Comments by "YDDES" (@YDDES) on "VICE" channel.

  1. The whole world heard about the satellites back Then. Ever from 4th October 1957, when the first Sputnik was launched. What the heck are You talking about?
    14
  2.  @Phillmagroin  Ha-ha, you ignorant fool. I bet you have seen the NASA guy explaining how they would test the new Orion, and misunderstood everything. By the way: IF one guy says one thing and thousands of others say something different, why believe what that ONE guy says? If it had been the other way around, had you still believed the one guy? Naturally not, since it wouldn't be what you already have decided to believe. You are a cherry picking fool.
    10
  3.  @MikahNeufeld  I wish them luck.... If There are kids here, You shouldn’t lie about Nobody hearing about satellites in the Sixties. Because that is a LIE!!
    10
  4.  @Phillmagroin  That "NASA guy"never says they hope to pass the belts for the first time within 20 years. Show me where and when he says so, or admit you are a dirty liar.
    7
  5. So, why was There No resemblance between ”2001” and the Apollo landnings?
    4
  6. How did Bassett "come forward to the public", for example??
    4
  7. What Footage? They took a lot of photographies.
    3
  8.  @derekdugger2321  So, You say that the engineers at North American Aviation planned the murder years Ahead and built the Apollo capsule so it would catch fire? Totally stupid.
    3
  9. Keith Steward No other country has considered it worth the cost to send humans to Moon, since USA already has Done it.
    2
  10.  @jasbour2222  Who has Said NASA can’t go thru the Van Allen Belts??? The reason they have ”lost” the technology (they clearly had it, if they could ”lose” it) to go to Moon, is that No one builds those Saturn rockets anymore, since the US Government doesn’t pay for them anymore. But they are building the SLS instead.
    2
  11.  @derekdugger2321  I would really like to see You in a shooting situation and after that, if You survived, be able to report EXACTLY What happened. Anyhow, What has an insane schoolshooting got to do with NASA???
    2
  12. So, where is the proof that Kubrick faked the moonlandings?
    2
  13.  @derekdugger2321  You are hopeless. There were only ONE ”moonrock”, in Holland, that a museum mislabeled ”moonrock”, before they found out it was petrified Wood. Not given by NASA or any astronaut, but by the American Ambassador, as a personal gift to the former Dutch Prime Minister, Willem Drees. His relatives presented it to a museum when he died. Holland Also got a real moonrock, like every other country. The real moonrocks have been thorougly examined and have never been subjected to oxygen or moisture. They also have zap-pits in their surfaces. You are all too eager to believe the silly hoax sites, instead of checking What the scientists around the Word have to say.
    2
  14. The fact that it COULD be faked today, doesn’t prove it was faked back then
    2
  15. Sorry, that comment was for ”Active Guard”.
    1
  16.  @fenrisunchained1926  You don’t need any special NASA technology to phone to Moon. The HAM operators have bounced radiosignals off Moon for decades. All You need is a suitable radio transmitter/receiver.
    1
  17.  @meltedmarshdaddy  Was You even Alive in 1969, or were You still dead??
    1
  18.  @fenrisunchained1926  Where do they get the power to send TV from Mars? You are just laughable.
    1
  19.  @fenrisunchained1926  Actually, it’s You who know nothing. Get a book about HAM radio. I have worked with people developing radio/TV technology. Don’t You understand that the operators know how far it is to Moon and What the delay-time is?
    1
  20. Two negatives make one positive.
    1
  21. Steve Bailie. No wonder You don’t see stars, with those sunglasses. The astronauts too had sunshields, ever seen their golden faceplates? But, honestly, They had the Brightly illuminated lunar ground in their field of view. Ever tried to see the stars from inside a room with bright lights on?
    1
  22.  @stevebailie7741  They didn’t fly to Moon in a computer. They used rockets. And, for your uneducated information, NASA had big computers on Earth, to do all important calculations and feed them into Apollos computers. The Surveyors, which landed on Moon before Apollo, had even less computers aboard and succéded.
    1
  23.  @stevebailie7741  So please present your strongest argument for your silly belief that humans never have landed on Moon.
    1
  24.  @edp3202  Who did What? And when???
    1
  25.  @leohu77  Gravity runs the universe. Every star, planet and Moon constantly falls towards the strongest gravity field, but Because of their angular movement, they often miss it and fall in a circle around it.
