experience I had of this was a job for , I think it was called Pye Telecom. The job was manually inputting stock records into a computer database. This involved not writing numbers into a table, as one might expect, but writing, one character at a time, such entries as : 34,000 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.0 Ohm. 240,000 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.1 Ohm. 242,500 res. 1%, 2W, carb. comp. 1.2 Ohm. 240, etc ! Then I worked for another Philips company that made Cellphones, Pye Telecom. There my job was rectifying cellphone guts that had been inspected by a computer-controlled machine and came with a readout that said such things as : R1 wrong value R23 WRONG VALUE R96 WRONG VALUE C5 WRONG VALUE TR 7 WRONGLY INSERTED and so on. I wondered how to find R1 on this very crowded board and went to my supervisor and asked him how to find itand after a bit of searching through a lot of papers he cam up with an A4 sized map, which he allowed me to photocopy. I went back to my desk and started by drawing a 1cm grid over the photocopy and writing an identifying number against the lines parallel to one side of the paper and identifying letters against the lines at right-angles to them. I then set about writing a list of the coordinates of the various components while I was thus engaged my supervisor came ocer to me and asked: "WHAT ARE you doing!? You are supposed to be working!!" I told him I was working and I was doing what ought to have been done for all who had to do this job abd that what I was doing would save the company a lot of money. "Uh, yes, I see what you mean" he said in a less aggressive tone "But, take care not to let George see what you are doing!" (George was his boss.) "Look!" I said, "Let's go and talk to George and I will explain what I am doing and why and then you won't have to worry about him seeing me working on this map." So we went and saw George and I explained why I was doing and why and he listened to me and when I had finished he thought about it and said: "Yes, go ahead and finish your map, but for God's sake don't let Ken see what you are doing!" I had a friend, another contractor who worked in the same plant. He asked me when he met me there, what I was doing and I asked him the same question. "I work in the Recycling Department" he said. "What do yo do there?" I asked. "I throw away about £100k/year of components!" "You joke, surely!" I said "No, I really do." Of course I asked how and why and he explained that when Pye Telecom received an order for, for example 1,000 cellphones, they orderd the components that they would need from the central suppliers or firms Like Farnell and when the batch had been completed there were always components left over. For example, 220k, 1/2W resistors might come in a box of 10,000 and the job only needed 5,000. that would mean that 5000 were unused at the end of the batch and they would be sent to the Recycling Department, which had nowhere to store them and simply put them in the dustbins. "But why don't they put them back in the stores?" I asked. "They can't do that because the computer only recognizes whole boxes." Likewise with wire or cable, the computer could recognize only whole reels. Then I worked for Pye TVT which made TV transmitters. The first morning when I turned up and asked what work they had for me the person in HR said "How would you feel about assembling a TV transmitter?" "Well!" I said a bit nonplussed, "I expect if you give me the parts and a drawing I can assemble it." So he took me to the shop where the transmitters were assemble and handed me over to the foreman. He took me over to a pile of parts, on the floor and said: "There you are." I looked at the pile to find the drawing, but I could not see it. "Where's the drawing?" I asked. "Oh, I'm afraid there isn't a drawing." he said. "No drawing?" I queried, incredulously. "No. I'm afraid , we've been waiting six weeks for the drawings. and the Drawing Office still haven't given them us." "So, how am I supposed to know what goes where? I've never built a TV transmitter before!" "I'll tell you what" he responded, brightening up a bit "They're dismantling one in the packing department just now, you can go and look at that and it'll give you an idea of how it goes together." So, for the next six weeks I trotted to the Packing Department and back again with parts in my hands, trying to remember how they fitted into the rest of the apparatus that I had assembled. Then one day I went to lunch in their canteen and found myself sitting next to a man who said he worked in the Drawing Office. "Ah! You're just the man I want to meet! Can you tell me why I there are no drawings for the transmitter for Sweden that I am assembling? I've been assembling one for the last six weeks and I cannot, for the life of me, think why there are no drawings for it." "There are drawings for it." he said. "Well, why doesn't the Model Shop have any then?" I asked "We're a bit tied up with ITV at the moment." Another almost incredible inefficiency in this factory was the obtaining of parts that one needed for the job. Philips had instituted a universal numbering system for, more or less, everything in the galaxy or at any rate everything that Philips might ever use. Everything had been given a number, whether it was an M6 hex-headed bolt,15 cms long under the head or a 100W 240Volt, pearl, Edison screw light bulb, or whatever it was, it was identified by a (IIRC, 7-digit) code number which used all ten numbers and all 26 letters. Now, if you wanted, say, 6 off M4 hex. plated steel nuts you had to write out an application form for that number of those nuts and take it to the foreman. The foreman would then sign it as approved and you took the signed application to the office where they would give you a printed slip for 6 of whatever was in the bin with the corresponding number that they had put on the slip. You then went and queued up at the stores where they would give you six of whatever was in the bin with the corresponding number. If you were lucky, you got what you needed, but if not, you had to start all over again! So, I'm not surprised that Philips is on its way out.
