Comments by "Animal Farm" (@animalfarm7467) on "Are Democrats Going Communist on Prescription Drugs? (w/ Charles Sauer)" video.

  1. The big question is why does Hartmann continually parade his fake left credentials in front of his audience by bantering Flat-Earth arguments with this Austrian-Libertarian Koch cretin? If Hartmann would only to bother to go to Bernie’s website and download the 1980 Koch Austrian-Libertarian platform titled “What Do the Koch Brothers Want? “, and present that to his audience, they would understand the real intent of the Washington bipartisan Neoliberal movement: e.g. “We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.” “We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.” “We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.” “We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.” “We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.” If the audience would only take the time to read the document on Sander’s website, they would be able to predict the response of Charles Sauer without Chucky ever having to open his mouth. And for that matter, they would also be able to predict the same response from Democrats like Pelosi as well "We are all capitalists now". Instead of this mindless repetitive choreographed ranting that only targets the emotions of the mindless rubes in the audience; the audience could get a comprehensive understanding of the Austrian-Libertarian narrative and some understanding of the Republican-Democrat Neoliberalism corporate end game. Instead of playing this Good-Cop/Bad-Cop routine, or as in Hartmann’s and Sauer’s case Bad-Cop / Worse-Cop, maybe Hartmann could interview someone with audience credibility; again, Chris Hedges or Bernie Sanders come to mind. So why does Hartmann continue with this periodic Sauer charade? Is it only to stimulate and take advantage of the emotionally challenged; those who have long ago lost their analytical skills?
    1