Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Brexit Is Sand in the Gas Tank for U.K. Economy: SocGen" video.
-
4
-
@peteroneill2991 You mention 'we' without indicating which 'we' you are. If you are referring to the USA, (where I am at), 'yes', we are supposed to be independent, even have a bill of rights for the individual so the larger society cannot totally screw over the individual, but as far as the USA working for the benefits of all, that's a good one. I needed a good laugh today.
While I believe the USA should be that way, (and even our own Declaration Of Independence states that our government is supposed to keep us all 'safe and happy'), our current President and administration puts America first and all other nations second and below, even to the point of screwing over other nations one way or another so that the USA can benefit. A total psychological 'us and them' type mentality. And Trump is not the first President to do so either. Other sovereign nation's politics get interfered with and governments overthrown, other nations resources get exploited, for the benefit of the USA. The USA even declares other people 'terrorists' and assassinates them with drone strikes even when those people are on their own sovereign soil, without giving them due process. If some other nation did that to US citizens here on US soil, wouldn't the US call those people and nations 'terrorists'?
To truly defeat 'terrorism' in this world, one has to also stop being a 'terrorist' themselves.
2
-
@JPV1409 Good morning john V, I just woke up and haven't even had my morning coffee or breakfast yet. Yours is the first reply of this day. (I am east coast time zone, USA).
Anyway, 'yes' the way I see it too is that Trump has made America and this world worse, not better since he became USA's President. Trump has alienated America's allies and emboldened America's enemies. Trump has seriously rolled back environmental regulations that could effect all species on this planet Earth, including having the USA pull out of the Paris climate agreement.
And what exactly is in Trump's taxes? What exactly is he hiding? Why won't he let not even the American public see what's in them? And what deals and promises is he making with other foreign leaders that he isn't telling the public about? Trump is lying so much, even just since he became President, that if his lies powered a wind mill, we could power a lot of homes and businesses with that wind mill. Trump is not to be fully trusted by any nation or foreign leader, including by the citizens of the USA. From my perspective, Trump is the worst President in my lifetime. It used to be Bush #2 for his war crimes, but Trump beat out even Bush #2. #Sad to say, but true I believe.
A few things though:
a. See my Twitter page under the same name as this comment. Many nations are moving their nation to utilizing hydrogen and are getting away from fossil fuels even for various reasons. Some of which are energy independence, not having to fight wars and spending their nation's blood and treasure trying to obtain and maintain fossil fuels, and for them and the environment the way they see reality, it's just the right thing to do. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in this entire universe and there are many ways to obtain hydrogen. Here again, you can see my Twitter page for more info.
b. There are 3 basic options that conscious species have it seems to me:
1. Sacrifice others for your own agendas.
2. Sacrifice yourself for other's agendas.
3. Basically remain neutral.
(And there are variations to these).
Those that fall into the first category, don't have a problem lying, cheating, stealing, assassinations, committing war crimes or even crimes against humanity if it helps them accomplish their own agendas. Interfering with or overthrowing a government, no problem. Think of dictators and even the USA's own CIA. And even some CIA directors have become President of the USA, so one can see where that might lead. And Putin was (still basically is?), KGB. Basically the worst of the worst of humanity, who have gotten into positions of power with their methods. Power which they then utilize to enhance the effectiveness and scope of their agendas. This at times is the real 'evil' in this world. To truly defeat terrorism in this world, one has to also stop being a terrorist. It's just that some people in power don't want to truly defeat terrorism in this world due to they themselves are the terrorists who have gotten into positions of power. Terrorism is 'good' business for them and their agendas. Think also of military industrial complexes and spy industrial complexes. Where would they all be if there were truly peace on this Earth? Out of a job with no paycheck in this economically driven world?
c. But still, individually and as a society of individuals, how exactly do we all want to exist while we do all exist? What kind of life do we all want to live? We do have choices, with all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all those choices. The USA's foundation was built upon revolt against an overbearing government. The people of a nation hold the true power of a nation, for what really is a nation without it's people? Just some land with maybe some wildlife? Of course weapons help when in the hands of the people and not just in hands of the government. Hence also though, why many governments want to take away weapons from the public, even right here in the USA. It's about power and control over the population, one way or another, so that those in power can more freely accomplish their agendas.