    1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. Seems to me that what Putin says is straightforward and common sense. The only surprise in what he says, is how different it is to what we are told he says, by the MSM. When you listen to what he says, it makes sense and it is clear that he is in full control of his senses and he does not appear to be hiding anything. Furthermore, he does not evade questions, he answers them. The widely spread idea in the West that he is on some drive to conquer the World, does not bear examination. (To me it looks like what the psychiartists call "projection". I.e. thinking that other people are thinking or doing what you yourself are doing or thinking. Like a man planning to murder his wife, imagining that his wife is planning to murder him.) In the case of Russia planning to conquer the World, one has to ask: "Who has about 900 military bases all over the World and why? Who has the largest military budget in the World BY FAR ?" (Bigger than the next 9 or 10 countries put together and some of those are allies!) Who has attacked and largely wrecked, at least 50 countries since 1950. Is it Russia? No, it isn't. Russia has one of the lowest population densities in the World (About 30 times less than the UK.) it has no need of more land. So why do so many people in the West think that Russia is on some drive to conquer the rest of Europe and after that the rest of the World? It is because, that is what they are told, over and over again. That repetition is a fact, but however many times a lie is repeated it does not make it true.
    1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369.  @voraxe3032  "sounds like a racket to me just eat decent" Type 1 Diabetes is a failure of the pancreas to produce insulin, which means you cannot clear glucose from your blood. Glucose is the breakdown product of sugar and starch. It is a genetic defect. You need supplementary insulin to replace the insulin that your pancreas is not producing. (Or this new Chinese treatment.) Type 2, means that, for too long, you have eaten too much sugar and starch and produced so much insulin, that the cells in your body have stopped responding to it and stopped absorbing glucose to make energy and fat. "Eating decent" is not helpful, if what you eat, contains sugar or starch. If you have type 2, you need to go on a keto diet and cut out as much sugar and starch as you can. Fortunately, if you get most of your calories from "decent" fat (Butter, Tallow, mutton fat, Lard, chicken fat coconut oil, real olive oil (and NO seed oils, NO Margarine!) you will feel hungry much less often and full much sooner. The reason for that is, when you eat sugar and you get glucose in your blood, your pancreas produces insulin and your muscles absorb the glucose and turn it into glycogen, which can be used later to make muscular energy. When the muscles have made all the glycogen they need, the fat cells turn the remaining glucose in the blood, into fat and store it. That leaves the insulin, that was produced to deal with the glucose, that has been stored, still in your blood and that makes you feel hungry! This is why sweet things make you want more sweet things. In other words, sugar and starch are highly addictive drugs which, when taken in excess, are very damaging. The Big Food Companies are the biggest pushers around! Read the labels on the food.
