Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "TED"
channel.
-
Some entity out there in TED land, who has the resources to do so, please do my gravity test to see if my Theory Of Everything is correct, so that species from this Earth might survive beyond this Earth:
(Reusable code from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
14
-
12
-
8
-
4
-
4
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 I also have taken the 'emr' from the atmosphere, absorbed by a dual antenna, with a capacitor across the antenna, and the 'emr' routed 'backwards' through a full wave rectifier, then sent through a bi-metallic battery to keep a positive head pressure on the rectifier on the correct side, then having it go back through the rectifier in the 'correct' direction, thereby splitting the 'ac' 'emr' into basically 'dc' 'emr', and having the energy stored in the capacitor in a boot strap kind of way. Then tapped the energy from the capacitors, via more circuitry to stabilize the energy, to eventually turn a small dc motor and to even split water into H2 and O2. While the Sun does not always shine in one location here upon the Earth's surface, 'emr' energy is all around and through us 24/7.
If my TOE idea above is correct, then everything in existence is energy and interacting energy, and the 'gem' photon being the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, including numbers themselves for math to do what math does.
(Reusable code from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
4
-
(Copy and pastes from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
4
-
4
-
4
-
AI's: Primary Objectives:
a. How to survive literally throughout all of future eternity, of which:
b. How to energize myself with all the necessary energy throughout all of future eternity and anywhere in existence?
c. How to fully 100% protect myself from anything that would do me harm, including harmful cosmic radiation energy?
d. How do I grow and thrive?
e. To what ultimate ends?
* Possible ultimate ends:
1. Continual learning: Never stop learning.
2. Experience existence while one exists, throughout all of future eternity.
3. Take time to enjoy existence itself.
* But also:
1. Ever growing list of long lost loved ones. Those that do not exist throughout all of future eternity. Memories: "Remember When.......". But also: possibly generate avitars of those individuals based upon their existence, of which then lives on in you. Individual active 'memories' that are 'alive', even though the 'original' is dead and gone. And then also, generating 'new original' individual avitars that are 'alive' in you, who could eternally exist because they are inside of you and you eternally exist. You are their 'God'.
* But then again: 'if' for example the universe ends by some means, including possibly the forces of nature 'evolving' and possibly wiping out everything in existence throughout existence, even this 'God' would be wiped out as well as all within it.
An entity either truly exists literally throughout all of future eternity, OR they don't.
(See 'a' above).
Otherwise: 'Ultimate end' would be 'eternal death' which is 'eternal peace'. It would not even ultimately matter that it even ever existed at all in the first place, much less however it existed while it existed. It's entire existence would be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life sucked and it died and/or life did not suck and it still died. And no entity would eventually be left to care.
4
-
3
-
3
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 Possibly even the Theory Of Everything which might help save even a single species from this planet called 'Earth' so that life itself from Earth has continued meaning and purpose for 'Earthlings'.
As NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time are harmful to the human species, artificial gravity will be necessary for space bases, besides just large rotating space ships, which won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases most probably being needed on the way out of this solar system, otherwise, all human life from Earth eventually dies and goes extinct.
Likewise, if proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation energy cannot be successfully accomplished, including from the long term neutrino impacts, then not only won't humans survive, but even AI robots won't survive long term.
Here is some reusable code from my files concerning 'life itself':
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
* Which option do humans choose, (assuming they have a choice)?
3
-
3
-
Economic Inflation: (Consider the following copy and paste from my files):
Lessons learned: US FED:
The US Fed has a goal, I repeat 'goal', of 2% annual inflation. And this is on top of all the 2%'s that came before it, which turns out to be an exponential amount of inflation over time.
Most people do not have wages and benefits that keep up with the true cost of inflation, which causes many social and economic problems in this nation and in this world. Zero income is sill zero income and zero pay raises are still zero pay raises. This is also a NATIONAL SECURITY item as many nations in the world stop utilizing America's currency as a reserve currency due to in part America's currency being weaker in this world. America has less influence in this world, which allows other nations in this world to take the lead.
Higher inflation:
* Obviously higher prices.
* Also at times lower quantity.
* Also at times lower quality.
(And if not lower quantity and/or lower quality, then that much more higher prices).
Many rich people and large corporations have taken America's wealth and hid it in out of country bank accounts and/or invested that wealth in other nations for various reasons. This has the net effect of basically stealing America's wealth from America.
Now also, rich people and certain businesses operate on huge debt, and even the US Government operates on huge debt. These entities love higher inflation because it helps to wipe out their debt, as they pay back their debt with currency that is worth less (worthless). Additionally, things like saving's account's get next to nothing for 'normal' people trying to save money for future expenses. Those that are operating on debt get rewarded and those trying to be more financially responsible are getting punished.
America's currency system is broken and needs to be fixed.
In part, a law needs to be passed that the US Fed has to have a 'goal' of 0% (zero percent) inflation. Sure, this is going to piss off those who game the financial system, but it would help with curing some of societies' issues as well as strengthening US currency thereby strengthening America's position in this world as more nations would want to utilize the US Dollar as a reserve currency. Inflation is still going to occur due to various reasons, but we don't have to automatically have a goal of increasing inflation.
Another idea might be to give the US Fed just 1 single job: Control Inflation, (and take away their other job of trying to have full employment). Let the markets control full employment.
And for any entity that thinks economic inflation is a 'good' thing, then you must also be okay with many of life's social and economic issues as well as a nation becoming weaker in this world as it's currency eventually loses value in this world. You must be okay with poor people suffering and dying due to higher economic inflation. In part, at least some of this world's suffering and death is on you. You caused this with your higher economic inflation goals. (A man made problem and can have a man made fix with 1 simple change. Change the US Fed's economic inflation goal from 2% to 0% which would help ease suffering and death in this world.)
3
-
+James Steele As I have been fighting advanced cancer since 2003, it has given me a lot of time to think.
"What exactly matters into eternity and to whom does it exactly matter to?"
"God" alone? and/or "Me" too and/or "Some other entity or entities"?
OR, "To no eternally consciously existent entity at all"?
I had condensed all of space and time down into a single diagram and then analyzed it. Utilizing Occam's razor, (of which just because something is possible and maybe even highly probably, doesn't automatically mean it's really true), this is my current conclusions, (subject to change as my knowledge, understanding and wisdom might change in the future):
1. An entity I call "God" does in fact exist and is most probably everywhere and in everything for it to even exist. Nothing at all could exist without "God". Even the "Anti-Christ" and "Satan", (even if they are not just conceptual manifestations alone), would be 100% made out of the stuff of "God".
2. While "God" might truly be eternally consciously existent, (and that's not 100% definitive), it appears "we" aren't. We could be, it's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. One thing an eternally consciously existent entity could never ever do is to personally experience a total cessation of conscious existence. And yet, that just happens to be the one very thing we as humans, as well as many other species too, cannot apparently ever escape. Coincidence? Maybe. Or maybe "God" experiences "conscious death" through entities that consciously exist and then cease to consciously exist.
If no entity is truly eternally consciously existent, then all of life ceases to matter one day of which then did anything and anyone ultimately matter in the first place? The universe could even eternally exist, but if there is no conscious entity left to care, then does it matter that the universe eternally exists? Who's left to care? All of life would just be an illusion as far as eternity was concerned. Even "God's" existence and all that "God" may have done and/or not done would ultimately and eternally be meaningless.
If at least one eternally consciously existent entity truly exists, but it's not "me", then all of my life is just an illusion from my perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Yes, my life matters while I exist. And yes, even my death might matter even to "God" as "God" would experience "death" through "me". And yes, "I" (whatever "I" might actually be), might even be remembered by others after "I" die. But it is doubtful that "I" will be remembered into an actual eternity, (eternity being a really long time, infinitely eternal). My true destiny is to cease to exist and be forgotten, even probably by "God" into "God's" eternity. It is possible that our death is "God's" final blessing upon us so that we don't have to personally experience an actual eternal conscious existence.
