Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Why Scientists Can't Agree On The Age Of The Universe - Featuring Dr. Becky | Answers With Joe" video.

Consider the following: (utilizing modern science and logic and reason): a. Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. b. An 'absolute somethingness' cannot come from 'absolute nothingness', 'absolute nothingness' just being a concept from a conscious entity in 'absolute somethingness'. Hence, an 'absolute somethingness' truly existed throughout all of eternity past, still exists today, and will most probably still exist throughout all of future eternity. That eternally existent 'absolute somethingness' most probably being energy itself. So, the universe ALWAYS existed in some form. There was never a time when the universe did not exist in some form and most probably there will never be a time when the universe will not exist in some form.
1
Consider the following: The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, continuously, over a prolonged period of time (and even modern science claims that 'em' has momentum), with other galaxies doing the same, with nothing to stop them from doing so, would tend to push galaxies away from each other. This could also allow the cosmic web to form between galaxies. Then further, when here in our galaxy, looking at far away galaxies, with other galaxies in between, the net effect of all those galactic energy interactions would have galaxies furthest from ours moving away faster the further they were from us. When the universe can be explained by known physics, no further physics is needed.
1