But, how do we all, individually and as a larger society (the largest society of all being all species in existence throughout all of existence), want to exist while we do all exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
Choices, so many choices and outcomes. But we all apparently have one life to live, how exactly do we all want to live that life? Then nature will still do us all in if we didn't work together to save at least one species from this planet Earth to consciously exist longer into the future for life itself to still have meaning and purpose to. Life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Even dictators, CIA, KGB, war criminals, etc., would still all die one day from something, forget everything they ever knew and experienced, and would be forgotten one day in future eternity as if they never ever existed at all in the first place. Based upon my current knowledge, understanding and wisdom of reality and the future in an apparent cause and effect state of existence that we appear are existing in.
d. And oh, if there was such a thing as 'one world religion' or 'one world sovereign government', I believe it should be based upon the real absolute truth as best as we could discern that real truth to be. For how can we truly deal with reality if we don't truly know what reality truly is? (And this includes even knowing, understanding and having wisdom in our very selves). Power to the people, for what exactly is humanity without people?
2
-
1
-
1
-
@JPV1409 Consider the following:
We appear to be individuals in a larger society of individuals. What is 'best' for an individual, may or may not be what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals. And conversely, what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals, may or may not be what is 'best' for the individual. But as individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist.
But now, if a choice had to be made of whose 'best' should take precedent over the other's 'best', whose 'best' should take precedence?
Should I decide how you should exist? Should you decide how I should exist? Should others decide how we both should exist? Should we decide how others should exist?
And who decides in how to even decide? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
This individual versus the larger society of individuals, who decides and by what authority they and they alone get to decide, is the cause of much strife, suffering and death in this world.
But still, how exactly should we, individually and as a society of individuals, exist while we do all exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
* Basically, should sovereign nations give up any of their sovereignty to others, why or why not? Why can't sovereign nations just have VOLUNTARY agreements that can easily be walked away from?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JPV1409 Sure, but consider the following scenario also:
UK leaves the EU, just basically removing their signature from the treaty and walking away. The UK then receives it's full sovereignty back, basically resetting the clock back to zero. Then the UK rebuilds it's alliances with nations one on one, especially those nations outside of the EU. And there are a lot of nations outside of the EU. The UK could even encourage other EU nations to do the same, basically weakening the EU's position in this world. Any other EU nation that leaves the EU, the UK and that newly 'freed' nation could implement their own sovereign agreements. In time, 'if' the EU wanted to do business with the UK, they could still do so, but with the UK still being a sovereign nation without giving up any of it's sovereignty. It could be a voluntary agreement between the UK and the EU for mutual benefits should the agreement be agreed to.
And consider also a very major point that should not be overlooked. The people of the UK voted to leave the EU. Either the people's vote matters or it doesn't. If the people's vote no longer matters, then the nation no longer has a democracy whereby the people's vote matters. That could certainly possibly lead to other problems for the UK in the future because the UK would have pissed off the people who voted, (and won), to leave the EU. From my perspective, if the EU and UK cannot reach a mutual agreement on the UK leaving the EU, (and how much time has to continue to pass before they do), then the UK should just walk away from the EU without an agreement to respect the vote of their people. And then, whatever happens, happens. But the UK would get their sovereignty back as well as being 'freed' from the EU.
Gaining independence can be tough initially, a lot has to be accomplished and there are only so many hours in a day. One has to keep the end goal in sight to help make it all work.
Then no matter what, we are still all going to die one day from something, will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and will all be forgotten one day in future eternity as if none of us even ever existed at all in the first place. EU or no EU. Life itself only matters to life itself, only as long as life itself still exists. The current analysis indicates that one day, no life is going to be left from this Earth and solar system, and possibly galaxy too. We either truly have a successful space program, OR we are all eventually going to die and go extinct without any conscious entity being left to care.