    1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433.  @JosephBisio  " What about that little Russian invasion of 2/24/22 ?? " That Invasion was provoked by the US whose proxy, the Ukrainian army, after spending seven and a bit years attacking the Russian-speaking Eastern provinces of Lugansk and Donetsk and killing thousands of them, threatened to wage an all out war on them and either etnicly cleanse the two provinces or masscre the inhabitants of them. The invasion was a pre-emptive strike to prevent this happenning. " What about Chinese threats vs, Taiwan," Taiwan is a province of China, as even the USG admits. The Chinese "threat" to invade its own province (?) is that if the province declares itself an independent country the Chinese government will invade to put it back under central government control, (Which, I should think, is what any government would do in their place!) but the Beijing government has always stated that they would much rather negotiate a peaceful union with two seperate systems in the mainland and Taiwan. " What about Chinese threats vs, Philippines, and Vietnam." Well what about them ? the relations between China and Vietnam are pretty good on the whole, true they have border disputes so do many other states in the region. The Chinese are not threatening to invade Vietnam. As to the Philipines there too the situation is similar. Until the Communists triuphed in China the US stated clearly that the islands and reefes that are disputed were Chinese. The Philipines have a new government which wants to please the US so they are upping the dispute over some islands. Thats about par for the course. Please detail Iran's threat against Israel. How do they compare to Israels genocidal actions and threats in Gaza?
    1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 7:15 The idea that you are peddling, that the war on Ukraine by Russia was a Russian initiative, is , franky, Fake News. That the Maidan Coup was orchestrated by the US, by Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt, the US ambassador to the Ukraine, is hardly a secret. After this, under US tutelage, Ukraine so alienated the Russian speaking regions of the Donbas, that they rebelled and demanded autonomous status. The Ukrainian army then attacked them and were defeated and had to be rescued by Angela Merkel by the negotiation of a ceacefire; which was the result of the "Minsk Agreement 1" which was constantly violated, mostly by the Ukrainian government side and was followed by the second Minsk Agrrement. which was also constantly violated, mostly by the government forces. Later, Merkel and Hollande admitted, even boasted, that they had negotiated the Minsk agreements with Russia simply to give NATO time to build up, arm and train the Ukrainian forces to be able to defeat Russia. By February 2022, NATO thought that the Ukrainian army was ready, so they faced Russia with a horrible choice: either Ukraine would launch an all out attack on the Russian-speaking Donbas and would wipe them out or expel them, or if the Russians would come to the aid of their Russian-speaking brothers in Ukraine, they would face the largest and best armed, best trained, best equipped NATO-style army in Europe (backed by NATO). This choice was made more dfficult for Putin by the fact that he knew that if he left the Donbas residents to their fate, the Russian people would be furious and would throw him out of power. As by February 2022, 10,000 residents of Donbas had already been killed, it left him very little choice. It is not as though Putin woke up one day and decided: "Let's go and invade Ukraine!" There is much more I could say that is relevant, but I think that is enough.
    1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. I have been saying for a long time now, that there is a clear conflict of interest in a private pharmaceutical firm. The firm has a clear, legal duty to its shareholders, Its duty to its customers is less clear, is moral not legal and is legally unenforceable. A cured customer is a lost sale. The best result of a product, is the "stabilization" of a chronic disease, where the patient is on the drug for the rest of his long life. (Better still if it is addictive.)This was made very clear to me by the case of Dr Barry Marshall N.P. who discovered that stomach ulcers (remember them?) were caused by Helicobacter Pylorii and could be CURED in a fortnight with antibiotics. It took him TEN YEARS to get this accepted by the medical profession as a result of the blocking tactics of the pharmaceutical industry. No doubt there are numerous other examples. They were able to do this because they own the Medical Journals through advertising and the Medical schools through sponsorship. Who can doubt that they own politicians too. As you say, we need the government to nationalize the production of generic pharmaceuticals, but I would go much further. I would say that Private pharmaceutical industry is an essentially bad idea. A bad idea in principle, What is needed is national pharmaceutical industries or better an international pharmaceutical industry funded by all governments. (The reason is simple: for the pharmaceutical firm the ideal medicine produces a customer who is sick of a chronic disease, while from the government's pov, the ideal medicine is one that produces a cured patient.) Nationalization would avoid price gouging, suppression of cures, and neglect of rare diseases among other advantages. It would prevent the suppression of medicines that work because they compete with newer, more profitable medicines which do the same or less. It would avoid a huge number of drawbacks that are built into private pharma. It would undoubtedly save billions. (Both meanings!) It would also free the medical journals to publish interesting papers without wondering if their advertisers would approve. Probably, the industry should be run, or at least supervised by a committee of practicing doctors, without more than the minimum of junior burocrats involved. Boy! Can you imagine the opposition such a proposal would meet?!