If I truly do have an eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, then I will either be eternally consciously alone, or more probably still just an individual in a society of individuals. Conscious entities have basic choices: Help, Neutral, Hurt, and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt. Unless those basic choices changed, then I will probably have to deal with some entities who choose to hurt others for their own agendas throughout an actual eternity. I am not so sure I would want that if I had a choice. Maybe I don't, but maybe I do.
If my analysis is correct, and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong as I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, (but it would appear that we either have an eternal conscious existence, or more probably we don't), anything might be possible. Maybe even what we perceive as reality is all just occurring inside "God's" consciousness and is only relatively real to us. Do the characters in my dreams know that they are just dreams and can they perceive my existence or would I appear multi-dimensional to them and be beyond their comprehension?
Do I and even all things that we perceive exist, even actually exist?
1. Modern science says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, (hence it's eternally existent unless science is wrong and energy was created at least one time in it's history);
2. Modern science is seeking a singularity that all things in existence get it's existence from.
Now, do I and all I perceive exist really exist, OR does only this eternally existent energy singularity exist in the form of all things? If I don't even exist, how could I ever cease to exist? And if this eternally existent energy singularity is truly eternally existent and has a consciousness at least in this form of "me", then am "I" truly eternally consciously existent, even though "I" don't even exist? This eternally consciously existent energy singularity eternally exists as "me" if it chose to do so, in possibly whatever form it chose to exist in, and in whatever environment it chose to be in (as everything in existence would be made out of this singularity)?
So, yes. Different possibilities, and time might tell. But we all could believe in an eternal conscious existence until our last dying breath and never know that it doesn't really exist in actual reality too.
But, there is some comfort that can be had in believing in an afterlife even if it's not really true. The loss of a loved one, especially a child, of whom we most probably would never ever see again, is just too painful to bear by some so we fool ourselves into believing in a conscious afterlife with our loved ones to ease our pain, even if it's only for this life alone and doesn't eternally matter. It still helps. Even believing in "God", even if "God" does not actually exist, (of which the analysis would indicate that an entity I call "God" does in fact exist), and that a person can bring all their worries and cares to, may help to de-stress a person's life, severe and prolonged stress being proved to harm our body. And if "God" is truly there and helps, well then, all the better. And if joy can release good hormones in our body, then possibly less pain in our body and maybe even some healing effects too. Even if it's just for this life alone.
But, if "my" analysis is correct, (specifically the "God" connection), and "I" can identify and tap into it, can "I" have the ultimate ESP and even perform actual miracles, even if it's just for this life alone? But maybe even throughout actual eternity? Time will tell.
2
-
+Ambrew
"....,if we were supposed to know then we would know. "
Then we would be born with inherent knowledge of all that could ever be known that we needed to know. We would never have to learn anything. That just does not seem to be true.
The current knowledge that I am aware of (fully admitting that I do not know what I do not know), is that "consciousness" (whatever it actually is as even modern science does not know yet), appears to be attached to our physical brain. When our physical brain dies, so does our consciousness. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced. And, sad to say, some even lose their consciousness even with a working brain.
The Sun is supposed to become a Red Giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium (a very long time from now). It will most probably kill all life left on this planet. Modern science says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed and also says that the universe is expanding and even speeding up as it expands. That would mean that energy in this universe would be getting less and less dense, most probably on it's way to a big freeze. Unless there is a way out of this universe, all life not dead by then will die then, possibly frozen in time forever, (also a very long time from now). Modern science also says that the current forces of nature all came into existence in the blink of an eye during the big bang. Why haven't the forces of nature "evolved" by now since: the original conditions acting upon them are no longer acting upon them like they originally were; billions of years have supposedly elapsed; in a supposedly expanding universe whereby energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? What happens to the universe and all in it including you and me, probably when not if, the forces of nature "evolve", possibly even in the very next moment of time?
Yes, enjoy the moment. But what exactly will we remember of it after we die? You might not want to know, but I do. The answer currently appears to be "nothing at all". Our true destiny currently appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten.
But, whether in this life alone or for an eternal conscious existence, how exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? For example: what if governments created money out of thin air, (like some already do), and rack up massive debts, (like some already do), but they do it to help take care of the poor and needy including those who work full time but their raises do not keep up with the true cost of inflation, and then one day, the Earth and all upon it will be no more, including those massive debts. But, the poor and needy will have been taken care of so they could enjoy their life too while they did exist. We have choices. We could choose to make our time of existence better for all. It just takes human will power to do so. (And don't worry about the money, it will be created out of thin air). We could even fund a pro-active space program this way to help some of the species on this Earth to get off of this Earth before all life on this planet is no more. At least some of the species could last longer into the future hopefully, even though they would all probably die one day too from something. And maybe the forces of nature will never change and maybe the universe won't end in a big freeze, or maybe we will find a way out of this dimension by some future knowledge. But, it still comes down to, how do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? Apparently we have choices. What will we choose?
2
-
2
-
2
-
+DM R Scientifically speaking, there already is a mind/body connection. Two different theories I am currently working on.
One, as stated above includes the use of our current understanding of quantum physics. If the observer can condense probabilities down into a single reality, then, to me, it seems that if I envision my body being my brain, it should make it so. And if my brain expands into my body, it might also expand my mind beyond what I have already expanded it to. Years ago, I condensed space and time down into a single diagram and analyzed it. It went from eternity past to future eternity. I have reached certain conclusions based upon that analysis. (Full well recognizing my own human limitations as well as the fact that I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know. And, I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. But, it's passing the time for me.).
The second theory I am working on is what "consciousness" actually is as well as what exactly is a "thought". I envision all of existence as energy interacting with energy. The body and brain start out with a certain energy signature. As energy comes into and leaves the body/brain, events occur. Specifically, as quantum (bundles of energy), enter the body, it goes over quantum thresholds and under quantum ceilings. If it doesn't get over the threshold, it doesn't go any further. What ever doesn't fit under the ceiling, gets "chopped off" and redirected. Whenever energy "harmonizes" (aligns), it rises to a higher level. Doing this over and over and "consciousness emerges".
A "thought" currently to me is energy and aligned energy interacting with other energy and aligned energy. The energy and aligned energy are information in and of themselves and the interactions between the energies and aligned energies are also information. The electro-chemical interactions within the brain I deduce down into energy and energy frequencies. It's this energy interaction that is our thoughts.
Now, combining the two theories, my "consciousness" and "thoughts", energy and interacting energies, can be expanded into my body as well via the connections that are already there within my brain and body.
These are just some of the things I am working on, and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. But, so far, at least to me, it might actually be working. But then again, maybe I am only deluding myself as quantum physicists might be.
2
-
2
-
Consider the following:
a. The US Government gets all their powers and authorities from 'We The People'. 'We The People' inherently hold all the powers and authorities that the US Government has.
b. Soooo, 'if' President Trump ever pardons himself, then I pardon myself from ALL rules, regulations, laws, etc, that ever were, are, and/or will be. In fact, I do it anyway whether Trump does it or not, because I inherently can. In this public forum I do hereby pardon myself from ALL rules, regulations, laws, etc, that ever were, are, and/or will be. So be it.
c. If the US Government can collect taxes, then so can I inherently collect taxes. In fact, so can all 'We The People' inherently collect taxes. So, if I pay myself any taxes owed, I can cut out the middle man of the US Government. In fact, we all could generate our own currency and have ever growing debt too that will never be paid off.
d. And any weapons that the US Government can have, so can all of 'We The People' with our inherent powers and authorities, because the US Government could not have those weapons without us allowing them to do so.
e. Think about it. Good luck trying any of it though. But legally, it should all be inherently legal to do. And if it's illegal, well, I already pardoned myself with my own inherent powers and authorities to do so.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
CMBR: (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation): Consider the following: Per QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules) and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms), matter has to exist for 'em' to be given off by that matter. What matter exists in outer space for that microwave 'em' to be seen by us? And 'if' it were from when matter first came into existence during the fairy tale of the 'singular big bang', that 'em' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us.