But then here again, how exactly do we all want to exist while we do all exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JPV1409 Nice speech. Either the UK is sovereign and can set how they live their own life and set their own future, OR they can't. Ditto for all the nations of this world. People voted here in the USA, Trump didn't win by popular vote, but by the electorial college. Some say entities basically even cheated to help Trump to win and Hillary lose. I didn't vote for Trump, but Trump is still the USA's current President, even if he is alienating America's allies and emboldening America's enemies and making America 'less great' in this world. Basically what I am saying is that here in America, we have problems too. All nations probably have problems and situations that they have to deal with too.
Some nations have a balloon of Trump in a diaper and some with Trump sitting on a toilet tweeting. And yet, Trump is still our President. We here in America are dealing with it, alcohol helps. All things shall pass, even Trump. The UK has to ask themselves, what kind of future do they want? They voted for their future, and the majority said they wanted to leave the EU. So, what's the real problem? Why isn't the UK leaving the EU as the people voted?
As far as life being ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, here is a copy and paste from my files concerning Earthling's future, (in part):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
* "And for what selfish reason are you prepared to sacrifice future generations ? Greed ?"
I am trying to save at least one species from this planet Earth to survive longer beyond this Earth, solar system and galaxy with my theory of everything idea so that life itself has continued meaning and purpose longer into the future. It all currently depends upon the results of my gravity test for what I believe gravity truly is. Along with actually being able to generate artificial gravity, proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, along with many other things, and it might even be possible, at least in theory, to generate a dimension within this dimension we are currently in for high speed space travel. We either truly succeed, OR all die one day from something and go extinct with no conscious entities being left to care. So here again, your national problems are very small compared to the problems I am currently dealing with. The very survival of conscious life itself from this planet called Earth.
Wish me luck and support the cause, or not. Fully your freewill choice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hazalnut8647 Some laws are necessary for our very existence. Where would we all be and would we even be, without the laws of nature? Some laws are necessary to create a framework for species to exist and a place for them to exist in. But then within that framework, we are apparently 'free' to exist however we all want to exist. How do we all, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? We do have choices. With all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all our collective choices.
Then we either all die one day from something and life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, or we don't and life itself continues on, possibly even throughout all of future eternity.
(See my above comment before your latest one to 'john V').
But still either way, how do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do all exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
Edit: And oh, the UK's 'absence of laws', that would dictate every single aspect of the people's life to keep them healthy, is what could 'hurt' people. But then, if done so, the people would have no 'freedom'. Do you all want to be healthy or do you all want freedom? Or do you all want the freedom to be healthy or not? Or even to have life itself or not?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hazalnut8647 Yep, car accidents too, and dangerous diseases, along with a whole host of other ways to die. Many Americans love their guns, automobiles, alcohol, music, etc..
The government has trained us for 'continuous war' so that the President can have more war time powers when this nation is at war. What this nation wants, this nation gets.
My edit to your edit: We also have basically the electorial college per the Constitution. Some Americans want to do away with it for the very reason you basically bring up. The electors per the Constitution were put in place because at the time as I understand it to be, the people putting the Constitution together did not believe at that time that the citizens who voted were informed and/or educated enough. Times have changed, but parts of the Constitution haven't. It's hard to amend the Constitution, as it should be, but it still can be done as evidenced by it being amended numerous times. It's still a work in progress, as is America. We have more freedoms here in America to decide how we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do all exist. Some US States have even legalized suicide. Not only can we 'hurt' ourselves over here, we can even actually take our own life in some States if we wanted to. Now that's 'FREEDOM'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JPV1409 Well:
a. "Sometimes i wished i had the power to strike down with a single lightning bolt all them that sacrifice others for their own agendas."
Be very careful what one asks for. Have you ever killed a virus in your own body, or killed an insect, or fished or hunted in your life, or were in the military in war?
b. Fossil fuels: In my Twitter feed, one can see that even Shell is on board with hydrogen. They see the value in future growth and are building many hydrogen fueling stations in this world. And in reality, we have been on a hydrogen economy for a very long time now, 'hydro-carbons', 'hydrogen and carbon'. Now we are just taking the carbon out of the fuel is all.
