Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Sen. Marco Rubio says U.S. strike against Iranian commander "had to happen"" video.

  1. a. Even with the General dead, he has already been replaced by Iran. b. If there were truly an imminent attack, the General himself was probably not directly involved other than to possibly give the 'go order'. The supposed enemy cells would already be in position to do the imminent attack. The new General could still give the 'go order'. c. If there weren't enemy cells prepared to do an imminent attack, there probably are now. If there were enemy cells prepared to do an imminent attack, those attacks would probably be more severe now. d. From Iran's perspective, President Trump is seen as being a 'terrorist leader' of a 'terrorist nation', Iran also being a sovereign nation. Iran is possibly just protecting themselves and their way of life from an 'imminent terrorist attack', of which, has now already occurred due to what President Trump just did. e. Others were assassinated in that car strike, supposedly 8 people died I believe. Were those other people who were assassinated by President Trump, who were not the General, 'murdered' by President Trump? f. Can a USA President pardon themselves from International Crimes? g. Who declares who is a terrorist in this world and who isn't? And by what authority do they and they alone have that allows them to make that worldly declaration? h. And the General was in a car outside of the airport. What 'imminent attack' was he doing? i. To truly defeat terrorism in this world, one has to also stop being a terrorist.
    3
  2.  @888strummer  a. You are obviously wrong, I am a US Navy veteran who honorably served this United States of America and also swore an oath to defend this nation and it's Constitution from ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. So, bite me. b. As far as writing a long book, I am an American in America with free speech. So, bite me. c. Killing this General, does not stop any attacks from occurring, as this General has already been replaced by Iran. It just changes who gives the 'go order' is all. So, bite me. d. Killing this General, does not stop the enemy cells, who were supposedly already in position to do the 'imminent attack' from doing their 'imminent attack', it would only delay it is all. And if those enemy cells did not exist before, they probably do now. And if they were in position planning an 'imminent attack', it would probably be a more severe attack now. So, bite me. e. And oh yea, 'bite me'.
    2
  3.  @888strummer  And you are wrong so many ways yet again. Bite me. Even many veterans are tired of our nation being in these continuous wars just so that a President of the USA can have more war time powers, so as to keep this nation at war, with continual spending upon these wars with an ever increasing national debt. These Presidents are actually destroying America from within. So here again, 'bite me'. Edit: And oh, I am a political Independent. No major political party can currently win the White House without sufficient Independent's support. So you are wrong there too. "BM'.
    1