Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "" video.
-
WASHINGTON POST:
a. During the hearings, I believe it was Hill who mentioned other financial aids from the USA to other nations that were also held up, I believe it was in the spring time, to be reassessed.
b. Most probably at this time the most probable scenario would be that Trump and his administration were trying to renegotiate those deals for potentially a better outcome for America, ('quid pro quo'; America First).
c. "IF" true, why wouldn't Ukraine's hold up of financial aid be included in the quid pro quo reassessment deals for America? If so, then even Ukraine's deal would be quid pro quo.
d. But now, did Trump and/or any of his supporters get any personal benefits from those other financial deals? If so, then that would require further investigations. If not, then why was only Ukraine singled out for personal benefits for Trump, other than due to Biden being Trump's political opponent?
e. Sure seems like Trump is guilty and should be impeached, the question for me though is just how guilty is Trump? Just Ukraine? Or with other nations too?
3
-
1