Comments by "Animal Farm" (@animalfarm7467) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

When it comes to the John's questions about the Iodine study, one should always remember the statement from Goldman Sachs to its investors: "It is always more profitable to treat the symptoms than to eradicate the cause".
143
When are people going to awaken to the fact you are playing by the rules with criminals that are either NOT playing by the rules, or are making up the rules as they go when confronted with inconvenient facts?
3
Even if you can cobble together enough money to buy adequate representation in court, never assume you will get a fair judgment. After all, this is the judiciary with questionable ethics and morals; inbred with British Intelligence, that intentionally corrupts court cases and locks away truth-tellers in Belmarsh.
2
Dr. Campbell - So you think that 87% of funding by industry for the MHRA may cause a conflict of interest? Consider Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), where only about 7% of the TGA's funding is provided through public funds. The remaining 93% of the TGA's budget is funded through industry fees and charges.
2
The problem I have is people making a pejorative of the term, "Conspiracy Theorist". If you have a theory of a conspiracy, I don't want some fool screaming "Conspiracy Theorist" in an attempt to shut down discussion; I want to know the information on which that theory is based. I want to make my own decisions on that information. God Forbid, I want to think for myself and not have some political-media opinion shoved down my throat.
2
It looks like the Malthusians have done their homework?
2
Liberalism is just a facade that is used by the western elites to create a Potemkin "society". At least Thatcher was being honest when she said, "There is no such thing as society". In the elites mind, society is just an illusion to manipulate the gullible, democracy is an inconvenience that must be eliminated, and anyone that that can’t be exploited for profit has no place in “their” world. When are people going to acknowledge that the Nazis didn’t just reside in Germany; they can be found in many fascists of the contemporary west; from supporting Banderites in Eastern Europe, to supplying weapons and political support in a genocide in the Middle East. Just look at how the Canadian parliament lionized a member of the Waffen SS; and you don’t have to look hard to find the same adoration of this abhorrent ideology in many western countries. Liberalism is just a Nazi fist in a humanitarian glove.
2
John F. Kennedy > Quotes > “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
2
This is a whitewash by the misnamed "Oversight and Accountability Committee". They are throwing Biden under the bus (and quite rightly so) while attempting to create a narrative to protect themselves from any blow-back. These Oversighters are just Hollywood actors (and not good actors) playing a role to protect their corrupt system and their corporate masters. A scammer will always misdirect and dilute the facts using the words, "We have to do better going forward"; and Wenstrup said this twice. Remember when Obama was giving reasons not to prosecuting the torturers, "Look forward, not back". How can you watch this "Accountability" soap-opera crap and not want to vomit?
2
I very much doubt if the circumstance will arise where RFK jr. will be able to source original COVID data. He has first-hand knowledge of powerful interests that want to keep inconvenient information hidden.
1
09:02 "Are rich entities more able to speak than poor entities?" The "Combating Misinformation and Disinformation" Bill was introduced into the Australian Parliament in September 2024. There was a one week period allowed for public submissions to be presented. This bill eliminates free speech for the public on broad topics nominated by the government, but the bill doesn't apply to the foreign mainstream media propaganda machine. Are rich entities more able to speak than poor entities? I believe you have your answer.
1
One has to be glad for Paul and his recovery, but the most important question has yet to be resolved. How did Ivermectin end up on Paul's medical records when he bought the drug out of state and paid cash without a prescription? And the more insidious question, why would Ivermectin end up on Paul's medical records?
1
@devdr8983 : There was no prescription?
1
@devdr8983 There was no credit card payment?
1
According to Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, the "product" was purchased interstate using cash (no Credit Card) and without a prescription.
1
I do enjoy our enthusiasm; you appear to be caught up in some "Hope & Change". Just make sure it's not the Obama "Hope & Change" which you seek. Everyone you mentioned continues to be, or is vieing for a political role. So as not to disappoint your audience, let's wait and see how this plays out, shall we. Remember, the proof of the pudding is in the actions of the politicians; not in their verbiage.
1
One must understand one of the tenants of the Neoliberal (Libertarian - Austrian) strategy created by the Thatcher/Reagan era governments to advantage the western elite - no Regulation. Their "Free Market" ideology does not allow the interests of the elite to be regulated by the majority. This is why recent governments created regulatory bodies that are funded by the industries they are "tasked" to regulate. This results in the rapid capturing of these regulators that now only exist to do the bidding of their funders. This was designed so only the misinformed will continue to believe their government is looking out for their interests, and given the credibility of the current credibility of mainstream media; that's the majority.
1
“How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?’ ‘Four.’ ‘And if the party says that it is not four but five—then how many?’ ‘Four.”
