Comments by "" (@ericp1139) on "Ukraine Wasn’t Prepared For Counteroffensive, Pushed By NATO Sponsors | US Defence Analyst Explains" video.

  1. Attacking force needs 3:1 advantage. Ukraine is going in 1:7. Victory was never an option for the AFU.
    3
  2. The game has changed so many times from Javelin to Turkish drones to M777 to HIMARS to Western tanks, to F16s…
    2
  3.  @MeowMeow6118a  1:7 was being generous. It could even be 1:10. Whoever pushed for this offensive should be charged for a war crime.
    2
  4. Taiwan: hold my beer
    1
  5. NATO never specifies what “progress” is being made.
    1
  6. The poor sod thought he’d have a cushy job. Never did he expect to actually have to do anything.
    1
  7.  kittycat3015 you mean their big announcement that there wouldn’t be an announcement?
    1
  8. @mauritsvanoranje6725NATO has been demilitarized, which is why they are scrambling to provide a hodgepodge of weapons to Ukraine. NATO has been fully exposed that it can’t last a week in a real war.
    1