Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Congress, White House Nearing Two-Year Debt Limit Deal" video.
-
HERE IS A THOUGHT: Claw back some of the tax give away's that Trump gave away and maybe the debt ceiling would not have to be raised, or at least not raised as much. Why is Trump and the other Presidents trying to bankrupt America?
Also, how come non-profits don't pay at least some tax as they also receive national security protections and get to utilize this nation's infrastructure? Maybe at least 1% of all money they take in, even from the sale of assets, (in other words, only taxing money they already have), and then possibly dedicating that tax revenue to paying off this nation's debt.
And sure, let me run up the government's charge card and I could make the national economy look better too. But what is Trump's plan on paying off his share of the national debt that he wrung up? Here again, eventual bankruptcy of America?
And consider also, economic inflation is 'bad'. Space travel has gotten more expensive just in my life time. What is space travel going to cost in the next one hundred, one thousand, one million years from now? Because the current analysis indicates that ONLY those species who make it off of this Earth and out of this solar system, and out of this galaxy too if my current analysis is correct, continue to consciously survive. Everybody else is going to die and go extinct. Hey, sometimes real truth really sucks.
(Copy and paste from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@edgmp (Copy and pastes from my files):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
___
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
@edgmp (Copy and pastes from my files):
The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows:
The formula has at least 3 levels to it:
1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable.
2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle.
3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it.
4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects.
Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be.
____________________________________________________________________________
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1
-
@edgmp (Copy and paste from my files):
FOR ME:
'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe.
'Time' is the flow of energy.
'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped).
But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
___
Thought about space time:
Consider the following:
a. Wavelength equals speed of light divided by frequency.
b. Wavelength is how far a single 'em' photon goes in space, or possibly is the size of space itself. (Especially since 'space' itself has not been defined yet). Possibly different sizes of space for different 'em' frequencies.
c. Speed of light: 'light' being 'em' photons, 'speed' being distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points.
d. Frequency being 'hertz', 'hertz being cycles per second, or how far an 'em' photon goes at a specific size during one second.
e. "IF" wavelength changes (the frequency changes) then the distance a single 'em' photon goes would change and/or the size of space itself would change (assuming that an 'em' photon makes up 'space' itself).
f. Possibly 'space' varies due to 'space' being made up of 'em' itself and as 'em' frequencies change, 'space' changes.
g. Another possibility would be that as the wavelength changes (frequency changes) then as the distance a single 'em' photon goes would also change in it's time of existence, 'time' would change for any given 'em' photon length. The effect of that single 'em' photon makes in it's given time of existence.
h. Possibly 'time' varies due to the wavelength of the 'em' photon.
i. So, possibly 'space' varies due to energy frequencies changing and 'time' varies due to the wavelength of energy changing, the 'em' photon being energy itself. And if as I currently believe that what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of the 'em' photon, then the 'gem' photon makes up the energy unit that possibly makes up everything in existence in this entire universe including the universe itself, including 'space' and 'time' or 'space time' itself. It is also how space and time can warp, bend and vary.
1
-
jimmy jimmy Thank you? Consider the following though also:
I have been unofficially fighting cancer since late 1998 and officially been fighting cancer since 2003 and in 2004 was given two years to live with less than a 5% chance of living beyond two years. And yet I am still here, still with advanced cancer, along with other medical issues. The end of last year I finally for various reasons stopped fighting the cancer. When is enough, enough?
Society does not have legal suicide where I am currently at, (Michigan, USA), although it is legal in I believe 4 states here in the USA, but why not all? "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness". How come all American citizens don't have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so? Is an American citizen truly 'free' if they can't legally take their own life?
But anyway, some of the treatments the VA had given me for the cancer had a side effect of clarifying my thoughts. Hence the Theory Of Everything, how numbers themselves might actually exist, a better explanation to the dual slit experiment, possibly 120 chemical elements to complete the Periodic Table of the Elements, along with other things too, including stuff about life itself. Time plus clarity of thought, plus a desire to be a sincere honest truth seeker, along with some other things led me to be where I am at today. Some 'KUWA' about life itself is pretty depressing though, like how all life from this Earth is probably going to die and go extinct. But as a sincere honest truth seeker, truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of how we would wish that truth and reality to actually be. But hence also, I some times drink too much, listen to music too loud, and wish I could literally die every night I go to sleep. But I still seem to wake up the next day and have to go through another day. But here again, when is enough, enough? How much is literally too much? I have lasted this long, but at times the pressure is mentally crushing. But yet I am still here, still drinking at times, and still listening to music at times, and of course YouTube, Netflix, TV, radio, reading, mental visualization techniques, and for me, also being out in nature.