    1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. I have posted this contribution to the discussion in a few other threads but I think it is worth doing so again, as, as faras I know no one else seems to thik along the same lines (Or circles.) Almost all the conflict that has plagued the World since 1945 has originated in the US, because of its obssession with being the World Hegemon. The constsnt war-mongering has its seat in what I call the "Vicious circle" in Washington DC. This circular structure is fed, willy-nilly by the us taxpayer and passes out money to the shareholders and employees of the weapons mfgs and the lobbyist industry, and its shareholders and employees and the MSM feeds off advertising bought by the weapon mfgs. The Vicious Circle consists of various parts: the congress-critters, the weapons manufacturers, the United States Government and the lobbying industry. The vicious circle functions in the following way: being circular there is no startpoint or end point, but I will start with the congress-critters, who vote for payments to the arms mfgs. The government then orders the weapons and pays the weapons mfgs. The weapons mfgs then pay their shareholders and employees and the lobbyists who pay the congress-critters' election expenses on condition that they vote "the right way" and so it goes round and round with the MSM carrying adverts from the arms mfgs and helping along with stories to alarm the general public. This structure is very powerful, very rich, quite ruthless and very well established. So long as it exists in its present form, I doubt that the World will ever know peace. The only solution I can think of, is if the US is handed a resounding defeat in Ukraine and the Russians insist that all arms mfgs must be nationalised enterprises, with no other shareholder than the government of their country. This, by cutting the financial nexus, would kill the "Vicious Circle" stone-dead. At least I hope it would, I think it would.
    1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years! The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders The job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease. Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If, for example, a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it. Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks well worth running.
    1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967.  @duncansmith7576  You think that the only purpose of a war is to take ground/cities? You should have listened to what Putin said was the purpose of the invasion when the Russians invaded. He said that the purpose of the invasion was to de-militarise and de-Nazify Ukraine and make sure that it was Not part of NATO or in other words "neutral". Nothing about conquering the whole of the land mass of Ukraine. De-militarizing Ukraine means destroying Ukraine's weapons and their army. That is what they have done. Isn't it? De-NAZIfying the Ukraine means destroying (at least) the power of the Ukrainian NAZIs which they have very largely done. Making Ukraine into a non-NATO state, remains to be done, probably through negotiations when the fighting stops, or when negotiations start. The point of continuing "to fight an army with no ammunition" is that this war is disarming NATO! Ask yourself: "Why does Zelensky's army have no weapons, too few men and no ammunition?" "Is it because the West has not given it any? NO. Is it because the West does not want to give it weapons? No. The reason is that the West has used up its stocks of weapons supplying Zelensky's army. The Ukrainians have worn some out, they have used up a lot, the Ukrainian government has sold a lot on the World Black Market and the Russians have destroyed the rest. The longer the war goes on the fewer weapons the West has. Big-arrow offensives cost a lot of lives and the Russians want to lose as few men as possible. Advancing slowly, is more economical and the Ukrainians keep bringing Naxis to be killed and weapons to be destroyed, so why would the Russians go wild and advance rapidly? Do you understand now?
    1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041.  @lorenzomagazzeni5425  China is a country about the same size as the US. It use to be the case that some parts were so far from the main centres of population that it took weeks or even month to get there. With enemy organizations always trying to stir up trouble, it made it easier for them if the centre was weeks away. It was difficult to develop the outer parts of the country, because it was so hard to get people and things into and out of the far away places. If someone fell seriously ill, in some parts of old China, they would die before a doctor could get to them or they could get to a doctor (See a book by Josh Horne called "Away with all pests!") To develop the economy and to raise all people out of poverty it was neccessary to enable everybody to be able to trade with each other. So the government built roads to every village, masses of bridges to shorten routs and then railways. Evidently, they thought that while they were building a railway they might as well make it a high speed one. The result is that the interior of China is now developing rapidly. Instead of weeks it now takes a matter of hours to get from one end of the country to the other. People in remote villages can sell stuff on the internet by post and they do. The problem with the wheels of an HST, is that the centrifugal force on a wheel rotating that fast is huge and unless the wheel is very strong it will fly to pieces. If you make it as a solid lump of steel the noise is terrible. The other problem is the bearings which have to be quite special, as otherwise they might seize up and derail the train, or as happened once in Germany a composite wheel came apart in the course of a journey, the rim of the wheel unrolled and came up through the floor of the carriage, passing between two people sitting there! The train left the track and IMMSMC hit a bridge. Quite a lot of people were killed. Obviously, the railways are an important strategic asset too.
