Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "South China Morning Post"
channel.
-
9
-
@PONTIANGOD There are many more spatial dimensions than just 3 and many more time dimensions than just 1: (See item #3 below):
(copy and paste from my files):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
5. In addition, I am operating in a realm where one plus one does not always equal two, and often does not.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. And I never said it would be easy.
3
-
@PONTIANGOD Also, this copy and paste from my files (as far as numbers are concerned):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.).
And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.
* Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.
3
-
3
-
China, and the rest of species here upon this Earth:
EXISTENTIAL PHYSICS: Current Analysis:
(subject to revision as new information might dictate):
WARNING: NOT FOR ALL AUDIENCES: Only read this if you think you can handle it.
Future:
a. 6th mass extinction event (possibly occurring now), and the 6th won't be the last. (And 'yes', at least some humans will survive these earlier mass extinction events).
b. Sun becomes a red giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium and will wipe out all life left on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey).
c. Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself, (note: adding to the red shift observations by the way), and it's possible ALL galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves (not confirmed yet).
d. 'If' one believes in the big bang theory, and space itself expanding, then the entire universe and all in it will most probably end in a big freeze. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination would be set like a way point on a journey). Note also: the singular big bang is probably not really true, there are other 'normal' explanations for the red shift observations, and the universe is most probably not going to end in a big freeze. Also, 'if' the current forces of nature came into existence in the early moments of the expansion of the singularity, and the singularity is still basically expanding, then the forces of nature will probably evolve one day, possibly even in the very next moment of expansion of this universe, and possibly wipe out everything in existence in basically a blink of an eye. Of which note also, the forces of nature as well as the universe always existed and never had a beginning. But 'if' modern science is correct, well ....................................blink...........................................
e. Outer space travel: Currently impossible to do for long periods of time due to:
1. Harmful cosmic radiation, including any potential neutrino impacts. (While most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do all of the time). AI and biological life would most probably not survive unless proper protections were had.
2. Biological species, especially humans, need proper gravity conditions and large rotating space ships probably will not work for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, biological life, especially humans, will not survive long term.
3. Biological species, especially humans, need many more items to properly survive, otherwise they won't.
* Note: If anybody has any actual factual evidence to counter the above, I welcome it.
** HAVE A NICE DAY IF THAT IS WHAT YOU CHOOSE TO HAVE, WHILE WE HAVE DAYS LEFT THAT WE CAN ENJOY. FOR EVERY MOMENT THAT PASSES, ONE LESS MOMENT BEING ALIVE AND ONE MOMENT CLOSER TO BEING NOT ALIVE.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thalljoben3551 Orange Juice bro, healthy 'acid'. Also alcohol (hydroxide) to offset the acid. Or sometimes, just plain H2O, (both and acid and a base).
Here is also the potential completion of the periodic table of the elements to potentially expand your mind with:
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
1
-
@thalljoben3551 Oh, and here is my gravity test to potentially collapse an expanded mind, in case you wanted to:
Gravity test: Very Short Version:
Counter-act the 'em' of a laser with 'em' and gravity will be left.
(CAUTION: Watch out for the mini gravitational black hole that should form).
* And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe.
But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions.
1
-
1
-
@KaguraBachipeak a. Many things to go into there, first and foremost, you don't know me nor what I am doing.
b. Space is not endless, but 'time' is endless. 'Space' being energy itself and 'time' being the flow of energy, or at least how I see it.
c. Either at least 1 species from this Earth survives beyond this Earth, solar system and most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, OR none do. Need to figure out what 'gravity' truly is, and then figure out how to have artificial gravity, as large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way. Otherwise at least all human life from this Earth dies and goes extinct.
Plus, need proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, including from the effects of long term neutrino impacts. While most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do. Otherwise, not only won't humans survive long term in outer space, but neither will microbes nor even AI robots, and all life from this Earth dies and goes extinct.
Even 'if' my theoretical idea of literally generating an inter-dimensional space ship by literally bending space and time to do so, still has some major issues that could prove to be harmful to the inhabitants of such a vehicle, especially during strong cosmic storms.
Even 'if' my view of how existence could exist side by side with non-existence throughout all of eternity is really true, (how this universe exists), generating an inter-dimensional space ship would have existence next to existence, and not next to non-existence, which is a contributing factor to the inhabitants being harmed inside the inner space time dimension. The outer existence interacting with the external magnetic field generated by the inner dimension. And hence also though, if this issue cannot be resolved, then it is highly probably all life from this Earth eventually dies and goes extinct. Currently, no exceptions.
1
-
1
-
@KaguraBachipeak FOR ME:
'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe.
'Time' is the flow of energy.
'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped).
But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
* And everything in existence currently appears to be eternally existent energy interacting with itself.
Thought about space time:
Consider the following:
a. Wavelength equals speed of light divided by frequency.
b. Wavelength is how far a single 'em' photon goes in space, or possibly is the size of space itself. (Especially since 'space' itself has not been defined yet). Possibly different sizes of space for different 'em' frequencies.
c. Speed of light: 'light' being 'em' photons, 'speed' being distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points.
d. Frequency being 'hertz', 'hertz being cycles per second, or how far an 'em' photon goes at a specific size during one second.
e. "IF" wavelength changes (the frequency changes) then the distance a single 'em' photon goes would change and/or the size of space itself would change (assuming that an 'em' photon makes up 'space' itself).
f. Possibly 'space' varies due to 'space' being made up of 'em' itself and as 'em' frequencies change, 'space' changes.
g. Another possibility would be that as the wavelength changes (frequency changes) then as the distance a single 'em' photon goes would also change in it's time of existence, 'time' would change for any given 'em' photon length. The effect of that single 'em' photon makes in it's given time of existence.
h. Possibly 'time' varies due to the wavelength of the 'em' photon.
i. So, possibly 'space' varies due to energy frequencies changing and 'time' varies due to the wavelength of energy changing, the 'em' photon being energy itself. And if as I currently believe that what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of the 'em' photon, then the 'gem' photon makes up the energy unit that possibly makes up everything in existence in this entire universe including the universe itself, including 'space' and 'time' or 'space time' itself. It is also how space and time can warp, bend and vary.
