Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Curious Droid"
channel.
-
7
-
For me:
"Space" is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same.
"Time" is the flow of that energy.
Hence the correlation between space and time into what we call "space time".
"Time" (flow of energy) cannot exist unless "space" (energy itself) exists. "Space" (energy itself), that does not flow (no flow of energy/no flow of time), is basically useless. An entity can't even think a thought without a flow of energy. Now, if "time" stopped, (no flow of energy), "time" would still exist, it would just be stopped.
So, to answer the question posed by the title of this video, "What if time did not exist?", then the answer would be that "space" would not exist either. For if "space" (energy itself) exists, then "time" (flow of energy) also exists, even if the flow is zero. But, no "time", no "space" either, basically absolute nothingness.
7
-
3
-
1
-
+Fiko Rahardito Baskoro
"NAH" what? For example, who and/or what teaches a fish how to swim, or a bird how to fly, or a baby how to cry? It currently appears to come from the DNA arrangement and their later development. In that specific context, one could say that the fish has a "soul", the bird has a "soul", and the baby has a "soul". But so too would a plant that has DNA in it too have a "soul".
And why stop at only DNA molecule arrangements? Why not any molecular arrangement one could speak as that bundle of information as having a "soul"? And why stop only at molecules? Why not every atom's bundle of information being spoke of as having a "soul"? And why stop at even atoms, go all the way down through sub-atomic particles down to the very energy itself and it's "information". It could even be spoken of as having a "soul". "Soul" being defined as a "bundle of information".
But now, the issue comes into that all that energy, sub-atomic particles, atoms, molecules and DNA has to be arranged in a specific way in a specific environment for a functioning brain and body to occur. So, while one could speak of everything having a "soul" (bundle of information that defines it), not everything would have a "consciousness" attached to that soul. That currently appears to need a functional brain for consciousness to occur.
Now, if there were such a thing as a universal consciousness or "God", then where is it's "brain"? Where exactly is it's arrangement of information that defines it to allow it to do what it does? No where that I am currently aware of.
So, when we die, we are dead for all of future eternity it appears and one day there won't be a conscious entity left to care that any of us even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever anybody did and/or didn't do.
The only exception to that is if species from Earth get off of this Earth and out of this solar system, and possibly be able to move about the galaxy if not even having to get out of the galaxy itself (I believe our solar system is being pulled toward our galactic center's black hole) AND then also that the universe itself does not end in a "big freeze" or by some other means, AND we don't kill ourselves off by some means.
Denying future reality will not make future reality any less real. We will either truly have an actual eternal conscious existence throughout all of future eternity, or we won't. Currently it appears we won't. Life itself is just an illusion, an illusion that will cease to matter one day. (Or so it currently appears).
1
-
1
-
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.).
And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.
* Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.
1
-
At about 4:00 in the video, with gravity eventually pulling the satellite to Earth's surface, same principal with our solar system being pulled toward our galactic center, and our solar system doesn't have any thrusters to maintain a circular orbit around the galactic center, hence also why we exist in a spiral shaped galaxy. Orbital velocity plus gravity acting upon the object and it eventually 'falls' toward the center of gravity in a spiral fashion.
Not only are only those species that make it our of this solar system potentially going to consciously survive while all other Earth species most probably die and go extinct, but so too, only those species that make it out of this galaxy potentially are going to continue to consciously survive while all other Earth species most probably die and go extinct.
We NEED a pro-active space program to get out of this solar system and out of this galaxy (and then of course, where are we going to go then?), otherwise, we are ALL going to die one day from something, will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place, and life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, at least as far as Earth species go.
1
-
1
-
Utilizing modern science:
Modern science claims that from an expanding singularity everything in this universe came into existence, including the forces of nature that it operates by and including you and me with our supposed consciousness', memories and thoughts.
But now, does everything in this universe even exist per se, OR does only the singularity exist in the form of all things? I exist and yet I don't exist depending upon perspective. And if I don't exist, then how could I ever cease to exist? And if the singularity is existing as me, and has a consciousness as evidenced by the consciousness that "I" am experiencing, and if this consciousness wanted to eternally consciously exist as "me", who am I to stop it from doing so since I don't even exist at all in the first place?
(And this would apply to you too).
So, to answer the question posed by the title of this video, "Are you, really you?", a more pertinent question to answer first is, "Do 'I' even exist?" Or maybe I exist and yet don't exist in a kind of superposition state of existence? If so, which context are we talking about, me or the other "me"?
1
-
Singular 'big bang' theory (fairy tale): What exactly is 'space' that space could expand? What exactly is 'time' that time could expand? And why is it ONLY 'space' expanding that is the answer? Why couldn't 'time' be slowing down giving us a relative perspective of an expanding universe? Or maybe both, 'space' expanding and 'time' slowing down and hence we perceive a universe expanding faster and faster?
Or then again, maybe our spiral shaped galaxy is collapsing in size, giving us a relative perspective of the rest of the universe expanding? Or maybe the net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, with other galaxies doing the same are actually pushing against one another which gives us a relative perspective of the universe expanding? Galaxies furthest from ours would appear to be moving away from us faster and faster, and they would be too, but not because 'space' itself were expanding but due to the cumulative effects of galaxies pushing against one another from our single perspective here on this Earth? And also how possibly the cosmic web even forms?
But, 'if' the universe is truly expanding, (of which it might not truly be, but if it is), 'then' the universe would either most probably end in a 'big freeze' or stop expanding one day, collapse back in upon itself, only to 'bang' again one day in a never ending cycle. We would just be in the latest expansionary universe. Either way, all life in the entire universe would most probably die and go extinct without any conscious entity being left to care and life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. It wouldn't even matter that any of us exist much less how we existed. Life itself just is what it is while it is but one day, life itself would be no more and life itself would be a was. And no conscious entity would be left to care.
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
* Which is our ultimate reduction? Currently it appears the answer is 'b' and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. But, can we ever achieve 'a'? And even if we could, do we truly want it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Some entity do my gravity test for my TOE idea:
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
Here is a copy and paste of the TOE idea:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1