    1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. Privately-owned pharmaceutical firms have a built-in conflict of interest. They make their money from sick people. Their really ideal customers are those who are chronically sick but not so sick as to be unable to work. Being capitalist enterprises they have a duty to make as much money as possible for their shareholders. This in turn means that they have to be opposed to anything that tends to promote public health. A cured customer is a lost sale. A cure for a common disease is a thing to be avoided, what is needed (What they need.) is something which alleviates the suffering, costs a lot of money and does not cure the illness. In short, privately owned pharmaceutical companies are an OBVIOUSLY BAD IDEA. Letting a body owned by privately owned pharmaceutical companies (Like the WHO.) make the laws for all countries, is self-evidently self-destructively stupid. Just ask yourself: "In whose interests are they going to work?" We should all oppose it! Ideally, pharmaceutical research organizations would be owned by the governments of the World and private research would be strictly controlled and its results would be available to the World's pharmaceutical manufacturer. Apart from this, pharmaceutical research would be a monopoly of the international organization. This would solve a lot of problems, but crucially it would remove the conflict of interest. Governments, like ordinary people, want cures, not "treatments". They want healthy populations. There are also other benefits of international research organizations doing the research for the pharmaceutical industry. It removes all the problems over patents. It ensures equal access to all countries to the medicines their population needs. It means that there would be no "orphan" diseases, diseases that are too rare to be profitable to treat. There would be no incentive to replace satisfactory medications with newer, more profitable ones, just because they are more profitable. Above all, there would be no incentive to suppress cures. Of course there would be disadvantages too. There would, no doubt, be complaints that the organization was "too burocratic" and inflexible, but the advantages would outweigh all the drawbacks. In my view, this arrangement must come, sooner or later. People must see and avoid the stupidity of the present set-up eventually.
    1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081.  @reginaldmcnab3265  The MIC is the Military-Industrial Complex. It was noted by Eisenhower in his final speech as something that needed to be carefully watched. And Boy! Was he ever correct! It should really be called "the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Media-Lobbying Complex". I call it "The Vicious Circle". It is a circular structure which is parasitic on the taxpayers and consists of the arms mfgs, the lobbying industry, the congress critters, the Media and the US government. Money comes into Vicious Circle (VC) by government taxation and goes out to the media, as advertising by the arms mfgs, as wages and salaries to the employees and shareholders of the, arms mfgs, to the employees and shareholders of the lobbying firms and as election expenses to congress-crittters paid by the lobbyists, to those who vote (Or agree that they will vote) "the right way". The congress-critters vote for the government to buy arms, the government pays the arms mfgs, the arms mfgs pay the lobbyists who tell the congress critters that if they vote the way they are told to vote, the lobbyist firm will help with their election expenses and that if they don't, the lobbyist will fund their opponent. In addition, people who have important goverment or Military jobs during their working lives and use their positions to help the arms mfgs, get well-paid sinecures with the arms mfgs and consultancy fees from the MSM after they retire. This is known as "the Revolving Door". This VC, is a group of relatively few people, but it is very, very rich, quite ruthless and extremely powerful. Its income depends on war, threats of wars and rumours of wars. Breaking it up will be extremely hard, but until it is and the arms-making industry is nationalised (preferably internationally) the World will never know peace.