1
-
@KaguraBachipeak And for those who claim 'space' and 'time' do not actually exist except for as concepts, then:
Consider the 'speed of light':
a. 'Speed' is distance divided by time.
b. 'Distance' is two points in space with space between those two points.
c. If 'space' and/or 'time' did not exist in actual existent reality, except for as concepts, then 'speed' could not exist in actual existent reality, except for as a concept.
d. If 'speed' exists in actual existent reality, then 'space' and 'time' both have to have some sort of actual existent reality.
e. Likewise, 'light' which is currently considered as 'em' also has to have an actual existent reality, in addition to being a concept, for 'light' to exist in actual existent reality, in addition to being a concept.
f. So, if the 'speed of light' actually exists in existent reality, then 'space', 'time', 'speed' and 'light' ('em'), all also have to actually exist in existent reality, otherwise, the 'speed of light' could not actually exist in existent reality, other than just as a concept, (which would put a major kink in a lot of physics formulas).
1
-
@KaguraBachipeak I'm back.
* Gravity: NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species. If we cannot figure out what 'gravity' truly is and figure out how to generate artificial gravity (besides large rotating space ships), then all human life from this Earth is probably going to die and go extinct one day.
In addition to the very short version of my test above, here is a copy and paste of a little longer version:
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
* "If u build an inter dimensional ship or something u will destroy the very fabric of reality and perhaps break every single law of nature and mess up the current understanding of physics in other words it's very much impossible to even achieve anything u just said."
Okay, then surely you must know what the very fabric of reality truly is for you to make this claim you just made. And you also must know every single law of nature as well. Please share your wisdom with me and this world.
1
-
@KaguraBachipeak a. "first post: the sun will engulf the earth in 5B years time which is over a bazillion times our life spans and by the time it happens we would have moved on to another planet or just wouldn't make it out."
And hence from the opening thread: "* Species stay on this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct."
b. And by your own words: "For proper protection against the UV Rays the earth has a giant magnetic field for a reason. Its protects the earth's atmosphere and its inhabitants from being exposed to the harmful rays."
So, 'if' species have to leave this Earth (otherwise die and go extinct), at a minimum, they would need a giant magnetic field. Otherwise they would be exposed to UV Rays. And note, it's not just UV Rays, but x-rays and gamma rays as well, along with alpha and beta radiation, along with neutrinos. While most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do.
And study how 'em' interacts with matter via QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics) whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics) whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms.
And if proper protections from all harmful cosmic radiation could not be literally had, then the other items from the opening thread: "* Species leave this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct."
And: "(No exceptions at this time)."
(This includes all life from this Earth, human, even microbial, even artificial).
c. "If you aren't trying to convey a message then what point are u going into?
Also from the opening thread, very first line, in all capitals: "LIFE ITSELF IS ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS."
d. "I dont that kind of time to read or answer your questions but it was nice talking to u."
Not to worry, because "LIFE ITSELF IS ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS."
Either at least 1 species from this Earth survives beyond this Earth, solar system and most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy and goes into a universe that most probably will never end, OR none do and all life from this Earth eventually dies and goes extinct. This Earth and all on it were all just a waste of space time in this universe. It ultimately would not matter that it even ever existed at all in the first place, much less how it and it's inhabitants existed while they existed, because one day, there would be no entity left to care about anything or anyone ever again. At least not from this Earth.
* Have a nice day, also nice talking with you.
1
-
@AcidicPlant Agreed. Entities that do hurt and cause suffering in this life, are just entities that do hurt and cause suffering in this life. Likewise, entities that are kind and loving in this life, are just entities that are kind and loving in this life. But causing hurt and suffering, or kind and loving, or any other way to exist while we all exist, is just is what it is while it is, which will all end one day with no entity left to care about anything or anyone ever again, at least not from this Earth.
But still, how do we all, individually and as a society of individuals, the largest society of all being all entities in existence throughout all of existence, including those not even in existence yet, want to exist while we do exist? We do apparently have choices. With all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all of our choices.
But then still, no matter how we all exist while we exist, the ending apparently is the same:
Also from the opening thread:
"1. Everybody will die one day from something.
2. Everybody will forget everything they ever knew and experienced.
3. Everybody will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if they never ever existed at all in the first place.
(OSICA)"
Of which also leads to other items in the opening thread:
"Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
** Can we change the ending? Doesn't look like it.
Not knowing the future does not mean the future is not going to occur as posted. People just won't know until it occurs."
* I guess I apparently know before it occurs, and now so do you and any other entity who reads and understands the above conversation. You have been illuminated with more of the real apparent truth about life itself. Have a nice day if that is what you choose to have. I am going to keep working on trying to bend the very fabric of reality to my will so as to try to keep life itself from this Earth alive throughout all of future eternity. Gives me something to do with my time of existence. And if I can never even succeed, it's still job security until the day I die. Literally trying to do the impossible. Any and all who would like to join me in this quest are welcome at this time. Actual eternal life in the universe, OR bust.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1