Comments by "rob shirewood" (@robshirewood5060) on "The History Chap" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23.  @hodaka1000  I recall someone said that the models used in the movie were also the Carbine type and i must admit when i visited the 24th Foot (as Royal Regiment of Wales) museum in Brecon some years ago the rifles on display there did look longer, add the bayonet and that is one fearsome weapon. As it says in the movie "and a bayonet Sir, with some guts behind it" too right mate, it took guts to just stand there and fight, not to mention work the rest of the time rebuilding and shifting mealie bags. Facing the Assegai and Knobkerry was no joke either, scary weapons. I visited Australia in 2001, and saw a Martini Henry on one of the Ranges i was invited to, to see a local shooting competition, mentioned that as a cadet in the UK i had used a .22 Martini action (privately owned) on a 25 yard target range. I had fired No4 Lee Enfield's and other models (privately owned) in UK so recognised the stripper clips, method of loading and the actual rounds. I saw the one competitor loading single rounds which took my interest and it turned out to be an early model with the magazine cut-off, demonstrating how the troops could retain their 10 rounds, use the cut off and fire singles Then he turned to the group watching "Would you like to see what this rifle replaced?" and took out a Martini Henry, the standard infantry version. That was a treat. Most of the weapons there were .303 so i suspect you are correct. I hear that things have changed now in Australia regarding personally owned weapons, i hope any Martini Henry models have not been scrapped that would be a historical sin. Australia needs to retain its shooting ability its a vital skill that the UK has let slip badly.
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1