    1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. This is a comment I have made elsewhere, but I'll risk showing it again. I agree with what you are saying in this video entirely. It seems to me, that there is an obvious and extremely serious objection, to privately owned pharmaceutical industries. Namely that there is a fundamental, built-in Conflict of Interest. To put it as simply as possible; to a privately -owned pharmaceutical firm, a cured customer is a lost customer. The ideal customer, is one who buys a drug that is still "in-patent", which is moderately expensive and needs to be taken indefinitely to "stabilise" the disease. A drug which does not cure the disease, but enables the patient to be well enough to earn a living. The treatment for stomach ulcers, before Dr Barry Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylorii and the fact that the disease could be cured in a couple of weeks with barium and antibiotics, was a text book example of just such a drug. The pharmaceutical industry fought hard to keep knowledge of this discovery from the public and succeeded in suppressing it for ten years! The obvious cure for this problem is to nationalise the Pharmaceutical industry in its entirety. (Better still, would be to internationalize it but that is a step for another time.) The point is, that a government has quite different priorities from those of a private firm. Whereas the job of a private company is to make money for its shareholders, the job of a publicly owned pharmaceutical firm is to produce the best range of medicines that it can, as cheaply as possible. To research cures for diseases that are troubling the public and to make sure that their products are safe or at least, that its side effects are known. As far as a government is concerned, the ideal drug is one that will quickly cure a disease, that costs very little and causes the least possible trouble to the patient. Having a nationalized pharmaceutical industry would avoid wasteful duplicated research, price gouging and neglect of "rare diseases" because there is no money to be made from treating them. Above all, such an industry has no motivation to suppress a cure, because it is making money from treating a disease. Another advantage of a nationalized pharmaceutical industry is that it would not have to worry about the cost of trials of experimental drugs in the same way as a private firm. If a new or repurposed drug was very cheap, but showed promise, the fact that it would not make money for the firm would not be an obstacle to setting up a test of it. Some people will object that "nationalizrd firms are always inefficient" and that such an industry "would be bogged down in burocrasy." Personally I think that removing the the "Conflict of Interest" would make running those supposed risks, worth running.
    1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 32:51 I heard a somewhat similar story from two men who fought in the Resistance in WW2 in Belgium. There was a coal mine which had all its machinery driven by compressed air to avoid sparks that might cause explosions and to provide ventiliation at the same time. This mine was particularly important, because the coal was suitable for producing fuel for Jet Fighters. The Resistance was given orders from London, to destroy the functioning of the mine , but in a way that would not permanently disable it, "As the owners of the mine, who were in London would not allow that" (!). The compressed air was produced by a turbo-compressor, driven by an electric motor and it was housed in a small building near the entrance to the mine. The entrance to the mine and the compressor house, were inside an electrified barbed wire fence guarded by a unit of the Gestapo. The Resistance men did their research and found that the electricity that supplied the compressor, went from the sub-station for the mine to the compressor house by a tunnel which was blocked at both ends. They gambled that the Gestapo did not know of the existence of the tunnel and to make sure that the great majority of the guards would be watching the fence they distributed leaflets announcing that they were planning a mass attack on the mine on the night they were planning to attack it. On the night in question, about five men IIRC, went along the tunnel and lifted the manhole cover that gave access to the inside of the compressor house and overpowered the two men looking after the compressor. They then put 1kg explosive charges on both ends of the compressor and another on the exposed bearing of the electric motor and two more inside the crates containing the spare compressor. (The owners of the mine had contacted the Swiss firm that made the compressor to ensure that no spare would be supplied before the end of the war.) They then set time fuses and left the same way they had come, taking the two mechanics they had captured with them. When the explosives went off, the turbine disintegrated and the flying turbine blades killed a large number of the Gestapo guards. One of the men telling me this story said: "And one of the most satisfying things about it was, that when I went later with an American unit, to Aachen we passed dozens of Messerschmitt 262s in hangars on the roadside, that had not been used, that could not be used, because there was no fuel for them."
