Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Fox Business"
channel.
-
1
-
discorperted Don't even those hospitals and other such organizations receive national protections and get to utilize the nation's infrastructure? I am surprised you don't know that. And here again, I am only talking about a very small percentage of their entire take. Why should they get a free ride, even if it's for the 'public good'? Isn't the public still picking up the tab for them protecting them and allowing them to utilize the nation's infrastructure?
And then also, how come the public doesn't get to set the wages for those non-profits who receive money from the tax payers? And also, how come public traded companies don't have the public set the wages for the CEO, etc, who work for the public? Shouldn't the owners of a company get to set the wages for their employees? Too many rich CEO's, etc, with their high paychecks, benefits and golden parachutes that is not in the best interest of the owner's investments. The shareholders would get a better return if the CEO's, etc, didn't get paid so much.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@John-ik2eg Without a successful pro-active space program, ALL life will die and go extinct from this Earth one day. (Reusable code from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal, at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kenneth9210 Well, let me ask you some questions then:
a. How exactly should we, individually and as a society of individuals, exist while we do exist?
b. How exactly should we, individually and as a society of individuals, take care of the young, old, ill and needy, if even at all?
c. What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
d. And specifically, as far as Trump goes, Trump will not be America's President forever. Future Presidents can undo most anything that previous Presidents have done, just as Trump is doing to Obama.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Elementalspecter Consider this item:
ECONOMIC INFLATION:
The way I see it is that regardless of the currency utilized (gold, silver, fiat, crypto, etc), economic inflation is still economic inflation. ANY economic inflation over previous economic inflation, overtime, eventually becomes exponential economic inflation. If an entities' wages, benefits and investments do not keep up with the true cost of inflation, then the entity falls behind in buying power and becomes poorer. A nation will eventually fail as will a global economy will eventually fail with ever increasing economic inflation because most people do not have wages, benefits and investments that keep up with the true cost of inflation. And this includes businesses as well. They also get zapped with ever increasing economic inflation. Math is still math and compounded economic inflation is still compounded economic inflation.
You want to help the nation and the world? Change the US Fed's economic inflation goal of 2% every year to 0% every year. Also, can possibly take away the US Fed's dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment to just having them take care of price stability. Let the markets take care of employment. Does anybody think the US Fed can take care of even that single issue all by itself? Price stability or bust?
And as a nation gets greater, shouldn't it's currency be able to buy more, not less?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1