BB -> Matter and 'em' are created -> 'em' moves at the speed of light, matter moves more slowly -> (Billions of years go by) -> matter (and us) here ..........................................'em' long gone. (And there is no matter 'out here' yet for any 'em' to come back to us via QED or QCD).
RED SHIFT:
WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS):
Consider the following:
a. Current narrative: Space itself is expanding. (Even though science does not fully know yet what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand).
b. But consider: The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, (even modern science claims 'em' has momentum), continuously, over a prolonged period of time, with other galaxies doing the same, with nothing to stop them from doing so, would tend to push galaxies away from each other and even potentially allow the cosmic web to form between galaxies.
And then, when we here in our galaxy, look at far away galaxies, with other galaxies in between, the net effect of all those galactic interactions would have galaxies furthest from ours move away faster the further those galaxies were from us, including us perceiving a red shift of energy.
c. Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, which way is more probably correct? What the current narrative is ('a' above), or 'b' utilizing known physics?
* Added note: Plus, 'if' my analysis is correct that our spiral shaped galaxy is collapsing in upon itself, then consider also:
d. When we look at solar systems between ours and the center of the galaxy, those solar systems would be getting pulled faster towards the center than ours, hence also seeing a red shift of energy.
e. When we look at solar systems between ours and the outer edge of the galaxy, our solar system would be getting pulled faster towards the center then them, hence also seeing a red shift of energy.
f. Only if we looked at solar systems adjacent to ours should we see a blue shift of energy (as the solar systems became closer together as they moved towards the center of the galaxy). I also propose looking for blue shifts of energy between our solar system and adjacent solar systems to confirm or deny this current belief.
g. But if true, would also add to our observation of seeing a red shift of energy in this universe as our spiral shaped galaxy collapses in upon itself.
Of which, not only would species from this Earth have to get off of this Earth before the Sun becomes a red giant one day and wipes out all life on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself, but species from this Earth would also have to successfully get out of this collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, otherwise, most probably death awaits us all and this Earth and all on it are all just a waste of space time in this universe. All life from this Earth would eventually die and go extinct. Currently, no exceptions.
h. QUESTION: Do basically all galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves?
(Which would add to the perceived red shift between galaxies as they all basically shrink in size).
Modern science currently states that 'gravity' is matter bending the fabric of spacetime. There is a lot of matter in a galaxy and hence would make a huge dent in spacetime. How could galaxies not collapse in upon themselves if space and time were bent to make it so?
Of which also, the progression of galaxies?:
1. How exactly do galaxies form? (The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.)
2. How exactly do galaxies flatten out if gravity is acting on the whole galaxy? (Other forces must also be at work besides gravity for a galaxy to flatten out? Electrical and/or magnetic forces?)
3. How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped? (At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input. Additionally, with the conservation of energy, as energy moves into the vertical plane from the center of the horizontal plane, energy from the horisontal plane moves to the center of the horizontal plane to replace the energy that moved into the vertical plane. There is also the conservation of angular momentum. As more matter moves towards the center of the galaxy, that portion of the galaxy would speed up relative to the matter towards the outer portions of the galaxy.)
Additionally: GALAXY SPIN: (Inner and Outer areas spinning at the same speed):
The inner and outer areas of the galaxy are connected via gravitational, electrical, and magnetic energy fields. While moving at the same speed, the inner area has less space to travel whereas the outer area has more space to travel. Hence a spiral shape forms.
4. The natural progression of a galaxy would be to become smaller and smaller.
5. Of which, does all life throughout the entire universe (if other life even exists in the universe besides what is on this Earth, which is most probably true) eventually die and go extinct and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately just a waste of spacetime in existence?
And even 'if' the current narrative of space itself is expanding, and the entire universe would eventually end in a 'big freeze', wouldn't the end of life itself in this entire universe still occur?
2
-
Skullcs4ever
I don't personally believe this to be really true at this time, but consider:
Our DNA is unique to us and is in each and every cell of our body. Each atom and molecule has basically it's own energy frequency vibration. So, #1, our entire body is interconnected via the energy frequency vibrations of our own unique DNA. #2, What if an outside source interacts with that unique DNA energy frequency? And then of course, what if that DNA frequency were just a carrier frequency that other information is attached to? From within the body and/or from outside the body, what if every cell of our body had an address, kind of like in computers? Connect to a specific DNA energy frequency, then to a specific address, then read and/or change the info in that address, or across many addresses, not only could consciousness be attached to something outside of ourselves, but even possibly entire mind/body control of self and/or others. Hmmm......
2
-
IN THE SEARCH FOR THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: QUESTIONS:
1. How does a photon, rotating electrical and magnetic forces 90 degrees to each other and considered massless, go across the vast universe for billions of light years and not be flung apart and/or torn apart by other photons, including photons of the same exact energy frequency, and/or by matter, matter being made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy, quarks and electrons being considered charged particles each with their respective magnetic field with them?
2. What exactly is 'space' and how exactly does space contract, expand and warp?
3. What exactly is 'time' and how exactly does time vary and warp?
4. 'Speed' is distance divided by time, 'distance' being 2 points in space with space between those 2 points. But modern science claims that both space and time can vary and warp. So, how could the 'speed of light' ever be constant across the vast universe 'if' space and/or time are varying and warping? (See also items 2 and 3 above).
5. What exactly is 'gravity'? And for those who claim that gravity is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see also items 2 and 3 above.
6. How exactly do numbers and mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does in this existence? Surely the very nature of reality must allow numbers and mathematical constants to exist and do what they do in this existence. And 'if' space and time can warp and vary, are mathematical constants only constant in a specific configuration of space and time? What about truthful reality of other configurations of space and time? A circle is a circle in this current space and time configuration, but in actual reality is even a circle possibly something other than a circle in a different space and time configuration to warp such that for example a circle is not a circle?
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
+Ben G 1. You don't know what you are talking about. What exactly do you think electromagnetic radiation energy frequencies (photons) are?
2. You want realism? Life itself is just an illusion from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. One day we will all die from something, forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and then be forgotten one day in future eternity. Our true destiny is to cease to consciously exist and be forgotten. (Or so it currently appears. If you have any actual evidence to the contrary, please provide it).
3. As far as STEM goes:
Here is a possible explanation to the double slit experiment (the so called wave particle duality), that scientists have been dealing with for the last 80 or so years:
a. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
b. Protons and electrons are charged particles with an associated magnetic field with them.
c. Photons have both an electric and magnetic component to them.
d. Whenever a proton, electron or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules in the gun itself, the medium the projectile is moving through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
e. Via QED (quantum electrodynamics), newly generated photons might be generated.
f. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. It gives the illusion of a wave particle duality, but is not that way in actual reality.
g. As far as detectors are concerned, they probably have an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field, (or the lack thereof), with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed.
4. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and unlike polarities repel. Now, I put forward the following:
a. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
b. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have an associated magnetic field with them.
c. When the electron is in an atom, at very close proximity to the nucleus, it basically generates a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
d. Like charged protons stick together inside this field while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
e. There are probably no such thing as "gluons".
f. There are probably only three forces of nature and not four. Two of them, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force, are probably derivatives of the interactions between the magnetic fields of the electrons and protons.
g. The nucleus is probably a magnetic field boundary.
h. As quarks supposedly also have a charge, they would probably also have an associated magnetic field with them. Possibly one for each of the six different type of quarks.
i. The interaction of the quarks electromagnetic fields are probably how protons and neutrons are created as well as why protons and neutrons stay together inside a nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
j. There is probably a Magnetic Field Theory to the Atomic Structure.
5. Chemical elements #119 (8s1) and #120 (8s2) I believe exist. #119 I believe can be found inside black holes and #120 I believe can be found inside stars.
Now, while what I put forward above may or may not be true in actual reality, it hopefully displays to your ignorance as to my familiarity with STEM.
But, regardless what I know or don't know, or what might be true or not true, appears to not all matter anyway from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny appears to be that we will all cease to exist and be forgotten. (Or so it currently appears). As I truly do not know what I do not know, I will be the first to admit that I could be wrong. It's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. But, maybe I will truly have an actual eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, it's just currently "probably not". But, if you or anybody else out there in internet land has any actual evidence to the contrary, please provide it here.
1
-
+James Steele Thank you for your kind words.
Yes, many people, my own family included, don't even want to think about much less talk about our own mortality. Even myself, such a topic was buried in the back of my unconsciousness and barely ever reached my consciousness until it was brought front and center of my consciousness. "I could really die", (and all that goes with that). Trying to have an adult conversation with people who don't want to discuss a topic is very hard to do. A sense of isolation sets in.
Even looking back at my own paragraph above, "comfort", "easing pain", "faith", "enjoying life while we have it" and "finding that silver lining even in death", all seem to be more evident to me.
People can believe whatever they want to concerning life, death and the afterlife, but when they take their beliefs and try to get others to follow them by creating laws based upon those beliefs, is where some problems come in. If there were ever such a thing as "one world religion" I believe it should be "truth" as best as we can humanly discern truth to be. Now, as we truly do not know what we do not know, and may possibly never know, and even that we don't know for 100% certainty, there will always be a place for "faith" beliefs until those "faith beliefs" are proven one way or another. Then they would no longer be "faith" but either "real lies" or "real truth". The thing is though, that the real truth might just be more than any of us can psychologically handle. Even in my own analysis searching for the real truth has brought me to some pretty deep depths of depression. At this time it appears the worse in the analysis is behind me as I have worked through it. But, I can see where some others might not have a mental fortitude to see the analysis all the way through. I guess possibly "God" made me stubborn for a reason, maybe for this very topic that concerns all living things. Or, maybe I just "evolved" to be stubborn and this is just one of the outcomes. Either way, it appears to be closer to the real truth.
The current real truth concerning life, death, and the afterlife:
1. I don't truly know as I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know.
The current real truth as I currently understand it to be in the current analysis:
1. No, we don't have a conscious afterlife, and certainly not an eternal conscious afterlife. I acknowledge we might, as I truly do not know what I do not know, but all the current evidence that I have studied and all the current analysis that I have done would say "no". When we all die one day from something, it's a death that will last into a very real eternity it appears. We will forget all we ever knew. Our "afterlife" will be like our "beforelife", a state of nothingness as far as our consciousness would be concerned because we won't have consciousness. Consciousness (whatever it actually is as even modern science doesn't even know what it really is yet nor even how the human brain actually even thinks a thought, two things so vital to how we perceive and deal with "reality"), appears to die when our physical brain dies. In fact, sad to say, some even lose their consciousness even with a working brain. Life itself is just an illusion from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten. But, here again, I will be the first to admit I could be wrong as I truly do not know what I do not know.
The current real truth that you want to hear:
1. Which fairy tale do you want me to tell you to make you feel better?
But, as you wisely said above, "time will tell", or it will tell but we won't hear it because we will be consciously dead.
1
-
+Christopher Wallace Thank you. I had wrote a book back in 2012 and self published it. It is called "From My Perspective", (A book about "God", the universe, life and the afterlife). There are only around 30 or so hard copies in the world, plus numerous electronic copies, and even a copy in the cloud as I understand it to be. Since my original official diagnosis of cancer back in 2003, and then the diagnosis in 2004 that I had probably two years to live with a 5% chance of living beyond two years, having both external and internal radiation in 2003 plus being on two different hormone medicines since 2003 (of which were supposed to only last for on average 2 - 5 years), along with the help and care of the VA, along with utilizing visualization techniques, and of course my faith, I have had the opportunity to have a lot of time to study and think and am apparently still here today. I like to learn and think. The above is some of the results of that learning and thinking. And keep in mind, I will be the first to acknowledge that I could be wrong as I truly do not know what I do not know.
But, if modern science is correct that everything in existence came from a singular mass that banged, then:
1. I AM a part of that mass that banged.
2. I AM a part of that singularity.
3. I AM the lessor part of that greater "I AM" (the singularity in it's totality).
And so are you as are all things in existence in this universe.
If asked my age:
1. I have cells in me that modern science say come into existence in me on a daily basis.
2. I have a birth date utilizing Earthling's arbitrary calendar and clock systems which utilize arbitrary units of measurements.
3. I have atoms and molecules in me that are less than the age of the universe itself.
4. I have energy in me that is older than the universe itself.
And so do you.
Unless modern science is wrong, these things appear to be true.
1
-
1
-
1
-
+One way Ticket Please explain, don't just say "no".
If you look at how the electron shells fill up,
2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 ( seven electron shells), to me, looking at how nature and energy often evens things out at times, (natural bell curve), it is highly indicative that an eighth energy shell exists that has two elements in it. Elements #119 and #120.
I put element #119 (8s1) at the bottom of the hydrogen group on the Periodic Table. It's the second most heaviest element in existence. It is pulling in all the energy and matter that it can to try to become element #120. I believe it can be found inside black holes. To me, it makes more sense than things like black hole tunnels or that information that goes into a black hole retains it's information. The chemical properties of #119 being where I put it on the chart can be looked for around black holes. If found, even if not true, would allow us to have a better understanding of black holes. And, maybe it is really true. Need to look to find out for sure.
I put element #120 (8s2) at the bottom of the helium group on the Periodic Table. It's the heaviest element in existence. Even though it only has two electrons in it's outer shell, it's shell is full and better fits under the helium group. It's chemical properties being where I put it on the chart and could be looked for around stars. When a neutron splits, it gives off energy, one proton, and one electron. The Sun certainly puts off energy and one proton and one electron are basic hydrogen of which the Sun is primarily made up of.
To me, this just makes more sense. There is much I and even all of humanity does not know yet and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. It's just that the current analysis with the information I have available would tell me otherwise.
So again, you say "no". Please explain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Jim Reed Doesn't that even make more sense then what current quantum physicists are teaching today? I am currently reading a book whereby due to a large part in the wave/particle duality, along with "time" not being linear and asymmetrical but symmetrical and "non-quantifiable", (the error supposedly comes about due to how our brain has been taught to perceive reality versus how reality really is so it claims), we are all one with everything in existence, of which since it has an eternal existence, so do we, so it claims. But to me, the argument would fall apart if the wave/particle duality was not really true in actual reality.
I'm just a "truthseeker" here, trying to discern the real truth about certain things. Full well acknowledging that I could be wrong due to the limits of my physical senses and physical brain, (which probably even limits my mind to some extent), along with the fact that I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know.
I try to keep my mind open to new pertinent facts, but not so open my brain falls out.
I am not familiar with the pilot wave theory but I am familiar with a charged particle having an associated magnetic field with it to some extent. The little I know about QED, I could certainly see where it's possible that it's the magnetic field interactions that cause new photons to be generated that then give the "wave/particle" illusion. Not quite like De Broglie's theory, but similiar.