    1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 31:37 I agree with Col MacGregor about the Donors, absolutely. These are at the heart of the existential problem facing the World. I have posted this idea elsewhere on the net and I would be very interested to hear comments on it. At the moment in the US (Where almost all the threat of war comes from.) the driving force for wars and threats of war is the complex system, consisting of the arms industry, the USG, the Congress, the Lobbyist Industry and the Shareholders of the arms-manufacturing firms. This complex system functions as a sort of closed loop, with inputs and outputs. Inputs come from the taxpayers, while the outputs are, of course arms and (More importantly in this context.) money to the shareholders of the arms-manufacturers, As the loop is circular in nature we can start anywhere, Let's start with the congress critters. These representatives are chiefly concerned with keeping their positions and are very often shareholders in the Arms Industry as well. They are approched by the Lobbyist industry representatives with an offer which is difficult to ignore. The offer is: if you vote the way we tell you to, we will contribute generously to your re-election expenses. If you don't, we will fund your opponent(s). The Lobbyists are paid by the Arms manufacturers to do this. As a result when there is a proposal to spend money on arms, it is almost always passed, with the result that the taxpayers have to cough up more money and the shareholders get more dividends and the lobbyists get paid by the arm manufacturers, more money to do their next lot of work. This "Vicious Circle" (as I call it) is a very stable set up. It is also very self protective. Many have lost their seats in congress, trying to expose it and break its power. Some have probably died trying. In normal (!) circumstances, it is very difficult to see how this can be broken up by anyone. However, we do have, at the moment, quite abnormal times coming. (Or so it seems to me.) Neightoe is on the brink of a massive defeat and if/when that happens the Russians will be in a position to dictate a lot of the Terms of Settlement. If one of their terms was that all arms manufacturers had to be nationalized, it would disrupt this cosy arrangement. Or, at least, I think it would, because it would cut the financial knot that hold the whole system together. It would remove the financial basis for the "Vicious Circle."
    1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600.  @nickiemcnichols5397  Ignorance is popular because people are often very lazy, particularly about thinking and searching. In the modern world it is possible to get away with being lazy, albeit at a fairly low level unless you inherit wealth. Some months ago, I read a very interesting article (or saw a very interesting video, I forget which) about why the Chinese are so tough and so smart. The idea of this piece was that the ancient Chinese system was ruthlessly meritocratic, unlike most societies you did not automatically inherit your father's position in society. E.g. if your father was a duke you did not inherit his title you had a lesser title and unless you earned merit, you son would inhert a still less important title and so on. Jobs in the civil service, (the main route to wealth) could be gained only by passing exams. So, if an obviously bright child was born he would be schooled to pass the exams. This was expensive, so in a poor family, the extended family would all rally round to pay for the child's education, because having a relative working in the civil service benefitted the whole family. The law meanwhile, was very hard on anyone who tried to prevent anyone from sitting for the entrance exam. At the same time getting married was also expensive and poor men had a poor chance of getting married. So to pass on his genes, a man who could not pass the exams, had to work very hard to be able to afford a wife. The stupid and the lazy often did not manage to do that. So, for several thousand years, you had a ruthless weeding out of the stupid and lazy and a promotion of the bright. It shows!
    1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. You describe this report as hard-hitting. To my mind it is not hard-hitting enough. It is abundantly clear that unless there were some simply amazing coincidences, some people were aware not only that a pandemic was, so to say, "in the works" but when it was going to strike. For example there was a conference involving Bill Gates which gamed the pandemic about three months before it struck and at least one pharmaceutical company was working on a vaccine against it, before the pandemic started. On another point it is certainly true that some of the scientists who were working on gain-of-function research have admitted as much and if I remember correctly, the REASON that the NIH sent the research to Wuhan was that GoF research had been outlawed in the US! The labs that the Russians discovered in Ukraine had been working on organisms which Victoria Nuland was alarmed might fall into Russian hands. Vide her congressional testimony under oath.) Also there were numerous published (Sic!) papers on closely-related viruses both by the Wuhan Lab and by the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill laboratory. There are "secret" bio-weapons research labs all over the world (Mostly like the one in Ukraine, funded by the US Department of Defense) and this pandemic could potentially have come from any of them. There are of course, others funded by other countries. To my mind the dangers of a really dangerous virus coming out of Nature by accident are vastly less than the dangers of a Lab-Leak of really dangerous pathogens designed to kill people coming from bioweapons research labs. I think therefore, that research should be rigorously confined to finding ways of dealing with, that is curing, the diseases that we already suffer from. The alternative is ridiculously dangerous. Engaging in such evil research should be considered a crime against humanity.