At times it is only looking at life itself as a young child that one can clearly apparently see life itself. Now if one wants to call that 'autism of a child' I am okay with that. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality regardless of what we would like that truth and reality to actually be. Sometimes life itself just sucks. It is what is it until it is no more. Then it is all forgotten as if it never ever existed at all in the first place. Or so the current analysis would seem to indicate.
1
-
@edgmp Hi Ed. Well, it goes back to when I was being brainwashed while still in my mother's womb when my ears and brain were first becoming active. Certain brainwashed memories run very deep in me that I can't still seem to get rid of. But I do keep trying.
I was born into and raised by a Lutheran family. What I was being taught just didn't seem to fit the reality I was experiencing. Hence the start of my quest to try to discern what real absolute truth reality was. After decades of study, I discerned that my parents (both long dead now), the religious institutions that I had attended, and society in general, all lied to me. Now some like my parents, maybe unintentionally, they didn't know any better. But certain religions that have had many people and almost 2000 years to discern what I have apparently discerned in less than one life time, I hold a different view of them. I believe they know the real truth but don't tell the public the real truth because if they did, they would have to give up their powers and authorities in this world along with their job security and continued funding in an economically driven world. Even today many people, even governments, are still spreading 'fake news' about God's existence along with whatever associated religious belief systems they might have.
So, it was a desire to try to know what the real absolute truth was about certain 'important' topics. I even wrote and self published a manuscript back in 2012. About 30 or so hard copies in existence, numerous electronic copies, and even a copy in the cloud I have been told. I had taken my mind from eternity past to future eternity and to a place I call the 'realm of all concepts' where nothing at all exists, not even space, time, logic nor reason, and yet everything that could ever be exists. It was quite a mind trip. While my thinking has progressed from what is even in the manuscript, then ending currently still remains the same. We die, forget everything, and are forgotten as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
But now also, society taught me the 'golden rule', to treat others how you yourself would like to be treated.
* If an individual causes society to suffer, society normally makes the individual suffer.
* But now, if society causes the suffering upon the individual first, then that must be how society wants the individual to treat them. What is fair is fair. The 'golden rule' is the golden rule or it's not.
* Now for me specifically, since society does not have legal suicide here where I currently live (Michigan, USA), society is prolonging my life, but also is prolonging my suffering. And since society did it to me first, that must be how society wants me to treat them with the golden rule that society taught me.
* I am currently trying to abide by societies' wishes by my Theory Of Everything which might help society survive longer into the future but then also telling society far and wide the real apparent truth about life and their future, which for many, provides suffering longer for at least some of them too. I am just trying to do the best I can with what I have.
All I want to do is die to end my suffering, but society won't let me legally die. Hence, I stopped the cancer treatments for my terminal cancer the end of last year. But, I still can't seem to die.
But, society can either legally allow suicide, at least for people who are suffering (terminal or not), and specifically here in Michigan, USA, so as I can end my own and some of societies' suffering, or society can keep me alive and I will continue to try to keep them alive but also suffering themselves. I have a plan either way.
My current self studies are in microbiology and quantum chemistry. One has to keep their mind busy and never stop learning for as long as we can learn for.
Of course, 'if' true, and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, (depending upon the gravity test), artificial gravity, proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, generating a dimension within this dimension we are in for space travel, and possibly even keeping the 'light of us' eternally coherent and functional (which could come in handy in those long space flights), all potentially become possible. Consider that if one went back a hundred years or so and told the people of the day what technologies we would have today, they would want to lock the person up for being crazy. But yet, here we are, discussing these topics over the internet, which probably also are having signals being bounced off of satellites.
Sorry for this for being so long. Haven't had my morning coffee or breakfast yet to slow my mind down. I do my best thinking while I sleep and when after I wake up when my mind is the clearest.
1
-
1