There is money to be made in the hydrogen sector, even internationally, for those who know what they are doing.
c. Guns: There are a wide perspective on guns even here in the USA. Some want no guns at all, some want only certain types of guns, and then there are people like me. For example, I don't know how familiar you are with the USA's Declaration Of Independence, but consider the following:
Basically 'We The People' allow the US Government to exist and give them the powers and authorities that they have, primarily via the Constitution of the United States. The Government is supposed to keep us all 'safe and happy' per the DOI. 'We The People' not only have the 'right', but the 'duty', to alter and if necessary abolish, any Government that does not keep 'We The People' 'safe and happy', as 'We The People' and 'We The People' alone deem that 'safe and happy' to be, and to set up another Government that 'We The People' and 'We The People' alone deem would keep us 'safe and happy'. (And hey, I didn't write the DOI or Constitution, I am just trying to follow them as any sovereign citizen of the USA should).
But anyway, anything at all the US Government can do, so can every single American citizen with their inherent powers and authorities, that the US Government received from us. If they Government can have certain weapons, so can 'We The People'. Now, we don't normally exercise those inherent rights so as to have a more orderly society, but those inherent rights and authorities are still our none the less. Hence 'We The People' can change the US Government to be anything we want it to be. It just takes enough of 'We The People' to make it happen.
Now also, along those lines, I personally believe we should do away with ALL formal political parties here in the USA and ALL politicians should be Independents. These formal political parties have become too powerful and are corrupting our Government and way of life. And sure, politicians would still be able to gather around like minded issues, just no more formal political parties at any level of governance in the USA. Not only do I believe we would have a better democracy here in the USA, but better governance in global affairs as well. I also fully realize that it would probably never happen as the current politicians would have to vote against their own self interests and history shows they don't often do that. But I still believe it should be done. And I am only 1 sovereign citizen here in the USA out of many.
d. President Trump and guns: Consider also that Trump is a Republican, not a Democrat nor Independent. Organizations like the NRA here in the USA are very powerful, not just because they fund many politicians, but they also have guns, lots of guns. There is a lesson to be learned by those that don't know, guns can be very powerful. They even helped America to become free from an overbearing powerful Government as well as help to keep America free even today. America has guns, lots and lots of guns. Some small, some big, and some very, very big. And we know how to utilize them, and have.
And note, cars kill people too. Should all cars be outlawed? We even have tests, licenses and car registrations for the drivers and vehicles. And yet, people still kill other people with cars. It goes back to some people just like to sacrifice others for their own agendas and they will find any way they can to do it at times.
If problems are to be fixed on a more permanent nature, then the very nature of humanity needs to be changed. But how does one take away a choice that humans inherently have? (To not sacrifice others for their own agendas. And this includes the politicians at the top level of the world's governments.). And note also, not only humans kill others for their own agendas. Many species in existence do, to stay alive themselves.
Of which, will aliens and/or the next jump in evolution have species that will treat humans like humans have treated 'lower' evolved species and even other humans? Why wouldn't they? They will have their inherent choices too. All the more reason to have guns, lots and lots of guns. Plan ahead for the very salvation of humanity.
1
-
@JPV1409 Sad to say, my current analysis seems to indicate that as long as species exist, especially conscious species, those 3 basic choices will always be available to choose from. Some entity somewhere, at sometime, somehow, will choose to sacrifice others for their own agendas. Some entities have to do it just to stay alive themselves, at least how nature currently seems to work.
For humans specifically, the studies I have done so far indicate that humans at times have an 'us and them' type mentality. 'We' or 'us' are okay, it's 'them' that are the issue or problem. And especially if 'we' can de-humanize 'them', then it's okay to do to 'them' whatever we want to do because 'they' are lessor than 'us'. This seems to be a pattern throughout human history.
And if and when aliens and/or the next jump in evolution occurs, (if they aren't already here or hasn't already occurred), and/or one or more AI's choose to one day, will they sacrifice 'us' for 'their' own agendas? Why would at least some of 'them' not?