    1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. I worked for a short while in Central Instrument-making workshop of the Akademie der Wissenschaften in Ardlershof, Berlin. In the DDR at that time, they had difficulty in getting the screws they needed, so they made their own. They had a huge encyclopedia-like book called "Deutscher Industrie Normen" Which specified, in enormoous detail the dimentoins and tolerances of everything imaginable. It even specified the radius of the bevel on the edge of the screwdriver-slot in the head of a screw. The tool that they used for making these screws was a special lathe, the headstock of which, together with the chuck gould slide towards or away from the tailstock. On the outer end of the headstock you could mount what they called "Ein Patron" (a cartridge) which was an externally threaded tube made of hard steel. about 3cms in diameter, this cartridge was matched by another piece, I think it may have been bronze which was half a nut of the same pitch. This half-nut was easily mounted on an arm which pivoted about a shaft mounted on the lathe bed. The simple v-shaped or square-shaped cutting tool was mounted on the cross-slide, which had a simple handle to push the cross-slide in as far as the adjustable stop would allow. In use, the stop was set for the first cut, the tool was pushed as far as the stop would allow, the headstock was set to rotate and the half-nut was engaged with the cartridge. The work piece then moved forward towards the cutting tool and the first cut was made. When the half nut was disengaged from the carteidge, the headstoch was pulled back to its resting place and the cutting tool was retracted at the same time Then the stop was reset and and the next cut was made. The screw-blanks were made on a standard capstan lathe as a seperate operation. It was surprisingly quick and easy to use this machine.
    1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. The usual avoidance of mentioning SANCTIONS! What a load of misleading cobblers'! Russia ha s been a very reliable supplier right up to the present year and the recent rise in the price of gas was caused, not by Russia cutting supplies , but by the bean-counters in Brussels thinking that they could buy gas cheaper on the spot market, than the price Russia charged for long term contracts. It was true that SOMETIMES it is possible to buy gas cheaper on the spot-market, but one cannot rely on it. Just as one can sometimes buy almost anything cheaper on the spot market, so one can sometimes get gas at a bargain price, but industry needs a reliable supply and that is exactly what Russia has been, even all through the Cold war. Europe has put sanctions on Russia, thinking, even saying, (!) that they thought it was going to crash the Russian economy and lead to "Regime Change" in Russia. Well, it didn't work and now we, the people of Europe have to live with the consequences of our Masters' foolishness. So far, the only Russian retaliation ha s been to say: "if you want our gas you'll have to pay for it in roubles." which is nothing to what they could have done. If our leaders keep poking them, we may soon find out. They a) do not rely on selling gas to live and b) they will have no trouble selling gas and oil outside Europe and the USA. Incidentally, the USA, for all its earnest warnings, is itself, busy importing Russian oil as I write. The obvious cure for the "problem" of the gas shortage is to cut the cr*p and open NS2.
    1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 55:21 Before the 1880s, the UK government used to get into a war and then find it did not have enough e.g. rifles. So, at vast expense to the taxpayer, it would dish out contracts (No doubt to the right people) to manufacture rifles. Then when the war stopped the orders would cease and the companies either went bankrupt or turned to making something else. Sometime in the 1880s Parliament decided to set up a commission to look into ways of improving this situation. One of their particular requirements was that the rifles should have interchangeable parts. I.e. if a two rifles were damaged beyond repair the undamaged parts from both could be cannibalized to make another rifle, This required a degree of precision that British machine tools of that time did not have. Eventually, the commission decided that the idea of sourcing standardized rifles from different private companies was a non-starter and they said that the manufacture of guns should be nationalized and the work be given to The Royal Arsenal. They also found that they could get machine tools capable of the required precision, from the machine tool factories in Massachusetts. These machines were bought and installed in the Royal Arsenal and produced rifles and other guns throughout the WW1 and WW2 and were still in use when I started doing my National service. In the 1980s I worked in the maintenance department of an English factory, employing about 150 people. I was told that the department had no current head, as the young, newly qualified Engineer who had been given the job, had been shown the department's only lathe (made sometime during Victoria's reign) and had asked: "But where is the keyboard?" On being told that that was not the way it was controlled he had resigned.
    1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1