Comments by "Animal Farm" (@animalfarm7467) on "Will the 2020 President be a Woman?" video.

  1. I wouldn't focus so much on gender as on policy. Could this just be yet another attempt by Hartmann to avoid the true progressing narrative and again intentionally obfuscate the divide between True Progressives and Corporate Democrats? Anyway, candidates aren't selected by gender; they are selected by which oligarchical faction they support. Do they support the Oil & Gas sector or do they support the Military Industrial Complex, but independent to all of that, they must support an imperialist aggressive Foreign Policy and War. If you want a female President believing a woman may make better decisions, might I remind you of the butcher of Libya, Hillary Clinton. When Gaddafi was killed by the CIA backed mercenaries with a bayonet in the rectum, Hillary famously said, "We came, we saw, he died". Then there is the appointment of the known torturer Gina Haspel as head of the CIA. And if you want the epitome of evil, consider the war criminal Madeline Albright. Albright who was responsible for the deaths of half a million Iraqi children under five years old from disease and starvation through UN sanctions and all Albright said in response in a 60 Minutes interview was, "It was worth it". Yes, this is the same Madeline Albright who said, "There is a special place in hell for women who don't vote for Hillary". So I do question whether a different gender would make more suitable decisions. For those who have been so manipulated using this divide-and-conquer strategy, might I suggest a rethink? Maybe you should consider the possibility, it is not male or female, or the deceptive Democrat or Republican that matters; or even the corrupted words of "Liberal" or "Progressive" that now have little relevant meaning; it is the policies for which the candidate stands.
    4