Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Bill Gates Sees 'America First' Endangering U.S. Influence" video.

  1. 23
  2. Kathy Sharp An entity that does not put conscious existence first above all else, eventually has no conscious entity left to care. Everybody, individually and as a society of individuals, should ask themselves this basic question: 'What exactly is being done to try to save any species from eternal conscious extinction?' This Earth has had 5 mass extinction events, there will be a 6th, it's not a matter of 'if', but 'when'. Many believe it is this century for various reasons. And the 6th will most likely not be the last in the future of this Earth. Science also tells us that this Earth and it's Sun will not last for literally all of future eternity. This appears to be really true. Only those species who make it off of this Earth and out of this solar system continue to consciously survive. Everybody else dies and goes extinct. And I won't go into what happens to solar systems left in this galaxy or galaxies in this universe, or even the universe itself. So, statesman or traitor alike, they will ALL die and go extinct and no conscious entity would be left to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and/or didn't do or how they chose to live while they lived. Nature does not care one bit about us but will kill us all in the end if we don't act, and even then, we probably still all die in the end. Some like to deny future reality, some choose to confront it. And facts are still facts, we are stronger together than as any single individual.
    2
  3. 2
  4. mistergutwagon1 Right or wrong, this is how I currently perceive life to be: We appear to be individuals in a society of individuals. What is best for an individual may or may not be what is best for the larger society of individuals and conversely, what is best for the larger society of individuals may or may not be what is best for an individual. But, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist. And this applies whether we are individuals in a nation, an individual nation among other nations, or as an individual in a society of all entities in existence throughout all of existence itself. If a choice had to be made to put one over the other, if for an individual, which individual? If for a larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? And who decides and by what authority do they get to decide? This natural tension between what is best for an individual and what is best for a larger society of individuals, and then even, which larger society of individuals, is the cause of much strife in this life, and probably throughout all of existence itself. Then, no matter what is chosen or by who, it appears that: a. We are ALL going to die one day from something. b. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced. c. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. No matter what we choose, nature apparently has the last say in the end and it currently appears nature doesn't care about us that we even actually exist, much less whatever any choices we made. Nature is our biggest ally and our biggest enemy. Life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Life itself is all just an illusion, an illusion that is all going to end one day and be forgotten. (OSICA) But still, while we exist, how exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? We do have choices, with all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all of our collective choices. Then we die, forget everything and are forgotten. (Or I acknowledge, maybe not, it's just that is not what the current analysis would seem to indicate.)
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. VORTEX1756 Do you really believe that if the USA's policy is USA 1st that the USA won't mess around with the rest of the world? Wake up and drink some coffee. The NSA is building profiles on everybody in this world, myself included. Hi NSA. But don't worry, there are back ups to the NSA's profiles in case something should happen to them, Russia's, China's, etc. Once artificial intelligence takes over even just one of these huge data bases, eventually, good-bye humanity. But don't worry, life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things, even for the AI's, but they would know that already. Nature itself is our biggest ally AND our biggest enemy that is going to kill us all. You want to conquer a real enemy, find a way to have actual immortality, and find a way to: Some hints to the apparent future: a. You will have to get through many mass extinction events here on this Earth. b. You will have to get through the Sun becoming a red giant as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium and wiping out this entire Earth. You will probably also need to figure out what 'gravity' actually is, be able to actually generate artificial gravity, as well have all the necessary radiation protections along with all the necessary supplies to stay alive. c. You might have to get out of this spiral galaxy before it all gets 'crunched' in the galactic center's black hole. (In openness and honesty, there are some who disagree with this point, I believe them to be wrong.) d. You might have to get out of this expanding universe before it ends in a 'big freeze'. (Of which I believe science to be wrong about this, but then again, maybe I am wrong.) e. You will probably have to find someway to continue to exist and consciously survive assuming modern science is correct concerning the forces of nature coming into existence in the early moments of the expansion of the singularity, and as the universe is still supposedly expanding, even supposedly speeding up as it does so, the forces of nature that allows things to exist and function in this universe might possibly 'evolve' (since it was expansion that brought the forces of nature into existence). Now personally I believe modern science to be wrong about how the forces of nature came into existence, they didn't, they are inherent in the energy unit itself which I believe to be the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon. But then again, maybe I am wrong and modern science is correct. If so, you better hurry in finding a way to continue to have actual immortality as the forces of nature could 'evolve' in the very next moment of expansion of this universe. Good luck. For me, I am ready to die, forget it all, and be forgotten for all of future eternity. Cheers.
