Comments by "rob shirewood" (@robshirewood5060) on "Royal Armouries" channel.

  1. 2
  2. I do not know if it is well known , but the original concept for the AR-15, was that it was intended for the USAF Air Police (airfield security) and not the Army, who had the M-14, or that the British and some Australian and New Zealand instructors with Malaya and Borneo experience from SAS trained Green Berets at the British Jungle Training School before they deployed to Vietnam. The Brits and Commonwealth trialled the AR-15 before the US Army actually had them. The British and Commonwealth forces never had fouling problems as our cleaning regimes in UK were more frequent, when in service with the US Army they had fouling problems because the trial ammunition powder was cleaner than the powder used in the field (US Government went for cheaper powder and did not issue enough cleaning kits or impress on troops the need to clean them frequently). That was verified to me by a veteran SAS soldier who had served in Malaya and Borneo and elsewhere, now sadly no longer with us. His opinion of SA80 was "not a soldiers weapon, the bloody thing is not instinctive or easy to handle, which the SLR layout was. It is mostly about keeping your line of sight of focus towards the enemy, the SA80 strays from the point, the SLR had everything to hand for the left hand, safety and selector for the right thumb, same for M-16, and you can keep your eyes on the target ahead. I hate the safety, the cocking handle, the fact you cannot use it left handed, the weight, the balance, of the SA80". He also mentioned that if you lost the spring on an SLR you could still cycle it as a bolt action rifle.
    2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1