Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Summers Says Fed Should Raise Rates Four Times Next Year" video.
-
6
-
2
-
@christianlibertarian5488 Consider this copy and paste from my files:
Consider the following:
a. Let's say money is backed by gold, silver, etc.
b. Then the population grows.
c. Everybody in the population would want a certain amount of money to live on.
d. More money would have to be put into the economy so that everybody would have a certain amount of currency.
e. But with a fixed backing system, each piece of currency would be worth less, (as the fixed backing to the currency in the economy would have to be spread out more).
But now consider:
f. The population itself is part of the backing to the currency. (Intrinsic value of human life). (Citizens are an asset, not a liability).
g. As the population size grew, more money could be put into the economy and yet the money in the economy could retain the same buying power.
h. Conversely, if the population size decreased, money could be taken out of the economy so as to retain a certain buying power of the money still in the economy.
i. In other words, tie the amount of currency in the economy, in part, by the size of the population.
j. Then also, the Fed could keep their job, BUT they should change their goal to 0% annual inflation, NOT 2% annual inflation (of which, currently most citizens do not get pay raises that keep up with the true cost of inflation, nor even interest on things like saving's accounts), which currently causes a lot of social and economic issues in society. Those issues could be lessened for a society if the Fed changed their ways.
1
-
1