    1
  10. VORTEX1756 Try to answer these following questions as best as you honestly and are able to: 'What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it eternally matter to?' 'God' alone? and/or 'Me' too? and/or 'Some other entity or entities'? OR 'To no eternally consciously existent entity at all'? My current analysis indicates the later as being really true. So then, ask yourself: 'What exactly is being done to try to save any species from eternal conscious extinction?' For me at this time until I die: Discern the very nature of reality itself to obtain artificial gravity, necessary radiation shield protections, FTLRT (Faster Than Light Relative Travel, I'm thinking a spherical space ship to conserve on resources), and actual immortality as a way is figured out how to keep the 'light of me' eternally coherent and functional, which will come in handy in those long space flights. Here is my latest TOE followed by my latest test for 'gravity'. But here again, denying future reality will not make future reality any less real. Species from this Earth either survive beyond this Earth and solar system, or they don't. If they don't, then life itself from this Earth is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life itself would all just be an illusion, an illusion that would all end one day and be forgotten. I either obtain actual immortality in some form, or I just enjoy the illusion until I die. Revised TOE: 3/25/2017. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating singularity (which is basically a pulsating photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. ___________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
    1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. David N Okay: 1. More and more cosmic radiation is going to impact this Earth this century: a. Our solar system is supposedly moving out of a 'dust cloud' in this galaxy which helps to protect this solar system from harmful cosmic radiation; b. Our Sun is going into grand solar minimum and should bottom out possibly around 2075 - 2080. As it does so, our solar system is going to have less of a solar shield protecting this Earth which will allow more cosmic radiation to impact this Earth; c. Our magnetic field around this Earth has been weakening for a long time now, and lately is speeding up as it does so, current projections to bottom out around 2035, possibly on it's way to another global magnetic field flip, maybe not though too. But, we are losing more and more of the magnetic shield around this Earth which will allow more and more cosmic radiation to impact the surface of the Earth. So, we are losing 3 shields which help protect this Earth from harmful cosmic radiation. 2. The Earth's magnetic poles are moving. While not all matter is considered magnetic, all matter can be affected by magnetism due to the magnetic fields associated with electrons and protons which make up matter. In addition, many species utilize the Earth's magnetic field for navigation. Many species might go off course and either die or at least will be where they weren't before. 3. There will most likely be crop failures in some areas of this Earth and booms in other areas, but it will take time to get the necessary equipment to the new locations, plant crops, grow crops, harvest crops and then still have to get those crops to the people who need those crops to continue to live. Denying future reality will not make future reality any less real. Many people can hide their head in the sand but reality is still going to occur with or without them.
    1
  20. David N 1. Well, to answer your question, read part of the above conversations concerning 'individuals in a society of individuals'. We all have choices in how to exist to some extent, with all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all those choices. 2. You bring 'God' into this conversation, please prove that 'God' even actually factually exists for those statements to have any real meaning. Main stream modern science currently believes that this Earth and it's Sun are not going to last for literally all of future eternity, this appears to be really true. ONLY those species that make it off of this Earth and out of this solar system continue to consciously survive, everybody else dies and goes extinct, or at least so the current analysis would indicate. Now, if we as a species don't find out what really causes gravity so as to possibly be able to generate artificial gravity besides large rotating space ships, which won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, PLUS if we as a species don't find a way to protect ourselves from harmful cosmic radiation, then it is highly probable that no species from this Earth are going to survive beyond this solar system. We ALL die and go extinct. But now: 1. Assuming "God" or "God's" actually exist, are they really going to come and save any species from this Earth when they don't even save species from other natural disasters? 2. Now, maybe aliens really do exist and will come and save some of us and not exploit or even eat us. 3. Or maybe the next jump in evolution will occur and they will save us and not exploit or even eat us. All I can really say is that I am trying to do my part by my latest TOE idea above as well as the gravity test that goes with it, plus my 'batteryless battery' idea that I am currently working on as below: "Batteryless Battery"???? a. Small aluminum cones with an electrical wire running through the center of the cones, cones spaced apart (not touching I'm thinking) but end to end. b. Electromagnetic radiation energy in the atmosphere interacts with the aluminum cones. c. Jostled atoms and molecules in the cone eventually have some electrons try to get away from other electrons of which those electrons gather at the larger end of the cone, of which also creates an area of positive charge at the smaller end of the cone. d. The electron's in the wire are attracted to the positive end of the cone and the positive 'end' in the wire are attracted to the negatively charged end of the cone. e. Basically a 'battery' has been created inside the electrical wire itself, different areas of electrical potential. Basically a 'wire battery' or a 'batteryless battery', however one wanted to call it. f. Numerous cones placed end to end increases the number of 'batteries' in the wire. Then of course, one could take that generated dc electricity to split H2O into H2 and O2 of which could be burned or utilized in a hydrogen fuel cell to get the electricity back with a byproduct of basically pure water. Species need pure water too. With the increased cosmic radiation that is going to be impacting this Earth this century as well as possibly a mini-ice age, might as well put that cosmic radiation to work for us. Life only matters to life as long as life itself still exists.