    1
  26.  @kennethroyer9949  If YOU pay for it, it can be Done. Why would the tax payers pay for your silly doubts???
    1
  27.  @leohu77  haven’t You understood, that gravity runs the universe?
    1
  28.  @duramaxdad  One reason: there’s No friction out in the universe. But on Earth...
    1
  29. Please explain that, since they designed, built, tested and launched all the spacecraft, rockets and stuff in full public view. How could it be cheaper to, on top of that, build impossibly large vacuum chambers with fake lunar landscapes and invent special photographic effects, never heard of by Hollywood or any other film makers???
    1
  30.  @maryvallettakeith6146  The "floating pen" was extremely easy. It was just fastened on a large glass sheet in front of the camera .I could explain how every photographic effect was created by Douglas Trumbull and his staff; not by Stanley Kubrick. The effects created for "2001" couldn't have been used for the Apollo flights, if you know how they were created. And, still the astronauts walk in Earth gravity on Moon...
    1
  31. NASA has No reason to do anything just because you want it.
    1
  32.  @ghz24  yeah, that’s why NASA never would have hired him to fake anything.
    1
  33. Victor Lozeno. The went thru the Van Allen belt in a rocket propelled metal spacecraft. No problems, only uneducated people, like many Youtubers, think the belts surround the whole Earth and are lethal.
    1
  34.  @victorlozano2486  The brainwashed one is clearly You. If You have ”researched” for ”40+ years, how come You haven’t discovered how Armstrong was filmed when he, as the first human, went out of the LM? Go look at ”Apollo 11 TV Camera”. There You Will find that they had placed a TV Camera at a ”hatch” in the descent stage, that was folded out when Armstrong manipulated a lever. Also, the engine didn’t make very much noice. It was like big blow torch, the fuel and the oxidizer were mixed in the combustion chamber and ignited at contact. No pumps or other things, that would cause noice. The exhausts were ”blown” out in the vacuum, where No sound can be heard. Also think about the fighter jet pilots, who sit just in front of their engines in an atmosphere and can communicate with ground or other planes. The astronauts also had hermetically sealed helmets, with the microphones inside them. The sound from the rockets on Earth, mostly comes from the atmosphere being displaced by the exhausts. Regarding the Van Allen belts: They do not consist of microwaves, but of neutrons and electrons, so You can’t compare them to a microwave oven. No heat is produced in the belts. You really need to educate yourself. And not by reading the silly, lying hoax sites on Internet.
    1
  35.  @victorlozano2486  I can understand that You are leaving, since your arguments have all been debunked. But I can’t, regrettably, feel any respect for You and your fantasies. There were No need for a person to film Armstrong when he departed the LM. The Van Allen belts don’t have any microwaves in them. There was No ”deafening sound from the LM’s engine inside its cabin. Furthermore, have You ever checked ”Zond 5”? The Soviet craft that rounded Moon with plants and animals aboard, who survivedback to Earth... Get Well!
    1
  36.  @heldercapela  So, What did Grissom do, except complaining over the bad sound connection during a training?
    1
  37.  @Smudgeroon74  Yes, North American Aviation had to completely redesign the Apollo capsule after the fire.
    1
  38.  @19Lillith  so, astronauts have to be murdered to die? You are sick. How were John Glenn and Wally Schirra murdered?
    1
  39.  @derekdugger2321  It took years to design and build the Apollo capsule. You made it sound like it was planned that a spark would occure to ignited the oxygen. So yes, in effect You Said so, even if not in plain words. And There would have been much simpler and cheaper metods to murder a person. If Grissom was so unwanted, Why White and Chaffee? You must, of course, immediately contact the police and present your proof that murder has been commited by the top brass of NASA. otherwise, You Will be considered just as guilty as those people, by protecting them. Because, You have PROOF, haven’t you? It’s a very dangerous thing to accuse people of murder, You know.
    1
  40.  @19Lillith  So, Swigert, for example, died of cancer decades after Apollo. How do You give people cancer to murder them? You are totally sick.
    1
  41.  @derekdugger2321  so, accidens can’t happen to spacecraft, without being staged? Have You ever contacted the FBI about your ”evidence”?
    1
  42. You wish it wasn’t true, you liar.
    1