And then to go even deeper, when one studies the human brain, how much control exactly do we truly have over what we perceive is our very own thoughts and actions? Current science indicates that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy. My own theory of everything idea goes deeper still and everything in existence are 'gem' photons interacting with other 'gem' photons, (dependent upon the results of my gravity test), but basically everything in existence is just energy fields interacting with other energy fields.
And 'if' really true, then at the very base level of existence itself, there really is no 'good' or 'bad' per se, or one entity sacrificing or helping another entity or not, it just 'is'. It is just all one reality interacting with itself.
But then still, while we consciously exist, how exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
(With all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all those choices. Then nature is still going to do what nature does and the current analysis is that nature is going to kill us all off in the end anyway. But still, how do we want to exist while we do exist, even though it doesn't apparently ultimately matter that we even exist in the first place much less how we all exist?)
1
-
@JPV1409 You caught me just before bed time. You must be up late on the other side of the pond.
1. I agree to disagree. There is no actual evidence that any conscious life exists at the base level of existence at this time, in fact, no life at all. So, how could there be 'good' and 'bad'? And to whom? At the base level of existence, it is just energy interacting with other energy. Energy without consciousness, memories or thoughts.
2. Laws are only good as those who enforce those laws, including unwritten laws.
3. See the copy and paste at the end of this post.
4. Here in the USA: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. "IF" Americans do not have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so, then are they truly 'Free'?
Anyway, here is the copy and paste from my files. In a nut shell, either species successfully get off of this Earth, out of this solar system, and out of this galaxy too if my current analysis is correct, OR we all die one day from something and go extinct with no conscious entity left to care. Life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life itself would only matter to life itself, only as long as life itself still existed. It's just that currently, no life from this Earth is going to be left one day, nor even the Earth itself.
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
* 'Nite for now. If you respond, I'll check back in the AM.
1
-
@JPV1409 a. Morning john V, you must not have gotten much sleep last night. As far as how we get to where we are at times, to properly deal with certain issues it sometimes helps to put issues in a larger context. The largest context of all being 'What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?' Where I am currently at in my state of existence, this is a lens of reality that appears to always be available to me.
b. "IF" my theory of everything is truly correct, the gravity test needs to be done to prove that portion of the TOE and the gravity test will speak for itself, and look for another post after this one with a copy and paste of the TOE and gravity test in it, then it might at least be possible to generate artificial gravity, proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, and potentially even generating a dimension within this dimension that we currently exist in for faster space travel. Basically as you indicate, science fiction of yesterday might just become reality today.
c. I agree about all working together. Help find some entity to do my gravity test and science can move forward one way or another. "IF" modern science is currently correct though, with their potential fairy tale of the singular big bang theory, (if the universe is truly expanding, then it is more probable that the universe cycles rather than just a singular big bang, we would just be in the latest expanding universe, but, the universe might not really be expanding, here again, see the following post), then the current narrative is that our current forces of nature all came into existence in the early moments of the expansion of the singularity. Modern science's narrative is also basically that the singularity is still expanding, even speeding up in doing so, and that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, a basic foundation of physics. So, will the current forces of nature ever 'evolve'? Will any current forces of nature change? Will any new forces of nature come about? Will any current forces of nature go extinct? Possibly even occurring in the very next moment of continued expansion of the singularity? Will the entire universe and all in it disappear in the very next moment of existence? Talk about living on the edge of existence itself, what a thrill ! But, I also believe modern science's current narrative about this universe to be wrong, or at least not complete.
d. I'll check out that video reference you listed. Also, look for another post after this one.
1
-
@JPV1409 (Copy and paste from my files of my latest TOE idea along with it's associated gravity test):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
5. And while we are on it, what exactly is 'gravity' that LIGO detected it? And wouldn't the detectors be affected by that gravity wave going through space at the same time the laser's 'em' were effected? Of which also, do my gravity test to try to discern what 'gravity' might truly be.
______________________
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
1
-
1