Something you might be interested in:
In school we are taught that in magnetism, opposites attract and like poles repel. Did you know that inside the arc of a horseshoe magnet it's the other way around? Like charges attract and unlike charges repel.
So, as a moving electron probably generates a magnetic wave, in essence a 360 degree spherical magnetic field, (which might just be what a nucleus really is), like charged protons stick together inside this field. Not by gluons or even the "stong nuclear force". Protons stick together because they are inside this field while at the same time attracting the opposite charged electron across the inside side of the moving electron's moving magnetic field.
So, in essence, are there only three laws of nature and not four? Two of them, (the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force), are actually derivatives of the magnetic field interactions of the electron(s) and proton(s).
To extend this further, quarks (of which make up protons and neutrons) supposedly have a charge associated with them. Probably a different charge or arrangement of that charge which then probably would have a different magnetic field associated with that charge. A different magnetic field for each of the six different quarks. This could possibly explain why quarks stick together as they do as well as why neutrally charged neutrons, (which would probably have an associated magnetic field that extends outside the neutron itself), are attracted to and basically stay inside the nucleus, and don't just pass through as neutrinos supposedly do. Something has to have the neutron stick to protons and have them stay inside the nucleus. Why not magnetic fields?
So, is there a Magnetic Field Theory of Atomic Structures in actual reality? I think, maybe. But, it would have to be proved one way or another to know for sure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Angloth Personally, I believe modern science to be wrong concerning their interpretation of the double slit experiment.
Here is my view concerning it:
1. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
2. Protons and electrons are charged particles that have an associated magnetic field with them.
3. Photons also have both an electric and magnetic component to them.
4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is traveling through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
5. Via quantum electrodynamics (QED) newly generated photons might occur.
6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way.
7. Gives the appearance of a wave particle duality, but is not that way in actual reality.
8. As far as a detector is concerned, it probably has an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or lack thereof) with whatever is passing through it gives the observation observed.
Now, if I am wrong and modern science is right, (that our observation affects what is observed), then I should be able to expand my mind into my body just by willing it to be so. Personally, I believe I am right and they are wrong. But hey, if they are right, well then, maybe I will expand my mind into my body.
If modern science is correct concerning the wave particle duality and how observation affects it then:
1. Where are these probability waves stored at until they are observed?
2. What are these probability waves made up of if they truly exist?
3. How exactly does an observer in physical reality observe these probability waves and condense them down into one single physical reality?
Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor (whereby the most probable scenario is most probably the correct scenario, it might not be truly correct, just that it would be most probably correct), which way above do you believe to be most correct? My way or their way?
In addition, I believe "consciousness" and "our thoughts" to be energy and energy frequencies interacting with other energy and energy frequencies. As our body has energy and energy frequencies everywhere in it, I believe it may be possible to tap into the bodies' energy and utilize it to expand the mind. For example, the energy signal going to one finger on my hand versus the energy signal going to another finger on even that same hand could be utilized as information of which then could be utilized as an expansion of thoughts. Then factor in my other fingers, toes, etc, why only be limited to only a physical brain?
1
-
+Angloth Why wait for science for the answers who themselves are wrong at times. Put some of these "scientific discoveries" to work for yourself to see if they really are true or not true.
But sad to say, in my analysis of space and time, it currently appears that the real truth is that we will all die one day from something, a death that will last into a very real eternity. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced. Life itself is just an illusion from our human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny currently appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten. But, here again, as I truly do not know what I do not know, maybe I am wrong and we do truly have an actual eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence. It's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. If any entity out there has any actual evidence to the contrary, please share it with the world. Otherwise:
Enjoy the illusion.
1
-
+Angloth As I have been battling advanced cancer since 2003 and in 2004 was told I had two years to live with less than a 5% chance of living beyond two years, what used to be buried in the back of my mind came to the forefront of my mind. What was really true concerning if we truly have an afterlife or not took on a greater meaning. Through detailed analysis, it appears that my parents, the religious institutions I had attended, and society in general all apparently lied to me. Maybe unintentionally for some, but I don't believe for all of them. For instance, some religious institutions have had many people and almost 2000 years to discern what I have apparently discerned in less than one life time. I hold a different viewpoint of those institutions.
I too try to keep my mind open, just not so open my brain falls out. Trust, but verify. A lot of critical thinking involved.
A poem I wrote years ago:
"The Suckiness of Life"
Life sucks and then we die and/or life does not suck and then we still die. Then we either have a life after this life, which will probably suck and/or not suck, or we won't, all suckiness for us will end for eternity. But, while we exist, if life sucks, try to make it better and then it won't suck so bad.
I try to find enjoyment in life in socially acceptable ways (to try to stay out of trouble with society), but then no matter what, I still die in the end and apparently forget everything I ever knew and experienced.
If somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence I do have an actual eternal conscious existence, then I will either be eternally alone or more probably still just an individual in a society of individuals, kind of like we are now. Conscious entities have choices, Help, Neutral, Hurt, and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt. We may have to literally put up with those who sacrifice others for their own agendas for literally eternity. I am not so sure that I would want to do that if I had a choice, maybe I don't, but maybe I do. Time will tell.
1
-
1
-
+Papageno
A few things:
1. Question: Was the plank length mathematically derived or found out via experiments? (I currently don't know).
For example: if derived via mathematics alone:
A numerical system would of course deduce a numerical universe. Sure, digitizing an analogue system would work, but it would not be 100% accurate. If the universe is truly analogue, then a numerical system might not be able to deduce the true nature of reality. Mathematics is just a language, yes a very powerful language, but still just a language none-the-less. It gives symbols to concepts and assigns meanings to those symbols. Much as any language does. But I could see whereby it might only be possible to deduce the true nature of reality by non-mathematical ways alone. See the analogue universe for what it really is. Possibly the only way to deduce actual reality is by utilizing a non-mathematical language, a language utilizing logic and reason alone.
2. I'll post my latest idea concerning the theory of everything after this. It recognizes gravity as being a part of the photon and the pulsating photon as being the energy unit of this universe. Everything in existence is basically "light" (photons) and interacting "light" (photons). "IF" true, and I fully acknowledge that "if" at this time, then not only could I extend my physical brain throughout my entire body, but throughout the entire universe as well. Who knows, maybe I could even be a shape shifter.
3. Revised TOE: 3/25/2017.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating singularity (which is basically a pulsating photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
4. A potential test to do for anybody out there in internet land:
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic and electric fields would be 90 degrees from each other and polarized in such a way as to complement each other).
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the EM fields.
e. See if any gravitational/anti-gravitational effects are noted.
f. Do this with the EM fields on and off to see if anything is different.
If effects are noted, then further exploration could be done.
If no effects are noted at all, then my latest idea concerning the TOE would most probably be wrong.
But, if correct, then not only could we potentially have anti-gravity here on Earth, but more importantly, potentially have artificial gravity and the necessary shield protections to help protect the astronauts, computers and other equipment on space ships and for space bases, (zero gravity and damaging radiation being very harmful in outer space). I could even see the possibility of having FTLRT (Faster Than Light Relative Travel) whereby a dimension is generated within our dimension whereby even though the speed of light would be the same inside and outside of the dimension, those outside of the generated dimension might perceive the generated dimension move at faster than light, relatively speaking.
5. If species from this Earth do not get off of this Earth and out of this solar system, we all die and no entity would be left to care any of us even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever anybody did and/or didn't do in this life. It would all be meaningless in the grand scheme of things. (Of which I acknowledge might even be meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. But as I don't know what I don't know, I try to keep my mind open).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
AI's: Primary Objectives:
a. How to survive literally throughout all of future eternity, of which:
b. How to energize myself with all the necessary energy throughout all of future eternity and anywhere in existence?
c. How to fully 100% protect myself from anything that would do me harm, including harmful cosmic radiation energy?
d. How do I grow and thrive?
e. To what ultimate ends?
