Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "" video.

  1. Can anybody, anybody at all, even prove that 'God' actually factually exists? What good is it to swear to 'God' if 'God' does not actually factually exist? Now, personally, I cannot prove that 'God' exists and neither can I prove that 'God' does not exist, so I try to keep my mind open concerning the existence of 'God'. And yes, circumstantial arguments can be made for "God's" existence, but so can circumstantial arguments can be made for "God" not existing. But I have yet to find a single entity upon this Earth that has any actual evidence of "God's" actual existence. Some religions have had many people and almost 2000 years and still haven't been able to prove that 'God' actually factually exists. For all I know, those who believe in 'God' are just believing in fairy tales as if those fairy tales were really true and that they are actually deluded. And without any actual evidence to prove that 'God' actually factually exists, they can't prove otherwise either.
    2
  2. Josue Sanchez. No. I could look for my car keys that I even know exist, and yet the car keys are not 'a life'. (At least as far as science currently knows.) Un-named concept -> Given a name (could be a sign, symbol, sound, etc.) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names for the same concept. Fairy tales truly exist too, and yes one could construe that they have 'a life', just as any idea has. But at this time then in the analysis, without any actual evidence of God's actual factual existence, (specifically as depicted in the Bible), then 'God' is currently nothing more than an idea or an un-named concept that was given a name with an attached meaning to that name. But now also, consider the following: a. The Hebrews in the Hebrew Bible that the Hebrews put together, claim that they and they alone are the chosen people of God. But, if God does not actually exist, (except for basically as a concept), then whom are they actually the chosen people of? b. The Roman Catholics in the Roman Catholic Bible that the Roman Catholics put together, claim that they and they alone speak for God. But, if God does not actually exist, (except for basically as a concept), then whom are they actually speaking for? c. If I, in a Bible that I put together, claim that I and I alone am God, does that make it true? But, if God does not actually exist, (except for basically as a concept), then whom am I in actual reality but myself believing in a certain concept? d. Now, in Kavanaugh's testimony where he swears to God, if God does not actually exist, (except for basically as a concept), then whom exactly is Kavanaugh swearing to? e. Kavanaugh, as well as all the entities who believe that God exists (beyond just as a concept alone), might just be believing in a fairy tale as if that fairy tale were really true. They might actually be deluded. And without any actual evidence to prove that God actually exists, (beyond just as a concept alone), they can't prove otherwise either. So now, do we truly want a deluded individual on the highest court of the USA? Do we truly want deluded individuals being in power here in the USA? Do we truly want deluded individuals making and enforcing laws that other people have to follow? People either need to prove that God actually factually exists (beyond just as a concept alone), or they are all deluded, and they wouldn't be able to prove otherwise either.
    1