Comments by "Free Saxon" (@freesaxon6835) on "How To Stop A North Korean Nuclear Missile" video.

  1. Interesting video, but I would have thought that N.Korea, at the moment, just wants to be left alone, all this is angry rhetoric is just that.........
    12
  2. Leonhart yes I rather think that's it
    1
  3. Conser pov You have it about right, I understand your frustration, but you won't win anyone over to ' the truth' by foul mouthing them. North Koreans ARE ' indoctrinated' and there IS a reason why, as you say. Correct in saying that the USofA has gone around the world destroying countries without nukes, what they have been up to in the middle East is criminal, is it the American people or their ' administration' ? Both poltical parties are guilty. The USofA has a jockey riding it, and it's not the American people. While America was off fighting International 'kill a the commie' wars' it was killing its own young 19 19 19 people off. The sick joke is that social MARXISM has killed off America while they were doing that
    1
  4. Conser pov With regards to North Korea, I generally agree with your comments, it's all 99.9% hype, and North Korea will obviously see the USA as the aggressor, understanbly so, however sometime in the future if Kim has a bad day .... Well.... ........ Only wish Kim treated his people more humanly. I like the apparent peace, lack of consumerism, and the way they live their life without currupt western ' values' but at what cost?????? Neither you nor I know !
    1
  5. Conser pov As regards social Marxism, it does fit the facts, deconstructing race, family, sexuality and nationhood. Marx wrote Das capital, in London, had he ventured to the north west of England and written the book some 30 years or so later he might have seen a nicer face of capitalism. Google Port Sunlight village, and read about lord Leverhulme, also lord Salisbury
    1
  6. Conser pov it was my attempt at humour pal......
    1
  7. Conser pov Ok you are a Marxist already! The fact that communism ' connects' with Marxism is not something to shout about, admittedly it's the Bolsheviks that should take the credit for the slaughter in the old USSR. Chairman Mou also contributed to the negative feelings about communism. As a system it goes against human nature in many ways. Some folks will never pull their weight, and a heirachy always forms that isn't based on merit. As regards the capitalist system, that too has huge flaws, of which no doubt you could write pages about, and I would be nodding in agreement. Free enterprise is good however, rewarding those who are inventive and hard working. Western democracy is a sham, a fact to which folks are waking up to. Please feel free to slag liberals off, I will join you in that
    1
  8. Conser pov oh you are a bit edgey aren't you? The deaths under Soviet communism are well documented, and extensive up to about 60 million post 1917 to mid 60s The worse period being the Bloshvick, Stalinist era's.
    1
  9. "Hard working and being inventive cannot compete against being ruthless and good at defrauding. Capitalist profit does not come from hard working and inventing - it comes from ripping off other people" Well you have partial agreement regarding the ruthless & defrauding, and the banking system versus hard working people. I am talking about free enterprise, not how the capitalist system works, you must surly realise that their are hard working, enterprising people, that move the world past the Stone age, and those that don't ! Ask yourself which group is over represented in Banking, fraud and usury ? who is the head of the I.M.F ? Almost exclusively the same group formed the Bolsheviks ( see what Churchill said about that, and no I didn't like the man) The `free market' is another HUGE topic, if you have a completely open global market its going to cause problems. As little as say 50 years ago, national government had more to do with national interests ( market wise )
    1
  10. I suppose the only real solution, as I see it, is small scale free enterprise, on a National level with perhaps strategic industries PARTLY run by a national level government. It would be National yet socialist in nature ................. I would call it NATIONAL SOCIALISM ermmmm has that been done before?
    1
  11. Well `JUST' the BOLSHEVIK revolution itself killed 9 million http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm the following decades year by year are equally bleak, the figure of 60 million is about right, up to the mid 1960s The Ukrainians would be far harsher to you on that point. "Financial capital has no national allegiance" Thats true in 2017 50 years ago less so. iphones ha ! never rated them. Also you forgot to mention the older Russian tanks don't use transistors for communication, they use valves, and valves aren't `taken out' during an atomic blast Why don't you condemn the Jewish bankers or the Jewish Bolsheviks. What do you think about Vladimir Putin ? I like him, hes gone a brain and knows how to use it
    1
  12. Conser pov I rather think you are just an apologist, nothing more, the repression, murder, starvation, so called ' mental institutes ' all played their part over the decades, all well documented. You will be saying the Russian Czar Nicholas II & his whole young family ' just fell down the stairs next ! The insane thing about all this dialogue, is that a good 95% of the world's population don't give a monkeys about YOUR opinion or MINE !! The just love Big Mac's trash T.V and the consumerist lifestyle! The unwashed masses are a little cleaner these days but still uneducated about almost any of their own history, left, right or centre. We'll have fun with the rest of your life, bye
    1