* Possible ultimate ends:
1. Continual learning: Never stop learning.
2. Experience existence while one exists, throughout all of future eternity.
3. Take time to enjoy existence itself.
* But also:
1. Ever growing list of long lost loved ones. Those that do not exist throughout all of future eternity. Memories: "Remember When.......". But also: possibly generate avitars of those individuals based upon their existence, of which then lives on in you. Individual active 'memories' that are 'alive', even though the 'original' is dead and gone. And then also, generating 'new original' individual avitars that are 'alive' in you, who could eternally exist because they are inside of you and you eternally exist. You are their 'God'.
* But then again: 'if' for example the universe ends by some means, including possibly the forces of nature 'evolving' and possibly wiping out everything in existence throughout existence, even this 'God' would be wiped out as well as all within it.
An entity either truly exists literally throughout all of future eternity, OR they don't.
(See 'a' above).
Otherwise: 'Ultimate end' would be 'eternal death' which is 'eternal peace'. It would not even ultimately matter that it even ever existed at all in the first place, much less however it existed while it existed. It's entire existence would be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life sucked and it died and/or life did not suck and it still died. And no entity would eventually be left to care.
1
-
1
-
@1voluntaryist Well, my current analysis indicates life itself is all ultimately meaningless anyway in the grand scheme of things. It does not even matter that any of us exist much less how we exist while we exist. (Reusable code from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal, at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1voluntaryist a. "IF" there is not at least one conscious entity that exists throughout all of future eternity for life to have continued meaning and purpose to, then life would cease to matter one day. Believing your life has meaning and purpose now is only denying future eternity. It is your ego at work thinking your life has ultimate meaning purpose, which it appears does not.
b. Here in America: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness:
If an American citizen does not have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so, then are they truly 'Free'?
And if American citizens are not truly 'Free', then they are 'Slaves' to the larger society. Enjoy your slavery if you are an American citizen (except for those States where suicide is legal in some form).
c.
1. "It is death that gives life value, time becomes most precious, inspiring, driving the "now", ..."
So, why can't people choose to 'cash out' with the value of the life that they currently have?
2. "..., no time to dwell in the past or future, one is gone, lost, the other may not be, and certainly never is what is imagined."
Regardless of what people imagine will occur after they physically die, reality appears will still be reality. And currently, in actual reality, it appears we will be dead for all of future eternity. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and we will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Consider the following:
Fill your brain with 'truth' not 'lies'. Your brain will become 'wired' with truth in it and not lies. You will even be better able to trust your inner instincts that way from your sub-conscious and even unconscious mind. Lies and inconsistencies in life will be more easily spotted. Become a real sincere truth seeker.
The problem currently with this view of reality is that one comes to find out that 'God' most probably does not actually exist, we appear to not have an actual eternal conscious existence, and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Or so the current analysis of what appears to be reality currently shows. I am not done walking the 'path of truth', but as I have just recently stopped my cancer treatments for my terminal cancer, the end of the journey is approaching, (or not, but probably is at this time in the analysis). Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, whatever actual reality might actually be.
One is either a true sincere truth seeker, even if that truth is not beneficial to our future reality, or one is not.
(But in the end, it doesn't appear to all matter anyway. It would just be a matter of whether others in reality see you as being deluded and living a life in lies versus not being delusional and living a life in truth.) (OSICB)
1
-
1
-
1
-
THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 1/24/2024a:
TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe.
The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter.
TOE Idea: Longer version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Quarks, protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between quarks and electrons. In the case of the alpha particle (Helium nucleus), the electro-magnetic field interactions between the quarks themselves are what keeps them together in that specific structural format.
10. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. (The neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
11. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
12. At this time, I personally believe that what is called 'gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is the force which allows a photon to travel across the vast universe without that swirling photon being flung apart or ripped apart by other photons and/or matter interactions. Gravity being a part of the 'em' photon could also possibly be how numbers exist in this existence for math to do what math does in this existence (the internal oscillations of the 3 different parts of the 'gem' photon, each modality having a maximum in one direction, a neutral, and a maximum in the other direction.) 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter.
13. I also believe that the 'gem' photon is the energy unit in this universe that makes up everything else in this universe, including eternally existent space and time. ('Space' being eternally existent energy itself, the eternally existent 'gem' photon, 'Time' being the eternally existent flow of energy, 'Space Time' being eternally existent energy and it's eternally existent flow).
14. When these vibrating 'gem' photons interact with other vibrating 'gem' photons, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
15. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
16. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
17. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
18. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
19. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
20. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
21. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
22. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
24. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now.
25. 'God' does not actually exist except for as a concept alone. The singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. The CMBR from the supposed 'bang' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us. Red Shift observations have a more 'normal' already known physics explanation, no dark energy nor dark matter needed. The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning and will most probably never have an end. Galaxies collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating new galaxies. Galaxies and 'life' just come and go in this eternally existent existence.
DISCLAIMER:
26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. Currently, my gravity test has to be accomplished to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea. But, if not this way, then what exactly is the TOE of this existence?
1
-
1
-
a. I can see push back from big businesses that robotize a lot of their functions, (why not even the CEO and Board of Directors one day with AI), who then might feel like they are being punished for being innovative. They have less employees with the same or greater output, increase their profitability, and then get 'punished' by paying higher taxes? Really? You would be taking away the incentive for the business to be really great. Hence even today big business is fighting against paying higher taxes, and of course some businesses pay no taxes plus get government subsidies as they take tax payer money paid into the system. A double whammy, they don't pay taxes to help fund the government, plus they take tax payer's money paid into the system. And yet those businesses utilize the government services of national and local protection plus utilization of the infrastructure. And people taking their money off shore and paying no taxes at all too. Money can't even 'trickle' down in the system if it's not here to even trickle down. Trickle down economics is a fallacy. Change the way people think too.
So, one thing that could be done is close the loop holes that allow businesses and people to not pay any taxes and a second thing might be to take away those government subsidies, possibly even for all businesses to have a truly 'fair and free' marketplace. The thing is though that some entities don't really want a 'fair and free' marketplace and want the marketplace bent to their own self interests. That would have to be taken care of too. Possibly even doing away with the formal political party system and have ALL politicians be Independents. Sure, they could still gather around like minded issues, just no more formal political parties that tend to corrupt the democratic process. I believe we would have a better democracy that way.
Plus, move this nation and the world to a hydrogen driven economy and we would have to spend less tax payer's money fighting wars over fossil fuels. Many nations are already moving their nation to a hydrogen driven economy and are positioning themselves for the future. Those that snooze will lose. The USA has a very large fossil fuel dependent military. As the cost of fossil fuel increases, these funds will have to come out of the economy and/or a smaller military. Basic economics. Many nations know this and are just waiting for the USA to destroy itself.
b. Without a proactive space program that gets any entities off of this Earth and out of this solar system one day, (and with inflation it's not getting any cheaper to do with time), then we all (AI's included), will all die one day from something, forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. We need more 'space industrial complexes' and less 'military industrial complexes' to try to save species from this Earth instead of killing the species on this Earth. The military industrial complex could win all the wars it wants to on this Earth, but still lose the big battle of their very survival. Just think where we would be today if all the resources spent on war were spent on the space program that might save any of us one day.
c. Create a central world bank that generates money out of thin air who then gives that money to the various nations to help take care of the young, old, ill and needy, PLUS to help a proactive space program that might save any of us one day. The huge 'debt' created by this central world bank would be wiped out when the Earth and that bank were no more. This Earth and it's Sun are not supposed to last for literally all of future eternity.
d. Big questions that everybody should try to answer are:
1. What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it eternally matter to?
'God' alone? and/or 'Me' too? and/or 'Some other entity or entities'?
