Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Why CGP Grey is Wrong | Monarchical Terminology" video.

  1. Consider the following: a. We appear to be individuals in a larger society of individuals. b. What is best for an individual, may or may not be what is best for the larger society of individuals. And conversely, what is best for the larger society of individuals, may or may not be what is best for an individual. c. But, if a choice had to be made concerning a certain topic, who's best should take precedent over the other's best? If for an individual, which individual? All individuals? If for a larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? A certain group? A certain State or Nation? A certain species? All species in existence throughout all of existence? Which larger society of individuals? d. And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? Should I decide how you should exist? Should you decide how I should exist? Should others decide how we both should exist? Should we decide how others should exist? And who decides in how to even decide? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? e. The natural tension between individuals versus the larger society of individuals, and which individuals and which larger society of individuals, is the cause of much strife, suffering and death in this world. f. So, some people claim 'God' exists and they and they alone are God's spokesperson here upon this Earth. The problem with that though, (out of various issues), is that God does not actually exist except for as a concept as humans personified nature and called that personification 'God' by some name. g. Now, if any entity upon this Earth has any actual factual evidence of God's actual factual existence, please feel free to present that evidence here for myself and the rest of the YouTube world to be able to see. And sure, circumstantial arguments could be had for God's existence, but so can circumstantial arguments could be had for God not actually existing. But where is any actual factual evidence, any actual factual evidence at all, of God's actual factual existence? h. (Copy and paste from my files): GOD DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST. For those who claim God exists, consider the following: a. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness truly existing. b. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness that has consciousness, memories and thoughts truly existing. People who claim God actually and eternally exists basically are claiming that 'b' above is correct but yet simultaneously seem to be saying that 'a' is impossible to occur. 'a' above can exist without 'b' existing but 'b' cannot exist unless 'a' exists. I am one step away from proving God's existence, but am unable to find any actual evidence to do so. And nobody I've talked to seems to have any actual evidence of God's actual existence either. Hence, at this time in the analysis, God does not actually exist except for as a concept created by humans for humans. Humans have personified Nature and called that personification "God". In addition, while modern science does not know what consciousness actually is yet, memories and thoughts appear to require a physical correctly functioning brain to have those items occur. Where is God's brain? Where are God's memories stored at? How are God's memories stored and retrieved? How does God think even a single coherent thought? If inside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where? If outside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where is the interface between that dimension and this dimension? No such interface has been discovered as of yet as far as I am currently aware of. * Added note: Modern science indicates that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Hence, energy is either truly eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. Additionally, an 'absolute somethingness' cannot come from 'absolute nothingness', 'absolute nothingness' just being a concept from a conscious entity in 'absolute somethingness'. Hence, an 'absolute somethingness' truly eternally existed, that 'absolute somethingness' most probably being energy itself. In other words, the universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning. While the creation account in the Bible and other religious belief systems are just fairy tales, so too is modern science's singular 'big bang' theory just a fairy tale. And why should deluded people rule over non-deluded people? If anything, non-deluded people should rule over deluded people for a better society. But, who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? Non-deluded people truly have a successful space program to get off of this Earth and out of this solar system, and everybody else dies and goes extinct in their delusions as even this Earth will be no more one day?
    1