1
This is just Zuckerberg acknowledging that the US government directs social media companies to censor. Zuckerberg is attempting to save face and limit any further damage to his company's reputation. Anything else is just a red herring and you can be sure that Zuckerberg will be more discrete and covert in censoring in the future. And Never forget; Facebook was funded by the CIA's In-Q-Tel venture capital.
1
But what happens when the culture of a nation is intentionally engineered through a mainstream media to convince a large component of society that elder abuse is acceptable?
1
In Australia, YouTube inserts an information link "COVID-19 vaccine - Get the latest information from the Australian Government Department of Health." for every one of Dr Campbell's videos since the beginning of the pandemic. EXCEPT FOR THIS VIDEO? The first hint of criminal prosecution and they appear to have abandoned the idea of linking themselves with a potential crime. I wonder why? It's not as if the police weren't only working for the interests of the corporate state, but maybe it's the Parliamentary connection that has confused them? After all, who would have ever believed Parliament would work in the interests of the people?
1
@jenniferfrances8793 : There are many similarities between Canada and Australia. They are both members of the Commonwealth (Empire) and have the same inbred foreign head of state; they both have (or have had) politicians in their ranks with links to the Third Reich & Banderites (Chrystia Freeland {Canada} -> Michael Chomiak) and (Eric Abetz {dual citizen Germany/Australia} –> Otto Abetz); they both have a corrupted democracy with their leaders working for western capital, but I believe Australia has yet to glorify a member of the SS in Parliament and attempt to cover it up by editing Parliamentary Hansard and then blaming Russia (but I could be wrong). BTW – Otto Abetz was a member of the SS, a convicted war criminal, worked for Ribbentrop, and was Adolf Hitler's ambassador to occupied France. Even after WW2, it appears this global Fourth Reich continues to maintain its role as minion to western capital. So when it comes to the unanswered questions and indifference around Covid, you shouldn't be too surprised.
1
Beware of those who use "Nanny State" as a pejorative. "Nanny State" is just a trope used by the elites to undermine public services (e.g. NHS) and privatize public assets; similar to Thatcher's "There is no such thing as society". "Nanny State" is designed to generate a specific response from the public, as if the government is belittling you saying you can't even look after yourself. And sadly this is the response they usually get from the gullible. A "Nanny State" by definition, would work for the interests of the people and not impose an irrational doctrine on their population to exploit public tax revenue for profit. Please don't confuse "Nanny State" with "Corporate State".
1
Paraphrasing Milton Friedman - "The ONLY function of a corporation is to maximize shareholder value."
1
@shoahkhan5670 : Yes, it's scary. They never ask questions; the majority just walks willingly into the gas chamber. They probably even take a cake of soap.
1
@shoahkhan5670 It's very simple. When people are confronted with evidence of a reality they cannot accept, the majority will either create a fictional reality that they believe explains what they see, or they just deny it exists and hide under their beds. I've seen it multiple times myself.
1
I would also be looking at getting an independent university mathematics department study to analyze the two methods the Office for National Statistics has used to calculate and present data for excess deaths. See how this "new" ONS methodology varies to its old methodology prior to February 2024 and and analyze how this methodology differs from that of other countries.
1
In this context, the word "SADLY" can be taken a couple of ways. One interpretation could be Gates is sad about the lost investment opportunity, or he could expect you to believe he is sad about the West's response to the virus. I believe the inferred ambiguity could be intentional. But what I would like to know is why Gates now appears to speak for the people on matters of health? It's as if governments have abandoned their duty and are attempting to privatize their responsibility on matters of health. Did anyone vote for Gates to be their health representative? I can understand why Gates is so interested in the investment potential of farmland, but why is Gates so interested in global health? Why did Gates lobby Oxford not to donate the intellectual property of their vaccine to needy nations? Isn't it dangerous to have an Austrian-Libertarian investor who believes that the treatment of symptoms is more financially beneficial than finding a cure; be so involved with Fauci and the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and also fund 10% of the budget of the WHO?
1
Just because an event has been recorded in "Hansard" doesn't mean that it's a permanent or an accurate account of history. Consider the recent attempt by the Canadian government to remove the inconvenient fact they had a standing ovation for a 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Galician) from the Canadian Parliamentary Hansard. Like most other western institutions, Hansard must be relegated to the trash bin of history.
1
May I suggest you stand back and look at the bigger picture. Whether it's intentional ignorance or just fear of the unknown, what many don't appear to understand is western governments aren't the final arbiter. Whether it's Tory & Labor in Britain, LNP and Labor in Australia, or Democrat & Republican in the US; most western government duopolies are owned by global financial interests and it's these interests that dictate western government policy. So you can vote all you like, the system has been specifically designed to ignore the will of the people. Until you come to grips with that reality, you are never going to understand the contemporary world. This is what makes the George Galloway win so extraordinary.
1