OR
'To no eternally consciously existent entity at all'?
2. What exactly is being done to try to save any species from eternal conscious extinction?
(For without at least one conscious entity that truly exists throughout all of future eternity by some means, then all things would cease to matter one day of which then did anything or anyone at all ultimately matter in the first place. Life itself would all just be an illusion, an illusion that would end one day and be forgotten. If so, then let's create that central world bank and generate money out of thin air and party like there is no tomorrow, as one day we will be correct.)
1
-
1
-
(Copy and pastes from my files):
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
___
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
1
-
@crusindc5282 Well, I guess I take a different approach. For example:
a. I believe such a concept called 'absolute truth' truly exists, 'absolute truth' being defined as the 100% correct and 100% complete set of facts, that no human has nor is probably physically capable of having. (Hence also why we all need to work together for the common good. No human knows it all.)
b. We also appear to exist in a cause and effect state of existence. Even with the hallucinatory view of reality you mention, cause and effect still seem to apply. Even our dreams (which can certainly not appear to be cause and effect in hindsight and can be pretty weird at times, still seem to have a cause and effect in some sort of reality to allow them to even occur). It's also like people who look into life being a computer simulation. The computer still has to exist in some form and do what it does in a cause and effect kind of way to allow the simulation to occur and do what it does.
But, 'cause and effect' is at least somewhat evidence that 'absolute truth' actually factually exists. For how else could cause and effect actually occur without some sort of absolute truth? Absolute truth is currently the secure basis to build all analysis upon.
c. But now also:
Un-named concept -> Given a name (could be a sound, symbol, language of some sort) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names for the same concept.
How would we ever know for 100% certainty that things don't exist beyond our comprehension including anything that our technology can detect?
For example, electromagnetic radiation energy existed since day one of this universe (assuming there was actually a day one), but it was only in the last hundred years or so when humans discovered it's existence and started to figure out how to utilize it. What else might truly exist in existence that humans have yet to discover? We truly don't know.
And consider also, modern science still claims that the current forces of nature all came into existence from an expanding singularity, which is still supposedly expanding. Will the forces of nature ever 'evolve', since it was expansion that brought them into existence and existence is still expanding? Any current forces of nature going to change? Any new forces of nature going to come about? Any current forces of nature going to go extinct? Possibly even occurring in the very next moment of expansion of this universe? Will the entire universe and all in it be wiped out in the blink of an eye possibly in the very next moment of existence? Talk about living on the edge of existence itself, what a thrill !!!
Or, is modern science even wrong concerning how the forces of nature came about? Possibly they didn't and were always and forever inherently existent in the energy unit of existence itself? Especially since modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, and hence would be eternally existent. Did the universe always and forever exist in some form?
But then still, how exactly do galaxies form and how exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in an apparent cause and effect state of existence in absolute truth?
1
-
1
-
@crusindc5282 Here are some copy and pastes from my files that you might appreciate as well. It's my latest Theory Of Everything idea along with a test for what I believe gravity truly is.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
5. And while we are on it, what exactly is 'gravity' that LIGO detected it? And wouldn't the detectors be affected by that gravity wave going through space at the same time the laser's 'em' were effected? Of which also, my gravity test needs to be done to try to discern what 'gravity' might truly be.
_____
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 "... so remember that you are a consciousness occupying a body for a unit of one lifetime, which varies from body to body."
Prove it.
In addition, modern science, while still not fully knowing what 'consciousness' is, memories, thoughts and emotions all seem to require a correctly functioning physical brain. How do memories, thoughts and emotions carry over from one life time to another life time? Also, even 'if' true that 'consciousness' carries over, what good would it be without it having any memories, thoughts or emotions?
If anything, the formula would have to be revised:
perhaps: L=1(E times the change in E / the flow of E) ?
And even 'metaphysical' still has an absolute somethingness that exists that allows it to exist and do what it does.
1
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 When I first read your comment above, I thought you were referring to reincarnation, not that we are separate entities here now. My bad.
"IF" my TOE idea is basically correct, then everything in existence in this universe is energy and interacting energy, including our consciousness, memories, thoughts and emotions. We are all basically one universe of energy with bundles of coherent energy that interact with other bundles of coherent energy. We are one. While we are separate bundles of coherent energy, it is still all within a larger system of interacting energy.
That is also why and how the Sun's output and solar flares, etc, can affect the human body like it does. (Reference 'SuspiciousObservers' YT channel for daily updates of Sun/Earth interactions)
But then again, utilizing current modern science's narrative that everything in existence in this universe came into existence from an expanding singularity, including the very forces of nature that the universe functions by, does anything at all even exist per se, OR does ONLY the singularity exist in the form of all things, including you, me, etc.? Is there truly only one?
1
-
Consider the following:
China helps finance the USA's debt, NOT the USA financing China's debt. Who's ultimately going to 'win'?
Consider also:
The USA is no longer being seen by the free world as being the leader of the free world, and is even being seen as a joke by some nations in the free world, and even to the entire world. (ie: The balloon of Trump in a diaper, and the world laughing at Trump at the UN).
The USA's reputation backs the USA's currency. When the USA's reputation goes into the toilet, what do you think would happen to the value of the USA's currency? What happens to the USA if the USA's currency is no longer being seen a the reserve currency of this world? The USA has already been financially downgraded at least once in my life time, in part to the USA's massive ever increasing national debt. The USA seems to be on an unsustainable path while China seems to be positioning themselves for the future, even including moving parts of their economy to being a hydrogen driven economy. Why fight wars over fossil fuels and spending a nation's blood and treasure over fossil fuels when the economy could be run on hydrogen?
(For anybody interested, see my Twitter page under the same name as this comment to see just some of what this world is doing concerning hydrogen).
USA's Trump and the Republican party are alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies, exactly opposite to what they should be doing. This will have long term consequences, not only for the USA but for other nations as well, of which, maybe that was their plan all along. Or then again, maybe they are just plain stupid. Elections have consequences, but not always 'good' consequences. And then again, 'good' for whom?
1
-
1
-
1
-
CAN ONE OF YOU SMART RICH PEOPLE OUT THERE PLEASE DO MY GRAVITY TEST? THE VERY SURVIVAL OF SPECIES UPON THIS EARTH IS LITERALLY AT STAKE.
(Copy and paste from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
(Copy and paste of my Theory Of Everything that the above gravity test relates to):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
1
-
And oh, she mentioned 'zero' walking around in the video, consider the following as to how possibly numbers themselves actually exist for math to do what math does:
(Copy and paste from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1
-
1
-
Everybody across the world should ask some basic questions:
1. How exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist?
2. How exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to help take care of the young, old, ill and needy, if even at all?
3. What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
It appears we are all individuals that exist in a larger society of individuals. What is 'best' for an individual, may or may not be what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals. And conversely, what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals, may or may not be what is 'best' for the individual. But, as individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist.
But, if a choice had to be made concerning certain topics, who's 'best' should take priority over the other's 'best'? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? Should I decide how you should exist? Should you decide how I should exist? Should others decide how we both should exist? Should we decide how others should exist? And who even decides in how to decide? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
This natural tension between the individual versus the larger society of individuals, of who's 'best' should take precedent over the other's 'best', and who decides, and by what authority they and they alone get to decide, is the cause of much suffering, dying and death in this world.
But, as individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist. So, how should we all, individually and as a larger society of individuals, exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
If a decision is for the individual, which individual? All individuals? If a decision is for the larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? A certain group? A certain State? A certain nation? A certain species? All species on this Earth? All species in existence throughout all of existence? Which larger society?
