Comments by "Inoovator" (@inoovator3756) on "Corey Gil-Shuster" channel.

  1. 9
  2. 9
  3. 8
  4. 8
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121.  @MrHRanjha  Yep again you are completely misunderstood, you assume that zionism is a religious movement when it is anything but. Are you aware that the original founders of israel weren't even religious whatsoever? They didn't believe that God promised them anything because they didn't even believe in God to begin with. And of course you fail to understand that hundreds of thousands of Jews lived in the mandate before 1948. If Israel wasn't created they would be living there just like you claim you would. So my question to you is why do you accuse Jews of "stealing your Egyptian nephews land" when your country was formed by stealing hindu land. Not only this but the only reason this even happened was because the Arab league did not accept the 1947 partition plan. If they would and the mandate would have been partitioned peacefully no one would have lost anything. But in their stupidity they instead decided to declare a war to genocide all the Jews living there and lost miserably. Let me give you a hypothetical. Let's say after the partition in the Raj India refused to recognize Pakistan and invaded it to try wipe out the country, and instead Pakistan wins the war and takes more land from India. Would you now accuse your country of stealing Hindu land? Of course not. I would suggest to your Egyptian cousin that perhaps he buy some more real estate in Egypt or any of the other 2 dozen or so Arab countries with plenty of land available. Plenty of Jews had to go through what your Egyptian nephew did. Did you know that over 800k of them were expelled from Arab lands and were forced to go to Israel and had all of their property confiscated? When are they going to get their land back? The answer is never of course. So what you're asking for is just special treatment for your Egyptian cousin
    1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152.  @MrHRanjha  "41 of the 1973 Constitution: The President (2) A person shall not be qualified for election as President unless he is a Muslim of not less than forty-five years of age and is qualified to be elected as member of the National Assembly. Article 41, while providing the qualifications for election to the office of president of Pakistan, states (in no uncertain terms) that in order to be qualified a candidate has to be a Muslim. The Third Schedule to the constitution, which contains the text of the oath to be taken by the president before entering upon the said office, specifically provides, in relevant part, that the candidate shall affirm that he is a Muslim and believes in the Oneness of Allah, the Holy Quran, and that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the last of the prophets of Allah. Thus, the constitution is, in express terms, discriminatory and excludes any member of the minority community of Pakistan from holding the office of the president of Pakistan. Under Article 41, only a Muslim is qualified to be elected as president. Initially, there was no such bar of religion against the election of the prime minister. Article 91; the Prime Minister must be a Muslim. The original language of the 1973 Constitution was substituted by P.O. No. 14 of 1985, providing that, "after the election of Speaker and Deputy Speaker, the National Assembly shall, to the exclusion of any other business, proceeds to elect without debate one of its Muslim members to be the Prime Minister."
    1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1