    1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. David N Again, you have failed to read and understand my comments above. Find and read my latest TOE above. The pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that eternally exists and makes up everything in existence in this universe, no "God" even needed. I have taken my mind from eternity past to future eternity and to the 'realm of all concepts' where nothing at all exists, not even space, time, logic nor reason, and yet everything that could ever be exists. I have not found "God" anywhere. Now, maybe I just haven't found the right mirror yet to see that I myself am "God". But then if so, that raises a whole bunch more issues and questions. The "God" you speak of, the "God" of the Bible, or of any other religious dogmas and beliefs, I have yet to find, most probably because they don't truly exist. An entity could look for all of eternity and never be able to find something that doesn't really exist. Likewise, religions promise a conscious afterlife, throughout all of future eternity too, and yet offer no evidence of it's actual existence. It's just a set of beliefs is all. You even mention the 'soul' above. Do you have any evidence, any evidence at all, that the 'soul' even actually exists, besides possibly just our DNA molecule being a 'soul'? But as far as an afterlife goes, many authorities of their religions probably know that there is no conscious afterlife, and yet they could promise that people have it, it's just that when people die one day from something, they will never consciously know it doesn't exist in actual reality. It's one of the biggest con games religions can play on people.
    1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. David N And yet Trump was trying to do more business deals in Russia. How's that wall coming that Mexico is going to pay for? Last I saw and heard Trump is trying to get America to pay for it. Hey I know, maybe since you said that MAGA wants to go back to how things were in the past, and since Mexico used to own part of Texas, maybe Trump is going to have America pay for the wall, then give part of Texas back to Mexico just so he could claim that Mexico paid for the wall. What a real genius MAGA has as their leader. I'm going to miss Texas though, have some really good friends down there along with some happy memories. Oh well, Trump the genius who is head of MAGA knows best. This all goes back to the original thread above that with MAGA's view of 'America First' at the expense of other nations, it is alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies. The USA's reputation backs the USA's currency. What happens to the USA if the world stops utilizing the USA's currency as a reserve currency due in part to the large debt that this nation has, in part due to Trump's huge tax giveaway to the wealthy, including for the corporations, banks, and with increased military funding, even for the military industrial complex? Trump's words do not match his actions at times and where they do, they seem to hinder making America Great, of which, America never stopped being great. Another thing Trump and MAGA seem to be out of touch with. And also: Very large fossil fuel dependent military + Rising fossil fuel costs = Destroyed economy and/or Smaller military. (Basic math). Of course, if Trump was better at math, maybe he wouldn't have had so many bankruptcies that stiffed so many businesses and lawyers. If people hate Trump, for some, it's not without cause. And we won't even go into how Trump treats women. If MAGA is what Trump is doing, then I firmly believe he is wrong. I believe that Trump being President is really only how the Presidency benefits Trump and his cronies, including those in the MAGA crowd at times too.
    1
  34. David N Here again, just shows how ill informed you really are. I am not a Democrat or Republican, I am an Independent and can think for myself and not just blindly follow the crowd. I am an Individual in a society of Individuals. Do you really think it wise that Trump left the climate accord that almost all other nations subscribed to? Do you really think that world wars aren't fought by nations working together, (for which ever side they might be on)? Do you think it was okay that Russia interfered with the USA's democratic elections? Didn't they look out for their own nation at the expense of the United States? Should the USA look out for it's own interests and slam dunk Russia with massive internet attacks non-stop? If everybody is just going to look out for their own Individual interests, then we have the wild west where anything goes. Kill all others as long as you survive. Wouldn't that be the ultimate looking out for ones own interests? Everything would belong to the 'winner'. And then still, even the 'winner' would still die one day from something, forget everything they ever knew and experienced, and then be forgotten one day in future eternity as if they never ever existed at all in the first place because there wouldn't be any conscious entity left to care about anything or anyone ever again. People who put their own Individual interests over the larger societies' interests are very short sighted. What even would our roads and highways be like if everybody just wanted to put their own interests over others? Why do you think individual nations among many other nations would be any different? What about standardization items? If we didn't have standards that we all agreed upon, then what? Have internationally made products not function properly when they went to other nations? And dude, you are still not getting it. We, individually within a nation, and as an individual nation within many nations, are stronger when together than when functioning independently. The MAGA crowd needs to crawl back under the rock they came out from and take your leader Trump with you. I have a voice in America too. Edit: As far as two of MAGA's agenda items: '1) bring our jobs back and end the corporate exploitation of labor arbitrage overseas. 2) Close the borders to keep corporations from flooding the job market and destroying wages.' Aren't those INDIVIDUAL corporations just looking out for their own interests regardless how it affects the LARGER SOCIETY OF INDIVIDUALS within the nation they are based in? If you want to put the Individual's interests over the Larger Society of Individual's interests, then what's the problem by what the corporations are doing? Again, we are back to what is best for an Individual may or may not be what is best for the larger society of Individuals, and conversely, what is best for the larger society of Individuals may or may not be what is best for the Individual. But yet we appear to be Individuals in a larger society of Individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway. So, how should we, Individually and as a society of Individuals exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
    1
  35. 1