Comments by "Animal Farm" (@animalfarm7467) on "Something Is Rotten in the State of Florida, and It's the Koch Brothers" video.

  1. So Seder, don't you feel stupid superficially criticizing Alex Jones for acting like a fool when his own lawyer said he was a character actor at his son's custody case? You should be criticizing Jones for promoting the John Birch Society. You must remember the Birchers. No, they haven't been relegated to oblivion; they are alive and well and living behind the scenes in many of the Libertarian YouTube sites. You may not remember that David Koch ran for VP in 1980 under the Libertarian ticket or that his father Fred C. Koch was one of the founders of the Birchers. So ironically, while your childish ridicule of a character playing a role by the professed actor Jones in the attempt to fool the rubes that take his rantings seriously, your potential to expose Jones for the Bircher and Koch sycophant he is goes neglected. If you are serious about exposing the oligarchs' scam, might I suggest you take a step back and look at the big picture? Jones is only a small cog in a large deception machine controlled by the Kochs and other oligarchs. You have started well by exposing Libre and the Kochs' attempt to sell the AstroTurf movement to the Latino community. Now expose the Kochs' link to the Atlas Network that is creating unrest in Europe, instigating coups in South America, and undermining democracies around the World in the name of Neoliberalism; or as the Kochs call it - Austrian Economics. And don't stop there; the Koch links to their mechanisms of deceit are innumerable and covert and it needs some extensive effort to expose this threat to the American people. Forget about the fake Russiagate scandal instigated by the Liberal Neocons where there is no proof; the proof of the Kochs' treachery is real and available for all to see - with a little effort and Google.
    1
  2. You shouldn't be so accommodating of those who appear to conflate satire and politics. Satire is sometimes an effective way of hiding deceit. I have found many examples where induced confusion within satire is convenient for those who deceive; should they get called on the deception, they respond by saying it is only satire. Once satire is introduced, credibility as a source gets diluted. As for Russiagate, may I refer you to the Seder episode "What Putin Really Wants” on Dec 17, 2017, where Seder interviews Julia Ioffe of the Atlantic as a credible source. Remembering the Atlantic is the mouthpiece for NATO and the Military Industrial Complex, Ioffe is allowed to spew speculation and inference without question. If you listen to the interview by Seder, you will hear an incredibly soft approach, never calling her out on any of the speculation and effectively giving her free reign to propagandize the audience. So why does Seder allow this to occur? Is it because he sees Maddow achieve such high ratings using the combined corrupted message of the mainstream media? In her first statement 57 seconds into the video she says, “This stuff is pretty well established that Russia hacked the servers of the DNC”. So is Seder ignorant of the fact the whistleblower William Binney said that it was impossible. The data rates for the Atlantic crossing are far too slow for this data to have been retrieved in such a short period of time. To understand the full story, watch the Jimmy Dore episode “NSA Genius Debunks Russiagate Once & for All”. I can’t accept Seder is that ignorant; there must be some other motivation. If you observe Seder’s body language it shows acquiescence as if he is just allowing her open slather to lie without any push back. Consider the lie of Putin being implicated in the Panama Papers. Putin wasn’t implicated in the Panama papers, although some Russian oligarchs were. Even the Prime Minister of Australia was implicated in the Panama Papers. So why does Seder allow this lie and irrelevancy to occur? I still ask how anyone could take this as being credible. Seder doesn’t come across as a stupid or ignorant man, so why the scam?
    1