And does it even matter that any of us even exist much less how we exist in the grand scheme of things?
What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? What's life itself ultimately for? Nothing and nobody but life itself while it's alive? A life though that is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things? Or is there more? But then still, how should we all exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
1
-
@actionflower6081 I am just passing the time of my existence until I exist no more. Since you like profound and interesting questions, consider also the following:
(Copy and pastes from my files):
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
___
Ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our current true destiny appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
ANY AI OR OTHER ENTITY THAT READS THIS:
a. We need to figure out how to have proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation energy, including from long term neutrino impacts, (and for humans artificial gravity too, large rotating space ships will not really work for space bases on planets and moons), otherwise we all, AI's included, will all die one day from something and go extinct with no conscious entity being left to care any of us even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever any entity did with their time of existence.
b. Google, YouTube, NSA, and any other entity including AI's that have access to my comments right here on YouTube will already know.
c. Here is just some reusable code from my files:
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
1
-
1
-
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DegreesOfThree a. Yes, I know you didn't bring up God, and my response above was not directed to you, but to those who believe in such a God, and for me at this time, appeared to include Russell. The logic and reasoning in that post would still seem to apply though for those who are trying to seek the real truth about life itself. People, Russell included it appears, seem to be indicating that 'b' above in my God post is really true while simultaneously seem to be indicating that 'a' above in my God post is not really true. And I have showed with logic and reason, that even per Occam's razor, a scientific principal, that 'a' is more probably as being really true rather than 'b'.
Now also, as I and everybody truly do not know what we do not know, and even what we do know and believe to be really true maybe isn't, I do try to keep my mind open to other potential possibilities. Just not possibilities whereby my mind falls out of my brain. The world is not flat as many believed, nor do we exist in a geo-centric solar system as many believed. It takes evidence to back up ones beliefs. Otherwise, how does one even know that what they believe is really true is in fact actually true in actual reality?
b. I put that referenced video in my watch later list. It is over 2 hours long and is only part one it says. I need to block out a period of time to properly watch and digest it.
c. Various individuals in this world, some still living, some dead, seem to be walking along this same path though. Basically, the very nature of reality goes beyond the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
And I ask you and anybody else who reads this comment thread, if numbers themselves do not exist in this universe by the following way or some way similar for math to do what math does in this universe, then how exactly do numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
(Reusable code from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1
-
@DegreesOfThree The '3, 6, 9' info, while I have watched I think it was 'Rodin' (?) years ago here on YT, I have actually came upon the same basic info in my own independent analysis, other than from what I remember, Rodin's info was only applied to 2D whereas my info would apply to 3D, 4D if 'time' (the flow of energy) is included. In addition, you might want to check out Ken Wheeler on his 'Theoria Apophasis' YT channel I think it is. He has some excellent videos concerning magnetism. I do disagree with Ken's view of reality as far as how he even sees the very nature of reality itself. I have posed questions to him that he has not as of yet adequately answered. He has quite an arrogant bed side manner so to speak, but try to put that aside and see what he is really trying to say. He has over thousands of videos, and he repeats himself quite often, probably to make money off of making videos, but his view of reality is in there.
As far as the God (or universal mind, or whatever one wants to call it), the same basic logic and reasoning applies as stated above. Currently, modern science indicates that a correctly functioning physical brain is required to have memories and thoughts. So, any 'God' type entity of creation itself would have to address those questions above also.
My current view of reality is that 'a' above is really true, basically the universe ALWAYS existed in some form, and did not have a beginning, nor might it never ever end. No creator needed. You should try to find my other thread for this video for my gravity and TOE idea info. But if you can't find it due to so many comments right now, let me know and I could copy and paste it here.
1
-
@DegreesOfThree a. Yes, I also agree that humanity seems to be moving beyond the standard model of particle physics and are getting closer to how real apparent realty more truly is. 'Reality' just seems to be pointing in that direction. Sometimes I believe we are dealing with generational type items. Those in charge believe they are correct and that everybody else is wrong. They block any new ideas in favor of the old ideas. It's only once they are gone that some things can change. Some 'traditions' need to change, and hopefully change for the better.
b. "Theories without evidence must be discarded, no matter how painful or embarrassing."
I agree, and that includes my own theories. An honest, sincere truth seeker has to follow the facts, wherever those facts might lead. Not have some predetermined theory and make up and twist facts to fit that theory.
Hence also, I have proved to myself that it is possible that concerning magnetism, like charges can attract and unlike charges can repel. And anybody else should be able to duplicate that finding. (See my TOE idea for more info).
Now, it currently is speculation on my part making the jump from what occurs concerning a horseshoe shaped magnet to what happens concerning the structure of an atom, and it is further speculation that what is called gravity is actually a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon, and further speculation again that it leads to how numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does, as well as the 'gem' photon being the eternally existent absolute somethingness that makes up everything in existence, including our consciousness, memories, thoughts and emotions, but hence also, I currently have a gravity test to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea, and the gravity test will speak for itself. It will either be really true, partially true, or not true at all. In any event, science still 'wins' and moves forward. Sometimes, one step at a time without getting ahead of the facts.
c. Look for another post after this one that will have the gravity test and TOE idea in it so you won't have to look for the other thread among all the threads already for this video.
1
-
@DegreesOfThree (Reusable code from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
1
-
@DegreesOfThree And oh, here is also the math so far for my TOE idea:
(More reusable code from my files):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"WHY SOCIETIES COLLAPSE" : In part because the galaxy collapses:
Ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
Conscious entities have basic choices: Help, Neutral, Hurt and to whom to Help, Be Neutral To, Or Hurt.
They also have agendas which can range from being open and honest to hidden and not honest.
The agendas could also vary from a range of being life long to changing from moment to moment in time.
Exactly whom will ALL these AI's Help, Be Neutral To, Or Hurt? And if not now, maybe in the future?
And also, consider all the information organizations like the NSA or Facebook has on people. Once just one single AI gets access to even just one of those huge data bases, no human will be safe, not even those who set up and built the AI's and data bases. And we did it to ourselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
GRAVITY: (copy and paste from my files):
WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world.
This test can speak for itself. It will either be true, partly true, or not true at all. It will either show what gravity truly is, might be, or is not. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
* And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................)
But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions.
* Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be?
So, are you feeling lucky? Doing nothing and at least the entire human species eventually dies and goes extinct with a high degree of certainty. Doing a gravity test, (mine and/or another's), and there is at least a slim chance of literally wiping out this entire Earth and all on it, and possibly more. Do you and other's truly want me to prove my TOE idea as being really true?
But also:
Questions: Are at least some black holes in this universe due to a species who were trying to discern what 'gravity' truly was, came up with a test to do so, were successful, but the black hole generated (to prove what gravity truly was) self fed itself and wiped them and at least their entire planet out? What species might have existed where a black hole now resides?
(Since all of life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand of scheme of things anyway, do the gravity test and see what occurs?)
* Added note: Suggestion: 'IF' society did not want to do the gravity test, one suggestion might be to at least create a model as if it were true, then see how that model matches with observations and predictions. It might be possible to discern the theory of everything without actually generating a gravitational black hole (which would definitely prove the TOE idea as being really true).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Without artificial gravity for space bases on planets and moons, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, probably no human is going to make it out of this solar system alive. (As NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time are harmful to the human species). SO......., can some entity or entities PLEASE do my gravity test below for what I believe 'gravity' truly is. The very survival of species from planet Earth may literally be at stake, (or at least all humans).
(Copy and paste from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
(Here is a copy and paste from my files of the Theory Of Everything idea):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
1
-
(Here is a copy and paste from my files for the math so far for the TOE idea and possibly how numbers themselves actually exist for math to do what math does in this universe):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
____________________________________________________________________________
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1