Comments by "alex Lo" (@alexlo7708) on "Simple Flying" channel.

  1.  @jonervine No, it isn't pretty appro but it's an ugly appropriate from guy who was brain washed till bias mind complete.
    1
  2. If so , US govt would make them pay for 737MAX.
    1
  3. Make a go around can add up 15 mins+.
    1
  4. Sure when consider MD80.
    1
  5. Have RR already known polymer fomular? Decade ago they was 1st who did composite fan blade name Hyfil. And they failed in its property because UK lacks behind US in polymer tech.
    1
  6. The 1000 is future long extend body.
    1
  7. No , its MD80. CRJ has 2-2 seat narrow cabin config. ARJ has 3-2 seat, same cabin to MD. Tail engine mounted on CRJ hinged side incline upward. ARJ it hinges lateral, again same as MD.
    1
  8. Wider cabin.
    1
  9. Its wide body airplane contemporary with A330.
    1
  10. D = dead if you add more.
    1
  11. It's cabin is wider than crumpy 787. You're an outsider. So knowing nothing.
    1
  12. You re new generation. So you don't know each European countries had their own big aircraft producers. British De Havilland Comet , Vickers. France SUD aviation. German(in Netherland) Fokkers. They all had made their own passenger jet aircrafts. But they ended up fell to American because they have their own small market. Afterward they started to cooperation and then emerging the Airbus. To build big airplane don't take much effort consider these Europeans had also done.
    1
  13. @Brummiewellington MH 370 was the fault of manufacturer who gave all informations technics providing to CIA with potential to shut down and hi jack the plane.
    1
  14. Russian had engine share building with France before. The Sam146 engine on Sukhoi superjet. And they end up in failure business.
    1
  15. Russia needs China money transfer. So China expects them IP tranfer. It is simply.
    1
  16.  @cdl0  IP will be copied for sure. That's why China corporate with Russia to buid a plane. If they insist they don't provide IP, It is surely not the building project. It will only offer to sell airplane. If so China don't need to cooperate with them because so many airplane manufacturer anywhere. They can buy it anytime.
    1
  17. Decades ago ,when in good relation. China aviation reg. had asked FAA in providing them all process to airworthiness issuance. Then they have complete learnt it. So the CAAC.FAR.25(China airwothiness license) is a shadow OF FAA.FAR 25 license. By the way, afterward US has aware on China aviation industry influence rise up. So they decie not to co-issue the airworthiness to any jet from China or Russia there on.
    1
  18. Whose spy? Rus or Chin.
    1
  19. ​ @stevemurray6475  No, CR929 has no any western parts. Some says RollsRoyce was having proposal but seems unlikely.
    1
  20.  @dy7296  The smaller the engine is ,the less benefit tecnlogy gap will given to you.
    1
  21. Because each EU plane makers were demolished by US giant. Vickers, Siddeley , Suds aviation , Fokker etc. So it united to challenge.
    1
  22.  Gandalf4568  Next generation?? Given MAX on example. The more you push on , the riskier you have.
    1
  23. What kind of polymer the 350 uses in it body composite structure. Does it come from US?
    1
  24. At least the tail engine has advantage on object jet sucking particularly for small jet that they aren't high enough.
    1
  25. If you worry on copyright you must force Boeing to expose all their tech to Russian and point out what is being infringed. Ask yourself, Will it happen?
    1
  26. No, more likely to 350.
    1
  27.  @Speedkam  Bankrupted?? You're kidding!! Actually they're almost bankrupted after being beat by western aircraft. Now it is adversed.
    1
  28. Russian says SSJ engine problem came from parts that made from the French's side. They will replace it with their own new engine PD 8.
    1
  29. Heard from China web. The China side aimed at build on their own at start but they got some line from higher govt to let Russian in.
    1
  30.  @osasunaitor  American govt does not want Boeing to compete in regional jet segment. They want to leave this market to their subordinate countries such is Canada CRJ and Brazil Embraer to compete.
    1
  31.  @kimcelarmycx229  Onlt its new supercritical wing that designed with the help of supercomputer simulation assisted.
    1
  32. Guess what is the airline's name? Till this day , they have not lay off any one employee. So their lost are huge some. The airline where board and directors all are corruption. They set up various shell company at Cayman Island bought Boeing and Airbus planes then lease to the airlines at twice or triple the cost they had bought.
    1
  33. Plane fuselage are different from wings or any control surfaces. Fuselages expand and shrink each time plane has operated. Delamination are common in any carbon composite material. By the way , Does Airbus use American polymer in their composite? Is it the same grade as being used by Boeing?
    1
  34. Because Russian is tired of you ,Indian.
    1
  35.  @sandeepsandhu4286  No,,,,no. The world excluding India , not including. It's just your own imagination.
    1
  36.  @68404  Sam146 engine. The failure of cooperation.
    1
  37.  @ilovecops6255  If they would have passed CFR-25 standard, I would say no different.
    1
  38.  @farhanatashiga3721  China might have more relied on Russia civillian engines in the near future given risk presented in western products now.
    1
  39. You cannot work with someone if you don't thrust them at least on the bottom line. If Russian never thrust China but shows their corporate, It means Russian want to cheat China money in developing their new airplane.
    1
  40.  SHRAVAN KUMAR  They don't secretly steal someone tech , but they openly copying it. If "secret" come first, It is CIA.
    1
  41. Russia has not big engine, so they come to 4. Their biggest turbofan is Ukraine D18T which has not enough thrust to dual.
    1
  42.  @intantarmizi6138  Operating price??
    1